Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Palmer 1997 0419
Palmer 1997 0419
6 CELL
PHOTOCATHODE RF GUN∗
D.T. Palmer∗ , X.J. Wang† , R.H. Miller∗ M. Babzien† , I. Ben-Zvi† , C. Pellegrini∗∗ , J. Sheehan† ,
J. Skaritka† , H. Winick∗, M. Woodle† , V. Yakimenko†
∗
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94309
†
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Accelerator Test Facility, Upton, NY 11973
∗∗
University of California Los Angeles, Department of Physics, Los Angeles, CA 90095
Abstract Emittance
Compensation
Magnet
The symmetrized 1.6 cell S-band photocathode gun devel- Waveguide Optical Transition
Radiation (OTR)
oped by the BNL/SLAC/UCLA collaboration is in opera- Gate
tion at the Brookhaven Accelerator Test Facility(ATF). A RF Gun Valve Phosphorous
Screen
novel emittance compensation solenoid magnet has also
been designed, built and is in operation at the ATF. These
two subsystems form an emittance compensated photoin-
jector used for beam dynamics, advanced acceleration and
free electron laser experiments at the ATF. The highest ac- Laser
Port
celeration field achieved on the copper cathode is 150 MV m , Bucking
and the guns normal operating field is 130 MVm . The max- Magnet
ε n,rms (π mm−mrad)
A correlation of the minimum spot size with an emittance
minimum was noted during these simulations. This was ex- 1.5 ■
■
perimentally verified during the commissioning of the 1.6 ■
■
cell rf gun, using the beam profile monitor located at the 1.0
output of the second linac section, as can be seen in Fig. 2.
The result in Fig. 2 is for a total bunch charge of 0.329 0.5
■ Bz Varied
± 0.012 nC, an electron bunch length of τ95% = 10.9 psec Bz Constant
with an n,rms = 1.17 ± 0.16 π mm mrad.
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Q t (nC)
8 1.6
■
5 ■ 1.0 o ≤ 0.8 π mm mrad (1)
R rms (mm)
■
■
4 ■ 0.8 Due to laser power limitation, rf gun bunch compression
■
3 ■ ■ ■ 0.6 and the Schottky effect it was not possible to keep the total
charge constant for different laser injection phases. There-
2 0.4
fore in Fig. 4 the plot of n,rms as a function of laser in-
1 0.2 jection phase is not for a constant charge but for a decreas-
0 0.0 ing charge from a maximum of 400 pC to a minimum of
1.35 1.4 1.45 1.5 1.55 1.6 1.65 1.70 178 pC.
B z (kG)
6
Figure 2: n,rms and Rrms versus Bz,max
5
ε n,rms (π mm−mrad)
2688
Simulation results using PARMELA with a longitudi- and thermal emittance would not increase and the longitu-
nal flat top electron pulse of τ95% = 10 psec, full width dinal space charge forces would be decreased in the central
tenth maximum (FWTM), indicate that a n,rms ≤ 1 π mm portion of the bunch.
mrad is attainable[6]. The results of our experimental stud- Due to the non-uniformity of the transverse laser
ies present two challenges. First is the increased τ95% and pulse and transverse variation of the cathode quantum
second is the larger than expected n,rms . These are not un- efficiency, the electron bunch transverse charge density
related since the emittance contribution due to rf scales as ρ(x, y) is not uniform. Laser assisted explosive electron
σz2 . Therefore an important issue is to find the mechanism emission(LAEEE)[7] has been used to smooth out this ef-
causing the electron bunch length to increase. Two pos- fect. The measured improvement in n,rms due to LAEEE
sible mechanisms were studied; laser pulse bunch length- are presented in Table 3. Qualitative data for QE(x, y) of
ening due to laser power saturation in a doubling crystal, the copper cathode is not available, but for the magnesium
or space charge bunch lengthening. Experimental studies cathode LASEEE improved the QE(x, y) by a factor of
of the correlation of the laser power and τ95% were under- two, from an order of magnitude variation across the cath-
taken. Figure 5 shows the results of these studies. While ode spot to a 50% after LASEEE.
keeping the total electron bunch charge constant at 360 pC,
the laser intensity in the green(λ = 532 nm) was increased. Before Laser Cleaning
The results is that τ95% = 10.9 psec. Keeping the laser in- Qt 918 ± 77.5 pC
tensity in the green constant and varying the uv on the cath- n,rms 5.18 ± 0.25 π mm mrad
ode to increase the electron bunch charge from 400 pC to After Laser Cleaning
1 nC results in an increase in the τ95% from 10.9 psec to Qt 1020 ± 58.7 pC
14.7 psec(Fig. 5). This clearly shows that the 1 nC electron n,rms 4.74 ± 0.24 π mm mrad
bunch length is not due to the laser pulse length but due
to some beam dynamics issue, almost surely longitudinal
space charge forces. Table 3: High charge emittance study results before and
after LAEEE
Q (nC)
0 0.333 0.666 1.000 1.333
3 CONCLUSION
20 20
We have presented the results of emittance studies of the
BNL/SLAC/UCLA 1.6 cell S-band emittance compensated
15 15 photoinjector. Emittance as a function of laser injection
■
■ phase, charge and peak magnetic field have been presented
τ (psec)
τ (psec)
4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Figure 5: τ95% versus Igreen with Qt constant. τ95% versus
Qt with Igreen constant. The authors would like to thank the technical staff at BNL,
SLAC and UCLA for all their dedicated work on this
PARMELA simulation do not show the space charge project.
bunch lengthening seen in these experiments and this sim-
ulation error is being investigated. This debunching effect 5 REFERENCES
due to space charge forces can be corrected by decreas-
[1] B. E. Carlsten, NIM, A285, 313 (1989)
ing the laser pulse length and using the debunching effect
to lengthen the τ95% to the required 10 psec. This tech- [2] L. M. Young, private communications
nique has the drawback the longitudinal phase mixing of [3] D. T. Palmer et al., Proc. 1997 Part. Accel. Conf. (1997)
the electron pulse could possible occur thereby degrading [4] K. J. Kim, NIM, A275, 201 (1989)
the emittance compensation process. A second possibility [5] H. Winick, Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., 75, 1-8
is to increase the laser spot size. But this would increase the (1995)
emittance due to the rf emittance contribution, the remnant [6] D. T. Palmer et al., Proc. 1995 Part. Accel. Conf. (1995) p.
magnetic field at the cathode and also increase the intrin- 2432
sic thermal emittance. Using a longitudinally flat top laser
[7] X. J. Wang et al., J. Appl. Phys. 72(3), 888-894
pulse would seem to be the best solution since the magnetic
2689