Professional Documents
Culture Documents
September 10, 2010 Memos-1
September 10, 2010 Memos-1
Attached is the third set of responses to questions that you have asked regarding the
FY 2010-11 Proposed Budget.
A?
,/LMaryK. Suhm
City Manager
The proposed FY11 budget of $17.0m is about $5.0m less than the FY10 estimated expenditures.
Of the 86,000 total street lights citywide, only 12,000 street lights are on major streets. Neighborhood street
lights provide neighborhood security and were not considered for reduction. The cost to disconnect and
remove the fixture/arm on 6,000 lights (every other) on major streets is approximately $1,572,000. After
disconnecting the lights, a savings of about $964,000 could be realized in the first year. In subsequent years,
a savings of about $1.2m could be realized.
Oncor will not allow for only the bulb to be disconnected with the fixture/arm left in place. This would create
confusion about whether a street light is out due to cost reduction or whether the street light is in need of
repair.
3. How much has been reduced for streets striping and traffic signs?
st
The Street Services briefing on September 1 indicated that $325,000 is needed to restore crosswalk striping
and street lane striping back to the FY08 level, and that $512,000 is needed to restore Traffic Signs back to
the FY08 level.
At the FY11 proposed funding level, only streets with little to no visibility will be striped. Additionally, reduced
funding level will eliminate replacement of signs unless they are severely damaged and will necessitate an
increase in the time it takes to perform repairs.
4. Have the road side cameras on Camp Wisdom been installed, if not when will they be?
The camera at RLT and Camp Wisdom was cancelled when the City determined that TxDOT planned to
install cameras in the same area. The City is allowed to share use of the cameras. This prevents duplication
of resources. See this website for real time images from the TxDOT cameras. http://dfwtraffic.dot.state.tx.us/
5. Can a franchise for Sanitation Department be dedicated to fixing alleys? How much would the 9¢ fee
reduction generate if we keep the rate and use the revenue for alleys?
Yes. Funds can be dedicated to specific uses such as alley repairs. The fee reduction of 9¢ represents
$225,000.
6. If the local option election passes, where does the alcoholic beverage tax go?
Alcoholic Beverage Tax (ABT), that is assessed on mixed beverages served at restaurants and bars and that
is received by the City, is revenue for the operation and maintenance of the Convention Center. Any
additional sales tax revenue that might be realized from sale of alcohol through retail stores is General Fund
revenue.
7. Can Transportation User Fee (TUF) be charged only to large trucks using city streets?
No. The TUF is charged to properties within the city based on the land use type. The fee charges for the
benefit that the property receives from the city’s transportation system based on type of land use and the
amount of traffic generated by that land use type. The fee can be scaled for commercial properties to try to
allocate between properties that have more large truck traffic on the city’s street system than other properties
have. The TUF is charged to properties, not to trucks or other vehicles that travel to the property.
1
8. What is timeline and steps necessary for City to become a Retail Electric Provider (REP)?
Preliminary work by our energy consultant, Priority Power Management, indicates a minimum of an 11-
month process to work through and position the City to become a self-serving REP. Some of the steps
necessary include (1) filing an application with the PUC, (2) securing Qualified Scheduling Entity, Electronic
Data Interchange and Billing services in order to satisfy PUC requirements, (3) participating in a required
ERCOT testing period which is only offered 3 times each year, and (4) complete REP license approval,
ERCOT certification and training, and TDSP notification.
City staff has begun the work necessary to become a self-serving REP and an application has been
submitted to the PUC for consideration. As a more definite plan and timeline are developed, staff will brief
Council and seek additional authorizations as may be necessary.
The City’s electricity needs are currently met through a new REP contract with TXU Energy that was executed
on July 7, 2010 for the period January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013.
9. How many people use the floors that are going to close in the Central Library?
The library counts how many people enter the building; we do not collect visitor counts per floor. Last year,
1.7 million people used the Central Library.
10. Why does Renner Frankford Library have security guards? How much does it cost to have them?
How many libraries have security guards? What is the cost for each library to have the security
guards?
All of our Neighborhood Libraries have security guards 15 hours per week at an annual cost of $8,700 per
library. Security is in place to ensure a safe environment in the evenings and during peak hours.
11. How much has been reduced for personnel costs from FY10 to the FY11 proposed budget?
Personnel costs have been reduced from FY10 to FY11 proposed budget by $50.9m for General Fund and
non-General Fund budgets. This includes reduction-in-force of about 450 employees (service reductions),
furlough days for both uniform and civilian employees, pay reductions for civilian employees earning $30,000
or more per year, overtime reductions according to Meet and Confer, etc.
12. What is the total cost of electricity expected to be in FY11, and how much will be paid from the
general fund, from Aviation, and from DWU?
13. Provide a 5 year history on the operating revenue and expenses at WRR.
Revenues >
Expenses $ 344,397 $ 469,238 $ 562,718 $ 147,870 $ (1,479) $ (133,722)
2
14. Provide a street striping needs list by Council District.
15. How much of the pothole money has been spent and what are the unfulfilled needs of potholes?
Department of Street Services has allocated $8.5m for Service Districts, of which $2.0m is for small asphalt
repairs, including pothole repair and small level-up repair. With this funding level, the department was able to
address all the requests for pothole repairs so far and expected to complete 30,000 potholes by the end of the
year. The department has no backlog of pothole requests at this time.
16. Does the department go back and seal asphalt streets within a year and are they being tracked?
The Department of Street Services has implemented a new sealing program designed to seal streets that
have been rehabilitated or restored one year after new asphalt placement. This new objective on crack
sealing efforts will begin by focusing on the 102 lane miles of Rehabilitation and Restoration completed since
FY08. In addition, Street Services will respond to service requests regarding crack sealing needs throughout
the city.
17. Inspect and provide status on the pothole at MLK at I-45 exit.
Staff inspected MLK exit at I-45 found no pothole. However, there is a pothole identified at MLK and 175
service road (adjacent to Forest Theater). Maintenance of this location is the responsibility of TXDOT. A
service request (SR# 10-00678985) was created and the pothole was repaired on September 10, 2010.
3
18. Provide a copy of the chart showing how much we have to spend in future years on the streets to
catch up.
Partial
Reconstruction 52 31 0 0 52/52 $6.0 $8.6 $11.2
Rehabilitation 30 24 18 18 12/30 $1.8 $1.9 $2.0
Restoration 10 10 10 10 0/10 $0 $0 $0
Full-Depth
Asphalt 60 20 20 20 40/60 $1.7 $1.9 $2.1
Slurry Seal 125 0 0 0 125/125 $1.6
Micro Surfacing $8.9 $20.8
50 0 0 0 50/50 $1.2
Other 75 75 75 75 0/75 $0 $0 $0
Total 402 160 123 123 279/402 $12.3M $21.3M $36.1M
1
* FY 2007-08 set the standard to meet the 2010 Street Satisfaction Goal
Police and Fire Meet and Confer Briefing was presented to you on August 4th. The summary provided in the
briefing is attached for your information. See Attachment A.
20. Provide a list of salaries for the 450 employees being eliminated through RIF process.
See Attachment B. The attachment is based on RIF notices issued in accordance with the City Manager’s
proposed FY11 budget.
21. Provide a list of Sanitation Services non-supervisory staff members by job classification whose base
pay is above $30,000.
22. What is the tax bill impact including all over-lapping jurisdictions if the City of Dallas tax rate
increases to 79.70¢?
See Attachment D which compares a 2009 tax bill to a 2010 tax bill for the average homestead and includes
the tax bill cost for over-lapping jurisdictions including counties and school districts. For the City of Dallas,
2010 tax bill is based on a tax rate of 79.70¢.
Attachment E is a copy of an Alley Improvement Strategy briefing presented to committee in February 2008.
The alley needs that had been identified with cost estimates totaled $187m at that time.
4
Budget Overview for Proposed Agreement
Contract Term
Proposal FY1O11* FYII-12 FYI2-13
Budget +I(-) Budget +l(-)
5 Days Mandatory City Leave* $ (7,500000) $ 7,500,000
CompTimeforOT
Police $ (74575O0) $ (3728,750)
Comp Time for OT Fire*** S I ,200.000) S 600000i
Hiring 29 fewer Police Officers for FYO9-1O S 8182491
Hiring 88 fewer Police Oficers for FYIO-1 S 5186D7
Delay rookie classes from going to paramedic
school***** $ ‘400
Savings from no Paramedic School $
Fire Dispatch Office Schedule Changes S 1400.0001
Suspend Fire Wellness S 193700Q([ Grant Funded $ 937,000
Delay Truck lOimplementatiori $ (I —
$ 13,927,316
Reinstate Steps
(if Trigger met) $ 6,976,277 $ 6,976,277
Retention Incentive
(if Trigger not met)
Stepscontinue
(if Trigger met) $ 7325091
Retention Incentive - -
Attachment A
$400, 000
Base pay will be reduced by 1.1538%
Cost for Uniform Staff Only. Cost for implementing for Civilians would be an additional $3M.
FY 2010-11 REDUCTION IN FORCE DATA Attachment B
Supervisor II General -
Court & Detention Services $42,794
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $42,619
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $41,980
Supervisor II General -
Court & Detention Services $39,507
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $36,774
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $36,182
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $32,100
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $32,100
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $31,788
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $31,788
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $31,477
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $31,477
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $31,477
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $31,341
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $30,627
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $29,978
Sr Court Specialist Court & Detention Services $29,120
Sr Coordinator-Planning Development Services $63,818
Sr Planner Development Services $63,339
Manager General
-
Development Services $58,013
Sr Inspector General
-
Development Services $57,903
Sr Inspector General Development Services $51,537
-
Sr Inspector General
-
Development Services $50,180
Office Assistant II Development Services $30,983
Sr Architect Equipment & Building Services $82,500
Project Coordinator Ill Equipment & Building Services $61 ,838
Project Coordinator II Equipment & Building Services $54,729
Supervisor Facilities
-
Equipment & Building Services $47,244
Sr Mechanic- Maintenan Equipment & Building Services $36,410
Storekeeper II Equipment & Building Services $28,358
Office Assistant II Equipment & Building Services $27,308
Trades Helper Equipment & Building Services $27,040
Office Assistant II Equipment & Building Services $26,394
6
FY 2010-11 REDUCTION IN FORCE DATA Attachment B
7
FY 2010-11 REDUCTION IN FORCE DATA Attachment B
$44,164
Electronic Technician Office of Cultural Affairs $45,873
Admin Specialist It Office of Cultural Affairs $45.659
Electronic Technician Office of Cultural Affairs $43,552
Coordinator III Park & Recreation $67,125
Supervisor Ill-Recreati Park & Recreation $62,617
Manager II Events/Med Park & Recreation $62,468
-
$58,796
Supervisor Ill-Recreati Park & Recreation $58,488
Supervisor Ill-Recreati Park & Recreation $45,200
Supervisor Ill-Recreati Park & Recreation $44,309
Coordinator Recreatio Park & Recreation
-
$41,000
Coordinator Recreatio Park & Recreation $40,180
-
$35,211
Sr Plumber Park & Recreation $46,860
Pesticide Applicator Park & Recreation $40,112
Recreation Program Spec Park & Recreation $39,296
Recreation Program Spec Park & Recreation $39,296
Recreation Program Spec Park & Recreation $39,296
Environ Specialist Park & Recreation $38,090
Recreation Program Spec Park & Recreation $38,070
Recreation Program Spec Park & Recreation $37,648
Sr Welder Park & Recreation $36,400
Recreation Program Spec Park & Recreation $35,231
Temporary Help Park & Recreation $35,211
Recreation Program Spec Park & Recreation $34,496
Environ Specialist Park & Recreation $34,220
Crew Leader Park & Recreation $32,759
Recreation Program Spec Park & Recreation $32,611
Custodian Park & Recreation $32,406
Pesticide Applicator Park & Recreation $32,115
Custodian Park & Recreation $32,098
Crew Leader Park & Recreation $31,770
Recreation Program Spec Park & Recreation $31,749
Custodian Park & Recreation $31 ,632
8
FY 2010-11 REDUCTION IN FORCE DATA Attachment B
9
FY 2010-11 REDUCTION IN FORCE DATA Attachment B
10
FY 2010-11 REDUCTION IN FORCE DATA Attachment B
11
_______ ______
Attachment C
SANITATION 2010 WAGES - Non-supervisory Staff >$30K
FY10 Projected Total
Pay including SJP A vie Projected Total
JOB TITL Annual Rate UT JOB TITL Annual Rate Pay including SIP & UT
Crew L ader $30,568 72 $43,829 22 Service Ag nt $35 19360 $43,373 35
Cr w Leader $30 571 63 $39,185 76 Service Ag nt $3 739 18 $38,041 75
Cr wLeader $3086845 $4134219 S rviceAg nt $3 91515 $36,918 83
Cr w L d r $31,140 30 $4801273 Semi Agent $36,267 30 $3932995
Crew Le d r $31,441 49 $4544367 Service Agent $45,863 17 $50,832 52
Crew Leader $31 78843 $50,683 56 Service Agent $4957909 $55,782 87
Crew Leader $31,976 26 $45 234 99 Service Agent $49,874 03 $53,902 99
Crew Leader $33,041 63 $44,708 81 Service Agent $54 400 32 $57,809 01
Cr w Leader $33,275 22 $47,589 91 Sr Customer Ser $31,573 78 $31,573 78
Crew L ader $33,294 77 $48,458 10 Sr Customer Ser 535,34731 $43,755 60
C w Leader S33,412 29 $52,380 33 Sr Customer Ser $43,612 61 $52,157 05
C w Leader $34 061 04 $53,303 68 Sr Machinist $38,557 79 $41,200 88
Crew Leader $34,391 76 $49,456 45 Sr Mechanic - $45,984 64 S77.015 80
crew Leader $35.1 1248 $52,899 07 Sr Mecnanic $51,330 24 $62,608 47
Crew Leader $35,295 94 $50,768 16 Sr Truck Dnver $30,377 15 $44,584 19
Crew Leader $35341 49 $53,483 77 Sr Trcck Dover $32609 82 $43,661 60
Crew Leader $3539037 $5236910 Sr Truck Driver $3593678 $55,073 17
Crew Leader $3539702 $48,319 66 Sr Truck Dryer $37,726 83 $60,396 40
Crew Leader $35,567 58 $53,103 82 Sr Truck Drwer $38,099 78 $64,461 08
Crew Leader $36,046 19 $55,865 83 Sr Truck Driver $38.1 3763 $51,520 74
Crew Leader $38 18256 $4441849 Sr Truck Driver $38,812 38 $59,534 81
Crew Leader $38,931 36 $50.51 322 Sr Truck Driver $40,794 21 $71,662 92
Crew Leader $39,903 34 $40,575 34 Sr Truck Driver $43,225.94 $70747 07
Crew Leader $41,444 21 $6735082 Sr Welder $46,066 59 $47,854 26
Crew Leader $41,474 37 $67.01 974 Sr Welder $47,548 18 $53,751 19
Crew Leader $41,765 57 $64,366 93 Storekeeper Il $30,353 65 $34,829 78
Environ Special $45,253 31 $47,018 57 Truck Driver II $30,181 63 $41,815 78
Fuel Transport $33,121 50 $54,269 28 Truck Driver II $30,216 99 $46 18677
Hazardous Waste $3200995 $4586733 Truck Driver :1 $30,505 90 $4601764
Hazardous Waste $34,731 63 $36,779 89 Truck Driver 1 $30,524 00 $39,002 49
Hazardous Waste $36233 60 $37 540 65 Truck Driver II $31088 93 $48,781 34
Heavy Equipment $30,274 82 $4732413 _Truck Dover Ii $31,093.30 $41,335 76
- Heavy Equipment $30,274 82 $56,146 80 Truck Driver II $31,097 04 $46,129 87
Heavy Equipment $30,400 86 $48,834 38 Truck Driver $31,107 44 $40,709 81
Heavy Equipment $30,477 82 $52,339 82 Truck Dover $31,135 73 $4416428
Heavy Equipment $31 967 10 $5032049 Truck Driver $31,407 17 $36,573 24
Heavy Equipment $31,987 90 $45995 83 Truck Driver $31,699 62 - $40,062 29
Heavy Equipment $32,308 64 $50409.07 Truck Driver $32,128 51 $45,802 17
Heavy Equipment $32,317 79 $58,606 59 Truck Driver $32,340 67 j $52,246 14
Heavy Equipment $32,360 85 $37,698 82 Truck Driver $32,366 46 $41,873 66
Heavy Equipment $32,644 77 $41,849 80 Truck Driver $32,525 38 $41,266 16
Heavy Equipment $32,891 25 $5357898 - _Truck Driver $32,653 71 $4988928
Heavy Equipment $32,913 50 $47,658 78 Truck Driver $32,683 66 $36,936 13
Heavy Equipment $32,915 58 $5040301 Truck Driver $33,244 85 $50,067 70
Heavy Equipment $33,461 17 $48,557 03 Truck Driver $33,281.25 $47,176 43
Heavy Equipment $34,546 72 $53,118 86 Truck Driver $33,499.02 - $39,371 66
Heavy Equipment $35,650 58 $51,687 98 Truck Driver $33 955 58 $50,048 40
Heavy quipment $36,165 79 $5731201 Truck Driver $3404003 $45,019 14
Heavy Equipment $36,467 18 $40 19459 Truck Driver $34,308 35 $49,461 ?0
Heavy Equipment $36,498 59 $47 52738 Truck Driver $34,387.60 $52,655 06
Heavy Equipment $38,220 62 $5507782 Truck Driver $34,395.71 $49,031 17
[Heavy Equipment $38,606.88 $57,409.19 Truck Driver $34,438.77 $44,880.84
Heavy Equipment $45,412.85 $55,380.21 Truck Driver $34,614.32 $43,799.04
Heavy Eqiñpment $455a60 $60864.43 Truck Ddver $344i .36 $52,799.81
Heavy Equipment $45,853.60 $83,141.01 Truck Driver $34,658.00 $51,423.05
Laborer $30,510.48 $33,587.54 Truck Driver $34,898.24 $45,426.24
_aborer $34,541.10 $49,067.25 jTruck Driver $34,941.92 $41,648.69
$35,724.00 $44,533.08 Truck Driver $35,001.62 $44,464.62
_aborer $35724.00 $45576.44 Truck Driver $3078i6 $38,999 92
aborer II $35 048 42 $45 88824 Truck Driver $35 224 38 $51,838 36
JMechanic
Mechanic
$33,535.84 535.84 lTruckDn’ver $35,283.87 $56,316 49
$33,904.00 $42,231 .80 Truck Driver $35,576.53 $37,570 37 —
12
Attachment D
Estimated Tax Bill Impacts for Average Homestead Residence
Estimated
2009 Tax Bill 2010 Tax Bill Change
Dallas County - Tax Bill by Jurisidiction
City of Dallas* $1,293 $1,357 $64
Dallas County $394 $414 $19
Parkland Hospital $474 $461 ($12)
Dallas County Community College District $164 $170 $5
Total Tax Bill by School District for Dallas County residents (includes City, County and ISD)
Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD $5,023 $5,065 $41
Coppell ISD $4,905 $5,217 $312
Dallas ISD $4,606 $4,586 ($21)
Duncanville ISD $5,176 $5,205 $30
Garland ISD $4,844 $4,879 $35
Grand Prairie ISD $5,270 $5,298 $28
Highland Park ISD $4,077 $4,132 $55
Irving ISD $5,190 $5,298 $108
Lancaster ISD $5,165 $5,195 $30
Mesquite ISD $5,180 $5,209 $29
Richardson ISD $4,729 $4,766 $37
13
Alley Improvement Strategy
Attachment E
Alley Issues
Today’s Discussion Future Alley Discussions…
Attachment E
2
Purpose
Review the history, uses, and challenges
associated with alleys
Attachment E
3
Overview
The City of Dallas began building alleys in 1920
1363 miles of alleys citywide
1164 miles of paved alleys
1142 miles of rear-entry and/or sanitation collection
alleys
Attachment E
4
Overview
The standard alley pavement width has varied
8-foot pavement (1964 to 1980) - 707 miles built or
rebuilt
9-foot pavement (1980 to 1990) - 44 miles built or
rebuilt
10-foot pavement (1990 to present) - 413 miles built
or rebuilt
Attachment E
5
Overview
Alleys have various uses:
Property access
Garbage/recycling collection
Drainage
Attachment E
6
Challenges
Maintaining and improving alleys is difficult due to:
Narrow pavement and rights-of-way
Encroachments
Overgrowth: trees, vegetation, and landscaping
Structures: fences, buildings, overhangs, poles, wires
Restrictive corners and intersections
Deteriorated alley conditions
Sanitation Collection
Automated sanitation trucks are 9.6 ft from mirror to mirror
Most Sanitation trucks are 8 ft from wheel to wheel making it a
challenge to stay on the pavement
Attachment E
7
Challenges
No plants or
other
obstructions
in the ROW
hindering
10’ Concrete Alley garbage
collection
15 Foot R.O.W
Attachment E
8
Challenges
Attachment E
9
Challenges
Overgrown
vegetation
Structural
encroachments
Narrow
10’ ROW
right of way
Attachment E
10
Challenges
Overgrown
vegetation
Damage
from
avoiding
growth
Attachment E
11
Challenges
Recent asphalt
repair-service
request Narrow turning
radii force
vehicles off of the
roadway causing
Past alley clip rutting
repair to expand
the width of the
alley to prevent
rutting
Attachment E
12
Alley Maintenance
Attachment E
13
Maintenance Comparison
Representative Maintenance Disparity
Street Repair: Alley Repair:
Permanent repairs are made Repairs are primarily
if possible temporary in nature such as
Prescriptive maintenance potholes and small level-ups
programs for different street Minor concrete repairs are
types made to correct major
-Partial reconstruction drainage issues or repair small
-Full-depth asphalt repair localized failures
-Minor concrete repairs
-Restoration
-Rehabilitation
-Micro-surfacing
-Slurry-seal
Attachment E
14
Maintenance Comparison
Street before repair Alley before repair
VS
Attachment E
15
Alley Maintenance Activities
Concrete alley
with asphalt
repairs
Attachment E
16
Alley Maintenance Activities
Repairs are often
temporary in
nature
Attachment E
17
Alley Improvement Funding
Reconstruction and routine maintenance
are funded through two primary
sources:
Capital bond program
Attachment E
18
Alley Improvement Funding
Average operating funds from 2003 through
the present averaged $1.4M annually
2003 Capital Bond Program allocated $17.2M
over four years for alley improvements
(including discretionary fund alley
improvements)
2006 Capital Bond Program includes $7.7M for
alley improvements ($1.9M annually)
$187M of alley needs identified with cost
estimates
Attachment E
19
Alley Condition Rating System
The City of Dallas began rating alley
conditions in 1993
Beginning this summer, one-third of the alleys
are scheduled to be evaluated each year using
the new Pavement Management System and
equipment, replacing the old method of
windshield observations
A letter grade rating is assigned based on
condition
A - Good D – Poor
B – Acceptable E – Unacceptable
C – Fair
Attachment E
20
Currently 71% of Rear Access/Garbage
Collection Alleys are in Satisfactory Condition
Without significantly
2003 Bond Program
increased investment in
alley reconstruction and
37.2%
maintenance the
satisfactory rating will
decline at a precipitous
rate
Attachment E
21
To Achieve a 100% Satisfactory Rating…
Attachment E
22
How do we begin to approach a solution?
Currently 71% of rear-entry and/or sanitation
route alleys are in satisfactory condition and our
current goal for street conditions is 87%
Attachment E
23
Summary of Projected Costs (2007 Dollars)
Costs in $Millions
Avg Avg Total Avg Total
To Total
Annual Annual Annual Total O&M (FY08 –
Achieve Capital
O&M* Capital** Cost Goal)
Option 1
– 75% by $2.9 $8.8 $11.7 $37.6 $114.5 152.1
2020
Option 2
– 85% by $2.9 $18.1 $21.0 $37.6 $235.0 272.6
2020
Option 3
– 75% by $3.6 $5.7 $9.3 $82.7 $130.1 212.8
2030
Option 4
– 85% by $4.2 $10.9 $15.1 $95.9 $250.6 346.5
2030
* Average Annual O&M numbers include the current funding level of $1.4M annually.
** Average Annual Capital numbers include actual amounts programmed in the 2006 Capital
Program and larger projected capital programs for alleys in 2010, 2014, and 2018.
Attachment E
(Current annual investment is $1.85M capital plus $1.4M O&M for a total of $3.25M) 24
Recommendation
Implement a strategy that achieves an
80% satisfactory rating for rear-entry
and/or sanitation collection alleys by 2020
Increase O & M funding by $1.5M in FY08-09
Includes $7.7M from the 2006 Bond Program
and a total of $167M in future capital
programs – for example:
2010 $61M
2014 $66M
Attachment E
2018 $40M
25
Summary of Projected Costs (2007 Dollars)
Costs in $Millions
Avg Avg Total Avg Total
To Total
Annual Annual Annual Total O&M (FY08 –
Achieve Capital
O&M* Capital** Cost Goal)
Option 1
– 75% by $2.9 $8.8 $11.7 $37.6 $114.5 152.1
2020
Option 3
– 75% by $3.6 $5.7 $9.3 $82.7 $130.1 212.8
2030
Recommendation
80% by
2020 2.9 13.4 16.3 37.6 174.7 212.4
* Average Annual O&M numbers include the current funding level of $1.4M annually.
** Average Annual Capital numbers include actual amounts programmed in the 2006 Capital
Attachment E
Program and larger projected capital programs for alleys in 2010, 2014, and 2018.
26
(Current annual investment is $1.85M capital plus $1.4M O&M for a total of $3.25M)
Other Issues
Attachment E
27
Appendix A-Maintenance
Activities
Attachment E
28
Appendix A-Maintenance Activities
Current maintenance activities include:
Small concrete alley repairs
Limited concrete repairs are made to alleys
Most concrete alleys are repaired using asphalt
Priority is given to residential properties with rear
entry access and Sanitation Services
Activities include:
Repairs to pavement
Alley clips
Rut repairs (using flexbase)
Drainage repairs
Attachment E
29
Appendix A-Maintenance Activities
Current maintenance activities include
(cont’d):
Asphalt alley repairs
Activities include:
Limited pavement and base repair
Pothole repairs
Level-ups
Drainage repairs
Unimproved alley repairs
Gravel or dirt alley ways
Activities include:
Re-grading of the alley surface
Add flexbase to even out the driving surface
Attachment E
Drainage repairs
30
Appendix B-Expenditures
Attachment E
31
Appendix B-Expenditures
Expenditures have varied for the Capital program, while
expenditures for the O & M program have remained constant
Attachment E
32
Appendix B-Expenditures
Capital Bond Programs Operating Expenditures
1985 - $1M FY 01/02 - $1.3M
Attachment E
33
Appendix B-Projected Costs
Total Investments ($M)
350
346.5
300
272.6
250 75% by 2020
250.6
235
75% by 2030
212.3
200
212.8
85% by 2020
174.7
150
82.7
85% by 2030
152.1
130.1
95.9
50
0
Total O&M Total Capital Total (now - Goal)
Attachment E
34