Attendance Sheet Module

Start Date 30-Jan End Date 13

Sl Batch Names S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11

1 CUTM - 2 Khushboo Kumari

2 CUTM - 2 Shalini Chauhan
3 CUTM - 2 Ujawl Kumar Singh
4 CUTM - 2 Neha Ranjan
5 CUTM - 2 Ayashkant Swain
6 CUTM - 2 Vijay Kumar
7 CUTM - 2 Ibrar Alam
8 CUTM - 2 Neha Maji
9 CUTM - 2 Subhum Mohanta
10 CUTM - 2 Snigdha Madhusmita Nath
11 CUTM - 2 Snehasish Ghosh
12 CUTM - 2 Nikita Nanda
13 CUTM - 2 M J Kiran
CUTM - 2 Latashree Das
CUTM - 2 Ravi Mahali
CUTM - 2 Krishana K Swain
CUTM - 2 Renu Kumari
CUTM - 2 Kumar Kishan Singh
CUTM - 2 Subham Kumar Chawda
CUTM - 2 Aditya Bisoyi
CUTM - 2 Priyabrata Mallick

CUTM - 2 Kumkum Barik

CUTM - 2 Nigar Fatma
CUTM - 2 Sushree Sucharita Panda
CUTM - 2 Khirod Kumar Nayak
CUTM - 2 Raju Sahu
 C Basics Time Slot 2 to 6 Batch CU

13-Feb Extension : in days Trainer Name Chand B

S-12 S-13 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-21 S-22 S-23 S-24 S-25 S-26 S-27 S-28 S-29 S-30
 CUTM
E , VG, G, A,
Chand Basha P

S-31 Total Total % Comm

0 #DIV/0! E
0 #DIV/0! E
0 #DIV/0! E
0 #DIV/0! E
0 100.00 E
0 100.00 E
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
0 #DIV/0!
Module Marks
Module : C Basics Evaluator Chand E, VG, G, A, P
Presentati
Th (Cur) Lab Prj Total M. Total Total % Trainer FB
on/Viva
Sl Batch Name 30 20 0 0 50 FB on Subject
1 CUTM - 2 Khushboo Kumari 16 20 36 50 72.00%

2 CUTM - 2 Shalini Chauhan 17 20 37 50 74.00%

3 CUTM - 2 Ujawl Kumar Singh 15 20 35 50 70.00%

4 CUTM - 2 Neha Ranjan 16 20 36 50 72.00%

5 CUTM - 2 Ayashkant Swain AB AB AB 50 #VALUE!

6 CUTM - 2 Vijay Kumar 17 20 37 50 74.00%

7 CUTM - 2 Ibrar Alam 13 20 33 50 66.00%

8 CUTM - 2 Neha Maji 11 20 31 50 62.00%

9 CUTM - 2 Subhum Mohanta 14 20 34 50 68.00%

10 CUTM - 2 Snigdha Madhusmita Nath 9 20 29 50 58.00%

11 CUTM - 2 Snehasish Ghosh 11 20 31 50 62.00%

12 CUTM - 2 Nikita Nanda 7 20 27 50 54.00%

13 CUTM - 2 M J Kiran 15 20 35 50 70.00%

14 CUTM - 2 Latashree Das 25 20 45 50 90.00%

15 CUTM - 2 Ravi Mahali 13 20 33 50 66.00%

16 CUTM - 2
Krishana K Swain 17 20 37 50 74.00%

17 CUTM - 2
Renu Kumari 16 20 36 50 72.00%

18 CUTM - 2 Kumar Kishan Singh 14 20 34 50 68.00%

19 CUTM - 2 Subham Kumar Chawda 15 20 35 50 70.00%

20 CUTM - 2 Aditya Bisoyi 15 20 35 50 70.00%

21 CUTM - 2
Priyabrata Mallick 12 20 32 50 64.00%

22 CUTM - 2 Kumkum Barik 15 20 35 50 70.00%

23 CUTM - 2 Nigar Fatma 13 20 33 50 66.00%

24 CUTM - 2 Sushree Sucharita Panda 13 20 33 50 66.00%

25 CUTM - 2 Khirod Kumar Nayak 16 20 36 50 72.00%

26 CUTM - 2 Raju Sahu 16 20 36 50 72.00%

 CUTM - 2

Comments by trainer(C )

Average in concepts,poor in logic

Average in concepts,need to look into logic

Good in concepts,average in logic

Very good in concepts,very good in logic

Joined company.

Good in concepts, Average in logic

Good in concepts, have to put effort in logic building.

Average in concepts, more effort needed in logic

Good in concepts, takes more time in logic building.

Average in concepts, have to put effort in logic building.

Below average in concepts , More effort needed in logic

Good in concepts , Good in logic

Average in concepts , have to look into practical

very good in concepts , very good in logic

Average in concepts, poor in logic

Good in concepts,Good in logic

very good in concepts,very good in logic

Good in concepts , Have to look into logic

good in concepts, Average in logic

very good in concepts , good in logic

Good in concepts , have to look into logic

Good in concepts , should have a look into logic building

Good in concepts , average in logic

Good in concepts, have to put effort in logic

Average in concepts, effort is required in building logic

Good in concepts,Good in logic

Shubhra

(DS)

Need to focus in implementing concepts

Should spend more time on implementing concepts

Good in concepts, need more hands-on practice

very good in understanding and implementing concepts , has the potential to do better.

Average in concepts ,have to work more in building the logic faster.

Average in concepts ,should focus more overall.

Have to put more effort in practical

Average in concepts, need more effort in practical

Should put in more efforts in both understanding
Concepts and implementation.
Have to put more effort in practical

Average in concepts, need to practice more

Average in concepts and logic

Quick learner. She has very good understanding of
Concepts and is performing well.
Average in concepts, have to focus more in building
Logic and implementing them.
Good in concepts, slightly slow in building the logic
And implementation. Can do better.
Quick learner .Very good in understanding concepts and
Building logic.

good in concepts,average in logic

Good in concepts and implementation.

Good in concepts and implementation.

Need to put in more effort in implenting

Concepts timely.

Average in concepts and implementation.

Needs to spend more time in implementing concepts.

Fine with concepts but should focus in building logic.

Needs to put in more effort in understanding concepts
And building logic.
Quick learner. Performs well . Good in concepts and hands-on.