Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ithihas: Monthly Archives: May 2009
Ithihas: Monthly Archives: May 2009
Ithihas
Kaleidoscope of Indian civilization
August 2008 Lala Lajpat Rai, S.Srinivasa Iyengar, Pattabhi Seetharamiah, Jamnadas Mehta,
July 2008 Konda Venkatappiah and others toured all over Karnataka and kept the national
June 2008 spirit alive. The flame of freedom struggle was also kept alive by a host of
May 2008
Congressmen of Karnataka like N.S.Hardikar, Srinivas Rao Kaujalgi,
Gangadharrao Deshpande, Kadapa Raghavendra Rao, R.R.Diwakar, Krishna Rao
April 2008
Mudvedkar and others. The authorities in Princely state of Mysore understood the
March 2008
value of spinning and weaving Khadi in the scheme of rural development and often
February 2008 cooperated with the Congress workers in the extension of Khadi industries and
other village industries sponsored by the Congress. The Diwan of Mysore, Albion
Banerjee not only permitted the Department of Industries to send exhibits to the
Congress exhibition at Belgaum in 1924, but also gave a donation for the
expenses.
Anti-Simon Commission agitation: For the purpose of enquiring into the working
of the system of Government and the development of representative institutions in
India, with a view to extend, modify or restrict the degree of responsible
Government then existing in India, a statutory commission was appointed by the
Government in 1927. The Commission headed by John Simon had no Indian
representatives. The Commission was appointed two year earlier than the
prescribed date as the ruling Conservative Party in Britain was doubtful of its
victory in the next general elections and did not wanted the Labour Party, which
was somewhat sympathetic to Indian aspirations should get a chance to determine
the composition of the Commission.
Congressmen felt insulted by the exclusion of Indians from the Commission and
the arrival of the Commission was greeted with hartal and there was wide spread
demonstrations all over India. When the members of the Commission arrived at
Bombay on 3rd February 1928, K.F.Nariman led the demonstration who held
placard inscribed “Swaraj is our birthright” and “No representation, no
Commission”. Lucknow experienced unprovoked police charges on an unarmed
and peaceful protest on the occasion of the visit of the Commission. Police entered
houses and beat respected people for daring to call “Simon go back”. During a
party given by some Taluqdars to the members of the Commission in Lucknow, the
police had barricaded the place. Still, the harmony of the party was marred by the
arrival from the skies of numerous black kites and balloons bearing “Simon, go
back”, “India for Indians”, etc. In Patna, a gathering of 50,000 people demonstrated
against the Commission, while only a few Chaprasis and government servants
gave it a welcome. Lorries of hired people, whom the government had brought
from the neighbourhood, walked into the boycott camp and not the welcome camp.
Lala Lajpat Rai bereaved: At Lahore, when Lajpat Rai and others led the protest
against the Commission on 30th October 1928, the police used force on the
perfectly non- violent demonstration and Lajpat Rai who was in the first row
received lathi blows over his chest, which proved fatal. He died on 17th November.
To avenge his death, Bhagat Singh and his associates decided to assassinate
J.A.Scott, the police officer under whose order the police had resorted to lathi-
charge. But due to mistaken identity, instead of Scott, a probationary officer,
J.P.Saunders became the victim.
In reply to the Indians protest against the non inclusive of Indians in the Simon
Commission, the Secretary of State for India, Birkenhead said that the Indians had
been excluded from the Commission due to their divided opinion and if they could
overcome their differences and frame a draft reform proposal, due consideration
would be given during the preparation of the official reform scheme.
The Nehru report: The challenge was accepted by the Congress, which
constituted a committee under the president ship of Motilal Nehru. The result was a
draft report, which recommended Dominion Status as the basis for the new
Constitution. But as there was no provision for separate electorates, the Muslims
refused to adhere to the report. Even Jawaharlal Nehru condemned the report as a
timid ideal and only after a long discussion with Gandhiji accepted a compromise
formula, by which Dominion Status was accepted as the basis of the new
Constitution, provided the British government conceded it before the end of 1929.
The failure of the government to accept the recommendations made in the Nehru
report led the Congress in its session at Lahore in 1930 to declare its commitment
towards realization of Swaraj. On 31st December 1929, Jawaharlal Nehru unfurled
the national flag on the banks of river Ravi and the working committee of the
Congress, which met on 2nd January 1930, decided to observe the 26th of
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2009/05/ 2/9
26.02.2018 May | 2009 | Ithihas
Advertisements
Report this ad
Report this ad
The period 1920-48 has been termed as the Gandhian ear in the history of modern
India . This was due to the overwhelming influence of Gandhiji on Indian politics
and society. The first major agitation launched under his leadership was the Non-
Cooperation Movement with the triple purpose of winning Swaraj, rectification of
Punjab wrongs and the rehabilitation of the of the Khilafat.
The Khilafat Movement was purely a religious movement organized by the Indian
Muslims, whose main plank was the conservation of the Turkish Empire and its
Sultan, whom they acknowledged as their Caliph (spiritual head). The Indian
Muslims feared that Great Britain would deal severely with Turkey for having sided
with Germany in the World War I and strip her of her hold over the holy cities of
Mecca and Medina . Gandhiji with a desire to secure a permanent Hindu-Muslim
unity included the Khilafat issue in his agenda.
various boycotts- social, educational, legal and economic and to distribute twenty
lakh spinning wheels to provide work of the unemployed or underemployed and to
replace foreign cloth by hand-made Indian cloth.
With regards to the latter, the important items were- 1. The surrender of titles,
honours, etc. and the boycott of official functions. 2. The boycott of schools and
colleges owned or aided by the government and the establishment of national
educational institutions.3.The boycott of elections to the Central Assembly and
Provincial Councils, 4. The boycott of British goods and encouragement to
Swadeshi. 5. The boycott of the law courts by the lawyers who would set up
popular tribunals for administering justice and 6. Not to enlist in the army and to
give up government service.
The Chauri Chaura incident: When the Prince of Wales landed in Bombay on
17th November 1921, the Congress called for a boycott and he was greeted with
black flags wherever he went. In the riots that followed, 53 people died and 400
were wounded. Between December 1921 and January 1922, about 30,000
agitators were arrested. As the situation was deteriorating, efforts to bring out a
settlement was made by some leaders like Malaviya. Gandhiji demanded the
release of all sathyagrahis for which the Viceroy refused. In Febuary 1922
addressed a letter to the viceroy giving notice of his intention to start a civil
disobedience at Bardoli in case the government failed to settle the Khilafat
question and undo the Punjab wrongs. On 5th February 1922 a police station was
burnt by a mob and a number of policemen were killed at Chauri Chaura in United
Province . This resulted in Gandhiji to suspend the non-cooperation movement.
Gandhiji was arrested and sentenced to six-year imprisonment.
The Swaraj Party: In the absence of Gandhiji, the Congress Working Committee
spent a great deal of time in taking stock of the affairs and discussing the future
line of action. The Civil Disobedience Enquiry Committee constituted by the
Congress in its report said that the country was not yet prepared for a non-violent
agitation and recommended the party to contest elections and enter the legislative
councils.
In December the Congress session held at Gaya was presided over by C.R.Das,
who was a strong protagonist of Council entry. But the followers of Gandhiji and the
Khilafatists defeated the proposal of Das. This led C.R.Das and Motilal Nehru to
form the Swaraj party on January 1st 1923. The manifesto of the Swaraj party
declared that while the goal of the party was attainment of Swaraj, the immediate
objective of the party is the speedy attainment of full dominion status. It described
itself as a ‘party within the Congress’ and not a rival organization. In the election,
which took place in November 1923, the candidates of Swaraj party won from
different provinces in considerable strength. In Central Province the party won
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2009/05/ 4/9
26.02.2018 May | 2009 | Ithihas
majority of seats while in Bengal, United Province, Bombay and Assam, it won
sizeable number of seats. It secured 48 seats in the Central Legislative Assembly.
The constructive programme of the Congress was taken up all over Karnataka.
National schools were established in Mangalore, Dharwad, Hubli, Hangal,
Bagalkot, Bijapur, Gadag, Belgaum, Sirsi, Hospet, Siddapur and other places. In
the National school run by Alur Venkata Rao at Dharwad, Dr. Bendre and
R.R.Diwakar worked as teachers. Propagation of Khadi, the abolition of
untouchability, the anti-drink campaign, village uplift, the encouragement to village
industries were among the chief items of the constructive programme. They helped
to awaken the spirit on national service and prepare the people for the bitter fight of
the coming days.(to be continued)
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2009/05/ 5/9
26.02.2018 May | 2009 | Ithihas
The partition of Bengal raised the political tempo in the country. The adoption of
swadeshi and boycott of British goods provided new methods of struggle. A radical
element began to assert itself from the Congress platform. Its leaders were Tilak,
Lajapat Rai, Bipin Chandra Pal and Aurobindo Ghosh. This group called
extremists, believed in protests and agitations and advocated boycott and passive
resistance. They appealed to the masses and looked upon ancient India for
guidance and inspiration. They wanted ‘Swaraj’, which they considered as their
birthright. The group identified with the moderates believed in prayers and petition
and looked to the west for inspiration. Their policy was a policy of mendicancy and
as reward of loyalty wanted a colonial self-government. At the Congress session
held at Benaras in 1905, a resolution was moved by the moderates to welcome the
Prince of Wales, was to visit India in 1906. The extremists opposed the resolution
and staged a walkout. The resolution was passed in their absence. The resolution
regarding passive resistance moved by Tilak could not be passed. The next
session of the Congress was held in Calcutta in 1906. Bipin Chandra Pal proposed
Tilak for presiding over the session. As he was not acceptable for the moderates,
Dadabhai Naoroji was elected as the president of the Congress session. This time
the extremists were able to successfully get the resolution passed on Swaraj,
Swadeshi, Boycott and National Education passed. But the moderates did not work
actively for the implementation of the resolutions.
The Surat split: In 1907 the Congress session was held at Surat and the
extremists proposed the name of Lala Lajpat Rai for presiding over the session.
But according to an established convention the moderates wanted Rash Behari
Bose, who was the Chairman of the Reception Committee of the last session at
Calcutta to be elected as the president. Tilak and his supporters had no faith in him
and Lala Lajpat Rai who was recently released from detention refused to accept
the president ship. The name of Rash Behari Bose was proposed by S.N.Banerjee
and seconded by Moti Lal Nehru. Bose was elected and took over the chair. Chaos
followed when Tilak who wanted to address the delegates was not allowed to do
so. Men with sticks charged the platform. Shoes were thrown on the platform.
Feroz Shah Mehta and S.N.Banerjee were injured. The president declared the
meeting closed and the police cleared the hall.
Aftermath the Surat split, the moderates met in Allahabad in April 1908 and drew
up a constitution. They again met at Madras in December the same year. In article
I of its constitution it mentioned that its goal was to participation of Indian in a
system of government similar to that enjoyed by the self-governing members of the
British Empire . This was to be achieved through constitutional means. The
Congress (moderates) lost popularity after the split and the average number of
delegates went on decreasing annually. The nationalists or extremists, left to itself
might have developed a separate rival organization to the Congress, but for the
repressive measures of the government. Lala Lajpat Rai was deported in 1907,
Aurobindo locked as an under-trial prisoner in 1908 and after his release, he retired
from politics (February 1910). In 1908 Tilak was imprisoned for six years for
provocative writings.
The Muslim League was the only party, which showed new life and strength after
the Congress split. The first annual session of the League was held at Karachi on
29 December 1907. The choice of Karachi , the capital of Sindh was due to its
religious and historical consideration. As the League publication put it – “If a
handful of men under a boy (Mohammad-Bin-Kasim) could teach Kalima to the
territory of Sindh and promulgate the Shariat of god, can seven crore Muslims not
make their social and political life pleasant”?
The Home Rule League: The people of Ireland were agitating for Home Rule and
Mrs Annie Besant, an Englishwomen mooted the idea of Home Rule for India . She
believed that the best way to preserve British connection with India was to satisfy
the Indian aspirations, which was conferring of self-government. Mrs Annie Besant
was the president of the Theosophical Society and was well acquainted with Indian
through and culture. She had made India her home and gradually became
Indianised. She realized that for the attainment of Home Rule, unity in the National
movement was essential and was chiefly instrumental in bringing the reunion of
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2009/05/ 6/9
26.02.2018 May | 2009 | Ithihas
moderates and extremists. Tilak after his release from Mandalay decided to work
for self-government through constitutional means. He was also influenced by the
freedom struggle movement in Ireland and organized the Home Rule League in
Poona in July 1916. Mrs Annie Besant inaugurated her faction of Home Rule
League in Madras in September 1916. While the activities of Tilak’s movement was
restricted to Maharashtra, that of Mrs Annie Besant embraced the whole of India
including Bombay . Tilak visited Belgaum , Sankeshwar and other places in
Karnataka and opened the branches of the League. The League had its branches
also at Dharwad, Siddapur, Bellary , Hubli and Mangalore. Dattopant Belvi was the
president of the Karnataka unit of Home Rule League.
The idea of Home Rule appealed to a large section of the population. All sections
of Congressmen joined the movement. Leaders like Lajpat Rai, C.R.Das, Jinnah,
Moti Lal Nehru, Madan Mohan Malaviya and others became heads of local
branches, which were set up in towns. By the beginning of 1918, Tilak’s League
had 32,000 members and Mrs Annie Besant’s League had 27,000 members. Both
the League aimed at conveying the message of Home Rule to the common man. In
addition to newspapers, vernacular pamphlets, posters, illustrated post-cards,
plays, religious songs adapted for the purpose were used and missionary style
preachers were employed for Home Rule propaganda. Reading rooms were
started and discussion groups and public meetings were held. Areas that were
hitherto considered politically backward such as Gujrat and Sindh were drawn into
the movement. For the first time in the history of the freedom struggle students
were attracted to the movement in large numbers. So also were women. Tilak and
Mrs Besant toured their respective areas and drew huge crowds to their meetings.
In their speeches they blamed the British for poverty and backwardness in the
country and declared that the only remedy for these ills was Home Rule. Their
propaganda caused serious embarrassment to the authorities. Attempts were
made to stop students from attending the League meetings and by restricting the
movements of the leaders. On 16th June 1917, Mrs Besant along with her
lieutenants, B.P.Wadia and G.S.Arundale were arrested. In July 1918 Tilak sent
Lala Lajpat Rai, N.S.Hardikar and K.D.Shastri to the United States of America to
set a branch of his Home Rule League in San Francisco . They worked hard to
counteract the British propaganda that on account of her diversity and
backwardness, India was unfit for Home Rule. Tilak himself visited England to
enlist the support of the Labour party. He also appealed to Clemenceau, the
president of the Paris Peace Conference to place India ‘s case for Home Rule
before the representatives of the allied powers. Mrs Annie Besant’s support for the
firing which took place at Jallianwallabagh, death of Tilak in 1920 and the
enactment of the 1919 Act, all led to the Home Rule movement to lose its
momentum. Later Gandhiji renamed the Home Rule League as Swaraj Sabha.
India and First World War: Though the people of India had no stakes in the war,
they were forced to contribute in men and material for the British in their fight
against Germany . Indian soldiers fought in France , Belgium , Egypt , Sudan , East
Africa, North China, Persia , Mesopotamia, Palestine , Aden , etc. India ‘s supply in
men, money and material was so large that Viceroy Hardinge declared in the
House of Commons and repeated in his autobiography that India had been bled
white by the war office. About 12,15,338 Indian soldiers were sent overseas and
more than one lakh men died fighting for the British. The British Indian government
made a free gift of 100 Million Sterling to England for conducting the war. This
amount exceeded the annual revenue of the government of India and increased
her nation debt to 30 percent. The total war expenditure of government of India up
to 31st March 1918 was about 12,78,000,00 Sterling Pounds. This apart the Indian
princes and people contributed about 2,100,000 Sterling in cash. There was also
forced conscription and war loans. For instance in Punjab the Revenue Officer
(Tahsildar) used to prepare a list of all men in a village and ask each family
consisting of three or four brothers to provide one or two recruits for the war. If the
fixed number were not made available voluntarily, he would resort to cruel
punishment like making the men stand naked in the presence of their women folk
or pushing them in between thorny bushes. Sometimes women were taken as
hostages and retained until the men came forward to enlist in the army.
During the war, the government of India had enacted the Defence of India Act to
curb revolutionary activities. In March 1919, as a substitute to this act, the
government passed the Rowlatt Act. The Act conferred provincial governments
with extraordinary powers to search, arrest, demand securities, etc. Another
feature of this act was that a person accused of crime by a Special Court had no
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2009/05/ 7/9
26.02.2018 May | 2009 | Ithihas
provision to go for appeal against the judgment given. Indian felt that after their
splendid help for England in World War I such a repressive Act was uncalled for. In
spite of opposition from all elected Indian members
of the Central Legislature, the Act was passed.
The Jallianwallabagh Massacre: As a mark of protest against the Act, Gandhiji
gave a call for an All India hartal on 30th March 1919, which was later postponed
to 6th April. In Amritsar , the hartal organized on April 6th passed off peacefully.
Michael O’ Dwyer, the Lt Governor of Punjab wanted to prevent Congress political
ideas from pertaining to Punjab and hence on 10th Congress leaders, Kitchlew and
Satyapal were deported from Amritsar . Mobs gathered to see the District
Magistrate to entreat him to cancel the orders were stopped by police who fired
upon them, causing injuries and deaths. The mob was filed with rage and started
assaulting Europeans, man or woman. It sacked the National Bank and the
Alliance Bank, set afire their premises and killed their European managers. The
Town Hall and a number of public buildings were gutted. Telegraph wires were
pulled down. A Christian missionary, Miss Sherwood was assaulted and left
unconscious. (But later rescued by Indians and taken care of) These incidents led
the authorities to hand over the administration of Amritsar to the military authorities
and on April 11th Brigadier Dyer took charge. Proclamations were issued giving
warning of dire consequences if meetings were held or processions taken. The
reaction of the people was to make a protest against these threats and a meeting
was summoned at Jallianwallabagh in the afternoon of April 13th. Dyer regarded
this as a challenge to his authority and decided to disperse it by force.
Martial law was imposed in other parts of Punjab also. In Lahore , people who
came out after 8 pm, violating curfew orders were liable to be shot, flogged or
fined. An elderly man tending his cow outside his shop door in a side land after 8
pm was flogged. In a village not far from Lahore , a Muslim marriage party
including the bridegroom, priest and guests were flogged for the offence of
assembling together violating the martial law prohibiting assemblage of people. In
Gujranwala , Colonel O’Brien ordered that when Indian met British officers, they
must salute, alight from their carriages or dismount if they riding or driving and
lower their umbrellas if they were carrying one. In one case a number of leading
citizens were summarily arrested, marched several miles in the burning sun and
put in a goods truck. They were refused permission to answer nature calls and kept
in the truck in these condition for about 48 hours. At Kasur, Capt. Doveton
confessed that some people were made to touch the ground with their forehead by
way of making them acknowledge the British authority. People including Sadhus
were whitewashed and lime washed and made to stand in the hot sun. About 107
persons were kept in a public cage without any overhead covering specially built
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2009/05/ 8/9
26.02.2018 May | 2009 | Ithihas
for the purpose. Gradually, news of the happenings in Punjab reached the rest of
India and there was an outburst of condemnation from every part. The true colour
of the British was manifested when Brigadier Dyer was not only acquitted of all
charges, but also showered with praise. But Michael O’Dwyer was not so lucky and
in 1940 Udham Singh shot him dead in London .
https://ithihas.wordpress.com/2009/05/ 9/9