Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Physical Chem - Complete
Physical Chem - Complete
PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
CONTENTS:
1) Atoms, Molecules & Stoichiometry *
2) Atomic Structure
3) Chemical Bonding
4) Gases *
5A) Chemical Energetics 1: Enthalpy *
5B) Chemical Energetics 2: Entropy *
6) Reaction Kinetics *
7) Chemical Equilibrium *
13A) Ionic Equilibrium 1: Acid-Base Equilibrium *
13B) Ionic Equilibrium 2: Solubility Equilibrium*
18) Electrochemistry
CHARGE Q
ANGLE OF DEFLECTION ∝ (denoted as )
MASS m
Q Q
For example: for proton = 1/1 = 1, for electron = 1/ (1/1840) = 1840
m m
Thus, the extent of deflection for electrons is more than protons.
If a proton 11H and a deuteron 12 H were to pass through an electric field, being
positively-charged, both will deflect towards the negatively charged plate (cathode).
However, the angle of deflection for the deuterons will be half that for the protons since
a deuteron has twice the mass of a proton.
Q Q
1
1 H has a ratio of 1/1 = 1, while 2
1 H has a ratio of 1/2 = 0.5
m m
2.2) Electronic Structure (pg 6-10)
ELECTRONIC STRUCTURE: Arrangement of electrons in atoms (or ions)
Electrons in an atom are arranged in different principal quantum shells which
comprise of one or more subshells
Each subshell contains one or more orbitals
o Provides us with information like: number of electrons in atom/ion
o Distribution of electrons in atom/ion
o Energies of the electrons
ORBITALS: Region in space where there is a high probability (>95%) of finding an electron
Electrons in an atom do not occupy fixed positions. They also do not circulate the
nucleus in a fixed path (orbit)
Electrons may be considered to move almost everywhere and occupy a certain
region around the nucleus.
Characteristics of Orbitals:
o Each orbital denotes an allowed energy state of the electron.
o Has a distinctive geometrical shape
o Electron in orbital described by four quantum numbers (where no two
electrons have the same 4 quantum numbers)
FOUR QUANTUM NUMBERS
(a) Principal Quantum Number: number of shells
PRINCIPAL Specifies the energy of an electron, the size of the orbital and the
QUANTUM average distance of the electron from the nucleus of an atom.
NUMBER As the value of n ↑,
(Shells) o the further the electron is from the nucleus
o the higher the energy level of the electron
o the less tightly the electron is bound to the nucleus
o the larger the orbital
Each principal quantum shell can contain a max of 2n² electrons
(b) (a) For shells with quantum number, n:
ORBITAL = 0 1 2 3 4 … n-1
QUANTUM
s p d f g
NUMBER
(Subshells/
E.g. : When n = 2, there are only 2 possible values for :
Orbitals) = 0 (i.e. 2s), = 1 (i.e. 2p)
Relative energy: s<p<d<f<g
This divides an energy level into sub-levels and describes the shape of the
orbital
Principal Quantum Shell, n Type of Subshell
1 1s
2 2s, 2p
3 3s, 3p, 3d
4 4s, 4p, 4d, 4f
(c) (a) For sub-shells with orbital quantum number,
MAGNETIC M = - , -( -1), -( -2), …, -1, 0, 1, …., ( -2), ( -1),
QUANTUM
This describes the:
NUMBER
Number of orbitals in each subshell
(No. of
Orientation of orbital in space E.g., when:
orbitals)
= 0, M = 0: In the s subshell, there is only 1 orbital
= 1, M = -1, 0 ,1: In the p subshell, there are 3 orbitals
= 2, M = -2, -1, 0 ,1, 2: In the d subshell, there are 5 orbitals
No. of orbitals in ms =
subshell +½, -½
1 +½, -½
1 +½, -½
3 +½, -½
1 +½, -½
3 +½, -½
5 +½, -½
1 +½, -½
3 +½, -½
5 +½, -½
7 +½, -½
SHAPES OF ORBITALS
TYPE OF DESCRIPTION OF ORBITAL SHAPES OF ORBITAL
ORBITAL
s orbital -Each s subshell : only one orbital
-All s orbitals:
o SPHERICAL shape
o NON-DIRECTIONAL
(as charge cloud is not concentrated in any
particular direction)
Reason: 3d and 4s orbitals are about equal in energy by the time Cr is reached. By having one
electron each in the 3d and 4s orbitals, electron-electron repulsion is minimized.
Once occupied by electrons, the 3d subshell is closer to the nucleus. The electrons in the 3d
subshell repel the 4s electrons from the nucleus and cause the 4s electrons to be at a higher
energy level.
Isoelectronic Configurations
When 2 different species have the same number of electrons, we say that they are
isoelectronic with one another (e.g: N³⁻, O²⁻)
Ionization energies affect the type of bond formed by the atom with other atoms. Elements
with low ionization energies lose an electron easily to form a cation, resulting in ionic bonds
being formed.
Ionization energies are positive values (endothermic) since energy is absorbed during
ionization to overcome the attraction between electron and nucleus
The 2nd IE > 1st IE because more energy is required to remove an electron from a positive ion
due to greater electrostatic attraction between the positive ion and the valence electron.
An electron in the atom faces two main electrostatic forces, namely the attractive forces by
the nucleus (nuclear charge), and the repulsive force by electrons closer than itself to the
nucleus. (shielding effect)
Zeff is combined effect of nuclear charge, Z and shielding effect, S, caused by inner
electrons: Zeff = Nuclear charge (Z) –Shielding Effect (S)
Higher Zeff
o stronger forces of attraction between nucleus and valence electron
o higher ionization energy
Across WHY?
period: As proton number ↑, nuclear charge ↑
IE ↑ Successive members of period have one electron added to the same
outermost shell.
Increase in screening effect = negligible
Effective Nuclear Charge ↑ (nuclear charge – shielding effect)
More energy required to remove more tightly held electrons, thus IE ↑
Down WHY?
Down a group, the number of filled principal quantum shell increases,
group:
and each successive element has its valence electrons located in a shell
IE ↓ with a larger principal quantum number n.
Hence, valence electrons are increasingly further away from nucleus
down a group (DISTANCE ↑), attracted less strongly by the nucleus
Less energy required to remove the valence electrons, hence IE ↓
If asked to compare the IE of two elements, write out the electronic configuration of the two
elements, and firstly see which electron is removed, then compare:
Distance from nucleus, presence of inter-electronic repulsion etc.
IMPORTANT POINTS:
Logarithm of IE are often plotted instead of actual IE for convenience, as IE values
vary over a wide range of values.
The energy gap between subshells is not as steep as that between principal
quantum shells and is sometimes not discernible
The large increments in IE from 1st 2nd, and 9th 10th, are due to the fact that an
electron is being removed from an inner principal quantum shell and is nearer to
the nucleus (at a lower energy level)
The slight jump in IE from 7th 8th , is due to an electron being removed from a
different subshell. This is due to the 2s electrons being at a lower energy (closer to
the nucleus) than the 2p electrons. Slightly more energy is thus required to remove
the 2s electron. (hence IE increases)
IONIC RADIUS
Ionic radii of isoelectronic ions (ions with same number of electrons) decreases as
the nuclear charge increases
no of protons 7 8 9 11 12 13
Across period 2, ionic radius decreases gradually from Li⁺ to B³⁺, increases sharply
from B³⁺ to N³⁻, decreases gradually from N³⁻ to F.
Across a period, the size of isoelectronic ions DECREASES.
o Na⁺, Mg²⁺, Al³⁺ have same no. of inner electrons, hence shielding effect is similar
o However, the nuclear charge increases from Na⁺ to Al³⁺, so the nucleus attracts the
valence electrons more strongly.
o P³⁻, S²⁻, Cl⁻ have same no. of inner electrons, hence shielding effect is similar
o However, the nuclear charge increases from P³⁻ to Cl⁻, so the nucleus attracts the
valence electrons more strongly.
Lewis Acids & Bases: - Acids: Accept e pair from base acid is an electron-pair acceptor.
- Bases: Donates e pair to acid base is an electron-pair donor.
Limitations: Only applies to reactions which take place in the aq. medium, compounds like
ammonia cannot be classified as bases even though they form OH- ions in water.
CONJUGATE ACID-BASE PAIRS
The Bronsted-Lowry Theory of Acids and Bases are of most use to us.
STRONG ACIDS: Ionizes completely in solution. STRONG BASES: Ionizes completely in solution.
[H+] = n[acid] (n = no. of H+ formed per mol of acid) [OH-] = n[base] (n = no. of OH- formed per mol of base)
Monobasic: dissociates to form 1 mol of H+ Monoacidic: dissociates to form 1 mol of OH-
Dibasic: dissociates to form 2 mol of H+: [H+] =2[acid] Dacidic: dissociates to form 2 mol of OH-: [OH-] =2[base]
In questions, during calculation of pH, there are 2 sources of H3O+ in a solution of dil. HCl from ionization of HCl &
self-ionization of H2O. If high conc. of strong acid is used, amt of H3O+ from self-ionization of water is negligible: [H3O+]
= [HCl]. However, if low conc. of strong acid is used, amt of H3O+ from self-ionization of water is NOT negligible.
*In the presence of H3O+ (or OH-), self-ionization of water is suppressed due to Common Ion Effect. H3O+ & OH- from
self-ionization of water are ignored when concentration of ANY of these two ions are greater than 10 -7 mol dm-3
WEAK ACIDS: Ionizes partially in solution. WEAK BASES: Ionizes partially in solution.
- +
CH3COOH (aq) + H2O (l) CH3COO (aq) + H3O (aq)
Due to incomplete ionization, the undissociated species of the weak acids still exist in relatively large amounts in the
dilute solution. Consider 0.10 moldm-3 HCN: HCN (aq) H+ (aq) + CN- (aq)
Initial amt: 0.10 0 0
Final amt: 0.10 – a a a
In this solution, [H+] = [CN-]. At eqm, [HCN] >> [H+] or [CN-]
ACID DISSOCIATION CONSTANT, Ka **Strength of Acid VS Concentration of Acid:
- Ka measures the strength of acid. The larger the value Strength of acid: Extent of dissociation of acid
the stronger the acid. Conc of acid: No. of moles of acid per dm3 of solution
- It provides a quantitative indication of the extent to *A strong acid can be of low concentration, a weak acid
which the acid is dissociated. can have a high concentration and vice versa.
- It has units of moldm-3, BASE DISSOCIATION CONSTANT, Kb
-The value is dependent on temperature.
- Kb measures the basic strength of weak base B. The
larger the value the stronger the base.
Dissociation of a weak monobasic acid: - It measures the ability of the Bronsted-Lowry base B to
CH3COOH (aq) + H2O (l) CH3COO- (aq) + H3O+ (aq) accept a proton.
+ -
- It has units of moldm-3,
At eqm, Kc = [H 3O ][CH 3COO ] . Rearranging,
[CH 3COOH][H 2O] -The value is dependent on temperature.
+ - + -
Kc [H2O] = Ka = [H3O ][CH 3COO ] = [H ][CH3COO ] Dissociation of a weak monoacidic base:
[CH 3COOH] [CH3COOH] NH3 (aq) + H2O (l) NH4+ (aq) + OH- (aq)
pKa = -lg Ka + -
At eqm, Kc = [NH 4 ][OH ] . Rearranging,
As Ka/moldm-3 ↓, pKa ↑, acid strength decreases [NH 3 ][H 2O]
(becomes weaker/pH becomes higher) + -
Kc [H2O] = Kb = [NH 4 ][OH ]
If Ka of HF > Ka of HCN (or pKa of HF < pKa of HCN) [NH 3 ]
- HF is a stronger acid than HCN
pKb = -lg Kb
- For HF (aq) & HCN (aq) of the same concentration: -3
As Kb/moldm ↓, pKb ↑, basic strength decreases
* HF dissociates to a greater extent than HCN, (becomes weaker/pH becomes lower)
HF contains a higher [H+] than HCN, If Kb of NH3 > Kb of CH3COO- (pKb of NH3<pKb of CH3COO-)
pH of HF is lower than that of HCN. - NH3 is a stronger base than CH3COO-
For dissociation of a dibasic acid (happens twice), there - For NH3 (aq) & CH3COO- (aq) of the same conc:
are two dissociation constants: Ka1 and Ka2. * NH3 contains a higher [OH-] than CH3COO-,
Hence, overall Ka = Ka1 X Ka2 pOH of NH3 is lower than that of CH3COO-,
Note that Ka1 >> Ka2>> Ka3… since +vely charged protons pH of NH3 is higher than that of CH3COO-
are more readily lost from neutral acid molecules than
from negatively charged conjugate bases of the acids.
CALCULATION OF pH OF WEAK ACIDS: CALCULATION OF pH OF WEAK BASES:
-3
Consider a weak acid HA (aq) of concentration Co moldm Consider a weak base B (aq) of concentration Co moldm-3
HA (aq) H+ (aq) + A- (aq) B (aq) + H2O (l) BH+ (aq) + OH- (aq)
Let [H+] be x moldm-3 at equilibrium. Ignoring self- Let [OH-] be x moldm-3 at equilibrium. Ignoring self-
ionization of water, [H+] = [A-] = x moldm-3 ionization of water, [OH-] = [BH-] = x moldm-3
Conc/moldm-3 HA (aq) H+ (aq) + A- (aq) Conc/moldm-3 B (aq) BH+ (aq) + OH- (aq)
Initial amt: Co 0 0 Initial amt: Co 0 0
Change: -x +x +x Change: -x +x +x
Eqm: (Co – x) x x Eqm: (Co – x) x x
+
Ka = [H ][A ] ( x)( x) x2 +
Kb = [BH ][OH ] ( x)( x) x
2
To see if the 2nd assumption is valid, we apply the 5% rule. To see if the 2nd assumption is valid, we use the 5% rule.
2 2
If x x 100% ≤ 5%, the assumption is valid, If x x 100% ≤ 5%, the assumption is valid,
Co Co
approximation can be used. If not, assumption is not approximation can be used. If not, assumption is not
valid, quadratic equation must be solved to find x. Simple valid, quadratic equation must be solved to find x. Simple
C
rule of thumb: if o > 1000, then (Co – x) ≈ Co.
C
rule of thumb: if o > 1000, then (Co – x) ≈ Co.
Ka Kb
Relationship between Kw, Ka and Kb/Relative Strengths of conjugate acid-base pairs:
(Ka of acid HA) x (Kb of conjugate base A-) = Kw (Kb of base B) x (Ka of conjugate acid BH+) = Kw
HA (aq) H+ (aq) + A- (aq) B (aq) + H2O (l) BH+ (aq) + OH- (aq)
14 14
Kb of conjugate base A- = Kw = 1.0 10 Ka of conjugate acid BH+ = Kw = 1.0 10
Ka of HA Ka of HA Kb of B Kb of B
thus Kb of a conjugate base can be calculated from the Ka thus Ka of a conjugate acid can be calculated from the Kb
of the acid. of the base.
The larger the Ka of an acid, the smaller the Kb of its conjugate base. If HA is a stronger acid than HB, A- is a weaker
base than B-. (exists in opposites strong acid has weak conjugate base and vice versa)
For an acid HA to react appreciably with a base, B, HA must be a stronger acid than the conjugate acid of B (BH +).
Consider the reaction between HA and B to form A- and BH+: HA (aq) + B (aq) A- (aq) + BH+ (aq), Kc = Ka of HA
Ka of BH
Kc is large if Ka of HA >>> Ka of BH HA reacts with B to a great extent. But B does not react with HA.
+
DEGREE OF DISSOCIATION, 𝜶
Degree of dissociation, α, of an electrolyte can be defined as the fraction of molecules with is ionized at equilibrium:
number of moles of molecules which are ionized at eqm
α=
number of moles of molecules present initially
-The degree of ionization may also be expressed in %.
For strong acids/bases which ionize completely, α = 1, For weak acids/bases which ionize partially, 0 < α < 1
Consider a weak monobasic acid HA of concentration Co moldm-3 and degree of ionization α. In aqueous solution, the
following eqm is established: Conc/moldm-3 HA (aq) H+ (aq) + A- (aq)
Initial amt: Co 0 0
Change: - α Co + α Co + α Co
Eqm: Co (1- α) α Co α Co
Ka = [H ][A ] ( Co )( Co ) Co
+ 2
[HA] Co (1 ) (1 )
Since Ka is constant at a given temp, dilution law states that any decrease in concentration must be accompanied by an
increase in the degree of ionization. For a weak acid in which α is very small such that (1- α) ≈ 1. Therefore,
Ka = α2 Co Ka Kb = α2 Co Kb
Co Co
For a weak acid, α increases with increasing dilution and is therefore NOT constant at a given temperature.
13.5) Salts of Weak Acids and Bases- Salt Hydrolysis (pg 22-25)
- Salts are produced when acids react with bases, making up of a cation (from base) and an
anion (from acid). When salts dissolve in water to form solutions, the resultant cations/
anions can undergo hydrolysis to form acidic or alkaline solutions.
- Whether the salt dissolves to form a neutral, acidic or alkaline solution depends on the acid
and the base which react to give the salt:
Types giving Elaboration
rise to salt
Strong base- When added to water, complete dissociation of NaCl occurs. Both Na+ and Cl- ions do not
strong acid undergo hydrolysis, so [H+] = [OH-] in aq. NaCl and the solution is thus neutral. pH = 7 at 25oC
(aq Na+Cl-)
Strong base- When added to water, complete dissociation of CH3COO- Na+ occurs. Being the anion of a
weak acid weak acid, CH3COO- is a relatively strong conjugate base and hydrolyses in water (partially
(aq CH3COO- cuz it’s still a weak base as seen by its low Kb value) to give OH- ions.
Na+) CH3COO- (aq) + H2O (l) CH3COOH (aq) + OH- (aq)
Slight excess of OH- ions generated by hydrolysis of the anion of a weak acid causes the
solution to be alkaline. pH > 7 at 25oC
weak base- When added to water, complete dissociation of NH4Cl occurs. Being the cation of a weak
strong acid base NH3, NH4+ is a relatively strong conjugate acid and hydrolyses in water (partially cuz it’s
(aq NH4+Cl-) still a weak acid as seen by its low Ka value) to give H3O+ ions.
NH4+ (aq) + H2O (l) NH3 (aq) + H3O+ (aq)
Slight excess of H3O+ ions generated by hydrolysis of the cation of a weak base causes the
solution to be acidic. pH < 7 at 25oC
weak base- When added to water, complete dissociation of CH3COO- NH4+ occurs. CH3COO- is a strong
weak acid conjugate base and NH4+ is a strong conjugate acid. The aq solution may be slightly
(aq CH3COO- acidic/alkaline or neutral depending on the relative conc. of H3O+ & OH- ions formed.
NH4+) Acidic if Ka of cation > Kb of anion,
Neutral if Ka of cation = Kb of anion
Alkaline if Ka of cation < Kb of anion
Since Ka of NH4+ > Kb of CH3COO-, a solution of CH3COONH4 is weakly acidic.
Solutions of Salts of Weak Acid Solutions of Salts of Weak Base
Salts of weak acids contain anion of weak acids. Since the Salts of weak bases contain cations which are conjugate
anion of the weak acid hydrolyses partially in water to acids of weak bases. Since the cation of the weak base
give OH-, it has a Kb and is related to Ka of weak acid by: hydrolyses partially in water to give H3O+, it has a Ka and
14
Kb of conjugate base A- = Kw = 1.0 10 is related to Kb of weak base by:
Ka of HA Ka of HA Ka of conjugate acid BH+ = Kw = 1.0 10 14
The pH of a solution of the salt of a weak acid with initial Kb of B Kb of B
conc, Co, may be calculated given its Kb of the anion OR The pH of a solution of the salt of a weak base with initial
Ka of the weak acid, or vice versa. conc, Co, may be calculated given its Ka of the cation OR
If we assume [OH-] << Co, so (Co – [OH-]) ≈ Co. Kb of the weak base, or vice versa.
If we assume [H+] << Co, so (Co – [H+]) ≈ Co.
x [OH ] Kb Co = Kw
Co
Ka x [ H ] Ka Co = Kw Kw
Co , pH = -lg Co
pOH = -lg Kw , pH = pKw - pOH Kb Kb
Co
Ka
13.6) Buffer Solutions (pg 26-32)
Buffer Solution: Able to resist a change in pH upon addition of a small amount of acid/base.
Buffer solutions contain both an acidic species and a basic species (in large amounts) to react
respectively with any base/acid added:
Acidic buffer: consists of a mixture of a weak acid and its salt.
Alkaline buffer: consists of a mixture of a weak base and its salt.
Acidic Buffers
- Consists of a mixture of a large reservoir of unionized weak acid & a salt containing the
conjugate base of the weak acid.
CH3COOH (aq) CH3COO- + H+ (aq) (reaction 1 partial dissociation)
CH3COO-Na+ (aq) CH3COO- + Na+ (aq) (reaction 2 complete dissociation)
According to Le Chatelier’s Principle, the presence of CH3COO- ions from the complete
dissociation of sodium ethanoate further suppresses the dissociation of ethanoic acid
(reaction 1), in fact more ethanoic acid is produced! Hence the buffer solution contains a
relatively high concentration of the unionized ethanoic acid (weak acid) and ethanoate ion
(conjugate base of the weak acid). These relatively high concentrations of both the ethanoic
acid and the ethanoate ion enable the solution to function as a buffer. The acidic buffer:
1) Adds a small amount of acid (H+ ions) to the solution
- When a small amount of H+ ions is added, nearly all the H+ added will be removed by the
large reservoir of CH3COO- ions to form CH3COOH. [H+] does not increase significantly and
the pH is kept approximately constant.
2) Addition of base (OH- ions) to the solution
- When a small amount of OH- ions is added, nearly all the OH- added will be removed by the
large reservoir of CH3COOH ions to form CH3COO-. [OH-] does not increase significantly and
the pH is kept approximately constant.
Alkaline Buffers
- Consists of a mixture of a large reservoir of unionized weak base & a salt containing the
conjugate acid of the weak base.
NH3 (aq) + H2O (l) NH4+ + H+ (aq) (reaction 1 partial ionization)
NH4Cl (aq) NH4+ + Cl- (aq) (reaction 2 complete ionization)
According to Le Chatelier’s Principle, the presence of NH4+ ions from the complete ionization
of ammonium chloride further suppresses the ionization of aq ammonia (reaction 1), in fact
more ammonia is produced! Hence the buffer solution contains a relatively high
concentration of the unionized aq ammonia (weak base) and ethanoate ion (conjugate base
of the weak acid). These relatively high concentrations of both the ethanoic acid and NH4+
ions. The alkaline buffer:
Buffering Capacity:
Amount of acid/base that may be added to a buffer solution before its pH changes
appreciably, it represents the ability of a buffer to resist changes in pH. Buffer solution is
most effective in resisting changes in pH when:
(a) the number of moles of both the weak acid/base and its salt are large relative
to that of the acid/base to be added to the buffer solution
(b) Weak acid/base to salt concentration ratio is close to 1:1.
ACIDIC BUFFER ALKALINE BUFFER
[ A ] ≈ 1, pH = pKa + lg [ A ] ≈ pKa [BH ] ≈ 1, pOH = pKb + lg [BH ] ≈ pKb
[HA] [HA] [B] [B]
When [ A ] = 1, maximum buffer capacity is When [BH ] = 1, maximum buffer capacity is
[HA] [B]
attained. pH = pKa, since lg [ A ] = lg 1 = 0. attained. pOH = pKb, since lg [BH ] = lg 1 = 0.
[HA] [B]
Effect of Dilution on pH of buffer: pH = pKa + lg [ A ] , pOH = pKb + lg [BH ]
[HA] [B]
From that equation, it can be seen that diluting the buffer has no effect on the pH/pOH
because the concentrations of HA and A- (or B and BH+) are reduced by the same extent (i.e.
the value [ A ] / [BH ] is unchanged.)
[HA] [B]
However, dilution has a marked effect on buffering capacity. It reduces the ability of the
buffer to cope with contaminating acid and base.
TYPE OF TITRATION e.g. of acid e.g. of base Marked pH change Suitable indicator
Strong acid- strong base HCl NaOH 4 - 10 All can use (1,4 preferred)
Weak acid- Strong base CH3COOH NaOH 7.5 - 10.5 4,5
Strong acid- weak base HCl NH3 3.5 - 6.5 1,2
Weak acid- weak base CH3COOH NH3 No marked change NIL
Titration Curve of Strong Acid-Strong Base Reaction
The graph below shows the change in pH of the reaction
mixture when aq NaOH of concentration 0.100moldm-3 was
added to 25.0cm of 0.100moldm-3 dil HCl:
START: Initial pH is low because EQUIVALENCE POINT: Region of rapid pH END: Excess NaOH is added
the acid used is a strong acid. pH change: Sudden increase in pH over the after equivalence point.
3
remains low from 0-25cm as the equivalence point (pH 410) when one Titration curve flattens out
solution still contains strong acid or two drops of base are added from the at a high pH as the base
that has not yet been neutralized. burette. At equivalence point, solution used is a strong acid.
contains NaCl, pH = 7 (neutral).
START: Initial HALF- EQUIVALENCE POINT: EQUIVALENCE POINT: Region of rapid pH END: Excess
pH (1<pH <7) Change in PH is fairly constant change: Shorter and occurs at a higher pH base
is not very low due to the formation of a range than that of a SA-SB titration. At titration curve
as a weak acid effective buffer when large equivalence point, CH3COOH is exactly flattens out at
is used. ([H+] = amounts of the weak acid and neutralized by aq NaOH and solution a high pH as
KaCo , its salt are present. (pH at contains CH3COO-Na+ (aq) pH of the the base used
calculate pH) half-eqv pt is where [HA ] = [A- resultant solution is >7, as CH3COO- is a strong
], pH = pKa) hydrolyses in water to give OH-. base.
START: Initial HALF- EQUIVALENCE POINT: EQUIVALENCE POINT: Region of rapid pH END: Excess
pH (7<pH <13) Change in PH is fairly constant change: Shorter and occurs at a lower pH acid
is not very due to the formation of a range than that of a SA-SB titration. At titration curve
high as a weak effective buffer when large equivalence point, NH3 is exactly flattens out at
base is used. amounts of the weak base and neutralized by dil HCl and solution a low acidic pH
[OH-] = KbCo , its salt are present. (pOH at contains NH4Cl. The pH of the resultant as the acid
calculate pH) half-eqv pt where [B] = [BH+], solution is <7, as NH4+ hydrolyses in water used is a
pOH = pKb) to give H+. strong acid.
Titration Curve of Weak Acid-Weak Base Reaction
The graph below shows the change in pH of the reaction
mixture when aq NH3 of concentration 0.100moldm-3 was
added to 25.0cm of 0.100moldm-3 ethanoic acid:
START: Initial EQUIVALENCE POINT: There is no straight, vertical END: After eqv pt has passed,
pH is relatively section on the graph change in pH at the equivalence titration curve flattens out at a
high because point is not as sharp as any of the previous titrations. fairly low alkaline pH value
the acid used is - pH at eqv pt < 7, if Ka of WA > Kb of WB since excess base present is a
a weak acid. - pH at eqv pt > 7, if Ka of WA < Kb of WB weak base.
* NO suitable indicator for this titration as rapid pH change is absent in WA-WB titration.
It is named the double indicator method, as there are two equivalence points that can be
identified using 2 different indicators.
From the titration curve, every equivalence point can be identified by using:
- Phenolphthalein indicator: solution changes from pink to colourless when reaction A is
complete (when sodium carbonate is only half-neutralized)
- Methyl Orange indicator: solution changes from yellow to orange when reaction B is
complete (when sodium carbonate is completely neutralized –CO2 formed)
SOLUBILITY EQUILIBRIUM (Lecture Notes 13b)
13.8) Dissolution as an Equilibrium Process (pg 2)
Soluble Salts: Dissociate fully in solution into their constituent ions.
Sparingly Soluble Salt:
Dissociates partially in solution to their constituent ions, as salt added↑, concentration of
ions ↑till point of saturation (contains maximum amount of dissolved solute at a particular
temperature in the presence of undissolved solute) (Unsaturated solution: less solute than
solution is capable of dissolving under the same given conditions)
Ions in saturated solution are in dynamic equilibrium (dissolution and precipitation happen
at the same rate, rate of Frwd rxn = rate of bkwd rxn) with excess undissolved solid. There
is no net change in concentrations of the ions.
13.9) Solubility Product, Ksp (pg 2-3)
Equilibrium established in a saturated solution of a sparingly soluble salt with general
formula MaXb: MaXb (s) aMb+ (aq) + bXa- (aq)
The concentration of a pure solid, which is proportional to its density is constant at a
particular temperature. Since [MaXb (s)] is constant at a given temp, then:
Kc[MaXb (s)] = [Mb+ (aq)]a [Xa- (aq)]b = constant.
Hence we can define a new equilibrium constant called solubility product, Ksp:
Ksp of MaXb (s) = [Mb+ (aq)]a [Xa- (aq)]b units: (moldm-3) a+b
Solubility product, Ksp equilibrium constant (Kc) for the equilibrium established
between the undissolved sparingly soluble salt & its constituent ions in a SATURATED
solution. Ksp varies with temperature. If a solution at a particular temperature is
unsaturated, the equilibrium between the excess undissolved solute and the dissolved ions
DOES NOT EXIST Ksp is not defined.
Hydroxides of Na+, K+ & larger Group 2 cations (Ca2+, Ba2+) Most hydroxides (OH-)
Sulfides of Na+, K+, NH4+ & Group 2 cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, Ba2+) Most sulfides (S2-)
Carbonates/ Phosphates of Na+, K+, NH4+ Most carbonates (CO32-) & phosphates
(PO43-)
Chromates of Na+, K+, NH4+ & small Group 2 cations (Mg2+) Most chromates (CrO42-)
Solubility and Solubility Product:
Solubility products give a direct comparison of the solubility of two salts only IF the total
number of ions produced in solution is the SAME in both cases (AgCl and BaCO3) in that
case, the higher the Ksp value, the higher the solubility of the ionic compound. If total no.
of ions produced is different, then solubility products do not give a comparison of solubilities
and a calculation must be performed.
* You will need to calculate Ksp from solubility/solubility from Ksp. There might be
discrepancy between the calculated Ksp vs theory due to the incorrect assumption that the
salt dissociates completely in aq solution. There might be another equilibrium reaction to
consider for the dissolution of the salt. Also, use ‘s moldm-3’ and not ‘x moldm-3’ when
calculating solubility.
- Aq. NaOH (strong base) ionizes completely in aq solution to give OH- ions
- Aq. NH3 (weak base) ionizes partially in aq solution to give OH- ions
NH3 (aq) + H2O (l) NH4+ (aq) + OH- (aq)
In a mixture of NH3 (aq) & NH4Cl (aq), ionization of NH3 to form OH- ions is suppressed by the
common ion effect since NH4Cl undergoes complete dissociation to NH4+ & Cl- ions. Thus, the
increase in [NH4+] suppresses the partial ionization of NH3 (aq). The position of equilibrium
shifts to the left such that the [OH-] in solution which is low at any time is made even lower.
The formation of a ppt depends on the Ksp value of the metal hydroxide.
(1) Metal ions, whose hydroxides have a moderately low Ksp forms a ppt in aq NH3 but
not in a mixture of NH3 and NH4Cl. (For example, when aq NH3 is added to Mg2+ (aq)
solution, [OH-] increases. At that instant, ionic product > Ksp, Mg(OH)2 is ppted out.
When a mixture of NH3 and NH4Cl is added to the same Mg2+ solution, [OH-]
increases but is too low to make the ionic product > Ksp no ppt results.
(2) Metal ions, whose hydroxides have a very low Ksp forms a ppt in both aq NH3 and a
mixture of NH3 and NH4Cl. Despite the low conc of OH- available in the mixture of
NH3 and NH4Cl, it is not high enough for ionic product > Ksp. Thus ppt occurs even
when a mixture of NH3 and NH4Cl was added to a solution containing Cr3+ ions.
The solubility of a sparingly soluble salt may be enhanced upon the addition of a reagent
that consumes the cation/anion of the salt (reagent forms a complex ion with the cation) .
When the conc of the anion is decreased, according to LCP, eqm position will shift to the
right (ionic product < Ksp) to counteract the decrease in the ion and cause more salt to
dissolve. MaXb (s) aMb+ (aq) + bXa- (aq)
ELECTROCHEMISTRY (Lecture Notes 18)
18.1) Preamble (pg 2-5)
RECALL FROM CHAPTER 1: OXIDATION NUMBERS AND STATES
* Recall negative/positive oxidation number more/less electronegative respectively
*Recall oxidizing: increase in oxidation state, loss of electrons, occurs at anode.
*Recall reducing: decrease in oxidation state, gain of electrons, occurs at cathode.
*Recall oxidizing agent: oxidize another substance, is reduced itself.
*Recall reducing agent: reduce another substance, is oxidized itself.
*Recall disproportionation reactions. (Chpt 1)
Electrolyte: Conducts electric current (and is decomposed) when it is in aqueous solution or
molten state. An electrolyte conducts electricity due to the flow of charge carried by its ions.
Strong/Weak/Non Electrolyte:
Compound which ionizes fully/partially/not at all in aqueous/molten solution respectively
A) ELECTRODE POTENTIALS
18.2.1) Introduction (pg 5-6)
When a strip of metal M is placed in a solution of its ions, M can be oxidized, Mn+ can be
reduced. Over time, the separation of charge across the metal-solution interface creates a
potential difference between the metal and solution. Electrode potential, E of an element is
the potential difference between an aqeous solution of its ions and the element when it is in
equilibrium with that solution. Electrode potential depends on standard conditions (25oC, 1
moldm-3, 1 atm). Standard conditions are mentioned in Chapter 5, under enthalpy.
Mn+ (aq) + ne- M (s) E = positive OR negative, depending on position of equilibrium
2+ -
Zn + 2e Zn (s) E<0
- Position of equilibrium lies more to the left. Zn has a greater tendency to dissolve as
ions and a lower tendency to be deposited as metal.
Cu2+ + 2e- Cu (s) E>0
- Position of equilibrium lies more to the right. Cu has a greater tendency to dissolve
as ions and a lower tendency to be deposited as metal.
The ion/ion half-cell consists of an inert electrode dipped into a solution containing ions of
the same element in 2 different oxidation states.
Each system primarily contains the same element in different oxidation states. In the
absence of a metal in the half-cell, platinum is used as the inert electrode. When a half-cell
is connected to a S.H.E, the resultant system has a potential difference (I.e. electromotive
force or e.m.f), measured with a voltmeter. If this e.m.f is measured under standard
conditions, its value is known as the standard electrode potential, Eo of the Mn+/M half cell.
Standard Electrode Potential, Eo, of a half cell electromotive force btwn half-cell &
standard hydrogen electrode(S.H.E) measured at standard conditions (298K/1atm/1moldm-3)
Salt Bridge: COMPLETES the circuit, does not allow mixing of the solutions in the two half-
cells. It is also used to maintain electrical neutrality. As oxidation and reduction occur, ions
in the salt bridge migrate so as to ‘neutralize’ the increasing charge in the two half-cells.
Migration of ions is necessary to ensure the continuous smooth operation of the
electrochemical cell until the reactants are used up. The cations migrate to the cathode,
while the anions migrate to the anode.
a) MEASURING STANDARD ELECTRODE
POTENTIAL FOR METAL/METAL ION SYSTEM:
You must learn to draw this!
Electrons flow from the metal/metal ion half-cell to
the S.H.E (since oxidation takes place) (flow of e is
opp. to direction of conventional current)
Anode: Mg Mg2+ +2e- (Mg is oxidized to Mg2+)
Cathode: 2H+ 2e- +H2 (H+ is reduced to H2)
At standard conditions, the reading first shown on the voltmeter gives the standard
electrode potential, Eo, of the Mg2+(aq)/Mg (s) half cell.
Mg2+(aq) + 2e- Mg (s) Eo = -0.76 V
The Eo is often written as a reduction potential. The voltmeter measures the potential
difference between the two half cells. Since the potential for the S.H.E is arbitrarily assigned
as zero volts, the voltmeter reading can be treated as the potential of the metal half-cell.
b) MEASURING STANDARD ELECTRODE
POTENTIAL FOR GAS/ION SYSTEM:
You must learn to draw this! Electrons
flow from the S.H.E to the gas/ion half-cell
(unlike earlier example since reduction takes
place! (Positive Eo value))
Anode: H2 2H+ +2e- (oxidation)
Cathode: F2 + 2e- 2F- (reduction)
F2 (g) + 2e- 2F- (aq) Eo = +2.87 V
c) MEASURING STANDARD ELECTRODE POTENTIAL FOR ION/ION SYSTEM:
You must learn to draw this! Electrons flow from the S.H.E to the ion/ion half-cell (unlike
earlier example since reduction takes place! (positive Eo value)
Anode: H2 2H+ +2e- (oxidation)
Cathode: Fe3+ + e- Fe2+ (reduction)
Fe3+ (aq) + e- Fe2+ (aq) Eo = +0.77 V
18.2.5) Information obtained from Standard Electrode Potential, Eo
(pg 12-14)
By convention, redox potentials are written as reduction processes (like how you see them
on your data booklet) The electrode potentials of half cells, E, are known as redox potentials.
Standard electrode potentials (Eo) are relative values since all electrode potentials are
measured wrt the standard hydrogen electrode. The magnitude of Eo measures the
tendency of reduction. The more positive the Eo value, the more likely reduction occurs wrt
the standard hydrogen electrode. For example,
Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- Cu (s) Eo = +0.34V
Reduction of Cu2+ Cu occurs more favourably compared to the reduction of H+ H2.
Hence, reduction will occur in the Cu2+/Cu half cell (CATHODE )and oxidation will occur in
the H+/H2 half-cell (ANODE). Thus, a positive Eo value position of eqm lies to the right,
while a more negative Eo value position of eqm lies to the left.
*Note! Multiplying a half-equation by “2” or any other factor will not alter the value of Eo.
Redox Series: Compilation of standard electrode potentials Eo found in the data booklet.
- Species on LHS are reduced in forward reaction, act as oxidizing agents
- Species on RHS are oxidized in backward reaction, act as reducing agents
For series arranged in order of decreasing Eo values, species on LHS at the top are strong
oxidizing agents, those on the RHS at the bottom are strong reducing agents. Therefore,
standard reduction potentials Eo can be used to compare the relative oxidizing/reducing
powers for a given set of species.
Reactivity Series of Metals: Relative reactivity of metals ease of which metals lose é.
Mn+ (aq) +ne- M (s) Eo
Given Ag+ (+0.80V) to Li+ (-3.04V), reactivity increases from Ag+ to Li+, Eo becomes more
negative and loses electrons more readily, thus forming positive ions more readily. Metal
oxidizes more readily and becomes stronger reducing agents. Thus from this given example,
Li is the strongest reducing agent while Ag is the weakest. Thus given two Eo values, we are
able to predict which redox reactions will occur if we were to connect any two half-cells.
Al3+ (aq) + 3e- Al (s) Eo = -1.66V
Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- Cu (s) Eo = +0.34V
Overall redox reaction: 3Cu2+ (aq) + 2Al (s) 3Cu (s) + 2Al3+ (aq)
Cu2+/Cu half-cell has a more positive Eo value as compared to the Al3+/Al half-cell. Thus, Cu2+
has a greater tendency to be reduced. Al is thus oxidized. Electricity is thus generated and
electrons flow from the Al3+/Al half-cell to the Cu2+/Cu half-cell.
Standard cell potential (Ecello ): Maximum potential difference between two half-cells
under standard conditions. It gives a measure of the electromotive force (emf) which
“pumps” electrons around the circuit. By convention, oxidation half-cell is placed on the left,
while the reduction half-cell is placed on the right. éflow from anode (ox) to cathode (red)
Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- Cu (s) Eo = +0.34V Cu2+/Cu, Cu2+ is more likely to be reduced, and acts as
an oxidizing agent. Hence Zn2+ is oxidized and loses é.
Cathode rxn (red) Cu2+ (aq) + 2e- Cu (s) USE FULL ARROWS, not
Anode rxn (ox) Zn (s) Zn (aq) + 2e
2+
A cream ppt (CuI) in brown solution (I2) is observed when blue Cu2+ (aq) is mixed with
colourless I- (aq) as CuI is insoluble. Due to side reaction happening, [Cu2+ (aq)] becomes
VERY LOW, such that Ecathode becomes much larger than +0.15V. Thus, it is possible for Ecell to
be > 0 spontaneous
B) ELECTROLYSIS
18.3.1) Introduction (pg 30-31)
Electrolysis: Process of passing electricity from an
external source to force a non-spontaneous redox rxn to
occur, by converting electrical energy chemical energy.
It takes place in a cell called the electrolytic cell.
More than one species can be reduced/oxidized. Which species will be preferentially
discharged at the electrodes will depend on the electrode potentials of the competing
species (which require referring to the Data Booklet)
(b) Position of Ions in the Redox Series
At the cathode, both Na+ (aq) & H2O (l) molecules are competing to undergo reduction.
Based on Eo values, 2H2O (l) + 2e- (aq) H2 (g) + 2OH- (aq) Eo = -0.83V
Na+ (aq) + e- Na (s) Eo = +1.36V
Since the Eo (H2O/H2) is less negative (more positive) than Eo (Na+/Na), H2O has a greater
tendency to be reduced than Na+ and is thus preferentially discharged. Hence,
Cathode reaction: 2H2O + 2e- H2 + 2OH-
At the anode, both Cl- (aq) & H2O (l) molecules are competing to undergo oxidation.
Based on Eo values, O2 (g) + 4H+ (aq) + 4e- 2H2O (l) Eo = +1.23V
Cl2 (g) + 2e- 2Cl- (aq) Eo = +1.36V
Since the Eo (O2/H2O) is less positive than Eo (Cl2/Cl-), H2O has a greater tendency to be
oxidized than Na+ and is thus preferentially discharged. Hence,
Anode reaction: 2H2O (l) O2 (g) + 4H+ (aq) + 4e-
OVERALL REACTION: 2H2O (l) 2H2 (g) + O2 (g)
Hence, electrolysis of NaCl (aq) actually results in the electrolysis of water!!!
(c) Relative Concentrations of the Species
The higher the concentration of any aqueous ion in the electrolyte, the more likely it will be
discharged. This factor often overrides the factor of the “position of the ions” (ion in high
concentration may be discharged even though its Eo value makes it unfavourable) Consider
the electrolysis of brine (conc NaCl):
O2 (g) + 4H+ (aq) + 4e- 2H2O (l) Eo = +1.23V EQUATION 1
Cl2 (g) + 2e- 2Cl- (aq) Eo = +1.36V EQUATION 2
o
Under non-standard conditions, prediction using E values fail. Here, [Cl] is much greater
than [H2O] position of equilibrium of Cl2 reduction equation shifts to
the left, such that E becomes much less than +1.36V. Thus, Cl- (aq) is
preferentially discharged to form Cl2 (g), as the first equation has a
more positive Eo value than the second equation now.
This is because upon exposure to air, aluminium acquires a protective layer of aluminium
oxide (Al2O3) which protects the underlying metal from water and any further chemical
attack. However, the layer is not thick enough and can be enhanced through anodizing,
which is the process of coating aluminium objects with aluminium electrolytically.
Amount of electrons, ne = Q
96500
mol or Q = neF
c) FARADAY’S SECOND LAW ***** (v impt)
Amt of charge required to discharge 1 mole of an element depends on charge, z, of an ion. In
other words, number of Faradays required to discharge 1 mole of ion at electrode EQUALS
the number of charges on the ion.
To discharge 1 mole of Implications
Na+ requires 1F (96500C) of electricity Na+ + e- Na (96500C to produce 23.0g of Na)
Mg2+ requires 2F (2 X 96500C) of electricity Mg2+ + 2e- 2Mg (193000C to produce 24.3g of Mg)
Al3+ requires 3F (3 X 96500C) of electricity Al3+ + 3e- Al (289500C to produce 27.0g of Al)