Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3 Organizational MNGT
3 Organizational MNGT
3 Organizational MNGT
MANAGEMENT
MEANING OF ORGANIZATION
DEFINITION OF ORGZN AND
STEPS IN ORGANIZATION
WHAT IS ORGANIZATION ?
• 2. FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION
WORK MANAGER
WORKERS WORKERS
•AS SHOWN IN THE FIGURE THE AUTHORITY DIRECTLY FLOWS FROM THE
WORKS MANAGER TO SUERINTENDENT (1 & 2) TO FOREMEN AND FROM THEM
TO WORKERS.
• DEMERITS :
1. IT NOT FOCUS ON SPECIALIST OR IT NEGLECTS SECIALISTS.
2. SUPERIORS ARE OVER LOADED.
3. THE PERSONNEL REQUIRED SHOULD BE HIGHLY SKILLFUL AND
QUALIFIED TO MEET THE CHALLENGES.
4. MORE WASTAGES NAD MAN HOURS B’COS OF LACK OF SPECIALIZATION.
5. IT IS LIMITED TO SMALL CONCERNS.
LINE AND STAFF ORGANIZATION
BOD-BOARD OF DIRECTORS
G.M-GENERAL MANNAGER
W.M-WORKS MANAGER
SECRETARY B.O.D LEGAL ADVISOR
SUPTD-1 SUPTD-2
WORKERS WORKERS
THIS TYPE OF ORGZN COMBINES THE LINE ORGZN WITH STAFF DEPT.THAT SUPPORT
AND ADVISE LINE DEPARTMENT.LINE ORGZN STEP BY STEP DEVELOP AS LINE & STAFF
ORGANIZATION.
MERITS AND DEMARITS OF LINE &STAFF ORGZN
• ADVANTAGES :
1. DUE TO PROPER SRUCTURE AND SPECIALIZATION, QUALITY OF PRODUCT
IS IMPROVED.
2. MORE TIME IS AVAILABLE TO THE SUPERIORS TO DO THEIR NORMAL
WORK.
3. DUE TO PROPER DIVISION OF WORK THERE IS LESS WASTAGES OF
MATERIAL,MEN AND MACHINE HOURS.
4. MORE DISCILPINE CAN BE MAINTAINED.
DIS ADVANTAGES :
1. DUE TO INCREASE IN STAFF MEMBERS & DUE TO THEIR HIGH SALARIES
AND OTHER OFFICIAL EXPENSES THE COST OF PRODUCT INCREASED.
2. IF FUNCTIONS ARE NOT PROPERLY CLEARED BY LINE & STFF ORGZN MAY
GET CONFUSE.
3. DUE TO LACK OF RESONSIBILITY AT TOP LEVEL DISCIPLINE AT LOWER
LEVEL IS LESS.
4. MISTRUST CAN DEVELOP BETWEEN STAFF & LINE POSITION.
SUPERINTENDENT
OFFICE SHOP
INSTRCTION CLEARK TIME & COST CLEARK SPEED BOSS GANG BOSS
DISCIPLINARIAN
INSPECTOR
ROUTE CLEARK
REPAIR BOSS
WORKERS-WORKERS-WORKERS-WORKERS-WORKERS-WORKERS
• IN THE LINE ORGZN THER IS MISSING THE PART OF SPECIALIZATION. DUE TO
SPECIALIZATION IT IS POSSIBLE TO ASSIGN RIGHT JOB TO THE RIGHT PERSON.
THUS PRODUCTIVITY CAN BE INCREASED. F.W. TAYLOR SUGGESTED THE
FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION.
1. REPAIR BOSS:- WHO TAKES CARE FOR THE ADEQUATE REPAIRS AND
MAINTAINANCE OF EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. VERY COSTLY TO APPOINT DIFFERENT SPECIALIST.
2. DISCIPLINE IS DIFFICULT AS EACH WORKER IS UNDER THE SUPERVISION
OF 8- FUNCTIONAL FOREMAN.
3. WORKERS GET CONFUSED ABOUT TE AUTHORITY AND ACTIVITY OF EACH
FOREMAN.
4. INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS BECOME MORE COMPLEX.
5. COST OF PRODUCTION INCREASES.
(IT IS FREQUENTLY USED IN SOME MOST MODERN & ADVANCE CONCERNS.)
DEPARTMENTALIZATION
• TO MAKE THE ORGANIZATIONAL WORK BETTER,THE CONCEPT OF
DEPARTMENTLIZATION HAS COME INTO PICTURE.
• DERATMENTALIZATION IS THE PROCESS OF BREAKING DOWN AN ENTERRISE
INTO VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS DEPENDING ON THE REQUIREMENT OF
ORGANIZATION.
ADVANTAGES OF DEPARTMENTALIZATION:
1. IT ROVIDES A PLATFORM ON WHICH TOP MANAGEMENT CAN COORDINATE
THE ACTIVITIES OF DIFFERENT DEPTS.
2. IT FACILITAES IN INCRESE ENTRPRISES EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCT.
3. DEPT MANAGER GETS TIME TO CONTRIBUTE MORE IN MANAGIRIAL
WORK,THAN PARTICIPATING IN CORE OR ENGINEERING ACTIVITIES.
BOD
G.M
MERITS:
1. PROPER AND SYATEMMATIC WORKING.
2. CLEAR CUT OF LINE AUTHORITY.
3. SUITABLE FOR SMALL CONCERNS.
4. COMPACTNESS OF AUTHORITY IN ONE HAND.
DEMERITS:
1. NOT SUITABLE FOR BIG ORGANIZATION.
2. DESCISION MAKING IS LATE IN ABSENSE OF AUTHORITY PERSON.
3. MISUSE OF AUTHORITY DUE TO ONE MAN SHOW.
DECENTRALIZATION OF AUTHORITY
DEMERITS:
1. MORE DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY MAY AUTOMATICALLY CREATE MORE
UNITY OF COMMAND WHICH CREATES CONFUSION.
2. EXECUTIVE IS ALSO MADE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAPSES MADE BY
SUBORDINATES (WHO HAS RECEIVED AUTHORITY).
3. DURING POLICY DECISION MEETING, THERE MAY BE CONFUSION,DELAY
ON ACCOUNT OF MORE AUTHORITY CENTERS.
SPAN OF CONTROL
SPAN OF CONTROL:
ADVANTAGES :
1. EASY FORMATION AND NO LEGAL FOMALITIES.
2. STRUCTURE OF ORGANIZATION IS SIMPLE.
3. OWNER IS FREE TO MAKE DECISIONS.QUICK DECISIONS ARE TAKEN.
4. PROFITS ARE FULLY ENJOYED BY THIS SINGLE OWNER.
5. BUSINESS SECRETS CAN BE MAINTAINED.
6. DUE TO PERSONAL ATTENTION, QUALITY OF WORK IS EXCELLENT.
7. SINGLE OWNER CAN ANYTIME DISCONTINUE HIS OR HER BUSINESS.
DISADVANTAGES :
1. LIABILITY AND ALL DEBT OF THE FIRM IS RESPONSIBILITY OF THE SINGLE
OWNER. I.e., HIGH RISK IS INVOLVED IN BUSINESS.
2. RATE OF GROWTH IS LOW.
3. LIFE OF BUSINESS IS UNCERTAIN.
4. POSSIBILITY OF EXPANSION IS LESS.
5. IT IS LIMITED TO SMALL SCALE FIRMS.
6. DUE TO LIMITED FINANCE AVAILABLE, QUALIFIED PERSONS CAN NOT BE
EMPLOYED.
7. MODERN EQUIPMENT AND MACHINERY CANNOT BE MADE EASILY
AVAILABLE.
PARTENERSHIP OWNERSHIP
• TYPES OF PARTNERS :
Thus , partnership deed gives stability to firm. It makes all tings clear and simple.
TYPES OF PARTNERSHIP
1. GENERAL PARTNERSHIP:
HERE LARGE CAPITAL IS AVAILABLE TO THE FIRM. THIS TYPE OF THE FIRM
POSSESES MUCH BETTER TALENT, JUDGEMENT AND SKILLS. THIS TYPE
OF FIRM HAS LEGAL STATUS. IN THIS PARTNERSHIP, PARTNERS HAVE
FULL CONTROL OF THE BUSINESS AND FULL RIGHT TO ALL PROFIT. HERE
PARTNERS CAN ENJOY TAX ADVANTAGES DUE TO PARTNERSHIP.FOR ALL
LOSSES, THERE ARE MORE THAN ONE PERSON IS TO SHARE THEM, SO
EASY TO ARRANGE THE DEBTS OR LOSSES.
1. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP IS ASSOCIATION OF ONE OR MORE GENERAL
PARTNERS WHO MANAGE THE BUSINESS AND ONE OR MORE LIMITED
PARTNERS WHOSE LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THE CAPITAL THEY HAVE
INVESTED IN THE BUSINESS.
LIMITED PARTENERS SHARE THE PROFIT BUT THEY DO NOT PARTICIPATE
OR INTERFERE WITH THE CONTROL OR MANAGEMENT OF THE FIRM.
LIMITED PARTNER TYPE OF OWNERSHIP IS EASY AND LESS COSTLY TO
FORM.
ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF PARTNERSHIP
ADVANTAGES:
1. LARGE CAPITAL IS AVAILABLE TO FIRM, THAN THE INDIVIDUAL OWNERSHIP.
2. RISK IS DIVIDED ACCORDING TO INVESTMENT
3. LIMITED LIABILITY.
4. IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH TAX BENEFITS.
5. BANK LOANS ARE EASILY SANCTIONED.
6. PARTNERS HAVE GOOD CONTROL OVER BUSINESS.
7. PARTNERS POSSESS DIFFERENT SKILLS, EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE, SO
CORRECT DECISION CAN BE TAKEN AND INCENTIVE FOR SUCCESS IS HIGH.
DISADVANTAGES:
1. MOST IMPORTANT DRAWBACK IS SHORT LIFE.
2. ALL PARTNERS SUFFERS B’COS OF WRONG STEP TAKEN BY ONE PARTNER.
3. DEATH OF PARTNER MAY DISSOLVE PARTNERSHIP.
4. SECRETS OF BUSINESS CANNOT BE MAINTAINED.
5. CONFLICTS AND MISUNDERSTANDINGS MAY CREATES PROBLEMS.
6. NOT SUITABLE FOR LARGE SCALE INDUSTRY.
JOINT STOCK COMPANY
ADVANTAGES :
1. LARGE AMOUNT OF MONEY CAN BE RAISED.
2. IT ASSOCIATES LIMITED LIABILITY WITH IT.
3. SHARES ARE TRANSFERABLE.
4. COMPANY’S LIFE IS NOT AFFECTED DUE TO THE DEATH OF
SHAREHOLDERS.
5. RISK OF LOSS IS DIVIDED AMONG MANY SHARE HOLDERS.
DISADVANTAGES :
1. A GOOD DEAL OF LAGAL FORMALITIES IS REQUIRED FOR THE FORMATION
OF A JOINT STOCK COMPANY.
2. BIG SHAREHOLDERS MANAGE THE COMPANY.
3. DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN SECRECY AS IN PARTNERSHIP.
4. OVERALL CONTROL AND DISCIPLINE IS DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN.
5. LABOUR AND UNION PROBLEMS MAY ARISE.
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
IT IS A FORM OF PRIVATE OWNERSHIP WHICH CONTAINS FEATURES OF LARGE
PARTNERSHIP AS WELL AS FEATURES OF THE CORORATION. ITS AIM IS TO ELIMINATE
PROFIT AND PROVIDE GOODS AND SERVICES TO THE MEMBERS OF THE COOPERATIVES.
HERE THE MEMBERS BUY SHARES OR AT SOME FEES AND THE PROFITS ARE
DISTRIBUTED PERIODICALLY
SINCE EACH MEMBER HAS ONE VOTE IRRESPECTIVE OF HOLDING (SHARES). IT
AVOIDS CONCENTRATION OF POWER IN ONE HAND.
IT HAS SHARE HOLDERS, BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER ELECTED OFFICERS.
CO-OPERATIVE ORGANIZATION CAN BE DEFINED AS A VOLUTARY DEMOCRATIC
OWNERSHIP FORMED BY SOME MOTIVATED INDIVIDUAL FOR OBTAINING NECESSARIES
OF EVERYDAY LIFE AT LOWER RATES THAN THOSE IN THE MARKET.
You must have noticed that besides many differences in previous types of organizations
among them in respect of their formation, operation, capital contribution as well as
liabilities, one common similarity is that they all engage in business activities to earn profit.
Without profit it is impossible for them to survive and grow. But there are certain organizations
which undertake business activities with the prime objective of providing service to the
members. Although some amount of profit is essential to survive in the market, their main
intention is not to generate profit and grow. They pool available resources from the members,
utilize the same in the best possible manner and the benefits are shared by the members.
TYPES OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY
• AIMS :