Is the observer different from the thing which he observes?

You, the observer, are observing the fact, which you term as being lonely. Is the
observer different from the thing which he observes? It is different only as long
as he gives it a name; but if you do not give it a name, the observer is the
observed. The name, the term, acts only to divide; and then you have to battle with
that thing. But, if there is no division, if there is an integration between the
observer and the observed, which exists only when there is no naming - you can try
this out and you will see - , then the sense of fear is entirely gone. It is fear
that is preventing you from looking at this when you say, you are empty, you are
this, you are that, you are in despair. And fear exists only as memory, which comes
when you term; but when you are capable of looking at it without terming, then,
surely, that thing is yourself. So, when you come to that point, when you are no
longer naming the thing of which you are afraid, then you are that thing. When you
are that thing, there is no problem, is there? It is only when you do not want to
be that thing, or when you want to make that thing different from what it is, that
the problem arises. But if you are that thing, then the observer is the observed,
they are a joint phenomenon, not separate phenomena; then there is no problem, is
there? Please, experiment with this, and you will see how quickly that thing is
resolved and transcended, and something else takes place. Our difficulty is to come
to that point, when we can look at it without fear; and fear arises only when we
begin to recognize it, when we begin to give it a name, when we want to do
something about it. But, when the observer sees that he is not different from the
thing which he calls emptiness, despair, then the word has no longer a meaning. The
word has ceased to be, it is no longer despair. When the word is removed, with all
its implications, then there is no sense of fear or despair. Then, if you proceed
further, when there is no fear, no despair, when the word is no longer important,
then, surely, there is a tremendous release, a freedom; and in that freedom there
is creative being, which gives a newness to life. To put it differently: We
approach this problem of despair through habitual channels. That is, we bring our
past memories to translate that problem; and thought, which is the result of
memory, which is founded upon the past, can never solve that problem, because it is
a new problem. Every problem is a new problem; and when you approach it, burdened
with the past, it cannot be solved. You cannot approach it through the screen of
words, which is the thinking process; but when the verbalization stops - because
you understand the whole process of it, you leave it - , then you are able to meet
the problem anew; then the problem is not what you think it is. So, you might say
at the end of this question, "What am I to do? Here I am in despair, in confusion,
in pain; you haven't given me a method to follow, to become free." But, surely, if
you have understood what I have said, the key is there: a key which opens much more
than you realize if you are capable of using it.