Professional Documents
Culture Documents
أثر التسويق الداخلي في تحقيق الالتزام الوظيفي
أثر التسويق الداخلي في تحقيق الالتزام الوظيفي
"
%#"
(#
()
* !* + ,- ./ 0 ! 123 . 4
, (" 5-
, !
/ # ! *
2010 /
$
#
) *
) +
' ) )) %$ &$ ' (
" 19 " (( ( - + )$ +( ) , ( - .
/' , ./ 0 1 23 ' 4 2& ) #
./
& 2;, 9 9 4 , 2' ?/ 0@ 1 ' ' +/'
. 9 0 /8 9
. 7( /8 B ) ? 0 2& C' 9 '@ 9- 2
7(
:3)
: ; $ ,4 +"
24 :)"(( =-
;
,4 ! ,2 >
* ; ?@))
: ; $ ,4 +"
: ; $ ,4 +"
$ B
G
. ! '4
!@- H&
...........................................................................
* ........................................................................... E
................................................................... '
F ................................................................... 8B
K ........................................................... 9
9I J
2 .................................................................... 9&
6 ..................................................................... 90 (
12 ............................................................................. !
39 ............................................................ 9
* 0
53 ...................9& 0 * 0 90 /8 9& 0 * 0 9-6
55 ............................................................................ 9&
55 .......................................................................90 M;
55 .................................................................... 90 D4
56 ............................................................... 9 ?/
57 .................................................................... 90 9
F
60 .................................................................... @ * :
62 ................................................................90 *I
65 ........................................................................... 9&
65 ......................................................... 90 9 JG -
93 ......................................................................... 9&
93 ................................................................. * 4 01
96 .......................................................................* -
98 ...................................................................D4 9G
#
,* ! '4
!@- 4
60 ! D 2
67
3*
K /
5
69
3* . 7
70
K /
8
C
74
/
12
3*
76
/
14
C
77
/
15
C
78
! . /
16
3*
.
79 ! . . 17
80
! . /
18
C
81
! . /
19
C
82
, /
20
3*
84
, /
22
C
85
, /
23
C
86
C) /
24
3*
89
C) /
26
C
90
C) /
27
C
,# ! '4
9(- C( 2
19 9 7: 1
61 90 / 2
+
. ! '4
!
!# $ %& ' :N "
,
%$ , ' , )
N ) %0 : 90 L;
9 )$
2 %&( )$ &0 I' ( .B 2 , 9&0 *
( )#
, .
, .01 ) )3 21 P 6 C'
. D I'
: >
L; 9 0 2- 2
, 4 /8 )$ 9- *64
9 @ 9-
)$ C' 9 )$
2 %&( )$ ) %0
9B -
R
, 9/ #0 B )$
* / Q
(400) 9
*N , S3 ( 2044) C' 9 G %# )$ 9
97,5) 90 9 0 ( 391) D40, 2; 0 ( 400) D 2 7( L3
) 0( #0 ' * ( 90 9G -(B 0@ 7( 20 ,(%
. ( 1
.
L( 1
2
N ) %0 : 4 90 ; *- ) MG 28
2
, 28 , 0'
* 4 ( 9 4 ;4 / 7( -
The impact of internal marketing in achieving a
multi-dimensional organizational commitment
to workers in the Greater Amman Municipality
Abstract
The study aims to demonstrate the impact of internal marketing
dimensions (training, empowerment, work teams, and marketing
information, and administrative support) as an independent
variable in achieving the commitment of workers in the Greater
Amman Municipality and through the types of organizational
commitment (continuance, and normative, and emotional) as a
dependent variable.
The researcher relied on primary sources and secondary sources
in the study through books and professional journals in this area,
has been designed questionnaire designed to measure the impact
of the dimensions of internal marketing in achieving the
commitment of workers in the Greater Amman Municipality in the
Jordanian capital Amman, which included workers in the
departments of Central and Executive , The total number of
employees in management positions in its various areas and
services the Greater Amman Municipality (2044), composed the
sample from (400) employees were distributed (400) a
questionnaire to them, and recovered (391) to identify and rate
(97.5), the researcher used the methods appropriate statistical
analysis of the data Kalost mean and standard deviation and
coefficient of regression.
One of the main results of the study reached a trace of the internal
marketing dimensions of the commitment of workers in the Greater
Amman Municipality, as well as a commitment to organizational
factors and the various types of a positive trend, according to the
results of statistical analysis of the study.
The researcher recommended that further efforts towards meeting
the needs of workers and gain the satisfaction to ensure that they
continue to work, as well as the need to focus on comprehensive
training in the various administrative levels and related
technological development on an ongoing basis.
>
, ,-@
U1U
:!
6
93 9
6
(0 .& %0 ? ' (
& * :
#&$ M
0 JG - * 4 #
2 * 3 F 4
) 2& 94 S&&( S;4 / * 3 L V-
L
# ) ;
2 81 +/' , 2;G , 2; 6
98 >'
+/ Q :' . -
< * #& *
)$
4
- %0 $ , 2; 3 )$ F 4 '@
. (343J 2009 %6
U2U
9 - ;-$ ; ' 1 9 93 9 ' -
)
; 4 * * 3 X$ ) ,
9'
+/
( 9' )$ 93 4 +/ 6
;&&(
0 S$8 93 ' 2
, * 3 ( 2; :
/ , 9
*
*68Y ' /
;0 @ 94 6
, 2; 4 ( D ? D$ ; -( & 93 L8 %&( 28;4
9(- , 2;G & 2; , 0 )$ ;4 / 2: '@
)$ *;0 2G6 )3 H < *$ <8 < ) 93 )$ & ),&
C0 D $ -
8 3 9& 4 ' ?' * 3 *(- &
(16J,1990, )
) . ;$ & )$ 9 ;3 ;$8 %&(
U3U
: ;' ! !#
;$
9$
C' 9 ?
< 6 7( 3(1
&
D4 )$ 98 0 9/ 4 9( 93 9G
Q 9
< N
)3 21 %&( )$ C' 9 )$ %# )
.(.
)8 41 .01)9
)3 21 %&( )$ 8 :[ 9$
?
) %0
@ S&$
C' 9 )$ (.
21 Q)8 41 21 Q.01 21) < N
\
)3 21 %&( )$ : :, ,O •
\
)3 21 %&( )$
' : :
,O •
\
)3 21 %&( )$
%$ %# : : G ,O •
\
)3 21 %&( )$ .B 2 : : F ,O •
\
)3 21 %&( )$ 9&0 *
: : D ,O •
U4U
: ! %3
.
)3 21 %&( )$ : 9$
•
.
)3 21 %&( )$ 9&0 *
: 9$
•
.
)3 21 %&( )$
' : 9$
•
.
)3 21 %&( )$
%$ %# : 9$
•
.
)3 21 %&( )$ .B 2 : 9$
•
: ! ! 3
: 9 9
4 )$ 90 98 '
<&# 0 M 2& 93 ?- ) %0 28 98 C .1
.C' 9
. J ' C'
:! .&
U5U
21 %&( )$ ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / : 4 1 :HO1
.
)3
)$ 9&0 *
( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / : 4 1 :HO2
%&( )$
' ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / : 4 1 :HO3
%&( )$
% ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / : 4 1 :HO4
%&( )$ .B 2 ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / : 4 1 :HO5
:!
. 9 @ 9-
)$ C' 9 :! !
U6U
. C' 9 )$ 9/ #0 ?B )$
:!#
, , 2003 +0 )
_ ' C' 9 )$
)3
Gray & Carter, (2002) Steel & Broady, Rafiq ,m & Ahmad ,Greenbery &
(Baron 2004,Meyer &Allen,1991
:! .
. * 0
S--
( 93 < 2& ./
8
, %&(
9 )$
2 +/' G D ' '( /
' *`$ ' ( L3 9 90 /8 )$ < -&
U7U
9$
* ; # 0'1 *
*4B 94 :K .1
93 9 4 MG %&( @ C0 D$ 93 )$
C * 8 41
(355J2009 %6
)G #) . 0 (
. 6
* ,$ 2& 2 ;6 )
* L
#
L8 %&( 4
94 90 /8 )$ ; -&
. 2;$8 C' 9
2; * 4 9 ' ?#0 2;( . 2;G 3 2; N 9
6
*/ *&
@ 9 C0 0 ./ @ 2; ' 2; 9$ ' :0 2;G 3
(439J 2008 Q a - ) >0Y C0 2: . C0
C' 9 )$
#
) * (6- 90 /8 )$ ; -&
.
6 9
0
;
8 2 ) *
<4 )8 : ! . .4
.. )&$ ' 0 9 @ 2 & )$ ; ? 06 93
9 ;
8 2 ) *
<4 90 /8 )$ ; -&
.
9' @ 2 & 4 C'
U8U
Q ;G , 98 $ 9 93 <$ 2; ./ & C) .5
2; 9
Q * 0 2& Q
9 2 8 90 /8 )$
. 2;8 $ 2;(-
93
94 8 : Organization Commitment :
&
9 Continuance Commitment : .1
93 )$
< * # '$ S' '0
+ N &1 93
)$
. ; S4 <0
;$ & 4 < (
U9U
01 )$
9
8 Affective Commitment
@/ .2
. S0
< .
1 Commitment Normative : C .3
U 10 U
,-@
C /)
U 11 U
:! . C
/)
: !
L
8
,< 9&
@ L +/' <
1
S ) %0
* ) 9& 0 * 0 - /8 2 )$ ,< L )3 21
.,
:B 3
;@
' 7( , 93 *6 ' 4 V#- * : 9 )$ ;3
%&( >G F 2 0
@ 9' $. ) %0 )0
9#
( 55J,
: 6
) %0 ?'$ 2& /;
( 11J, 2009
U 12 U
# 90$ < C 2; $ ) %0 L
)$ :( L &
2;
4 28( 2; 0
L3 ) %0
. 9# ?4 */ 9 - L; 4 ' *
$ 2;N$ '
L3 2 7( G / $@ %0 * 0 90$ 8
( 6 ;&&( 93 ) * ; L8c V, 2;$
(Gummesson,2000, p140 )
%&( ) G D 9# * 6 % * ,$ 2& ' )'
)G # ).9( %&( ./ G , 8 1 <&&( 93
0 ./ L;
U 13 U
9;4 93 9 ?B 90$ < N ) %0 L- '
9 <4
9
$
01 2;
' 'N .
D ' ;4 /
?B * ' / < 90 /8 CI , )4
0 ;
D ' ;4 / ?
0 ' 4 ; X$ )4
;
4 ; 1 ) %0 9 *
L61 2 2& $
9
0 G 28 9 ? )$ 93 90$ '
28# 2;/4 2; '@ 3 (1 ?N$ ' ( %# 2; 4 (
,
d & C
] 0 %&(
( <4 ) %0 : .2
.)3
. 2;
6
%
U 14 U
.) S4 ;&# ( <4 8 ' S %0 90$ %# )$ 28 0 .4
. (6
;6 ' 9 ?( 93 940 %# )$ ) %0 28 0 .5
.
9&
C
L8@ %&(
2;
' ( 2; ; 9&
* 3 2; /;
L; 2;
?4 9 *
6
D
%# 0 20
:
%3
9 4B \ 2 9&0 2;## 2 94 9&0 2;$8
U 15 U
@ 0( L; 28(
D4 2 ;6 ) $(
.2
.0 W (
9 94 *6( 2 & 93 )$ ) %0 %# 0 .5
28 7(
> ( ) ;$
9 9G % .6
.
-
?B 2 8 +/ )$ ?:Y
. 9
9
* 0
(8J, 2003 , ( )0 ? ' 2; @ 28( 28 2 < 'N
U 16 U
J -
9&0 *@ 94) ? < ) )&0 M +$ &
M 7( L;0 %0 )$ 9&0 ;$8 %&( 93 ;0 )
/8 ' 4 F ) $ ( Lovlock & Wirtz ,2004 ,p21).(
, 9
: -
6
). ;
' * D$ ; ) > 4 V,
( 160J,2005,%$
, ; ? $B 9 <-( &
<
$ & :
0 .2
0 +6 ? ('
; -( ) 2
94 :
0 X$
D, 9 , 6B ; ?:' 0N M 2 , )G <'0 9 01 +;0
( 31U30J, 2008, 6
) . G 0
2;,
D -1 1 */ * 00Y * ;4 94 : D .4
U 17 U
* * 3 )$ B *
;
/ $@ : $@ .5
) 2- @ ' 7 :@ : 90 )( : . .6
90 90 (
9 2& ;6 2 ) 9&# )8 : 9 2& 9 .7
/8 , '. 0 9 2& , * 93
9
*4B
2& 9 )$ 9' 28( 0 <4 9', 9 2& G &
( 153J,2009,%6
)G #). 9
! G
M # S
* 4 /8
(1) 2
' )$ ' 9' * 4 76:
.* 9N
U 18 U
( 1) 2
'
93
6
) %0
%0, ) %0, )4 %0 : )8 %0 P 9:6: 4
. )
) )4 %0 ;4 : @ 4 4 6 9 7: 90
M 9
*
6
* 6B 6 +/ 2; < - 2 J- 6
6
D -1 2& J .
9 ( /8 )$, %0 *
. * ) 0
U 19 U
3 ( 2 <6 ./, ) %0 0 :$ 7: )0 4
& , , 93 )3 +/ )$ $
:
;$ Q;4 S:' # / ; @ > ) %0 2; %#
(346J,2009, %6
)G # ) . G , 8 <&&( 93
0 ./
:K
.) .
$@ *
9 L; ./ # 8
L
2& ( J 9 93 9$ 93 8
(226J,
(438J, 2005
U 20 U
. 8N ( ; ' <4 9 * 00Y D$ /8
(146J,2009 ,%6
)G #).9 2& 9 2;G > '
1 S3 *
)G #).93 L8 %&( 9, * ; 28 8#
(318J,2006,[
2& );$ / 9 ?B ; *' ) * , 28
(61J, 2002,
) .
; 9 0
)$
D N S( ' +/ , 93 )$
9& @ 9-( 9 :
) ). 6
9 2& ;0 2 ( * 3 8 4 )
(25J, 2009,
I ( )
0 $@ * 8 4 *
* ; 9 )$ 2;0
2009 , .4).93 L8 %&( ;0 93 21 ?
(45J,
L; * 3 9G # % 9 ? )$ ?#
U 21 U
/N , (301J,2008, a - ? ) .2;4 ?
? ' D$
(Baron
: K ! 3
2006 b[ )G b#) :9b 90bG 4 )$ 98
: 93 9 G %&(g 7( , !
!
! 3 •
. D
)&0 ) ( c +/ ' 0 c L
, # & 94
o
. 8#
* ; 0( o
. ;0 0 / ;$8 9 - 93 ;4 ( ) *
: o
. 93 L8N
L8 # )$ 28 0 o
%&( ( ;
94 9 9 4 * 8 4 % 0 o
. V
* 0 0 V, .Y 93 L8 L
)$
0 o
. 9
: K ! 3 •
? ' 2; 4 2; ' 2; ?4 ' 1
* ;
o
. 9#
( ) 41 @ %&( -1 * ; # )$
0 o
.
)$ 9
#
2 J $ ) # o
U 22 U
93 N
+
93 21 ' o
.
2G6 '
:
(Daft, 1992 ,pp502)093 4 ' )$ ,$ W ( 2; N 2 &
(98J, 2007 ,)
). 93 )$ 0Y 9#0 E +/' < -&
8 Q*
)$ 9' )
' [ L ,
.93
J 2;( , L 9;4 *6' ( 2; ; 2; D$ $@ 9
0@ # 9B * ; 9 4 +/ , )$ ,.( & ?
9 * ; 8 V4 % * ; Q 9 & * ;
U 23 U
96 * ; *& $ .B ' 4 0
. ,$ J$ -( 2;/ * : 9 ; 2;$8 %&( 8# )$ 2;
?
? )$ 28 0 7(
' 6 ( )$ 4 4 ' &
(138J, 2007, )
). 2; 9# * 4 * ; 4 B $ (
6
*
* < 0 0( )$ # 1 , ;4 2;
# -
(,1989,p67
0
# L8@ %&( * c ' L' 2; 9 * D,
(Ahmaed
U 24 U
0
* 4 :Y ) 2;3 9&
*& / 1 9#0 2;( .1
0 (40J,2008 ,
0 )3 ,
P
#0 1 9' 9 %&( S
$ 94 ; N [ ;$
93 8( ) & 94 3 )$ ?( @ * 4 &$ 9Y0
U 25 U
* ; 2;
$@ ?I- 94
%$ [
)'0 , 9 ' :' 9 4 ' 9
;
9' +0 21 4 # ' 90 9 4
4 /8
)
/8 ( %'
9 4 F 'N 9 ?B JG -
0
9 * 3 )$
20& .
)$ 9 % ?#0
.(55J, 2002 ,
) 93 )$
Q *6' ( 9 &, ?4 94 ' *# '1 , Q %
U 26 U
: 9 JG -
%$ L-
.
9 & * ; L 20 ,@ ( * ;
. ;
V ), * ; 4 B 9 6 ) 4
%$ D .3
. 93 9
9# , , 8 4 B # *
(
0
*
* ; 4 6I01 ?4
0 *
-$ 20 -1 0@ /8
:. ,
.2
0
%$ ? ' ? .Y 9;0
; L0B
V(- ' 20 7( : , .3
.;
.
)$ # 9G
1 9, . 2 .4
U 27 U
2 93 2; 3 )$ :Y ' 9 * 3
(
<4 Q
' )$ 9 M F 4 )0 0 F .B 2
9( * $ +/', 90 L ' E
9#I S,
<( )G4
Fb Db$ <bG6 %$ %&( .B 2 <4 '
:' 9 $ #
<
$ &
0 /
' 1 7( ,$
,2006 ,[ )G #) (yancy , 1998,p:4) .? ( C N < +/
(' 93 )$ $B 9 9 9 ?B * & (442J
(56J, 2002 ,
).?( ?0 28
> )$ 1 21 (
: ! .
U 28 U
M . 9 - *1 4 /8
'N 4 / ) *4B
9$
2& *
D4 )
/8 ., 8 90 0@ -
( X$
%
?B 8/ ) *4B X$ *
/8 +0 * 8 41
? 0 D#0 ?- /; <4 $( 1
2 9' * B 2& 93 L8 %&( )$ 98 0 )$ 9
$ :' 2;
4
2
4 *
G 0 *1 -1 & ' ) %0 M
*
$ 2 3 $ )I , 93 )$ 9
9&0 *& /
( kotler, 2006,137). 93 ? 94 9G # 9&0
*
-( L; +/, 9&0 93 N 9&
9 ( 9
U 29 U
*
)
9&0 *
2 3 28 0 E +/
) * 7( 9
S S' ' 9&0 *
%6
).6
D$ 2& )$ 28 0 ( ; 9 ', ; M 93 .
(369J,1999,%6
)
) : ) L- 93 ;
) 9G
. ?4 * 4
9#(
+;0 +0 L6 S ;
# P 0 9&0 9# @ &
.2
.<
.
0 M D
)$ 96 *
$ S, S
2 9&0 *
2 81
/ )$ S 0 6
S ' <- - 0( '
;
93
0( 93 , ) %0 F 4 , 2; D
L )$
U 30 U
7( J0. SG < 4@ 2& ;4 9 2 81 ;
C(, 9
93
. 6
;4 * ,$ 2& 4 2; 9&0 *
:
S3 , * *
) 28 ( )3 21 2;
* 3
0 ./ 9 0 B L8@ ( )3 21
, <$ ?:Y *I
C 9 4B D$ 9 6
S ,$
&0 )$
d
$ W : < <
)$ 0 )
2;$ 8
2 %&( )$ 9 9#&
, 28 , ?
(507J,1995,.4
Lb3 9b b: )b )3 21 94 7( : ! ) , .1
. < 90
98 C </ %&( )$ < </ 9 41 <3 <$ &:
<
#
%
) )3 21 94 ; N $ : !
, .2
.2 ' ) 4B )3 H 23 9G 9B ? & # <-G -
b
b 9b b J$ $ C ' )8 :!* , .3
Cb 2b1 C0b b' 7b( ) 9b3 % (1 )$ @ *&
Sb <b#
b b
9b Jb )$ $ 4@ ' S
U 31 U
2; 8
;6
2& ?0 9 )3 21
,* () ,(Steers, 1977, p47) . ;G & ;( 4 0 93 2;-(
(42J,2003
9- 9(, ; )$ 1 , ;$8 93 2& # 1 < '
.(1146J, 2003, 281). ; )$ 01 ;$ & )$ 9 ;( -
. ; & J( ;$8 ; D %$ ; J6B ; # 1 93
9 93 4 9 4B 9 401 < N )3 21 [
(Hall ,et al., 1970 , p177).93 L8 L8
+0 & ' , # ? 01 <$ & 9 9 . <( 4 B 9
U 32 U
(Mowday : ) )3 21 2; 4 28 ? B ' S/
,et al ,1982)
. 2
D % 93 2
L8 N &1 .1
.
)$ 9& ;4 /
01 .2
.
( 9
$ E , PB L
,
:
H
(Herscovitch & Meyer ,2002,p:474) :)8 P 9:6: )3 21 P
(
# )#
21
8 :
@/ .1
. S# ;
) 93
U 33 U
<' 9 9' <( 94 93 )$ 0 : .2
:' <'0 [ ' )$ < N 9 - 93 )$ & 7(
M 8 93 )$ & )@ 21 ;$ :
4P .3
. ;
2 ;$ / < * 0( 93 N
21 ; 2& 90G *' 76: (Buchanan ,1974,p:535-539) %$
: )8 )3
. ; ;$8N
)$ < 2& ./ , C0 M D
) !# U
93
01 ?'@ 9 + 4 <
./ :5P) U
)8 P 9:6: )3 21 (Greenberg & Baron ,2004 ,p:216-217)
: 90 * )
D - 9 )$ 9
9' < V0 23 9G N
> 0( 94 :N 21
U 34 U
)$ <G6 93 94 : )#
21 '). *&
(65J,2005,.;).(93 <#
2;
)$ & ( 21 C ./ > 0(B < -& : C .2
& ./ 4 2 %#
/8
(@ )$ , 93
L8@ D, )$ 98 0 , ) 4B 9' 2; F 0 23
> 0( 8 .
21 '. 23 9
* 0 0 20 ##
2& <4 # 21 P /8 , 2; $- )$ ) 6 P S 4 &
94 - (
>'
8 , ;
2 40 1
(
93 )$ & 4
9(, < -& : C .3
<&&( 6 9(, 21 /8 9
7(, ; ] 4 < N
9 9# @ )$ 1 8 .01 21 (& Slocum, 2004 ,pp32-60
H 9# D$ 93 2& N .01 21 &
< .01 21 [ 7( '(59J,2008,. -).()3
U 35 U
+ / ;( L0 ) L ' 1 /@ D 93 9# )$ 1
(don, & slocum 2004,pp 32-60) (Moideenkutty ,et al .,1998). 93
Greenberg &Baron ,2004 ) : 9b b 4 2 b81 6b b 9b
(,pp:219-220
6 <
C0 ? )3 :B )
:
@ :) .1
7(
C )3 21 .& < N /8 , *& / )$ 9'
7( : Q- !
!- H
*" .2
. 8
*
8
U 36 U
9 4 * '0 ;3
)$ ' * 4 ? 2; 3
2 24
)$ :N 8:' * 4 /8 , ?' G 2; 3 2;
:) * 3
( 40J ,2005,)$
) ( 34J,2008, $ ) !
> # .1
Dbb$ )bb$ Sbb; S )bb3 2bb6 Nbb * bb0 bb +/bb
* b
b3 $ 9b
b3 Lb
b8@ %b
b&( b
b' > b
b( b
b
b
b
2;
$b
b
b( b
9b
Fb Db$ b b
9' b b jb; )
2;b
b ? b
b b
b
b
b4 9Y0b
b 2;b
b b
b ) b
b , 2; b
b
.(318J, 2002,
).<
2005 ,)$bbb
)( 46J,2008 , bbb$ ) NNN KNNN NNN .2
(41J,
L
,$ +0
%
; ' 9 4 +0 94 :Y B
.21
U 37 U
)b&# #b b Jb( * b3 ? )$ 9:( */ &
.Yb b' b; b( )b$ * D4 9 4 90 * )3
:Yb )b b
b b )b8
#I, - : , /=& .3
, b
)b3 2b1 b b b: #I,b /; 93
b 9b ' 9 0b B 9b/ * & *- % )$ 2;0 )3
,.
0b) . b8
Lb 9b3 b b, C L
, 93 )$
(381U380J,2006
)$
2 )$ :Y ' ;:( % 0 )3 21 P D4 7( C
)
28 S S0 )3 H '
$, 2; D
L
? 6
S ,$,
C 0 21 94 X$ , *& D - )$ 2;' * -
U 38 U
:! .
:! . 1
S
:
. .
!
-
.:*" . D4)
( 2001,
'/) 90
9 @ % 9 - )$ ) %0 *4 * & > 90 /8 *$8
? '
V4 ) %0 M 90 *-
.90 D4
.
* (# * ),
! ! (* +
)
(2007,+ ) 90
(( !
! )(
/
* +& ) :P
6
9 ?4 ) %0 20 : )$ 7( 90 /8 *
0
U 39 U
4 +/' 9 4 9
6 * '$ 6
9& 9 ?4 ) %0 90
,$ 3 ( 3 2 93 9G -( 91 ?4
#
0 (
,$ 3 ( 96 2 93 2& %$
)$ )
2
* 3 C )&0 <4 P, 90 90 /8 *$8
* 0 0 S&# 86 ' 7( )&0 <4 * ' %# C )$ * +/'
*:
9
) %0 * 0 0 S&# 8 *
M
2 , 96 98@ ) %0 ) #& * 3 '
2; 00Y %0 )$
$ 2;'
D / !P- )
( 2008,
) 90
!* 8
! !) !
, !'
U 40 U
+/' ) %0 , 9 4 + 2 94 90 *$8(
) ) %0
*:
9 @ 9G )$ 2: ) %0 >
/
90 P, + ? 7( * - 94 90 *4
8
C +0 <4 )$ ;8 94 + 9Y %
$ 9 9$ &:
9 4
+0 :N 9B ? & # 0Y D *1 -
0 G
& + 3
. F4)
(2009 ,
) 90
$ DO 8 +@#
&
/ + ! !)
@
((
*
)3 , C0 : ) %0 D L '0 90 /8 *$8
C & . >0Y + 0 6: @ )$ )(- P #& )$
9 4 9 6 ) %0 * 0 9 4 * 0 + 8 N :(
6 )3 , :Y ' ./ )3 , ) %0
( ) ' %0 ) -1 ( ' ) ) %0
U 41 U
:
.
! !
, )
( 2005,C;@ ) 90
(!
0( 9 )$
)3 21 )$
%$ ( 90 /8 *$8
9
94 )3 21 :( *- 90 *-
9 -
%$
:( 9G -( %$ )3 21
%$ 4 B
' +/' S# S ' ) 6@ 21 24
+
P .* )
( 2006,B## !#) 90
(8 !
! (;*
9G -( 91 */ %$ +/' )3 21 * 4 ( 9; 9G -( 91 / S:
U 42 U
I )$ ?
* 4 ( :' * '
C 4 B 94 ( +/ )3
.
8 /=& - )
( 2006,C ) 90
9&# & 9
4 9
9'( D4 * ' )$
C )3 26
)#
) 9:6:
)3 21
#I, - > & 90 * '
9
#I, - 90 <# 9
6 4 90 *-
#I, - 9G -( 91 ./ 2; : 4 9
N )3 21
90 9[ 4 +/' * 3 )$ ) $c )3 21
@ )$
' > + +0 )$ ) 6@ )3 21 +/ 28:
U 43 U
)$ 9 '@ * & C )3 ' C L' 90 /8 *$8
*;3
)# )3 &01 )3 21 <
6 9 @ *
4
21 )3 ' C0 9G -( 91 */ 9 4 9 6 4 90
)$ 9 '@ * & )3 ' 90 ?, <4G * ' )3
? ;$ > 9G8 , C )3 21 ?
9$ ' 9 @ *
4
'
2; ' )$ 2;G & 90 * G; , &01 /4
2 81
. ( 0 .
)#
) )8 * ' 9:6: 6 )3 21 7(
( !
/
!/ .
2
* ' )$ B C )3 21 D$ L
90 /8 *$8
'@ B C 21 D 90 *- 9 #0 )$ 9&#
)$ 9 :
1Y8 ;3 ./ +0 6 9 0 4 0
%:
F# %&( . ( 2 3 & / )$
+
0 )
: ! * .
:
. .1
U 44 U
(2000,Ahmad & Rafiq) 90
E
)$ 1 V(-
%# ) %0 N 90 *' 9 9
9( )8 ) %0 2; # 90 0 ( 76: 90 * * '
9
6
90 F& ?B I %# 9(
( 9( , #
() )8 ) %0 - %# )4 #B 9(& (
* & ' ; 40 )$ ?' *I 7( 9 * '
- )3 %0 ( 7 ( 4 ?, 93
,
)$ ) %0 )$ 7( ? D ) %0 2; V, ./ %0
98 9$
*B -1 9&: 2; ) 6 93 ? ' #
U 45 U
9&0 940B
98 / < @ :' ' <; <&# ) %0
. * 3
%0 2; L
2 )
' 90 *-
Q 9 $0 > )$
* & .) %0 M %# I 9 & 2 )$ . +/' )
(2009,Mei-Liany) 90
)
$ / G0 D 9&
*6 & 6 90 /8 *4 )$
L: ' %$ :Y ' ,&0 )$ 9' L8 * 8 4 9Y -B
U 46 U
* '0 20 & ;
( * 3 4 +/
. 9'; ? 9
2- : 9 ?B * 0 6 9$
:( Mishra,2010) 90
9
$
9 %0 M ' ) %0
# +/', 93 ?8 9
.@ 3 ( 9 *1 -1
/4 )$ 1
$ -
) $( 2; 2 ; 9&
*& )$ 9(6-
:
. .2
U 47 U
*`$ ' *1 -1 ) 4
) 900Y 9$ &:
:N 90 /8 *$8
, 9 * 3 *0 )$
)3 21 ( 9 $(
) 4
( *`$ ' 9 -1 90 /8 *4
*`$ ' N 90 /8 MG ,3 )3 21 4 # #
V * $ 0 $ +/', @ : ) ;
( Shirbagi,2007) 90
9G8 , D - )$ 98 0 /; ' L' 2; 8 7( /; )0 0@ L;
?B
* ; *
9
*/ 7( D )$ 0Y :'
U 48 U
21 )3 ,
D$ ( 9
6
( 90 /8 *$8
+0 ( 90 /8 *'
,9 0' 9
C& 9 )3
( * 3 90 *- , )3 21 )3 ,
, ? ' , ) 4 : %&( )3 , (
D$
.Y0 $ C 93 C 93 L )3
-1 *: ', )3 21 # 93 )$ 9 ' '
4 ,
9' 9Y L8 - 6 98 ;
(Iqbal,2010) 90
(an Empirical Assessment of Demographic Factors , Organizational
Banks and Organizational Commitment)
U 49 U
)$ )3 21 9$
9
6
)$ 7( 90 /8 *$8
21
' # 4 1 ,)3 2 D 9
6 < 2
C0
+/' ,
D -1 +/' ,
%$ * 0 0 * ,
%# 3
.(.
0 )#
) )8
.
M
, ( .
)#
0 21) )3 21
(93
9;4 ; &0 ' /Y * ' 9B *& 90
?N$ ' 2 3 F 1
9
6
* 0 , 6
(
9 *
9 +/' 9
F +/' , ?4 9' )$
F
.
21 6 S 28:'
2
, 9& (
..01
U 50 U
: ( Mukherjee & Malhotra 2004) 90
) ?( 9' )$ C' + ( )$ 9 ?4 ( .
.01
&
0 ) -1 , )3 ,) ) %0 - 7(
7( 9 B ;- 9 )$ 9 <' + . C )3
, *1 -1 ( % F % ) ) %0 -
N .( )#
.01 .
) )3 21 - (
. 93 2;
6 D *
6
9
J$
U 51 U
:( Ching & Sheng 2009) 90
) %0 ' L' & ? )8 * , )3 21
) %0 98N L1 ?, 0 . N 0 93
L ' E * , 3 (6 9&# ,$ ; @ * , 2
4 )$
*
# * 4 ( 2;$ S, 2;
(- D
'
.E
U 52 U
! . ! 123 ! . !-P
)$ 6
, 9 ?4 ;
6 ) %0 9& 0 * 0 E
*
9$
*$8 7( ( * 0 *1 -1 * 3 + ): 9 * 3
S4 S; 2; /8 ) %0 ( 9& 0 * 0 ' *
4
, * 3 )$ <&# 9' J $ - 7( , <$ 7( 90 S-
+/ )$ , %# V - & V, / 4 & < X$ /
2 0( ;
4$ )3 21 ) %0 : * ) * 0
21 (
3 (1 )3 ,, *`$ ',
%$, *1 -1, $(,
.)3
7( )3 21 ) %0 8 ; *# ; N 90 /8
(
%$ .B ' 9 *1 -1 .B 2 ): >
9 )8 2
P #& 4 )$
9 93 )$ )3 21 )$ 8:
0C'
U 53 U
G ,-@
! !*;
U 54 U
!
.*
/; ( 90 9G -(B
! J;
* @ P4 +/ )- M; 90 /8 2- )$ 7( 20
L' * ( +/ SG -( 90 *I ( )( M; , 7(
! F *
2
C' 9 )$ 9 ?G * ) G %# D4 )$
.( 2010
U 55 U
: !
12
*& +/ @ % @ 9- *(- 7( 0( @
*# *; 1933 2 )$ 1925 )$ - * D, 9-
2 )$ .90 L (100) 1949 2 28 R (. '0 D 9
. 86.3 93 9 9( 0 * 90 L 461 '0 R 1969
2
R 90 L ( 850 ) )$ '0 * 1979 2
F $ 2 . S S04 (11) 9 (14) *, 90 (1,4) ; '0 -
%# * 9#0 C' 9 . ;$ C@ 9 G
2 , ?B )$ 9'6 2; %# /8 9&# D0 *-
9 ( ( K4 93$ ( N 93$ (
U 56 U
! !
391) ; D40 9 0( 400) 9 * 01 R G %# /8
90 %&( )$ *8 0 7( 9G D 7( (% 97.5) *- 90 (
71 74 380 14 6 !=
79 81 419 13 6 ! #
J )$) 2010U C' 9 9 ?G : -
(G %#
#0 )9 * 0 90& ?G ' ,G 90& 9&# ' 7(
U 57 U
*- / , . C0 ?G 9&# ' )$
24( D 26 90 9/
)$
D 2 ' Q 9 * 0 (5) 2; , / 28
.
?B #&$ 9/ #0 ?B
! .
0 90 .3
. 90 * ,$
U 58 U
!
/ ,
?8 4 9 01 *(- , 90 E 2 7( ; 9 01 #
9&0 *
' ) )8 Mishra, Forzad), Trnavceri,
C 9$
L; ? ( 24) 4 /8 7(.( .B 2
%$
9 (, )
C0,
,> 4) 9$
: G :*
94 , 9#0 9&$ : 3 94 , %$ : 2 94, ? %$ : 1 94)
(2) 2 4 ( * I * G$ 76: )0 90 > & 20& 2
: +/
U 59 U
(2) 2
4
2& C0 9G
D 3.67 – 5
E 1 – 2.33
-- ?/ 0@ (1) 2 %( '( 94 9 01 E 2 &
*6
4X 7( 2
9(& *6
* 3(6 7(. ; - ;(-
@ ( H ')
0( 2 90 )$ 90 > & ? * : 'N
U 60 U
90 *I H ' 2
(3 ) 2
4
@ ! 4 =
! .@
0 .704 6
0 .768 4
'
0 .709 4 *
9&0
0 .748 5
%$
0 .696 5 .B 2
0 .629 4 )8 41 21
0 .689 5 21
.01
0 .776 3 .
21
0 .945 36 '' ?@
9& 90 *I * : 9
(3) 2
4 *;3 ) 2&
: !
! !'-) K
JG - 9&
90 *I L- )( )- -(B 20 2
: )8 ( SPSS )
) 0( #0 .
L( 1 .1
0 #
.3
U 61 U
. ( (ANOVA F test ) .5
(.B 2 ,
%$ ,9&0 *
,
' , )
ار
ﺱ&اري.ام ا0.ا ﺕ ا
!"ا!ت ا
1ه3ﺕ.ام ا0.ا $'&ق ا
ا*داري+,ا
ام اري0.ا
@
, Gray & Carter, (2002) Steel & Broady, Rafiq ,m & Ahmad , 2003 +0 )
U 62 U
! .:*"
9'; * Q SPSS 9G -(B 9 20 G -( MG ( .7
0 9(
U 63 U
D -
U 64 U
!
.90 9G0
( 4) 4 ,*
U 65 U
' 9$ JG - 0( 90
D(4) 2
4
: )
, (% 37.1) *I$ 7 B 90 (% 62.9) 2;0 *I '/ @ I 7(
( %67.8) <0 90 MG * &$ 9 41 9 ( , (42.5) I
* 4 &$ ? * 0 , (%31.5) 4 90 *I 4 9G$
*
D4 MG ;3 +/' ,( 1
,(
,# 1
: +/ - ) $ 90 * ,$ 9,$ ' > & 90
21 %&( )$ ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / : 4 1 :HO1
( .
.01 )8 41)
)3
U 66 U
": 9 4B .Y0 9, /8 7(
\
)3 21 %&( )$ : :, ! ,O
9, & , 9 & (0.05)
9
* ' / 9
9, E$)
: C' 9 )$
)8 41 21 %&( )$ : :
(5),*
K ANOVA /
!
3*
Sig*
DF β (R2)
C0 F (R)
* 4
91 90( # 1
9( ( 1 (
4 )G -(B ( MG *;3 7( Q (5) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
2 %&( )$ ) %0
(N' 9G -( 91 ./ :
9 )$ )8 41
2 )$ -( ) *I (0 .127) <
.
2 0( .Y 9# 0( )$ ?( 94 ?
/8
U 67 U
2 %&( )$ ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 ./ : 4
.)8 41
(6) ,*
0.000 71.9 #0 0.99 3.6 <:( D, )$ 9 * 93 2& 5
(3.5) *
+ 2
) 0( #0 R 7( %
) @ 9,
)$ : 'Y /8, ( 3) 9I ( <4 4 90 )$ 20
*
#0 7(, C' 9 )$
C )8 41 21 %&(
( 3.7) R 7( ( 6)( 1) 2
?
' (6) 4 )$ ?
)$
? '
& 4
M D, ?B
. @ 4
U 68 U
(7) ,*
3* . !
' )8 41 9 )$
2 (7) 2
4 6 3(6 '
94
2 ) ( 3) 2
?
) 0( #0 * ' 7(, )8 41
9 )$ )8 41
2 'Y /8, ( 3.3) ) 0( #0
% #
)$ ( 94 * ' )3 21 * * #0 D4 /
.
.01 21 %&( )$ ::
U 69 U
(8),*
K ANOVA /
!
C
Sig*
DF Β (R2)
C0 F (R)
* 4
91 90( # 1
9( ( 1 (
7( )G -(B ( MG ;3 ./ Q (8) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
R / Q .01
2 %&( )$ 9G -( 91 ./ : 4
)$ ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / :, (0.000) 9I 9
(F)
. C' 9 )$
.01
2 %&(
U 70 U
(9) ,*
0.000 62.1 ) 1.17 3.68 90 9-) ' ? ) 0 ) +
2
(9 4 9 -
0.000 54.1 #0 1.17 3.22 90 C@ * 3 )$ 9(
J$ 3
0.000 62.2 #0 1.15 3.63 ) ( ) )$ 01 & ( 4
0.000 59.7 #0 1.18 3.59 93 0@ 3 EI ) + 9
- 5
/8 ,( 3.6) 2
) 0( #0 7( ( 3) 9I > & ? ( 94
C@ * 3 )$
J$ )(3) 2
?
* #0
* ', ( 3.9)
U 71 U
.
.
21 %&( )$ ::
(10),*
K ANOVA /
!
C
Sig*
DF Β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! ! /
!
)G -(B ( MG *;3 7( Q (10) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
2 %&( )$ ) %0
(N' 9G -( 91 ./ : 4
9# )$ I M .
2 )$ *I (0 .127)<
Q (0 .356) & .
2 0( .Y 9# 0(
9G -( 91 ./ : 4 'Y /8 , (0.000) 9I 9
F9
:@ /8 'Y
.
C' 9 )$
2 %&( )$ ( 0.05>α) C0
U 72 U
(11) ,*
0.000 66.2 ) 1.15 3.9 )
6 L- ) (
+ & 1
0.000 47.5 #0 1.34 3.2 L3 ,$ ? ( C ?( 93 )$ 01 & 3
( 1) 2
?
* 4
,( 3) 9I ( 94 < / (3.66) 2 ) 0(
.
d C0 ' C' 9 )$ .
2
9
6
*/ 9
(F) 2
0 90 /8 )$ ?
& ?
S 0
9 )$
)3 21 %&( )$ : 4 ) 9 9,
.( .
.01 )8 41) 9:6: < N C'
%&( )$
' ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / : 4 1 HO2
. ( .
.01 )8 41)
)3 21
\
)3 21 %&( )$
' : :
,O
U 73 U
)8 41 21 %&( )$
' ::
(12),*
ANOVA /
!
3*
Sig*
DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! ! /
!
9 )$
)8 41 21 %&( )$ ) %0 - (N'
'
)$ I M )8 41
2 )$ *I (O .159) <
. (O
94 ? )
/8 (0 .398) R β ( 1
, ' 9#
9
$ C )8 41 21 C0 ? .Y
' * # ?(
91 ./ : 4 'Y /8 ', (0.000) 9I 9
(F)9
:@ /8 'Y ,
)$
)8 41 21 %&( )$
' ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -(
.C' 9
U 74 U
(13) ,*
0.000 59.4 #0 1.0 3.2 * 4 ( 9 401 P0 ) *& / 1 * (6- . 2
9 ) #
0.000 61.2 #0 1.0 3.3 '$@ F# *6' ( )$ . ?B ) V 3
. ( 2) 4
.C' 9 )$
.01 21 %&( )$
' : :
(14),*
ANOVA /
!
C
U 75 U
Sig*
DF β (R2)
C0 F (R)
* 4
91 90( # 1
9( ( 1 (
9G -( 91 */ 9 6 4 ./ , (14) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
9& R # 1 ;3 /8 .01 21 %&( )$
' :@
.413) β ( 1
R ' ,
' M .01
2 )$
0( .Y .B ' 9# 0( )$ ?( 94 ? )
/8 (O
%&( )$
' ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 ./ : 4 'Y
.C' 9 )$
.01 21
.
.
21 %&( )$
' : :
ANOVA /
!
C
U 76 U
Sig*
DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! ! /
!
)G -(B ( MG *;3 7( Q (15) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
.
2 )$ -( ) *I (0.170) <
. Q (0.170)
' ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 ./ : 4 'Y 7( (0.000)
..
2 %&( )$
9 )$
)3 21 %&( )$ ' : 4 ) 9 9,
.( .
.01 )8 41) 76: < N C'
)$ 9&0 *
( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / : 4 1:HO3
( .
.01 )8 41)
)3 21 %&(
U 77 U
": 9 4B .Y0 9, /8 7(
\
)3 21 %&( )$ 9&0 *
: : G ,O
. C' 9 )$
)8 41 21 %&( )$ 9&0 *
: :
(16),*
! . ANOVA /
!
3*
Sig*
DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! ! /
!
)G -(B ( MG *;3 7( Q (16) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
)8 41
2 )$ -( ) *I (o.192) <
. Q (0.192)
9&0 *
9# 0( )$ ?( 94 ? )
/8 Q (0.441) β 9
( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 ./ : 4 (0.000) 9I 9
(F)
.)8 41
2 %&( )$ 9&0 *
U 78 U
(17) ,*
0.000 69.5 #0 0.98 3.4 ?4 * 9$ ' *
?B $ 2
9&0 *
( 9
$ * 8 4 (17) 2
4 6 V, '
2
) 0( #0 ( 3.55) *
2
) 0( #0 R / 9 4
2 ? * ' , 90 )$ 20 )0 > & )$ ( 3) 9I ( 94
/8 , ( 3.2) 9I 9 0( * #0 *-( ?4 *
.( 2) 4 )$ <
U 79 U
.
.01 21 %&( )$ 9&0 *
: :
(18),*
! . ANOVA /
!
C
Sig* DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! /
! !
1 0.471 110.665 0.221 0.471
0.000 389
390
.(α ≤ 0.05)
!'-" ! 2 S
7( )G -(B ( MG ;3 ./ Q (18) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
*
9# )$ I M .01
2 )$ *I (0.221)
. C' 9 )$
U 80 U
\C' 9 )$
.
21 %&( )$ 9&0 *
: :
(19),*
! . ANOVA /
!
C
Sig* DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! /
! !
1 0.471 110.877 0.222 0.471
0.000 389
390
.(α ≤ 0.05)
!'-" ! 2 S
)G -(B ( MG *;3 7( Q (19) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
I M .
2 )$ *I (0.222)<
.Q(0.222)
)
/8 Q (0.471) β :N 9
*I ' Q 9&0 *
9# )$
2 0( .Y 9&0 *
9# 0( )$ ?( 94 ?
. .
C' 9 )$ .
%&( )$
% ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / : 4 1 : H04
. ( .
.01 )8 41)
)3 21
U 81 U
9 )$
)3 21 %&( )$
%$ : : F ,O
\C'
\
)8 41 21 %&( )$
%$ : :
(20),*
, ANOVA /
!
3*
Sig* DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! /
! !
1 0.428 87.198 0.183 0.428
0.000 389
390
.(α ≤ 0.05)
!'-" ! 2 S
9G -( 91 */ 9 6 4 7( , (20) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
9 )$
)8 41 21 %&( )$ ) %0 - (N'
%
)$ I M )8 41
2 )$ *I (0.183) <
. (0.183)
94 ? )
/8 (0.428)R β ( 1
,
%$ 9#
. 9
$ C )8 41 21 C0 ? .Y
%$ * # ?(
9 )$
)8 41 21 %&( )$
% ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -(
.C'
U 82 U
(21) ,*
0.000 69.9 #0 1.0 3.7 ) ; N 6 ( 2& ) ( )$ 5
2
) 0( #0 , (3.52) *I 7( 2
) 0( #0 6
( )$( 5) 2
?
* ' &$
%$ * ,( 3) 9I ( 94
9 0( * #0 < X 2 & 6 ( 2&
(
?B 2 8 '( 3) 2
?
* ' , * #0 *-( (3.7) 90
\
.01 21 %&( )$
%$ : :
(22),*
, ANOVA /
!
C
Sig*
DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! ! /
!
U 83 U
9G -( 91 */ 9
6 4 ./ , (22) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
.C' 9 )$
\
.
21 %&( )$
%$ : :
(23),*
, ANOVA /
!
C
U 84 U
Sig*
DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! ! /
!
)G -(B ( MG *;3 7( Q (23) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
.
2 )$ -( ) *I (0.203) <
. Q (0.203)
.Y
%$ 9# 0( )$ ?( 94 ?
/8 Q (0.451)β
9
(F) 9
:@ /8 'Y Q (0.413) & .
2 0(
)$
% ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 ./ : 4 (0.000) 9I
..
2 %&(
9
6
*/ 9
(F) 2
0 90 /8 )$ ?
& ?
0
9 )$
)3 21 %&( )$
% : 4 ) 9 9,
.( .
.01 )8 41) 76: < N C'
U 85 U
%&( )$ .B 2 ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 / : 4 1:H05
.( .
.01 )8 41)
)3 21
\
)3 21 %&( )$ .B 2 : : D ,O
)8 41 21 %&( )$ .B 2 : :
(24),*
C) ANOVA /
!
3*
Sig* DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! /
! !
1 0.405 76.327 0.164 0.405
0.000 389
390
.(α ≤ 0.05)
!'-" ! 2 S
)G -(B ( MG *;3 7( Q (24) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
2 )$ -( ) *I (o.164) <
. Q (0.164)
0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 ./ : 4 (0.000) 9I 9
( F) 9
2 %&( )$ .B 2 (
U 86 U
( 0.000) 9I 9
( F ) 9
:1 /8 'Y Q (0.405) & )8 41
2 %&( )$ .1 2 (0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 ./ : 4
)8 41
U 87 U
(25) ,*
' 90 )$ ' / $@ 3(6 (25) 2 4 P6#1 6
( 9
$ . ,( 3) 9I ( 94 2
) 0( #0
D ?4 *
6
( 4) 2
?
* '$ .B 2 *
?
, * #0 *-( (3.2) ; ) 0( #0 '
0Y
.(2.8) ) 0( #0
U 88 U
\
.01 21 %&( )$ .B 2 : :
(26),*
C) ANOVA /
!
C
Sig*
DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! ! /
!
9G -( 91 */ 9 6 4 ./ , (26) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
9& R # 1 ;3 /8 .01 21 %&( )$ .B 2 :@
(0.400) β ( 1
R ' ,.B 2 M .01
2
9# 0( .Y .B 2 9# 0( )$ ?( 94 ? )
/8
21 %&( )$ .B 2 ( 0.05>α)C0 9G -( 91 ./ : 4
.C' 9 )$
.01
U 89 U
\
.
21 %&( )$ .B 2 : :
(27),*
C) ANOVA /
!
C
Sig*
DF β (R2)
F (R)
.* , ,
! ! /
!
9G -( 91 */ 9 6 4 ./ , (27) 4 #0 ( 1 ( 20 2
9# 0( .Y .B 2 9# 0( )$ ?( 94 ? )
.
21 %&( )$ .B 2 ( 0.05>α) C0 9G -( 91 ./ :
.C' 9 )$
U 90 U
9, + E$ F, ;3 @ 9
9, ( 2&
9
6
*/ 9
(F) 2
0 , 90 /8 )$ ?
& ?
0
)$
)3 21 %&( )$ .B 2 : 4 ) 9 9,
.( .
.01 )8 41) 76: < N C' 9
U 91 U
D ,-@
U 92 U
!
( ;, ' * - * 4 01 94 90 *- 7(,
:)
:.* 0
Q (.
.01 )8 41 ) C' 9 )$
21 %&( )$
*
* 0 9$ ' $ Q & 4
M ?B $ 7(
%0
(N' C' 9 )$
' : 4 MG *;3 .2
+ 9 ? 9 ) # * 4 ( 9 401 P0 ) *&
0
@ 96 *6;0 9 @ $ ?4 '$@ F# *6' ( )$
*
9/ #0 ?B )$
MG * .3
U 93 U
* *
D4 ' , ?4 * 9&0 *
. )G # 90 D %
D4 ?B +/ , 76: < N
)3 21 %&( )$ S(,
D
( '$@ 9 ? 2; +/' ,) 4
%
, 9 @ 0
9 4 98 $ M 2& J( ;
D 9# *
6
< D +/'
)$ 9 0 B *
6
#
M
( )8 4 2 C' 9 )$
C ;3 .6
U 94 U
( C' 9 )$
C .0 2 4 90 *: .7
C' 9 )$
C .
21 90 *- ' .8
I
U 95 U
T: .-
: ) ( ; '
* 4 ( 9 4 ;4 / C' 9 7( )- U1
0 C * 3
9 )$
93 '1 PB J$ 2 ?, 7( )- U3
4 ;4 ? 9- */ * @ %
-- C'
.C' 9 )$
*
$ '
C' 9 2& ?, 7( )- U4
;4 ,$ 9&# ?4 9 2&
(- )'
9&0
0 C' 9 )$
4
2;
4
* (6- E ' % # D0 ?, 7( )- U5
%
-- ,& L )$ i *& / )$ 9'
02; N
U 96 U
$ @ C0 # 0( )$ < D
)3 21 98@ 3 U6
* 3 E
P, > )$ 9&0 * 0 4 7( )- U7
U 97 U
F*
9
' : 1
, (z) !
()
E2
, 0 ( 0( 94 , 2 , ) -
.9
0 – 9
?B ;
. @, , % 900Y, 1#, U ,( 1999), ) 8 , ( -
, , J3
& !3
,(2009), #0 , #( -
C# -
(" ,(2009) , ?
0 , ) 0' ( 8 , . -
.
(" ,(2009), 4 , . 0 2 3 ,0 -
.E , '
9' ,1# , ,-
U 98 U
,
* , ) . ,(2009 ), , %6
( , )G # -
,1# , ! # (* (" ,(2008), 0 , , )G # -
,(2006 ), .$ 2 8 , .
0( Y , , 2( L0 , )G # -
.
,
8 ! () ,(1997),V - ( ) 8 , # -
' ,1# , ( .' @ ) () , (2007) ,2:8 , ) -
2 ,1# , !# (" ,(2010) , ( ( , ) -
. ,
. @ ,
. @,
U 99 U
, (
* ) (- !# (",( 2005), )- , )& -
, 1/# , , .
8 , (2002 ), 0 ( , -
. G
, <
# , .; :
, :
8,( 2000), ( ,8 -
. 9 '0B, 9
4
8 , ,( 1995 ), ( 28 , .4 , %$ 0 ,8 -
. ,
, (/ ! ) !# (" D ,(1999 ), ) ( ,) -
. ,
,1# , (,
*
, ) (" ,( 2008 ), )4 , 6
-
. @ ,
U 100 U
!*)) . (" +"
, , ( 2004 ), 24 , 24 -
. 9
4 * #
: 9
4 G 0 :
(* +
Q(2009) 0 )#
Q -
@ Q
. (*
, (2006), 9' V - , .4 -
& +
/ Q(2008)Q ( 28 Q ( -
0 @ Q Q 9 @ 9
4 ,
@ ,
* 0 9
9
4 ,?
U 101 U
! .'; :&
, (2006) , L . 8 ( Q <( -
+ 3
. F4 Q(2009)Q 0 2 ;0 Q ) -
DO 8 +@#
&
/ + ! !)
@ &
@ ,
* 0 9
9
4 , ?
! )
:
;4P !
!Q (2005) Q ($ (Q. -
9
0 Q 9 @ 2
L 9
4
U 102 U
)
: F4Q(2008) Q 2 0 * 0 * Q ) -
!)
@
!
! Q(2008)Q ( Q . - -
Q * [ 9
4 Q 04 9 0 Q !
! .#
!
@ Q %
/
@
;4P ! !
. *
* 0 9
9
4 , ' 9(# Q D !'3 :&
@ Q ,
! ! (* +
(2007) ( 2 0(, ) -
04 9 0 , ( !
! )
/
* +& :P
@ Q Q
* 0 9
9
4 Q
Q
;4P !
! Q(2005) Q ( Q )$ -
0 9
0 Q E Q 9 @ 2
9
L 9
4 Q 04 9 0
Q
B4P
@ & Q(2009) . Y$ > Q $ -
0 9
0 Q 9
Q C& 2 9
4 Q 04 9 0
. @ , : 9 @ 9
4 , ? 04 9 0 , !
.
U 103 U
!NN G :b b:
. *
D B'3 :&
( 2003), , 28 -
. 85
, 0(B 94,
9 & ,(2008), 9 0 , ( -
, 8@ 9
4 – ? 4 9' Q, () ! ' ! !
* +" !#
/ !P- ,(2008) , ) , ) 28 % , ( -
. (426
P .* ,(2006 ), 4 0 , 9 ( ( , 9(( -
9
4 94 , 8 !
! (;*
+
U 104 U
8 /=& - , (2006) , 0 , .
0 -
.:*" . D4 Q(2001)Q ) ( Q )G # -
!@ ! P) , .4P Q(2004) Q ( ( Q -
? 4 -
6 9
94 Q !/ !
@ :
:
0 (53U1) J ) :
1 4 ?8 & Q > 9
4
!
, ,(2005) , V - 9 );$ , .;$ -
: ! * F*
1 . BOOKS
- Berry, L., (1984 ), Service Marking in Different: Text,
Cases and Reading, Prentice Hall New jersey.
- Cahil ,D .J.,( 1996 ), Internal marketing: your company: s
nextstage of Growth, New York, The Haworth Press Inc.
- Daft, R. & Noi, R. A. ,( 2001). Organizational Theory Behavior,
Harcourt College Publishers, U.S.A
- Davis , K & John ,W.N ,.(1989).Human Behavior at- work :
Organizational Behavior , 8th ed.(N,Y.:McGraw-Hill Book Co.)
U 105 U
- Don . H , Slocum , j., v.r. ,(2004) , Organizational Behavior
th
,10 ed,South –Western Thomson ,Canada .
- Gummesson , E.,( 2000 ) Internal Marketing in the light of
Relationship Marketing and Network Organization: Directions
for Management , N.Y.
- George, Jennfer M.,(1999) Organizational Behavior. N.Y., Addison-
Welsey Publishing Company
- Huxtable, N. , (1995 ) ,Small Business Total Quality,
London ,Champman and Hall .
- kotler , Philip , keller , k.l (2006), Marketing Management ,
New Jersey.
- Klein ,A. ,(1989 ).A Total Quality Approach to
Performance Reviews , U.S.A., Texas.
- Lovelock, C. & Wirtz, J., (2004), Service Marketing, (5th
ed.), New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall .
- Mowday , R.T.,Porter ,L.W. ,& ,Steers ,R.M. ,(1982).
,Employee – Organizational Linkages : the Psychology Of
commitment , Absenteeism ,and Turnover ,New York
:Academic Press .
- Schermerhorn, J., R., Hunt. G. & Osborne, R. N.( 1997) ,
Organizational Behavior, N. Y., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Schneider & Bowen , winning the Service Game .In :
Lovelock , P.& Wirtz ,J., (Eds.), Services Marketing ,New Jersey,
Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Zeithaml , v.a and birner , m. j and gremler , d.d
(2006),service marketing in tegratuy customer focus across .me
firm, new York , megrow-hill erwit.
2. PERHODICALS
- Arumugam ,V. & Boon,O.K.,(2006), the Inftuence of Corporate
Culture on Organizational Commitment : Case Stady of Semi conclutor
Organizations in Malaysia , Sunway Academic Journal ,3(1), PP(99-
115).
- Buchanan ,B.,(1974),Building Organizational Commitment : The
Socialization Of Managers In Work Organizations, Administrative
Science Quarteerly,19(4) ,pp:(533-546).
U 106 U
- Chang ,C.S & Chang ,H.C.,(2009) , Perceptions of Internal Marketing
and Organizational Commitment by Nurses , Journal of Advanced
Nursing ,(1) ,PP ( 92-100 ) .
- Dunne ,A. & Carter , S. & hogg,G.,(1998), Investing in People :
Internal Marketing and Corporate Culture , Journal at Marketing
Management ,14,pp(879-895).
- Dunphy, D., & Bryant, B. (1996)., Teams: Panaceas or prescription for
improved performance. Human relations, 49(5),pp( 677-699).
- Eccles, T.,( 1999) ,The Deceptive Allure of empowerment , long
range planning , 26(6),pp.(13-21).
- George, D. (1990) Internal Marketing and Organizational Behavior a
Partnership in Developing Customer-Conscious Employees at Evrey
Level , Journal of Business Researth ,20(1) ,pp.(63-70) .
- Guerin. (1997), Team work at Barton company: A psycho-dynamic
perspective ,paper presented to the symposium of the international
society for the psychoanalytic study of organizations.
- Hackett ,R.D. ,Bycio ,P. ,Hausdorf ,P .(1992),Further Assesment Of
Three – Component Model Of Organizational Commitment ,Academy
Of
Management :best papers proceedings .
- Hall, D .T. ,Schneidr, B., & Nygren ,H.T.,(1970).Personal Factors in
Organizational Identification , Administrative Science Quarterly ,15 ,pp
(176-190).
- Herscovitch ,L & Meyer ,J.,P.,(2002) , Commitment To
Organizational Change : Extension of A Three –Component Model .
Journal OF Applied Psychology ,87(3) ,PP(474-487).
- Hunglin , C. & fong ,k.,(2009), Antecedants to Continance
Organizational Retailing Services Industry , the Journal of International
Management Studies, 4(2),PP(206-214) .
- Iqbal ,A,( 2010 ), an Empirical Assessment of Demographic Factors
, Organizational Banks and Organizational Commitment , International
Journal of Business and Management ,3(5),PP( ).
- Jarvi,P., the Internal Marketing and the Commitment at the
Employees when Managing the Customer – Orientel Business.
- Logaj, V., and Trnavcevic , A.,(2006) Internal Marketing and School :
the Slovenion, Case Study , Managing Global Transitions, 4(1), pp(79-
96).
U 107 U
- Malhotra ,N. & Mukherjee ,A.,(2004) the Relative Influence of
Organizational Commitment and Jop Satisfaciton on Service Quality of
Customer Contact Employess in Banking call Centres , Journal of
Services Marketing ,18(3),PP(162-174).
- Mei-liang ,c , (2009) the Effect at Knowledy Economy and
International Marketing an Jop Ssatisfaction in Taiwan,s It Industry, the
Journal of International Management Studies, 4(2), pp(116- ).
- Meyer,J.P & Allen ,N.J.(1993).Commitment To Organization and
Occupations : Extension of A Three –Component Model . Journal OF
Applied Psychology , 78(4).pp,(538-551).
- Meyer ,J.P & Allen ,N.J.(1991).A Three – Component
Conceptualization Of Organizational Commitment . Human Resource
Management Review ,1(1).pp,(61-89).
- Mishra,s and Ghaziabad, Rajnagar, (2010) ,Internal Marketing - a
Tool to Horness Employees Service Organizations in India ,
International Journal of Business & Management , 5(1) , pp(185-193).
- Moideenkutty ,U et al., (1998).,Percived Organizational Support as a
Mediator of the Relationship of Perceived Situational Factors to Affective
Organizational Commitment , papers presented at Eastern, Academy Of
Management annual meeting , Philadelphia .
- Potochny, Donk, (1998) . Employee Empowerment key to efficient
customer services , Nations Restaurant News, 32 (32),pp.(1-23).
- Rafiq , M & Ahmed , D.K., (2000)Advancesin the Internal Marketing
Concept :Definition, Synthesis.and Exteuisian , Journal at Serves
Marketing , 14(6),PP( 449-462).
- Rafiq , M. & Ahmed , P., (2003) , Comnentary Internal Marketing ,
Issues and Challenges , European Journal of Marketing , 37(9), pp
(1177-1186) .
- Salas, E., Stagel, K. C. & Burke, C. S., (2003).25 Years of team
effectiveness in organizations: Research themes and emerging needs”. To
appear in C. L. Cooper & I.T. Robertson (Eds.), International Review of
Industrial and Organizational Psychology. New York: John Wiley &
Sons. February, 19.
- Shirbagi ,N,(2007), Exploring Organizational Commitment and
Leadership Frames within Indian and Iranian Higher Education
Institutions , Bulletin of Education & Research , 29(1),PP(17-32) .
U 108 U
- Steel , L. & Broady-Preston , J., (2002) , Employees, Customers and
Internal Marketing Strategies in Lis , Library Management , 23(819)
pp(384-393).
- Steers,R.M,(1977),Antecedents and Outcomes of Organizational
Commitment ,Administrative Science Quarterly,22,pp.(46-56).
- Varey, R.J (1993) , Internal Marketing :a Review and Some
Interdisciplinary Research Challenges , Internatianal Journal of Service
Industry Management , 6(1) , pp(40-63)
- Waris , s. & fatima , N. & sahibzada,s.A.,(2009) Study an
Relationship Between Organizatial Commitment and its Determinants
Amang Private Seetor employees of Pakistan , International Review of
business Research papers ,5(3),PP(399-410) .
- Wilkinson, A., Empowerment: Theory and practice, personals
Review,27 (1),pp:(40-56)
- Yancey ,M. , (1998).,Works Teams : Three models of effectiveness" .
paper presented to center for the study of work teams , University of
.www.workteams.unt.edduNourth Texas ,.
9
4 G 0 .3
U 109 U
P ! '4
U 110 U
(1) 2
%(
9
4 20@ 2
+ 9
4 ) $ . 1
9 @ 9 9
4 )G # ( . 2
9 @ 9 9
4 %6
. 3
#0@ % 9
4 )
( . 4
#0@ % 9
4 .
24 . 5
#0@ % 9
4 .& > 6
#0@ % 9
4 i F - 7
#0@ % 9
4 > ) 8
U 111 U
(2) 4
';
;#
!
)
7( 90 2' 4
0 7( 9, 9 4B 4 / Q ;$ 9' 2' 2
Q
. #&$
2'
0( S'
#
9' L, G
#0@ % 9
4
U 112 U
:8 K !
;
!*) F
(x) ! P F& +*
M M ! K .
(# !/ (# ,
9 *
* 0 9$ ' ?B $ 2
? 0 94 ?B >& 3
?
L8@ ] ## D, 2 4
&0
9:( D, )$ 9 * 93 2& 5
.
) # * 4 ( 9 ) )$ L- 9( + 7
9
)$ G6 D - D 4 1 13
* *
2; )$ )G6 *
2& J( 14
U 113 U
% F
?B D4 15
%$ )$
0 16
D
( '$@ ?B 2; 17
7(
)$ )G6
- ) N
18
%'
)$ 9 0 B *
6
# 2 8 ?B C 22
0Y D ?4 *
6
D 23
U 114 U
<' )$ 9 ) ' ( )
0 29
' ? ) 0 ) +
30
(9 4 9 -
90 9-)
C@ * 3 )$ 9(
J$ 31
90
) ( ) )$ 01 & ( 32
3 EI ) + 9
- 33
93 0@
C .
) (
+ & 34
)
6 L-
) 0@ 28 )
6@ 21 N
35
) )$ & )
$
C ?( 93 )$ 01 & 36
L3 ,$ ? (
U 115 U
:!M .
: !
!*) (X) (#" F& :*
> 4 (37)
'/ .2 : .1
)
C0 (38)
> ' .3 2 .2
9 9 : .1
* 0 .4
(39)
9 0 49 – 40 . 3 9 0 39 U 30 .2 9 0 29 – 23 .1
N$ 9 0 50 .4
9
? (41)
9 0 12 U 9 .2 * 0 8 U 5 .1
:'N$ 9 0 17 .4 9 0 16U 13 .3
U 116 U