Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Multiple Caoice: Audi'Iing Examinatiu.1
Multiple Caoice: Audi'Iing Examinatiu.1
Multiple Caoice: Audi'Iing Examinatiu.1
MULTIPLE CaOICE
•
INST--<..TJC':'ICNS: SPlec:tanswer for e::J.ch __,f the following
the ".11Tect
one {o.r- each item bv shading U1e box
"- .c -:C' · to cr. ~L c. ,.21. :): '.! ~Tr chni ce che sheet provided.
STRICTI. Y NC i-:T.ASVRF:.3 AI<E LT.LOTiED. Use penc:.:.l 1~0. 2 cnly.
-----------
~ :-·. "= ' s reporl: lS
cl·U--11 . . :) . . __ the ;nedlUJ,t tt:r.uugh ch he expresseo;:
vJ!ti
Hie· c-,p inion 1ES His disclaimer uf opinion 1: E:S
b. I lis up inion \TC...., ,--.
"~~ His di.sclaine.t of opinion t:o
c. L::.s opini-:>n No !-:is dio:c;lalmer of opinivn YI:S
c1. Hi :o opi:-tion tb
" hi.3 disclaimer of opinion No
3. Sl; Ir~fornati0n risk .refeLs to the rj s:: thac: the auditoL may express
an •Jnqt...all i:ied opinion on the [i.no.r.cial. statements ;..rhen iiJ fact the
financial sta'::.ernent.s uLe ma.ter-'-a}ly rd.SS"Cated.
:32: ThE' ulCJ.ses and rncti ve.s of the in::orrnation pro·;ider m'3.y be a cause
of infcrT2tion risk.
33: TL'- "s,.;u.;-nptlO:l un~ier~Lyi,l~i ,itl 3.Ud~.t: o<=_ fjr.lr.cial St2t~ments is
ch<c"y vnJ L l.Je Lded l~_;' diffen.cnC CjJOlCpS ior similar purpose:
tne ~0ove st::tlements i~i2re incorrect?
-------
a. ·J ~ i!ld 52. . . 71 and S3.
31 onl:,r. d. S2 and S3.
6. A. basi..: tool used by the o.udltor 'co control the c.udit ;..ork and
revi..;~-,· t!1e p;ogress of ti1e audic:
a. Audi~ prog~arn. c. Engagement lette.t.
b. P!ogress flowchart C.. Time "tnd e.{pense summary.
l l J1f' ...::•'• .. C·l•:l ~- J nu
(11~d J. I_ rJ .( J.f\ {,' \1' [ L-r::"'
-·.,
!-' .. ....1.. ; '. '-·: J ·. e ! ......
\-1
·· ~ 1 ·=- r1 · .! (; T_! I _,l•
II
rl'};~-~ !,'•-'' :,:,\~ d<""l>)ll!)\'_ :L f'1<1 i.. C;: l.!!··_, i (,' ·.: t :Ci oi t fJ c r: hun·; <e·
:.j_: i !.h \-;:.:ru:= r. u lJ y ·rc•J,Itl i ;q ;• r j fl c q; l ,_. c;
!'-'1...::; ,-t ~_ 1r.-:~;nt.:. 1 l ' 1 uo;, l.t.i,:,tti.on .-. h ~-: l ;_ ~~
? . l .! u
'
1
I.' l_ \. lo ~ I >,' ~:. :1 i -, -· '-' -'-· '
.._ ._l -~ l~ L ... ce . Ln I '· .=i (~ r ._,: f
llrnitaticn::; _1 fl t- ~--.:· l_ :l Cl J
...~, ~/ -~ t. ern._, .
'i'h<c
c· ·.) r: ; 'j L~i·:.·eC on tlJd'
.l. (_ t j t,-__ , t_ :..r.
VJf·. . :
:j ~; ' : rr't
cl J.Cr' l.
T "" ... c-r.; .. _
v.· · t ; ,··I
• 1 •L h e:
~-,' CJ ;__· L l :1 q ,_ ,, ~J '-~ t 5 r\ i-' ~l C' ~.l r C1 n c f·
ft: j fi ~ J rn~Tl L (J t -'L"E:<tuj rt.::nter"': ~ J l ·?: t.1 c~. i t .
\'lh; ·-.:ll ~. t· ' d
;: r au 1.
'i j ~ l . ·, (-:: ~-j ~-
..... ·t . 1J
• •
First Pre-boaril- Batck 26 fOctober 2013)
f'l• .. mb e .r s .
?
' c. Six members.
b. ~"""'r)'ll rrternbcrs. d. SA\ren members.
2•]. l 1urinq cr.P initial plannL·,q for an audit, c CPJI. obtains n. level
Knc.·J.edrr>.c: of the c:li..ent' S b1.1 Siness t:O r.elp him eva} uate:
a. 1·hE-- 'easonabl,=ne~s of e.st:Lma.t:e.o;, s·.1ch as v.::} uation of
Jn.·/_.:;t:Jrir;~ a.nci c_ll-Jwar..cc:s for dou~tful ,-1ccou11t~s.
n >.Jhc' '.cc: C [0 accep~ t:-Je .:Ol!CJdCJI"illef'L Ol f'::>t.
t:-1e r..c,t'.!I:e of t:he audit: reoort te .,..,ill iss'Je.
ht~' · ,___.f,_ ~..--abil_i ~~Y :>£ t_Le bus1_ness.
"-.:.. .L. pre] l ollinary cr ent ri'.nCP conference wi. th thP audj l:ee .i_:o; a usP~ul
step a~oidi~g misunder~t~ndinqs. Which o~ the fol!owing items is
us cc 3.lly fl(l_C covered ir, ,-:: pre.1 .iMinary conference?
a. Spe 1a: ?roblems known to be rele~~nt tc the audit.
a. 2xce:,·~ t ') which the .independent auditcr wil:l need assistance and
~-c.. c: ·:.Jtion fcc:n t: 1 1e o,··ani~:atio:-1's perso'"lnel .
.. _JL 'c'.)fi of Jccou:it.lrc'., recc. cis ar,r: u.~hPr date. snur<·:es which ~tay
:_nt:=: ;_-cor.~e c~ t\1L' ~·~ .J_t ar1c: ci~tri,:..ulcy oL comnletior..
ci. to~rarr :o tc follo~~d.
i '' t· fl• 0
::-i ' 1L d r1 i :
held C:Cllll!jl:\/, U:e auditc>L'3 :.ollCJ;I.d
a. nc:.:L t., U,c: r~guJ.atory a.uthc.r! \'.i "~'".
b. dl::'tr: :·r; tn~--- \',lJO ·wa.s re~:;pvn ~-~bl j_(Jl. t!~E i . .i 1_·:~qaJ. L-tr..:t.
i:-:terj_;· r.v :_he t:~;-..~arr,jnati--Jl'. t-_.- ;~.h-rl' 1 ty l Ll_euaL a(:t3
·...)j_ t.I1ir1 n ~' ·-=:.
: ,c-po, lc
c. t l ·-,I. n. I- l ii\• !
:·cnC: 1 t. .i.ons
(}. .4.i -' l.' c.:_; r rec 1_
b.
b:lS ~
!~or1-· ~.~E.LJJ( .t.c:.l F\co.fl<;.gem:.:'lt s pr·,,,c,ccUf·•----:.c·l
• vJi'.\' the sr:le•:t· :>n
?rincipJ e~;. ed y,''
cu::np~nS~i Lion --J
._ c: [: j ! i_' :t
t:poc ~ ("'l \ .L c-·v• J._ • I·~:
:); l.
to di:ccov ,..
:L>l.Lt ..Jr J.S n~~~ .:.equtred tc~ t:J.-:tn LLe dUC_it
r_· 5 h~ l:. C (_ ()1-:-cc ~:
._.;, but~ :.;houl.i ,_:'~"~;_id('C·r l.1:E'III ; f he or
·;~ , ~'~~ i,'lq tl-:e au . . l; ~..
pl ,'t.:dl t t ~)
to ,1f\
d.
c·.:JrK!.i' tun:, whenever th•oj' rna] L>:'."iULt LI' nusst:.::t·•ome'ltc·.
"'
:"G. ln a ce\'t.(·W ::;:-~gage1,1ent ',·he ;::>ul·lic ac,oc:ntz"nt pro·r:dQs ;Jcqa··:cv>"
assu. -;nc· Ln t:l,c r>':Dort wh:'..~;1 is lsc-.ueJ.. Th~ s can
• ·,)est C"le:c;.:rir eoJ
;1,
,_·! t-Ll_ L l_ () n
d. ·~ :-< c 1-:. ;:1 r f 9 r t ht·
b. the
~a.i.rJ\
~·n Cand·i I~ed, C:l'.A, was rec,ue:.tc':C tr: pC"rfc-r:r, a review c:l'l<'~gernent foL
Seauc.y, [;;c., a non-pt~bJ.i c .-ntit:y. :>L:dy h'iS an :'..mm;c.' ·:tJCJl dlre.:-'::
financ l·\L l'1te,:es•.. I11 t.h1::, c:.'~udi . J_,-.n, •.:a:~dy i~c:
•
Fi~rst Pre-l;i):trd- Batch 26 (Oct.)ber ~013)
.... -;t bPcaus,~ th'6 f:t.nc:ncid] interest is irnma t.e.: ial, and
•c·:-~;_. ___ ,_., may J.ss.e c1 ;:_ev:,.ew rRport.
c,f Ulc: !:~. .::.n rl·;na~·-':5 Si·•r:vice ac; vice-r:...:.e.:;i.c ·~nt <·f a 1
.L~J·=::·easer::l
5 UCJ9'"'S C.edl<:o,, ::ompet-'-ci..on .:or .1udits
t:h:1t:
aUdJCOca .~f
i<Jde;:>~ncience.
less which of ::r.e
, ~ J... _! o v.; i r 1 <J s:.:t~e.r.=:ncs besc su:_::,r:-n,·ts t:,is argumeut"
"n reduces the a. uCJi to c· s ,n:J. r gin of e r .cor in es ti:n 3. t:. nc;
reqL~red to ~rlce the aud1t profitably
0n over t.ne Z~uc·_t fee may so'Jr the relatio'lship betwe•-:n
t.he auJ1tor and the cljc~~
force t~1e audi Lor t:o take sh:Jct.cuts in the
per.· f ,~ rrna :. ce of ?Uc1lL.. ng [.rOCEcC•U':'E.'=> thc:re~y ..:-educing ~he
e If .c:ct 1. 'Jc-nes s of the a·udl t:
pr1r:2 ""rnpec~ tlvn me~y res'..:l. c in t'1e auditor s ubrni t t: i.ny 21 bid
belc·,.; t11c actua] cost of an initinl engagem,;nc i..n the hope of
making .. ~J '=he loss in subseg>lent ye'?.lS
.. ,,
- l . ~:. , .. :.._·~q fi;:rn Da•,;.s .: ,1 anrl C.::eek, CF .1\s, .i.s r1f::g0l i.atirHJ a
·.~_:,l.._' __ ·,-:::npan y, r,•c:V>I c1JdJ. t cl1e:1t. A3C .i.s in C\ high-·risre
.,. .:: dq:ee dS l.~Jlc'wS: Cl.1ent \,.J..Lll pay:
0JV>ISO~ issJvs 3 cledn, unqu&lif.Led opinion.
PSO, u(jJ a quali£ied 0pin~on l'=> iss~ed.
• 210,000 i E a ~lsclai~er
of op~nion~s issued.
t.her:E.. a ·.;~clat:ioq of the rJ..:..e.s on professional. fees?
·'l. No. Th~.. fees hdve b~e.J. s -~t in ac..:oraa.nc~ \lith Code uf
P c: ,. r -" ~c:· ··,]" ~ Et::1i cs .
b. Yes. It is a contingent tee a~rangnment.
c. Yes. T'le fees are n0t C0ntir.gl'!nt, buc: thP':,'. .are i~1adey1•ate in
lic;;:.t: of the r.!.sk: invclv~d. Th~~:ce n~ight, be a risk o.: a
f'ercvpti.'Jn th3.t the quai.i•.v ·:·f wo~·k co11ld
. • ~ e
))e lmpaired.
.
d. No. ':'hE: re"'!s have ~·een s.::t : n the prnpEcr manne.r. ~lriC:~ an
·mqu.,lifierl opinion dero'\f'.us mo:·e aur:llt_ w<Jrk to detect and 1dj1..cst
misstatements, while a disclai~~r is not really an opinion, but
•
a .refusal t:) express an opinion •
•
::>5. _n an uudit situation, commu:•icat:ion between the succ~ssc·r and
fJrede;es;~or dUdi tors should b.e:
a. A'...lti:urize:i ir·. an eng:::..geTr.enT_ l.;;tt<'.r.
b. AcKnowlecqed ill a l.·eprt:.c: =ntation lelte.r.
c.;. Eit:.er: w>:itte:!l or or:al.
d. Wr:itt:en and includec1 in the hCr:king raper.s.
.., 0.
,•
J \ pec,on wro:>e C::'A c?:c•:.i.ficatE h2s he"!:-t revoked
(.1. :.=cu1 110 louger t--rdctice 0s -:: Ch'\, ur.-..Less reinsta·tE!d.
b. Is a-ttomo.L:i.cwlly reinsi:.ated ·a:s a C:Pl' after two years .'.f r.e ha:s
ac;.:t~d in an exemJ.>.::.Sary mar..Jler.
c. Mu~t ~e reinstated an a CP~ hy the bOA after twc years ii he ~as
actecl 1.n an exemplary rna!lnP.r.
d. Ma:,• be r:e.in.stated :'s a ~PA b;' t.he i30A after three year:; if he
has dCted i:1 an exemplar'/ manner.
]'7. Which r)£ the fol.::.rlWll1':] i:o incl•lded in the seal L:sed by a
Ce.rti.=.l.ed Publi·:: Acc.o•Jntdnl 'l
a. Professional taz receipt. ( t?T!:) nUll'.ber.
b. Comrr.~mit.:y tax cer:-r.ifi.c:ate ';wnbc:c
•
c. Taz. irier,tificat i-Jn Nui:tbe.:: \TIN)
d. CPA ~egis-r.ration number .
38.
.
Ramooe::o, CPA, has an <'. 1Jdi t: C;2.ienr:, P..po.J.lo Layug Inc., whlch uses
another 1~PA for m.J.na.ger-cent se:-v:..ces vic ck. ~amones s~nd:; his firm's
lilerature cove::ing its In,'3fl'J<:'emer.l sc.rvices capo.bi 1.itie.'; to Rc·ck,
Inc. or, an unsolicited Inult;:.nl.j l.)as::.s. ID add.i.tivn, Pc.mones has
;?:Covided a list c-f ::.ritlc.' .,n,s of r_;;e: ··-1o.::r: o::Jf the cJti,er CP/\.
a. Re~;nc;~,es 1.s violac;.ng the cr;de of pr:-:Jfessicn::tl E.thlcs bPcause
t:h~s .s a form of advertising.
b. R&mones is violating the rules on •promotion oE work by
pr:')feo;sional acco:...nt<:.nts.
c. Ror,lunt:.s is violatinq '::'!E: code of professJonal. etlt.i.cs unless h<;-
oLltu.i.ns the other CP.K' s p.cr:mi:i::;io:l to' mall suc:h J iteLature to
Reck, Ir7·c. , •
d. Ram')nes is not violating the code o~ p~of~ssional ethics.
A B c ::::,
Jose l1a~quec Y..::s Y_;s Ye<> ·fe<>
Shirle.f Cordova Yes No No 'lo •
Antonio ..:.raramillo No 'fes No Ye"
Jdmes De~ Rosario No No . No No
•
"
47. Use the same information <.s ·number 16. Wr.o among the· ;;,.bo'!A tAa.m
members are considEred "assist:ant::/'?
A o c L
Josr= Marque." No No• Nc No
ShirL:>y Coraov& No Nr_• No Y~-~
.
.. .>
48. Bamboo Bt.endia, CP.A, has :ius:: finished drafting the '-lUdit
engagernenC.. let!~er which will document the ter;ns of engagemPnt fnr:
the 2013 u.ud.i.l nf Grace ttanufacturing Company. Which of the
following ;,tat·pft1ents i::. least- ll_ke}.f t0 appear· ir. M.c.' Buendia's
audit engagement letter?
a.. .'\fter perfornu.ng our prelimj nary analyci.:::al procedt'res, we will
discuss wi ti1 you the other p1:occd'..lres w~ CC'InsidE>r necess2.ry to
comp}.ete the ~ngagement.
b. Durin~ th~ course of our audit w~ m3y cbs~cve ~pportuniti0s for
economy .LD, o.:: improvec control~cov'c'r, yvc.1r o~erations.
c_ Our engagement is subject to the risk t:·,at mat.erial errors o.c
irrequl~rities, including fr~~d.and defalra~ioris, if they exist,
will nLt be detected.
u. fees tor our !:>E>rvices a.cc b::~-:ed on our re:gC~lar per djem rates,
plus travel and uther out- o::-pccket C}:p~ll:.es.
49.
·'
Ir. forming an 3.Ud.i l opinion, th::> :tudil:o.::
a. Obtains sufL_cien~.. ap~ropn3tc e:mdi t evidence tQ be o.ble ':o
draw an o0inion•
on which to bJ.~e lhat conclusivn.
G
b. Obtai..-ls suffl~~iE.r,t, appropriate au,;i.t evidc;nce t<) be a·0:e tu
draw COllClU3lOnS OL '.•:1ich to '-Jc~SC t!ut O:?il1:'LC;1.
.3tudJ.es c>nd evaluates the ~:~t~!:nal cor.trol structure o£ the
company to b.=_ able to c!raw ':<.'l\C}l_;::>ions on which to oase an
audit
r:l. EvrJ..:.uat:es ;::h(~ risK of mater-ial misstatements for various account
• balances and r:-ero.r:t:s the rnisstatE:rcents to rn<tn:J.gement .
50. ConLad, CPA, is conducting ti1~ 2 013 audit of Manlolo Co. - which
- specialiZf~s .in ':he manufacture of ce.llphone compon~nts. These
cellpnone:e ha·re Intern~t C"lld e:nail capabil.i ties anC: feature Centrir.c
Mobile techn-JJ og:J. .In t:he perf,,rz,tance of the n.udi t, t.he f:)llry,ri ng,
except one, wculc!. be conside1:cd by r:on.::-ad aE" fra11d risk: facto.::~:.
Choose the ex<::_ept io~.
a. t\ew 2CCOL'f.L.. rc;, sto.tut,Jr:' or regula+-.ory requirements t:'hat cou.:d
impajr the Lindncial stab~Jity or profit~~ili~y of the, entity.
b.. Hanay-::ment: dces no-:: engage in coimnitt.i:-:g c:o analysts, credi '.:'. ors
=tnd othe.r.· third parties to achieving wh<.tt iippears to be unduly
aggressive or ciearly u~r~alistic forecasts-
c. A sign.i..fi.cc:.r.t portion or manas~ment' s compensatior. is
represenced by nonuse~>,_ stock ~ptions, or ot:her ir:centive~, the
value of \.Jhich is conti.ngent upon the er!tity achieving unauly
aggressive <.. argets for orera~ing results, ,finar.cial position, 01.
cash flow.
Adverse cc..·nse'=tl'et.ces on siqni·f~cc>.E'lt pen.ding trans~c~ions (such
as a busin.::s s combin.::~tion or r:ontre~~t award) if poor fin<c-:.nc ial
results arc rerorted.
•
Understanding of Coordination,
Under.·Qnuing the 1\ccour.ting Ne~ture, Timing, l)irection,
of t~e tll\:ity and t<.is!< es1~d and Intem31 and Extent of Supervision and
1ts Envimnmc'1t M~teria!ity Control Syttem Procedures Revrew
c.. Ye~ l>Jc.. Yes N':> Yes
b. xes Yes Ye:s No Yes
c. Yes fe!j No No Yef:>
d. ':es Yes Yes Yes"' • Yes
56. 'i'he dLditoL is likely to c::ccumulat= more evidence when the audit
is for a company:
a. \ti!"·,o!:e sh.J.res arF! P'lblic'..y held.
~. 'tile ich has ext ens:'. ve iDd•"bt~dness.
c. Wh' ch is"· to be sold .i.n the near futc~r2.
d. All of the answers. •
f ·~~- ....
~. .!
... '
"17. 'I'h J:'.:JU']bOU t. the audit engag~r:tenL, t.he auditor ~~ould consicteJ
management's assessm<=r,t of th<.: r.lient' s 3.b_;_li'::.y to c: !ntj.nue as a
gcJL':) concerr. Wh:.ch o:::: Lhe f:cllow~ng E1i'::!' cast. :·,;m:~fic3·:': doubt
ao _:, u t c h<-' Pn t i. t y' s gc iug co1 u .e ru as .s urr.IJ t _i_o:t '?
a. T:1e tntir_y hc•aviJ.y usc·ri shoL·c-term d'1bt f1nancing :'or •
i.n"•"SL:nents :;,n long·-l:..vecl ass<=cts. "
b. r·(
v ·
lGf'.Ct.2 · 1- h ~al-Jl~.~""":.
W_--_~._. ·' () L C''\~11
..... ,_ e r 5 +- ' • t- --- ... ' ' .::eqUlCClncn~-~S.
s ·---.c..'"""ll-L-.__.,_.l._:: ·
60. \·:hl c .Jt the fol.1 owil,'J ·>tCJ tentr·:1ts is inco.:: -:ect?
d. 1\n engaqem1:.nt qt.;.ali~y control r.evicw orcii:1a:-:i.l:' involves
:iiscu::; s i.cn wl th ~he er.gagement ;.;a.::tner, a rev.J'w of tlle
tinancia::. s ca tements o :- oL.her :> lWj ect rn<::t.te t: ir1 f.or.na ::.ior and the
report·, a•1cl, in particulc.r, con:>ider<Oition o.f whether +:hp report
is Rppr.opria.te. ~
b. '1'hEo extent of the --ev.i.ew rlcpends on t:hP complexity· of the
cngagerne'1t and tl:e r;_~k :h.lt t.he reporc might not be af>pt:op~·iate
in the r:i .ccums ta:1ce.s.
c. The J.:(.:VlC:W r:educes the resp8nsibiliries of the engdgen,ent
[.'d c:ner.
,:L An engac;e;·,1e'1t quo.l.i.t'/ r::uf'trol r'2vic.w ;ra:,: OC CO:Jd .. cted b,o: cc,re tne
end of t~e 2ngagernent.
61. PSQCl rf'c~llir.es c::Jmplai:->ts f'r.d a:.'.egal 'i.oLs ac,ainst; th,-:: f'. r.rn tc· be
dealt· wltt1 ap).Jropriately. C'.Jn1Gla'~nts anc.: c:lleg."ltions rna' C'>me f:-crn:
;\ c D
a.
proce~ur~s on:
dep~nd
rhe CPA Firm!s SizE ~YES; Th~ N~ture of the CPA Firm's
. Practice
·-:ES; Cost-b<"nefit cons:i.de.ca',i.<'ns =··NO.
b. T:te C?A Firm's Size = YJ:::S; T~e Natur!c! of the CPA Firm's Practice
= NO; Cost-benefit ~~~~ideration~ = YES.
'[he CPA Fi.:-m• ~ S.Lze ·' YES; The Natu::e of the ::PA firm's Practice
= YES; Cost-benefit consideratio:1s = YES.
c. ''Le CPA Firm's 5ize c.c" NO; ':'he Nature of the CPA Firm's P.1:actice
YES; ~ost-b~ncfit con~.Lderations = YES.
67. Tnmc.,hawk Co:cp. o.=ally <::ngc.ged Ind.~_an &. Co., CPAs, to audit i-ts
final ::::.:c<-.1 statements. Tomahawk's mc1nagenent informed Ind~an that i t
'3uspec-ced that t~E:: accounts receivable were materially overstated.
!Uthou,,h the finc...nc~al ~tat:ements ~hut Indic::.n audited did, in fact,
in::::lude a :naterially oversta".:cd ac-;-.ou:1t.s rece~vable bal.ar.ce, Indian
.Lssuec " standard u;''cyualil'ied report. If l'omahawk sues IndL1n for
negJ l':)er.cc ln. f~iling to discoJer the over.-:t.atement:, InJjan' s best
defcc>!t:=:e W)uld be' '::hdt:"
a. _ndian had S.Lc:;r.ed no eHgageme.nc let.ter.
b. nuia:1 per£ormec< th~ CJ.u.ciit in c::.ccordanL:e witl:. PSJ\s.
c Indian w~s not in privity of contract with Torea~awk.
d. 1 jdia ..--1 cl.id r.ot. perfo:.:r, the au.dit recklessly or with e;n intent t0 deceive.
•
Oucu.l ty cont.r-ol policies anC: procedures a:ce designed to promote
68.
an incernal culture =ecognizing chat:
..
A. QL1.1lity is es::;entiaJ ir perfor:rni.n'1 er.gagements.
B. F·.eascnable, and net a0solute, <\Stourauce can be pro·Jided by all CPA
engagemc:nts. •
::
~- The. rirm shou.ld ~lwa.;s move .:o;..rards tne eliminat~on of audit risk.
D. T.te pro;noticn of "~ quality-o1:iented iDte'"rnal culture depends on
clear, consi·s tent c.r.rl frequent-. actions and messag-'!s ··:roJ,, all levels
c f ll-,e firm's mar.agemer.t.
69. ~aint:, CPA, i.s pl .. nninc; the audit of Theory l:'rinters, Inc.
Theoty verbally asserts r, Saiat th~t all the expenses fo~ the year
h~ve been ~e8ocded i~ thP accounts. Theory's repres0ntatiorr in this
:egaLd: ""
a. s su.:'ficient e'.ridencc fot· Sa.int to conclude thJ.t: the
cmn:Jlet;'ness asser:tio:, .is supporte,d for the exp,:nsf~S.
b. CzHl enable Sai.nt to m.i.r.irn2 ZE:: h.Ls work Oil th-= as.ses;;ment of
ccn t :-ol ris.'-<. for the .ccrr.;Jletenc-ss of expenses.
c. .,tc.llrl be di,s:::egdrded ~ccau."e i t is not in wc:iting.
cl. l." no': consiJ.c;re0 a. outficient basis ~or Saint to cr.mclude that
dl~ expense.s have 'oeeu recorded.
71. Th,' folloHing .:..re loqi~-~1 furoctions ot n. CPA itl put.lic acco1:nting
pract.lce:
A B r;
Attest function (l~e., audits, Yes Yes Yes Yes
revie·..;s)
• Tax praccice. !tax ~la~2in0, tax Yes Ye.s Yes No
co:npl.'.ance)
• M~nagement consulting services Yes Yes Yes
!r.t:~c:rna} audit Yes No No
~
76.
a.
'. .
Whiclt of the foll01~:ing sta'.:emE_,nts bes~ describes "detect.i on risk"
The ?.llditor will c::>mpt...te auuit: n1at2riality incorre;ct:ly.
b. Tile auditor wilJ faiJ. to detect materia] rr.i.s8tatemenu.. t!1at
occur.
c. The C:tudi to1.· will ap.1,1ly more audit procedures than are required
in th.: c'i.rcumst.ances.
d. The :•uc~jtor will fili.1 to modj_fy th"' and]t :;;pinion on Lnancial
stater~c.nt s that a.:::e ~Tlterially nLisst.ated.
78. The follo·.-~ing c.re the n1o1::~ .. signific.ant·. powers anci :!:u"lctions of
thE. Boaru of Accou:1tancy (select:·-....~he excepU.on):
a. To pre:>cr.ib.:: and ado!)'t the Plle.s and regulations n'::!cPssary for
car.cyi.ng <)Ut the provisions of RA9293.
b. To super\·ise the regist rat Lon, lict:.nsure and pru.c'cice of
accoll.n'-·'mcy in the Philippines. •
c. To administer oaths in connect.i.on with !:he adn~nistr<.tion of
RA9290.
d. To m~te c·ut sente:1ce£ of 1mpr.i~cnrnent to violators of RA9298.
{·.
\.· \
•
•
F:rst Pre-board - Ba~ch 26 (October 2bl3)
,,.
b. a. of
Review .
.
'33. How J..::mg Wll.l be the term,_ ~f the chaiman, the vic~-chairman
(t~rm as DOA m~mb~r) .".:-H.i the m~mbers of the Professiona.l Regulatory
3oa~d of Accountancy?
Chair:mar, Vice-Chai rm•.n Members
. ., ----·
3 years yearc 3 years
·'c. 1 ye?.r
.J
1 year 3 ye1rs
c 3 years 1 yea.r 1 year
d. 3 ye:1rs l year • 3 year::>
•
tl4. The .i':ollowing are t:r.~ funct:.ons of the Eaucationa.1 Technical
Council (ETC) f.:X-::ept:
~ .
;:, . OetermL~e a !.-inimwn sta."lctard curriculum f.or t.he s':udy of
,l :..count:ancy to bP- i::t.p.l.er:.entE.d in al). schools offcrinq ;1ccountancy
a~ an undergraduate ccu~se.
j. Es taoL. sh tear.hing standards, including~ t:he qualific<n:ions of
'ne.nbe.::s c~ the facu:.ty of schools and colleges of ilCCour.·.tancy.
c. Monitor t!"le pr0gress of the program :m the stuc.y of c\Uditing and
undeL·taking Ttleas}!;ces for. the •attainment of ?. high qud.lity of
accounting educati0~1 in t.he CO'-'i"ltry.
d. Evaluate periodically the performance of educational .Lnstitut~ons
':!£ter:;.ng accountancy education.
.!'
90. :n devel:::>p.i.ng the ovE=ral! <ludit plar, for a. ne"i client, a far;to·.
not to be CCJJ,sid-=red is
a. '!.'he t eriPS :>f. thr: ~ngc:.gem~nt and <>.n:t' statutory responsibj U. tieo
b. The ~l~ent's business, ioc.luding the struct~re uf t~e
orsanization and &c..:ounting'system used
c. ThP. amn~nt of estimat~d audit f~e ;
d. ~'he audit risk.::: and ;:i:roc~du:ces to be re_rfont'ed t::c achie\re e~udi t
objcct'~ves
•
91. Which state~ent is correct?
a. A review involves th-::. :.pplicat.i.on of aL•dit sl<il}s and techEiques
and the g21. ther ing of ;• v:lden.ce.
b. A re•;i:c!w co;~~p..:-ises i:-~qui';:-y, c co':lfirrnati.on, and an:ilyU_cal
proc•=dures which are • d-esignee: to revi..ew the 'r~liabili ty o{: an
assertion that is tht- 1·es:r:;o:1sinil ity of o11e party :Cor use by
another :;;arty.
c. In a compilation engaqem"!nt, thr: acc01intont is en:Jag2d to use
2udit.ir.g expert.j.se as oppos•-'!d to accounting expertise.
d. Since no as[~ural.<Ce j s expre:"sed in a <::ornp:tlation engagem2nt,
a use~s 0£ compi.leci informat).or, deri•v~ r.o benefit. even w:1e:1 the
:3e~";i.CC" has ":Jeea pe.civnn"!c vi.J.th due professional ski.:Cl auc car·~.
"
• •
I
i •
F~rst Pre-board -Bat<:h 26 .{Or.tober 2013)
•
?2. rahich r)£ t.he following f'act::>rs ·or condition~ is an audita:::: l'tast
likeJ....:i to pi..::.n c.n :1.:1~it to disrover?
~ Financial pre~suLes aite;tlng employees.
b. Ir.ac.eqL'&t~ mor.iL.~ rin;1 o::= sig.l.ifir.ant con·t.!:ols.
!ii_ah tu.cnover of seni:::Jr manag~r:1.ent.
c:. In~bility t.o gene::at.e pos_i_tive ·cash flows from 0pe.cations.
':<3. Internationz,l Sta11dards on hudi'ting {ISAs) on whi::h the PSAs are
~as~d arc ~en~ra~ly applicahle to t~e public sector, including
government bl!si,nes3 ertterprises. · -.Hovreve:r, .the applic3bility of the
e-J.ll.::valent PSA£ on Pr;ilippinP- putll.i.c .sector en.tities has not been
aadre::.scd by tf:.e Ao...tditin<;; ~ta.nda.rds and. Practices Council· (Note:
Tl:e 1\SPC has be~n ceplaced by the Aud.i.tiug an.d A.:>st~rance Standards.
Co·.J.ncil) . It is r.r.e u.r.derst:anding ·of the ,"\Sf'C thn.t this matter will
be adc.::es~ed by.: ·
"'· The Cor:unission on Audit itsel£ in due course.
b. T!'le Asso::'iat:ion of CFAs in PubJ~i_c Practice it:=;e!.f in due course.
c. The !? r::ofessio,lc..l Rcgulat·;.on Commission of the PI-J.ilipoine<> itself
Ln due col\r~e.
d. 'II1e E roiess ional Reg.ulatO[Y i3oa rd of Accountancy i Lself in due
C0'.lrse.
9<'. :'\n au.ditor uho has been inv.:.ted to submit a prc?osal for an audit
i3 a
ei1gctg~'>mC!:Jt
a. ?.cedecessor auditor:. c. Principal nuditor.
b. S~ccessor,auditor. d. Interlrn auditor.
96. . ·.n audi ':o1· has ;.;idldrawr-. f.r:om au audi<;: engagement of a pub.1.icly-
lw lCJ CCJ!,lpanj aft~r Cill~.~nCj irreg;.Ilarit:ies Which IT:Ry mat~rially
atf:ect th"! fifli'l.ncial st:atements. The auditor should set forth the
r<e:a~;cn3 ana findings in co1.·respondenc<-! to tl'>e
a. Securities anct Exchan;e Comrniss:..on.
b. CliEnt's legal counsel.
c. ~tock exchanges where. the com?a~1y':; stock is trad~d.
d. Board of 0irectnrs.
:_.-._- y;;yr
//~'i"
Certified Pub.U c J.\ccountar.ts (PIC:? A) • Which ~ne is incorrect?
a. A direct0 r:: cc.n only rc:ptcsent a sector· in a re1d.on i.f he/ s~\e h..1s
' bten a rn<::!mbE:r i:::1 <;ood sta.rcling in such s·ector. in the re(Jion for •
'- •.-{~
I
at lea.;;t t·..:o years at thE: ~~me of. hi!</her nomination.
b. T~ere shall o:::1iy re fourteen ··ational directors, 'unless there is
\
~ valjd =eason to have additional rep~esent..1tion. ·
c. '::'!:2 n.,ticnal d:!rectors shall be a~portioned according to sectors
ir' t!te iour geograph:i_c sect-:Jrs based 0.1 the ratio of latest
a\'l.i.,able numbP-r of '"ewbers :'~11 good .. st:anding ::.rom t:hose ar~as.
<.1. It shall havE: a f·J.il-tim2 career ExecuU_ve Di.-::ec'!:or who shall.
irr:IJ2 ern,:::'_ the "?o:!.icj e~- ;Jrowulgat~d. by the' PICPA Bodrd of
Dir~:~ctcJL; a;1d shalL have d.~.rect surervi::>iui1 ove-r the ?JC.PA
_r·Qcr...=~a.":''Lar·.
98. \'a lmid, CPA and :1uman· rEosmJ::CG~' partnE;r of ABC and. Co •. auditing
firm, ,:,eri0dic3.J.1y studi~s. the CPA finr' s personnel a·dvz:ncernent
exper~ence ~o ascert~~c whether individuals•mee~ing stated criteria
are a:;sic;nc=d increas':!d c'e::Jr2•.;.s of re~ponsib 0clity. 'l'his is ev::..den-:::e
of the CPA firr.1' s adhere!l.re c.o prescribed stdndards of
a. Qual~l:y c.::Jntrol. c. Supervi.::.i'on and review.
~- Due prcfessional care. d. Fieldwock.
99. \~hich o:. tht:: follov~ing is mo:::t lii<e~yo a quality control procedure on
cliellt 2cceptance and :::onti nua.1ce? •
a. Desiynat:e indlv.idual<> as specjalist::; to serve as at.:.thoritative
sources.
b. Frcv.ide adequ~te supervision at. all• · organizational levels,
consJ.dEC.rinq trainiT',g, ability and e}:perieetce of per5onnel
2ssignP.C ir, e:1qageDents.
r::. F.:val:.F;t.,:: clients upon' thE: occurrence e>i Sfecified €VE::nt.s to
dete miiJe whet:Le;r the r2.!.at1.onships ~,J<;ht to b~ continued.
d. ?"'r.icdil<>.3.lly counseJ pP.r.:;crmeJ. as to tlleir progress and career:·
(:·~"~pc.~ :·t.un.Ltit.:-S.
•
l.OO. The. OL:Lc-om2 c•.:: ~l:e
.:cvaJ ua-t_ion or measurem2nt 0f a subject rnntter.
A. Audit ceporc C. Suhj er:t analysis
9. Suhject mattP.r inform2tion D. Criteria
---end o£ examinaticon--
.
•
• •
•