Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Davis Edwards Trading and Investing
Davis Edwards Trading and Investing
Davis Edwards Trading and Investing
Two common applications for options are risk management and modeling energy
investments. In the energy market there are a lot of physical decisions that need to be made on
a daily basis. Do I turn the power plant on and convert my fuel into electricity? Do I lock in a
fuel supply for the winter now or should wait a little longer? Should I invest in building a new
power line between Oregon and Northern California? Option theory provides a way to quantify
those decisions.
From a transaction standpoint, option trading requires both a buyer and a seller. The
seller takes on the possibility of a big loss in exchange for money up front. The buyer pays a
premium to the seller for that service. If the option pays off, the seller will need to find the cash
to pay the buyer. With options, money is not magically created, it is simply transferred between
the two parties. The option buyer is described as being long the option or being long volatility
(since rare events will mean a big profit). The option seller is described as being short the
option or being short volatility (since rare events will mean a big loss) (2010: 20).
Options theory has simultaneously revolutionized the financial markets and caused a
huge number of financial collapses (2010: 21).
In the spot market, commodities are delivered on the day of the transaction. Spot
transactions are usually consumers purchasing small quantities of a commodity for immediate
use. The forward market is a financial market where delivery is scheduled at some agreed upon
point in the future (2010: 44).
1. Negativne cene
2. Ciklična tržišta
3. Nelikvidnost
4. Transparentnost cena
6. Baza
Option is a financial term that describes a common feature of many contracts. This
feature gives one person in the contract the ability to make
some kind of decision in the future, usually to buy or sell something at a
fixed price. Being able to place a dollar value on the ability to make future
decisions is a cornerstone of modern investing. Option contracts work
by having one person pay another for the right to take some action in
the future. The money paid by the buyer to the seller when the contract is signed is called the
premium (2010: 200-201).
Two common applications for options are risk management and
modeling energy investments. In the energy market, there are a lot
of physical decisions that need to be made on a daily basis. Do I turn
my power plant on and convert my fuel into electricity? Do I lock in a
fuel supply for the winter now or should wait a little longer? Should
I invest in building a new power line between Oregon and Northern
California? Option theory provides a way to quantify those decisions (2010: 201).
A put option works similarly. It gives the owner of the option the
right to sell an asset at a fixed price. If the market price is greater than
the fixed price, a put option is worthless. No one will willingly sell at a
lower price than necessary. However, if the fixed price is higher than the
market price, the put buyer makes a profit by selling at a higher price (2010: 202).
Volatility is the tendency of the market to see a large price move. Market volatility
goes in cycles—sometimes the financial markets are quiet and very little is going on, and
other times prices can change rapidly. Because of the way options pay out, option buyers
and sellers are very exposed to the market volatility cycle. For an option buyer, options
offer unlimited benefits if the prices move in one direction, and limited losses if the prices
move the other way.
• An option buyer who is long volatility benefits when large price
movements become more likely.
In some cases, options can be a good way to get into trades that
would otherwise be too risky. A good rule of thumb is that no single
decision should ever be so risky that it risks shutting down the trading
desk. If a trading desk is close to its risk limit, and strongly believes in
a trade, options can be a good way to take on more exposure without
taking on a large risk.
There are two steps to most option pricing models. The first is predicting statistical
distribution of likely movements in the underlying
price. The second step is determining how to replicate the option under those probability
conditions (2010: 221).
The simplest model of future prices is a binomial tree (Figure 3.5.1). A binomial tree
assumes that the underlying
prices can rise or fall a certain percent every day. That percent stays
constant over the life of the option. Prices start at today’s price and
slowly diverge from it over time (2010: 221).
Blek-Šolsova formula
Šta je rizik!
The purpose of VAR is to give a simple description of risk. For example, a VAR report
might be: “Once a month the trading desk can
be expected to make or lose at least $1 million over a one day period.”
This description is both meaningful and short enough to be conveyed
to a large audience. As a single number, it is simple enough to use in
daily reports and easy to examine for trends. For example, if the VAR
estimate had fallen from $20 million to $1 million in the past week, this
would represent a significant decline in the risk (and probably size) of
the portfolio (str. 347).
There are three main steps to calculating a VAR number, which are depicted in
Figure 6.1.1.
1. Construct a distribution of possible P&L moves (usually by examining what
types of moves have happened in the past).
2. Turn all the moves into positive numbers, and sort the P&L into a
new distribution.
3. Find the value in the nth percentile of the distribution (the 95th
and 99th percentiles are popular choices for VAR) (str. 347)
Models and the viability of the model’s assumptions change over time. If a model lasts
20 years, a lot of things can change. Investments like power plants, pipelines, and natural gas
wells all have an extremely long life span. Even when a pricing model is sufficient at first,
there is no guarantee that things won’t change. Assumptions made years earlier can be
invalidated by regulatory changes, population shifts, and technological changes. Exacerbating
this problem is the problem of employee turnover—commonly, the original developers of the
models have moved to another job or retired before problems develop (str. 358).