Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Background of The Marine Insurance
Background of The Marine Insurance
1
(2007) The history and legislative framework of marine insurance, “The Principle of Indemnity in Marine Insurance Contracts”. Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg
2
Legal and documentary Aspects of Marine Insurance contract, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Report, <
file:///C:/Users/User/Desktop/c4isl27rev1_en.pdf> accessed on 04/03/2018
3
Barrie G Jervis, Reeds Marine Insurance (1st Edition), 2005, Bedford Squire London, UK. Page. 1
4
A credit policy where, in case of a mishap of the loss, the debtor was discharged from the payment of the loan of the ship R. L. Carter,
Reinsurance (Brentford, Middlesex: Kluwer Publishing Limited, (c) Mercantile & General Reinsurance Company Limited, 1979), p. 10-11.
5
A Naval laws, containing the principles for the settlement of losses, John A. Bogardus, Jr. and Robert H. Moore, Spreading the Risks (Chevy
Chase: Posterity Press, Inc., 2003), p. 4.
6
The Magazine of the Institute and Faculty of Actuary, http://www.theactuary.com/archive/old-articles/part-3/reinsurance-3A-a-brief-history/
accessed on 11/03/2018
7
Supra No. 3
8 Ibid
9 Supra no. No. 3
10 Ibid
11 Ibid page No. 5
12 Ibid Page No. 6
13
Special Edition, Newsletter for Reinsurance, February 2009 Issue No. 65file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/rsn-2009-iss65%20(1).pdf
accessed on 12/03/2018
14
The History of Marine Insurance Its Origin by Nicholas G. Berketis PhD, <http://docplayer.net/36397658-The-history-of-marine-insurance-
its-origin-by-nicholas-g-berketis-phd.html> accessed on 11/03/2018
15 Supra 3Page No.2
16
Marine Insurance Act, 1745, http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/app/uploads/2015/06/ICL4_Insurable_Interest.pdf accessed on 10/03/2018
17
Marine Insurance Act, 1788, Ibid
18
Marine Insurance Act 1845, Ibid
British Judiciary and Marine Insurance
The British judiciary has played a vital role in not only interpretation of the law but also
candidly settled the issues regarding payment, assessment of losses, clarification of terms,
categories of policies, intentions and obligations filed by the parties. The judgements revel that
how the courts had decided those matters concerning to the purpose of the insurance (1761),19
its terms (1778),20intentions of the parties (1808),21 and the business ethics (1816).22 The
Courts established the mechanism to assess the losses (1847), and passed the prime
judgements.23 Those verdicts had categorised the Marine Insurance policies,24clarified the
misunderstandings in contracts,25 established the doctrines and laid the foundation of the
laws.26 and determined their effects.27 Those prime rulings had resolved the issues among the
parties and strengthened the concept.28
TYPES OF POLICIES: - The Marine Insurance Industry regulates definite policies and the
Act, 1906, has defined the following policies: -
1) Voyage And Time Policies: It is a policy which provides protection for specific trip
from one harbour to another or from one wharf to another. It is common for cargo and
the insurer remains responsible till the landing of the properties.31
2) Valued Policy: - The valued policy provides for agreed value of the policy of the
insured goods.32
3) Unvalued Policy: - It is a policy which does not require the value of the assured assets
contrary to the valued policy. If any damage happens then the assured after assessing
the value of the goods and the damage shall submit the claim.33
4) Floating Policy By Ship Or Ships: - It is a variable policy based on general standings,
wherein the remaining terms are declared subsequently. Moreover, there is also
provision of rectification of any omission or error at any time.34
19
In Lewis V Pucker (1761), Lord Mansfield, held that the purpose of the valued policy.
20
Warranty, Pawson v Watson (1778)
21
Insurable Interest, Lucena v Craufurd: HL 1808
22
In Brotherston v Barba (1816), J. Abbot, held that A contract of Indemnity is the great principle of Marine Insurance Law.
23
In Irving V Manning (1847), the issue regarding the Constructive Total Loss (CLT) was settled.
24
In Lewis V Pucker (1761), Lord Mansfield, declared that Valued Policy could not be a Wager Policy.
25
In Irving V Manning (1847), the issue of Time policy was settled.
26
In case of Carter V Boehm , the Lord Mansfield, established the doctrine of “Duty of utmost good faith.”
27
In Liddgett V sactertan (1871), it was held that valued policy is beneficial for both parties, i.e Assured and the Insurer.
28
Castellan v Preston (1883), Brett, LJ reiterated the basic concept of Marin Insurance case.
29
https://www.ctplc.com/media/72258/The-Marine-Insurance-Act-Centenary-Cause-For-Celebration.pdf accessed on 07/03/2018
30
Marine Insurance Act 1906 1906, “An Act to codify the Law relating to Marine Insurance” [21st December 1906], <<
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Edw7/6/41/data.pdf >> accessed on 11/03/2018
31
Voyage and time policies, Section 25 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
32
What policy must specify, Section. 23 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
33
Unvalued policy, Section 28 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
34
Floating Policy, Section 29 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
Significance of Agreement in Valued Policy
Section 27(3) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 provides:
“Subject to the provisions of this Act35, and in the absence of fraud36, the value fixed37
by the policy38 is, as between the insurer39 and the assured,40 conclusive of the insurable
value41 of the subject intended to be insured,42 whether the loss be total43 or partial.44”
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Valued policy, Section 27 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
46
Definition of Marine Insurance Section 1, MIA, 1906 , http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Edw7/6/41/data.pdf dated 07/03/2018.
47
Contract must be embodied in policy, Section. 22 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
48
Signature of insurer, Section. 24 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
49
What policy must specify, Section. 23 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
50
Disclosure by Assured, Section. 18 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
51
When contract deemed to be concluded, Section. 21 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
52
Insurable interest, Section 5 of Marine Insurance Act, 1906
53
Definition of Insurable Interest, Section, 5 of MIA, 1906
54
Quantum of interest, Section 14 of the MIA, 1906
55
Valued Policy, Section, 27 (3) of MIA, 1906
Judicial background of the Marine Insurance Act, 1906 and the policy adopted the courts
The Marine Insurance Act 1906, is mirror of the hundred years judicious decisions
made during the judicial journey of the law Lords and the jurists, who after considering the
speculations,56 terms, 57 intentions of the parties58, categorising the contracts and the losses,
passed the judgements. It is a bouquet of those thoughtful rulings, which strengthened the
canons,59 thus are still celebrated throughout the globe. 60
56
Carter v Boehm (1766)
57 Warranty, Pawson v Watson(1778)
58 Insurable Interest, Lucena v Craufurd: HL 1808
59 Duty of utmost good faith, established in Carter v Boehm (1766), Lord Mansfield.
60
The Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, invited papers from the scholars and celebrated the above milestone judgement
after 250 years, <https://law.nus.edu.sg/pdfs/cbfl/events/CartervBoehmAfter250Years.pdf
61
Mixed sea and land risks, Section 2 of MIA, 1906
62
Carter v Boehm (1766)
63
Section 6
64
Section 56
65
Section 68
66
Section 56 (2)
67
Section 57
68
Section 60
69
Section 56