Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20 views

    Summary:: Petalwidthcm, Species) Samples: 150

    Uploaded by

    GOVARDHAN
    The document summarizes an analysis of the Iris dataset using k-means clustering and various machine learning models in RStudio. Key steps included running k-means clustering with species set to null, using the rattle function to analyze correlations and error matrices for decision trees, linear models, and SVM, and obtaining 4.5% error rates for decision trees and SVM and 0% for linear models. Decisional attributes like petal length, width and sepal width were also evaluated for accuracy in species prediction.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Summary:: Petalwidthcm, Species) Samples: 150

    Uploaded by

    GOVARDHAN
    20 views5 pages
    The document summarizes an analysis of the Iris dataset using k-means clustering and various machine learning models in RStudio. Key steps included running k-means clustering with species set to null, using the rattle function to analyze correlations and error matrices for decision trees, linear models, and SVM, and obtaining 4.5% error rates for decision trees and SVM and 0% for linear models. Decisional attributes like petal length, width and sepal width were also evaluated for accuracy in species prediction.

    Original Description:

    fgvjgv

    Original Title

    Document

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes an analysis of the Iris dataset using k-means clustering and various machine learning models in RStudio. Key steps included running k-means clustering with species set to null, using the rattle function to analyze correlations and error matrices for decision trees, linear models, and SVM, and obtaining 4.5% error rates for decision trees and SVM and 0% for linear models. Decisional attributes like petal length, width and sepal width were also evaluated for accuracy in species prediction.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    20 views5 pages

    Summary:: Petalwidthcm, Species) Samples: 150

    Uploaded by

    GOVARDHAN
    The document summarizes an analysis of the Iris dataset using k-means clustering and various machine learning models in RStudio. Key steps included running k-means clustering with species set to null, using the rattle function to analyze correlations and error matrices for decision trees, linear models, and SVM, and obtaining 4.5% error rates for decision trees and SVM and 0% for linear models. Decisional attributes like petal length, width and sepal width were also evaluated for accuracy in species prediction.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    Summary:

    In evaluating the Iris dataset, I found it important to be able to reference graphs of the
    samples. By keeping species as null, we can find the k-means clustering for the samples using
    R software. In addition, using rattle function in RStudio I found the correlation between
    samples and error matrix for the models i.e. Decision tree, linear, SVM. Finally, we get the
    results of k-means clustering.

    Data set link: https://www.kaggle.com/uciml/iris/data


    Attributes: 6 (Id, SepalLengthCm, SepalWidthCm, PetalLengthCm,
    PetalWidthCm, Species)

    Samples: 150

    Model accuracy/error rate:

    K-means
    Related work:

    Hierarchical clustering
    Decision tree
    SVM

    S.no model Error rate (%)

    1 Decision tree 4.5


    2 Linear 0
    3 SVM 4.5
    Decisional Attributes:

    PetalLengthCm, PetalWidthCm, SepalWidthCm

    Accuracy of Decisional attributes

    PetalLengthCm – 95.2%

    PetalWidthCm – 98.5%

    SepalWidthCm – 96.9%

    You might also like