Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANPQP Ver 3.0
ANPQP Ver 3.0
ANPQP Ver 3.0
ANPQP Version 3.0 Phase Diagram (Matrix)
Explanation of the Matrix Project Milestones
Complete document Submit document Obtain approval
1 Must Must Must
(1) If Renault/Nissan requests If Renault/Nissan requests If Renault/Nissan requests
2 Must Must N/A
(2) If Renault/Nissan requests If Renault/Nissan requests N/A
3 Must If Renault/Nissan requests N/A ISO/TS
Document submission timing 16949
Activity timing (Document to be submitted upon changes or Renault/Nissan requests)
Phase 1 Phase 5
Category Output Document & Document Completion Instruction (DCI) Phase 2
Requirements Phase 3 Phase 4 RampUp and
Design
Review and OffTool OffProcess Mass
Completion
Planning Production
Element Activity Name DCI Format Example
L M H L M H L M H L M H L M H
Component Supply Chain Management
DCI 2 2 2 2 2 2
(CSCC) 7.37.4,
2.1 SubSupplier Management
8.2
SubSupplier PSW or equivalent (SSPSW) DCI (2) (2) (2)
https://suppliers.renault.com/anpqp/v3/ANPQPVer3_EN/ANPQP/matrixen30_general.htm 1/4
ANPQP_index
Supplier Master Schedule (SMS) DCI 2 2 2
Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring DCI 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2
3.2 Project Planning and Plan/Status Report (SPPMP/SR) 5.5, 7.1
Production Preparation Monitoring 7.6
Production Capacity Plan (PCP) DCI 2 2 2 3 2 2
Capacity Submission Warrant
Renault DCI 1 1 1
(CSW)
3.3 Project Risk and Concern
Project Development Record (PDR) DCI 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Management
Suppliers Internal DR Record (SIDRR) DCI 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
4.1 Product and Process Design
Full Process DR Record (FPDRR) DCI 2 2 2 2
Review
Design Potential FMEA DCI 3 3 2
4.2 Design Failure Mode
and Effects Analysis
Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) DCI (2) (2) (2)
Change List (CL) DCI (2) 2 (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2)
DRBFM Work Sheet DCI (2) 2 (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) 7.17.5,
8.2
HCPP Renault DCI (2) 2 2
Special Characteristics and Key Feature
DCI 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2
4.4 Engineering Product Diagram (SCKFD)
Specifications / Drawing Study and Engineering Product Specifications
Completion DCI 1 1 1
https://suppliers.renault.com/anpqp/v3/ANPQPVer3_EN/ANPQP/matrixen30_general.htm 2/4
ANPQP_index
and Engineering Drawings / CAD data
4.5 Special Renault
Certificate of Certification (COC)
Characteristics DCI (2) (2) (2)
/Conformity of Product (COP)
Management Nissan
5.1 Process Failure Mode
Process Potential FMEA DCI 3 3 2
and Effect Analysis
Floor Plan Layout (FPL) DCI 3 3 3 3 3 3
Work Instruction (WI) DCI 3 3 3
Process Capability Study Plan (PCSP) DCI 3 2 2
5.4 Process Capability Study and
Improvement
Process Capability Study Result (PCSR) DCI (2) 2 2 (2) 2 2 (2) (2) (2)
RamUp Activity Plan (RUAP) DCI 3 2 2
5.6 Activities during RampUp
RampUp Activity Concern and DCI (2) (2) (2)
Countermeasure Report (RUACCR)
5.7 Identification and Traceability
Appearance Approval Report
Nissan DCI (1) (1) (1)
(AAR)
8.1 Non Conforming Product 8D Concern and Countermeasure Report
DCI (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) (2) 8.3, 8.5
Management Summary (8DCCR)
9.1 Design Change Management Design Change Request (DCR) DCI (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
7.17.4,
9.2 Process/Facility Site Change Process/Facility Site Change Request 8.5
DCI (1) (1) (1)
Management (PFCR)
Copyright © Renault / Nissan
https://suppliers.renault.com/anpqp/v3/ANPQPVer3_EN/ANPQP/matrixen30_general.htm 4/4
1. CONTRACT REVIEW
Category Purpose:
To prompt the study of the Request for Quotation (RFQ) files received from Renault-Nissan and identify the technical
aspects of the program.
Element Activity:
Activity Purpose:
To demonstrate that the product and process proposal will achieve the Renault -Nissan targets.
Note(s):
The Product & Process Concept Proposal should be part of the detailed response to the Renault -Nissan provided Request for
Quotation (RFQ) package.
The supplier shall conduct a contract review including all technical aspects of the RFQ package.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Study and develop a Product & Process
Content Concept proposal which achieves all
targets requested by Renault- Nissan.
Output Product and Process Concept Proposal
Document
Key Point(s):
The Product & Process Concept Proposal is a part of the technical response to the Request for Quotation (RFQ) file.
Activity Purpose:
To prepare and implement a plan to achieve all the product quality and reliability targets agreed with Renault-Nissan.
Requirement(s):
The Product Quality Target Study Plan and Product Reliability Target Study Plan shall be part of the detailed response to the Renault-
Nissan issued the Request for Quotation (RFQ) package.
Implement the plan and deploy the quality and reliability target agreed with Renault-Nissan into the product and process design.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Compare the target Implement the plan and report the progress to the relevant
Content set by Renault-Nissan department.
Renault-Nissan with
the performance.
(gap analysis)
Prepare a plan to
achieve the target.
Output Product Quality Target Study Plan
Document Product Reliability Target Study
Key Point(s):
The Product Quality Target Study Plan is the document that describes how the supplier will achieve the quality target agreed with
Renault-Nissan. (This will be requested through Request for Quotation (RFQ) or relevant document)
Key Point(s):
The Product Reliability Target Study Plan is the document that describes how the supplier will achieve the reliability target agreed with the
Renault-Nissan (which will be requested through Request for Quotation (RFQ) or relevant document).
The reliability requirement is defined in the supplier specification as a proportion of failures at a mileage term in RFQ if applicable.
Category Purpose:
Identify and manage the supply chain (including the deployment of Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP) activities to all the
sub-suppliers).
Element Activity:
Activity Purpose:
Note(s):
The suppliers shall have a system for new sub-suppliers selection and current performance evaluation (Criteria for selection,
evaluation and re-evaluation).
All purchased products or materials used in product shall conform to the applicable regulatory/Renault-Nissan requirements. Supplier
is responsible for cascading all requirements to their sub-suppliers to ensure that all Renault-Nissan specifications and targets are
met and sustained throughout the life of the product.
The suppliers shall be responsible for the management and approval of the product quality and the associated document (e.g. Part
Submission Warrant (PSW) and equivalent documents) for all sub-supplier's (including those specified by Renault-Nissan) unless
otherwise agreed in the Request for Quotation (RFQ).
No sub-supplier changes are allowed in Phase 4, unless otherwise agreed by Renault-Nissan.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Select the potential Submit the CSCC Update the CSCC Submit the CSCC Update the CSCC
Content sub-suppliers and document based on whenever there are document after document whenever
make a draft the result of product any changes to the identification of all there are changes to
document of feasibility study. sub-suppliers. the sub-suppliers the sub-suppliers
Component Supply before the start of and re submit.
Chain Chart (CSCC). mass production.
Validate and
approve the
sub-supplier PSW or
equivalent before
start mass
production and
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
submit it if requested
by Renault-Nissan.
Output Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC)
Document Sub-Supplier Part Submission Warrant (PSW) or equivalent
7.3 Design and development (e.g. 7.3.6 Design and development validation)
7.4 Purchasing
8.2 Monitoring and measurement (e.g. 8.2.4 Monitoring and measurement of product)
Key Point(s):
The Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC) is a chart which visualizes the structure of the component supply chain to reinforce the sub supplier
management.
The CSCC shall cover all tiers of the supply chain down to raw material level (including grease, sealant, solder, etc.).
The document shall include details of the supplier names, plant locations, development experience and responsibility.
Special Characteristics shall be identified at each tier using the appropriate symbols (Refer to the “4.5 Special Characteristics
Management”)
Key Features (as required) should be identified at each tier.
Note(s):
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: N-CSCC417 Iss. 2
X65K Doc Rev. Date: 2011/3/2
A B C OBD R
2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/4
Supplier Name: AAA Industry Co. Supplier Code: 1F86 E-mail: m-i@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Nanjing Author: M Ince Tel: +86 458 745615
Part Name: Pedal Compl - Brake w/brkt Remark:
Part No. & Issue Level: 18002 JR458
Design Note No. / DEVO: T0F587
*= Additional detail may be requested dependin on project and customer
Development
Supplier Feature Manufacturing Feature experience of the
Product Tier N supplier
Business *
Feature (Where the
Development responsibility
Plant/Proc Method /
Product Structure Manufacturing Plant Experienc supplier has
Renault/Nissan specified
New for the Tier N supplier
Development experience
Location
Vehicle manufacturer
New for the supplier
*
Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5…N Country State, City
PEDAL COMPL -
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y Y Y X64K
BRAKE W/BRKT
BRKT ASSY -
RJ Stampings Wuhan Plant China Xiaogan N
BRAKE PEDAL
BRKT - BRAKE
RJ Stampings Wuhan Plant China Xiaogan N
PEDAL
Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant
REINF -
RJ Stampings Mumbai Plant Inda Mumbai N
BRAKE
Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant
SLIDE PLATE
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y Y Y X64K
- BRAKE
Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant
LEVER
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y Y Y X64K
COMPL -
PEDAL ASSY
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y N
- BRAKE
LEVER ASSY -
BRAKE PEDAL
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y N
Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant
TUBE -
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y N
FULCRUM
Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant
Swansea
Raw Material NT Limited Wales Swansea N
Plant
PLATE -
PEDAL PAD
AAA Industry Nanjing Plant China Chuzhou Y Y N
Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant
Swansea
Raw Material NT Limited Wales Swansea N
Plant
Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant
Rubber
Raw Material Bursa Plant Turkey Gemlik N
Industries
BUSH - PEDAL OK
Seoul Plant Korea Seoul Y N
(2pcs) Components
XL
GREASE Atsugi Plant Japan Atsugi N
Lubricants
SUB BRKT -
RJ Stampings Mumbai Plant Inda Mumbai N
BRAKE PEDAL
Chennai
Raw Material CA Steel India Chennai Y Y N
Plant
BUSH - OK
Seoul Plant Korea Seoul Y N
PEDAL Components
Bourges
Rolled Sheet Rollem Up France Bourges N
Plant
Swansea
Raw Material NT Limited Wales Swansea N
Plant
SPRING - OK
Seoul Plant Korea Seoul Y N
RETURN PEDAL Components
Guadalajara Santa
PIN - FULCRUM Pins Co Mexico N
Plant Maria
Bourges
Rolled Sheet Rollem Up France Bourges N
Plant
Swansea
Raw Material NT Limited Wales Swansea N
Plant
XL
GREASE Atsugi Plant Japan Atsugi N
Lubricants
RIVET - BLIND, OK
RD, HD OPEN
Seoul Plant Korea Seoul Y N
Components
Key Point(s):
The Sub-supplier Part Submission Warrant (PSW) or equivalent is a document that affirms to the tier 1 supplier the ability of his sub-supplier to
deliver components, which finally allow the final product to meet Renault-Nissan requirements.
Category Purpose:
Identify the requirements, risks and timing associated with managing a project through all phases of Alliance New Product Quality Procedure
(ANPQP).
Element Activity:
Activity Purpose:
Note(s):
Each supplier shall be required to nominate at least one Supplier ANPQP Representative (SAR) for their organization. This person will be
responsible for ensuring that the requirements of ANPQP are deployed through each related function in their organization. As a result, the
nominated SAR(s) shall have sufficient responsibility and authority within their company to successfully undertake these responsibilities.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Select a team leader to Update and resubmit the Supplier Contact Directory when necessary
Content supervise the planned
development process.
Select a project team and
assign roles and
responsibilities.
Create a Supplier Contact
Directory.
Output Supplier Contact Directory
Document
Key Point(s):
The Supplier Contact Directory is the document which gives the contact details of the multi-function team members named by the Supplier's Senior
Management. It demonstrates that all the necessary resources to achieve the Renault-Nissan targets are in place.
The Supplier Contact Directory has three pages and covers;
Head Office
Project Team
Manufacturing Plant
The Supplier Contact Directory shall be provided at the start of a project. A re-submission of the document is required every time any of the
information changes.
The supplier shall add all useful contacts to this format.
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
JR100 Doc Rev. Date: 2012/2/12
A B C OBD 2
R Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/23
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: mayne-mannI@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: I Mayne-Mann Tel: +3344444444
Part Name: Front Carpet Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 82005 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T06854
Head Office Contacts
Address: Logistics:
Unit 15
An Industrial Estate Logistics Partner: U-Haul
Somewhere Delivery Type: Ex Works
Annual Holidays:
Postcode: 65482 Supplier to: From To Duration
Tel No: 00 56 845 54 45 54 Summer Shutdown: 2012/7/23 2012/8/6 10
Renault
Fax No: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Winter Shutdown: 2012/12/23 2013/1/2 7
EDI Number: ABC11111 Nissan Other Shutdown: - - -
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
JR100 Doc Rev. Date: 2012/2/12
A B C OBD 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/23
R
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: mayne-mannI@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: I Mayne-Mann Tel: +3344444444
Part Name: Front Carpet Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 82005 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T06854
Project Team Contacts
Address: Logistics:
Unit 15
An Industrial Estate Logistics Partner: U-Haul
Somewhere Delivery Type: Ex Works
Annual Holidays:
Postcode: 65482 Supplier to: From To Duration
Tel No: 00 56 845 54 45 54 Renault Summer Shutdown: 2012/7/23 2012/8/6 10
Fax No: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Winter Shutdown: 2012/12/23 2013/1/2 7
EDI Number: ABC11111 Nissan Other Shutdown: - - -
ANPQP Document Contact Lab / Trials Contact Safety and Regulation Contact
Name: Ch Kleen Name: B Note Name: N Sinc
Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 34 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 30 Telephone: 00 56 845 54 45 57
Mobile: 00 56 768 60 33 21 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 33 20 Mobile: 00 56 768 60 60 67
E-mail: KleenCh@ABC.com E-mail: NoteB@ABC.com E-mail: SincN@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: ANPQP Facilitator Job Title: Testing Facilities Leader Job Title: Design Manager
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
JR100 Doc Rev. Date: 2012/2/12
A B C OBD 2
R Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/23
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: mayne-mannI@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: I Mayne-Mann Tel: +3344444444
Part Name: Front Carpet Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 82005 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T06854
Manufacturing Plant Contacts
Address: Logistics:
Unit 15
An Industrial Estate Logistics Partner: U-Haul
Somewhere Delivery Type: Ex Works
Annual Holidays:
Postcode: 65482 Supplier to: From To Duration
Tel No: 00 56 845 54 45 54 Renault Summer Shutdown: 2012/7/23 2012/8/6 10
Fax No: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Winter Shutdown: 2012/12/23 2013/1/2 7
EDI Number: ABC11111 Nissan Other Shutdown: - - -
Manufacturing Quality Manager Manufacturing Quality Contact Manufacturing Quality Contact 24h
Name: J Jung Name: F March Name: F March
Telephone: 00 56 845 45 58 88 Telephone: 00 56 845 45 58 89 Telephone: 00 56 845 45 58 89
Mobile: 00 56 768 06 05 04 Mobile: 00 56 768 06 05 00 Mobile: 00 56 768 06 05 00
E-mail: JungJ@ABC.com E-mail: MarchF@ABC.com E-mail: MarchF@ABC.com
Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56 Fax: 00 56 845 56 56 56
Job Title: Manufact. Quality Senior Manager Job Title: Manufact. Quality Team Leader Job Title: Manufact. Quality Team Leader
Activity Purpose:
Plan the project activities in line with Renault-Nissan milestones and monitor the progress.
Note(s):
The tier 1 supplier shall deploy all Project Planning and Production Preparation Monitoring requirements to all sub-suppliers (including in-house
sub-suppliers).
There are several sheets on Production Capacity Plan (PCP) format file and the tier 1 supplier shall submit the Cover Sheet in Phase 2. The other
sheets shall be prepared and submitted upon Renault-Nissan requirement.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Plan and monitor the required ANPQP activities.
Content Ensure targets for each activity and milestones are included in the plans.
Create the initial plans as Finalize and submit Update the plans if necessary. Review and update the
required. required plans. Monitor progress to plans and report status plan as required.
Output Supplier Master Schedule (SMS)
Document
Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan / Status Report (SPPMP/SR)
Capacity Submission
Warrant (CSW) (Renault)
Production Capacity Plan (PCP)
Key Point(s):
These five boxes are to show the date that parts for each specified trial are to be delivered. The
Delivery Date (x5)
delivery dates are given by Renault/Nissan to the supplier.
In case of the part to be delivered to ILN (International Logistic Network), delivery date for ILN to
ILN Delivery Date (if applicable)
be shown.
Quantity (x5) These five boxes are to show the quantity of parts for each specified trial.
Plant SOP Date (Renault/Nissan) This is the date that production will commence at the relevant Renault/Nissan plant.
This figure represents the annual volume assuming that the maximum monthly requirement for
the year was required in every month.
Planned Maximum Annualized Production
E.g. annual volume could be 350,000 units, but with a peak monthly requirement of 35,000 units,
Build
the maximum annualized production volume would be 411,250 units (based on 20 days /month
and 235 days/ year).
Identify year and months that the timing plan covers. Timing for each element should be shown
Time Scale using a time-scale in months (maximum) to cover the whole of the project life and with reference
to the standard set of symbols.
Enter the Renault/Nissan project milestone names.
Item examples to be planned timing for:
Trial and SOP (Start Of Production) of Renault/Nissan
Project Milestones
Project kick-off meeting held by Renault/Nissan
Delivery of trial parts to Renault/Nissan
Design data freeze and release
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 Doc. Rev. Date:
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Dec 1st 2010
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: DVC Compl - Auto Trans Cont Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 34901 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04587
Vehicle Trial Production Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Annuale Production
Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty SOP Date Volume Max.
Requirements Date Date Date Date Date
(Forcast information) PT Lot 2011/8/18 50 PT Lot 2 2011/10/20 100 2011/12/19 120,000
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 Doc. Rev. Date:
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Dec 1st 2010
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: DVC Compl - Auto Trans Cont Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 34901 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04587
Vehicle Trial Production Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Annuale Production
Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty SOP Date Volume Max.
Requirements Date Date Date Date Date
(Forcast information) PT Lot 2011/8/18 50 PT Lot 2 2011/10/20 100 2011/12/19 120,000
8 Production Facilities (inc. Test) Installation Engineering G. Eto Equipmemt Installation Issue TPM planning
Quality Assurance
9 Control Plans FB trial result
S. Ito Develop Draft FB T0 Result Re-submit (if updated)
Engineering
10 Floor Plan layout/ Process Flowchart
S. Eto Design Manufacturing Process Design Floor Plan Lay Out
11 Operation Sheets/ Work Instructions Production J. Kudo Develop Work Instruction Update Work Instruction
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 Doc. Rev. Date:
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Dec 1st 2010
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: DVC Compl - Auto Trans Cont Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 34901 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04587
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 Doc. Rev. Date:
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Dec 1st 2010
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: DVC Compl - Auto Trans Cont Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 34901 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04587
Vehicle Trial Production Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Delivery Annuale Production
Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty Trial Qty SOP Date
Requirements Date Date Date Date Date Volume Max.
(Forcast information) PT Lot 2011/8/18 50 PT Lot 2 2011/10/20 100 2011/12/19 120,000
Key Point(s):
The Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan / Status Report is a document that is used to establish the targets for the 4M
(Man, Material, Machine, Method) at each stage of the project and to report the achievement of these targets at each milestone.
The supplier shall complete a Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Plan/Status Report for each part or part family/group. This
document should identify the targets set and results achieved by the supplier for each Renault/ Nissan project milestone.
All targets shall be expressed as a percentage of required Start of Production (SOP) condition.
For Renault minimum timing requirements to achieve these targets, see company specific requirements.
Note: For Renault, the Full Volume Conditions are at the end of ramp-up.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault / Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document.
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel No The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level As issued by Renault / Nissan design department.
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Milestone Enter the Renault/ Nissan project milestone name.
M Indicate the planned total number of personnel (including all shifts) who will manufacture the product at each
A Planned Target
milestone
N
% of Personnel at Full
Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the personnel required at full volume condition
Volume Condition
Manning Requirement
Achievement Indicate the actual number of personnel used to manufacture the product at each milestone
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of Full Volume Condition Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the full volume condition
Skill Level Planned Target Indicate the planned number of fully trained personnel who will manufacture the product at each milestone
% of Personnel at Full
Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the personnel required at full volume condition
Volume Condition
% of Process Capability
Indicate the above plan as a percentage of features shown on the Process Capability Study Plan.
Study Plan
Indicate the actual number of features, as shown on the Process Capability Study Plan, that were capable at
Achievement
each milestone
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
Straight Through Ratio Planned Target Indicate the planned percentage of good product manufactured without rework at each milestone
% of SOP Target Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the SOP target
Achievement Indicate the actual percentage of good product manufactured without rework at each milestone
% of Components Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the total number of sub-components to be fully approved before
Approved by SOP SOP
Approval of
Sub-components Achievement Indicate the actual number of sub-components fully approved at each milestone
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
Planned Target Indicate the planned number of parts with graining approval at each milestone.
% of SOP Target Indicate the above plan as a percentage of the total number required for SOP.
Part Graining Achievement Indicate the actual number of parts with graining approval at each milestone
% of Planned Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the planned target
% of SOP Target Indicate the above achievement as a percentage of the SOP target
Part Marking for Mass Indicate the planned number of parts with mass production marking at each milestone.
Production Note:
Planned Target
Component marking includes any marking that is made on the product to aid identification of the product.
Typically this includes part number, Renault/ Nissan symbol, Material type, traceability identification. For
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X78 Doc Rev. Date: -
A B C OBD 2
R Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/31
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: pleasder@abc.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: P Leader Tel: +44 7895 156 456
Part Name: Widget A Milestone: Plan
Part No. & Issue Level: 12345 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T0F789
Project Milestones
Production Preparation Influencing Factors (All numbers below are cumulative numbers) Comments
S-Lot PT1 PT2 SOP
Planned Target 0 2 2 2
% of Personnel at Full Volume Condition 0% 100% 100% 100%
Manning Number of
Achievement
Requirement Personnel
% of Planned Target
M
% of Full Volume Condition
A
Planned Target 0 1 2 2
N
Number of % of Personnel at Full Volume Condition 0% 50% 100% 100%
Skill Level Personnel Fully Achievement
Trained % of Planned Target
% of Full Volume Condition
Planned Target 2 8 8 8
% of Supplier Test Plan 25% 100% 100% 100%
Test Number of Tests
Achievement
Achievement Passed
% of Planned Target
% of SOP Target
Planned Target 0 5 5 5
% of Process Capability Study Plan 0% 100% 100% 100%
Process Number of
Achievement
Capability Features Capable
% of Planned Target
% of SOP Target
Planned Target - 92% 98% 98%
Straight % of SOP Target - 94% 100% 100%
% of Product
Through Achievement
Straight Through
M Ratio % of Planned Target
A % of SOP Target
T
Planned Target - 94% 98% 100%
% of SOP Target - 94% 98% 100%
E % of OK Product
OK Ratio Achievement
R (Including Rework)
% of Planned Target
I
% of SOP Target
K A Planned Target 0 1 1 1
E L Approval of Number of Sub- % of Components approved by SOP 0% 100% 100% 100%
Y Sub- components fully Achievement
components approved % of Planned Target
M % of SOP Target
E Planned Target 0 1 1 1
A Number of % of SOP Target 0% 100% 100% 100%
S Part Graining Components with Achievement
U Graining Approval % of Planned Target
R % of SOP Target
A Planned Target 0 2 2 2
Number of
B Part Marking % of SOP Target 0% 100% 100% 100%
Components with
L for Mass Achievement
Mass Production
E Production % of Planned Target
Marking
S % of SOP Target
Planned Target 2 2 2 2
Production Number of % Planned at Full Volume Condition 100% 100% 100% 100%
Tooling Production Tools Achievement
Completion Complete % of Planned Target
% of Full Volume Condition
Planned Target 2 2 2 2
M Production % Planned at Full Volume Condition 100% 100% 100% 100%
Number of Gauges
Gauging Achievement
A Complete
Completion % of Planned Target
C
% of Full Volume Condition
H
Planned Target 0 2 2 2
I Number of
Facilities % Planned at Full Volume Condition 0% 100% 100% 100%
N Facilities
Commission Achievement
E Commissioned in
ed % of Planned Target
Final Location
% of Full Volume Condition
Planned Target - 0.15 0.15 0.15
Production % Planned at Full Volume Condition - 100% 100% 100%
Cycle Time
Cycle Time Achievement
Achievement
Achievement % of Planned Target
% of Full Volume Condition
Planned Target 5 10 50 100
Quantity of % Planned at Full Volume Condition 5% 10% 50% 100%
M Packaging Packaging Achievement
Availability
E Available % of Planned Target
T % of SOP Target
H Planned Target 1 1 2 2
O Number of Work % of SOP Target 50% 50% 100% 100%
Work
D Instructions Instructions Achievement
Complete % of Planned Target
% of Full Volume Condition
Average Score
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No./Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X78 Doc Rev. Date: 2011/2/28
A B C OBD 2
R Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/31
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: pleasder@abc.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: P Leader Tel: +44 7895 156 456
Part Name: Widget A Milestone: PT1 Status Report
Part No. & Issue Level: 12345 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T0F789
Project Milestones
Production Preparation Influencing Factors (All numbers below are cumulative numbers) Comments
S-Lot PT1 PT2 SOP
Planned Target 0 2 2 2
% of Personnel at Full Volume Condition 0% 100% 100% 100%
Manning Number of
Achievement 0 1 Person not in place, starts wk 10
Requirement Personnel
M
% of Planned Target 100% 50%
% of Full Volume Condition 0% 50%
A
Planned Target 0 1 2 2
N
Number of % of Personnel at Full Volume Condition 0% 50% 100% 100%
Skill Level Personnel Fully Achievement 0 1
Trained % of Planned Target 100% 100%
% of Full Volume Condition 0% 50%
Planned Target 2 8 8 8
% of Supplier Test Plan 25% 100% 100% 100%
Test Number of Tests
Achievement 2 6 Re-testing, results wk 15
Achievement Passed
% of Planned Target 100% 75%
% of SOP Target 25% 75%
Planned Target 0 5 5 5
% of Process Capability Study Plan 0% 100% 100% 100%
Process Number of Tool modification pending,
Achievement 0 4
Capability Features Capable Completion wk 14
% of Planned Target 100% 80%
% of SOP Target 0% 80%
Planned Target - 92% 98% 98%
Straight % of SOP Target - 94% 100% 100%
% of Product
Through Achievement - 90%
Straight Through
M Ratio % of Planned Target - 98%
A % of SOP Target - 92%
T
Planned Target - 94% 98% 100%
% of SOP Target - 94% 98% 100%
E % of OK Product
OK Ratio Achievement - 93%
R (Including Rework)
% of Planned Target - 99%
I
% of SOP Target - 93%
K A Planned Target 0 1 1 1
E L Approval of Number of Sub- % of Components approved by SOP 0% 100% 100% 100%
Y Sub- components fully Achievement 0 1
components approved % of Planned Target 100% 100%
M % of SOP Target 0% 100%
E Planned Target 0 1 1 1
A Number of % of SOP Target 0% 100% 100% 100%
Awaiting judgement by
S Part Graining Components with Achievement 0 0
customer
U Graining Approval % of Planned Target 100% 0%
R % of SOP Target 0% 0%
A Planned Target 0 2 2 2
Number of
B Part Marking % of SOP Target 0% 100% 100% 100%
Components with
L for Mass Achievement 0 2
Mass Production
E Production % of Planned Target 100% 100%
Marking
S % of SOP Target 0% 100%
Planned Target 2 2 2 2
Production Number of % Planned at Full Volume Condition 100% 100% 100% 100%
Tooling Production Tools Achievement 2 2
Completion Complete % of Planned Target 100% 100%
% of Full Volume Condition 100% 100%
Planned Target 2 2 2 2
M Production % Planned at Full Volume Condition 100% 100% 100% 100%
Number of Gauges
A Gauging Achievement 2 2
Complete
C
Completion % of Planned Target 100% 100%
% of Full Volume Condition 100% 100%
H
Planned Target 0 2 2 2
I Number of
Facilities % Planned at Full Volume Condition 0% 100% 100% 100%
N Facilities
Commission Achievement 0 2
E Commissioned in
ed % of Planned Target 100% 100%
Final Location
% of Full Volume Condition 0% 100%
Planned Target - 0.15 0.15 0.15
Production % Planned at Full Volume Condition - 100% 100% 100%
Cycle Time Cycle time to be reduced by
Cycle Time Achievement - 0.25
Achievement including 3rd operator
Achievement % of Planned Target - 60%
% of Full Volume Condition - 60%
Planned Target 5 10 50 100
Quantity of % Planned at Full Volume Condition 5% 10% 50% 100%
M Packaging Packaging Achievement 5 10
Availability
E Available % of Planned Target 100% 100%
T % of SOP Target 5% 10%
H Planned Target 1 1 2 2
O Number of Work % of SOP Target 50% 50% 100% 100%
Work
D Instructions Instructions Achievement 1 1
Complete % of Planned Target 100% 100%
% of Full Volume Condition 50% 50%
Average Score 100% 84%
Key Point(s):
The Production Capacity Plan (PCP) is intended to confirm that the production capacity to support Renault / Nissan requirements will be available
and not constrained by the mix of product required.
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
A B C OBD Doc. Rev. Date:
R
Doc. Origin Date:
Supplier Name: Supplier Code: E-mail:
Supplier Plant Name: Author: Tel. No:
Part Name: Remark
Part No. & Issue Level:
Design Note No. / DEVO:
Gray boxes can be either filled or calculated
Planned capacity
(ANPQP : production capacity plan document)
Next Process Machine Name of Ref List of Standard Nb Average This operation Cumulated Effective Nb hours Nb shifts Total Number of Percentage Number of part Current Weekly
operation operation type and the part final cycle time parts/cycle operational scrap rate Downstrea capacity per per shift per week Weekly machines of (from this capacity
Identificatio produced product [sec] efficiency [%] m scraps hour (same base working production operation) used (equivalent
n by this using (based on [%] as OEE time allocated to per final final product)
operation this Ref. production (this op. calculation) thisRenault- product
results) [%] included) Nissan parts (coefficient)
(not final
including product [%]
scraps)
Milling A Milling
10 20 Plane machine Bearing cap 123 123 300 2 85.0% 0.00% 0.00% 20.40 7.0 18 126.0 1.0 100.0% 1.0 2570
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
0.00% 0.0
Designation :
Designation :
Site : Vehicle/Function :
parts/w
W0715 96 70.0% 5.0% 24.9 15 374 259 Number is sum of left and right parts.
W0815 96 70.0% 3.0% 25.5 22.5 573 418 300
Numbers apply to "Capteur
W0915 96 80.0% 3.0% 29.1 22.5 655 468 Antipincement " only
200
W1015 96 80.0% 3.0% 29.1 22.5 655 518
*YYYY/MM [days/month]
[B] Working Days per month Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14
31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
*Depend on Calendar month or Weekly month
[pcs/month]
[F] Production Capacity Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 TOTAL
per month 36,704 33,152 36,704 35,520 36,704 35,520 36,704 36,704 35,520 36,704 35,520 36,704 432,160
*F = (3,600 / C * D * E) * (A / 60 * B)
[pcs/month]
Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 TOTAL
YNM 1,200 13,000 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 12,300 137,200
DFL 2,500 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 122,500
0
0
0
Nissan Plant 1,200 15,500 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 259,700
0
0
0
0
0
Nissan IPC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
A 0
B 0
C 0
0
0
Other OEM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
[G] Total Demand 1,200 15,500 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 24,300 259,700
[H] Difference ##### 17,652 12,404 11,220 12,404 11,220 12,404 12,404 11,220 12,404 11,220 12,404 172,460
*H = F - G
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14 May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14
【Countermeasure】
Category Take countermeasure items Responsibility Due date
Quality
OK ratio & STR achieve the target
Man
Machine
Special team for Maintenance & Quality
Outsourcing
Method Bank build
Key Point(s):
The Capacity Submission Warrant gives the demonstration that the suppliers’ industrial system is apt and able to respond to Renaults’
production volumes & lead-time Targets, during the increase in production and serial mass production phase.
The production volumes & lead-time Targets are given by Renault.
Group of part references (one group per document) are proposed by Renault according to Supplier processes.
Supplier has to contact Renault Purchasing Department in case of remarks on parts groups.
The supplier shall document his industrial production capacities in accordance to :
The Production Capacity Plan Results
The Supplier Production Preparation Monitoring Status Report
This is denoted in weekly volumes of parts to be produced for a given period, agreed in accordance with the increase in given
production or the quarter Renault Reference Capacity.
The industrial capacity can be proved and backed up through supplementary documents (mix theory, Capacity Survey Vx…).
All capacity evolution has to be agreed by Renault prior to any change.
The supplier must use the ANPQP document format and is not allowed to use its own document
The supplier must submit the "Capacity Submission Warrant" for Renault Approval before Supplier Start of Production (Supplier SOP)
For rules related to document submission, refer to the Ground Rules of Document Submission page
Supplier Name: Rapid Automotive Supplier Code: 00024524 01 Document Origin Date : 07/09/10
Supplier Plant : Barcelona Author : John Thomson Tel N° : 33 43583924
Part Name : Bumper
Part No & Issue level : 8200 585 523 / 524 /525/526/527/528 Index : D
Design Note / DEVO :
Reason for Submission Initial Submission Design Change Location Change Details/other :
Re-Submission Process Change Tooling Replacement
Material Change Sub-Supply Change Tooling Refurbishment
8200585523 Bumper N°1 White B98 250 300 400 500 1000 2000
8200585524 Bumper N°2 Green B98 50 60 100 100 500 1000
8200585525 Bumper N°3 Yellow B98 100 80 120 140 300 2000
8200585526 Bumper N°4 Red B98 70 80 100 100 150 1500
8200585527 Bumper N°5 Black B98 50 60 100 100 150 1500
8200585528 Bumper N°6 Orange B98 60 70 80 90 100 1000
Global volume to use for your answer 580 650 900 1030 2200 9000
Global volume to use for your answer 4550 4800 7400 4550 4550 8600
Supplier Declaration :
I confirm that the information covered by this documentation confirm that our industrial system is operational, at the level of performance foreseen to
manufacture and to deliver products in conformity to the specifications, to the requested volume and at the requested date. Any deviation from this
declaration are as follows :
RENAULT APPROVAL
APPROVAL INTERIM APPROVAL REJECTED
Note: Approval by Renault shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
Activity Purpose:
Identify all project risks and concerns, and manage corrective and preventative actions during design and product/process development.
Note(s):
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Identify and record all project risks and concerns during design and product/process development.
Content Identify and record the root cause(s) and countermeasure(s) and define the implementation schedule
Confirm that the effect of potential countermeasures will not cause new concerns
Confirm implementation and effectiveness of all countermeasures
Share countermeasure details with Renault-Nissan
Output Project Development Record
Document
Key Point(s):
The purpose of the Project Development Record is to compile on one form, all concerns and development issues identified during the product
development and production preparation phase. This document will operate as a project diary.
The document will serve as an historical reference when conducting an analysis of design or process failure and effects study on future projects.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault-Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document.
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel No: The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document.
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing.
Part No. & Issue Level As issued by Renault-Nissan design department.
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Detail The concern detail with sketch whenever possible.
Raised by The name of the person responsible for raising the report.
Date The date of raising the report.
Build The trial build at which the identified concern was raised.
Root cause Details of root cause(s). The original report should contain full and extensive information.
Details of temporary/permanent countermeasures.
Countermeasure
The original report should contain full and extensive information.
Design note Design note number for any countermeasures which result in a design change.
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X123
A B C OBD
Doc. Rev. Date: Sep. 20th 2011
R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Jun. 23th 2011
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A999 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: Kick Plate Inner Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 12345 XX123
Design Note No. / DEVO: TQ2345
Root cause
Concern identified during T0 off-tool trial
Injection tooling incorrect Confirmed OK following T01
inspection activity.
accuracy trial part inspection activity.
Report
No. Tool modification will be
Countermeasure
Design Note: TQ1234 Design Note: TQ1234 Design Note: Design Note: Design Note:
Raised by: NISSAN Date: 22/6/2011 Judgement: NG Date: 26/8/2011 Judgement: OK Date: Judgement: Date: Judgement: Date: Judgement:
Date: 6/22/2011 Build: T0 trial Confirmation NG - 22/6/11 (J Smith, NEPQE) OK - 26/8/11 (J Smith, NEPQE)
Sharp edge identified during T1 trial.
Design mismatch, design note (TQ-2345
Root cause
issued for VC-LOT adoption) Design Note (TQ-2345, for Confirmed OK during VC-
VC-LOT adaption) has not LOT part source inspection
applied yet. activity at supplier
Report
No. Desigh note (TQ-2345)
Countermeasure
Design Note: Design Note: TQ1234 Design Note: TQ2345 Design Note: Design Note:
Raised by: NISSAN Date: Judgement: Date: 26/8/2011 Judgement: NG Date: 15/9/2011 Judgement: OK Date: Judgement: Date: Judgement:
Date: 26/8/2011 Build: T1 trial Confirmation NG - 26/8/11 (J Smith, NEPQE) OK - 15/9/11 (J Smith, NEPQE)
Category Purpose:
Element Activity:
Purpose:
In order to assure the quality requirements from Renault-Nissan, suppliers and Renault-Nissan need to clarify potential quality problems and
solve them in design or development stage. Design review is held to prevent all the possible quality problems before their occurrence.
In addition to the supplier internal design review, Renault-Nissan requires to attend on joint design review with Renault-Nissan based on the
assessment level.
Notes:
Design review implementation timing is required to be clarified in supplier master schedule or its substitute documents.
Full Process DR is applied to the system that is assessed as level H as a joint design review with Renault-Nissan.
Quick DR is applied to the system that is assessed as level M as a joint design review with Renault-Nissan.
Full Process DR
Activity Purpose: :
Full Process DR is applied to systems / parts having high newness such as first adoption in the world or first adoption in Renault-Nissan (are
equivalent to assessment level H) as proactive prevention activities against potential quality problems.
Design and production engineers in suppliers and Renault-Nissan jointly detect potential failure modes and decide countermeasure against
them by using standardized tools such as Design Potential FMEA / FTA.
Important characteristics that must be controlled in mass-production process and control plans for these characteristics are clarified by using
the standardized tools that Renault-Nissan requires.
Results are reviewed by expert reviewers of Renault-Nissan in order to study any risk to quality.
Quick DR
Activity Purpose: :
Engineers of suppliers and Renault-Nissan jointly conduct proactive prevention against defects and customer dissatisfaction issues swiftly
and efficiently by focusing on changes in design (assessment level M). Defects and customer dissatisfaction issues caused by changing
points are expected to be found through intensive discussion among design, test and production engineers of suppliers and Renault-Nissan.
Countermeasures for these issues are filled in the DRBFM worksheet from the viewpoints of design, test and manufacturing.
Finally, the results are reviewed by expert reviewers of Renault-Nissan in order to study any risk to quality.
Activity Content:
:
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity In the pre-preparation step, summarize changing points If newness level of a design change in phase 3, 4 or 5
Content
between base design and new design in the Changes List is same level with assessment level M, Quick DR is
form. conducted focusing on the changes in design. Basic
Based on the Changes List, consider concerns related to the procedure is same as described for phase 2.
changing points and summarize the results in the preparation
section of the DRBFM worksheet.
The preparation section of the DRBFM worksheet starts with
the column “part name” and ends with column
“countermeasure to eliminate the concerns”.
In the preparation step, design, test and production engineers
of suppliers and Renault-Nissan gather to have an intensive
discussion focusing on results of the pre-preparation.
Key Point(s):
The Supplier Internal Design Review Record is a summary of the main issues discussed in the supplier internal design reviews. It shall include a list
of issues identified and countermeasures implemented. Attached to this summary are the minutes of all the internal design reviews.
The Supplier Internal Design Review Record is used to confirm that the product and process targets in each phase of Alliance New Product Quality
Procedure (ANPQP) were achieved and all issues/ concerns have been resolved.
The Supplier Internal Design Review Record shall cover the following items as a minimum:
Review of the output documents from the Project Risk and Concern Management activity
Design/ functional requirement considerations (Appearance/ Shape/ Performance/ function etc.)
Formal reliability level and confidence level targets
Component/ sub-system/ system duty cycles (Reliability/ Durability)
Computer simulation and bench test results
Analysis of Potential Failure and Effects
Review of the design for manufacture and assembly effort
Assembly build variation results
Test failures
Design verification progress
Regulatory requirements
Logistics and Packaging
Key Point(s):
The Full Process DR Record is a summary of main issues discussed with Renault / Nissan in Full Process DR.
The Full Process DR Record is used to confirm that product and process targets in each phase of ANPQP were achieved and all issues / concerns have been
resolved.
Describe the documents that Renault / Nissan requires based on the contents shown above.
Key Point(s):
The Quick DR Record is a summary of main issues discussed with Renault / Nissan in Quick DR.
The Quick DR Record is used to confirm that product and process targets in each phase of ANPQP were achieved and all issues / concerns have been resolved.
Base design and changing points from the base design (Changes List)
Concerns related to the changing points and their effects (DRBFM) results
Design verification results for concerns identified through DRBFM
Computer simulation and bench test results
Countermeasures for problems identified through the computer simulation and bench test
Important control characteristics and Process Capability Index
For rules related to document submission, refer to the Ground Rules of Document submission page.
Describe the documents that Renault / Nissan requires based on the contents shown above.
Activity Purpose:
Identify potential design failure modes, their associated causes and their effects.
Implement effective and adequate countermeasures for the potential failure modes and their associated causes.
Note(s):
Significant system faults shall be analysed using FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) to identify all possible causes and implement countermeasures for
them.
The scope of this activity will be decided through discussion between Renault / Nissan and suppliers.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Organize the system Review and update related output documents whenever the design is changed
Content structure and functions or modified.
using System Structure
Diagram and Function
Block Diagram.
Detect potential failure
modes and decide
countermeasures for
them using FMEA /
DRBFM.
Incorporate the
countermeasures in
drawing / CAD data etc.
Clarify important control
characteristics that need
to be controlled in
mass-production
process to realize
Key Point(s):
System Structure Diagram is a diagram to break down the system to sub-system and components hierarchically and show the newness of each
sub-system or component. It is used to extract all the components and judge the adequate failure mode analysis method (FMEA (Failure Mode
Effective Analysis) or DRBFM (Design Review Based on Failure Mode)) based on the newness level of each sub-system or component.
Key Point(s):
Function Block Diagram is a diagram to break down the system to component parts hierarchically by focusing on the relationship among functions.
Function of the parts, potential failure modes and points on design countermeasures are considered using Function Block Diagram in advance of
FMEA.
Document Description:
Key Point(s):
The Design Potential FMEA is an analytical technique used by a cross-functional team to ensure that all potential failure modes and their
associated causes have been identified and actioned. Complete assemblies, along with every related system, subassembly and component shall
be evaluated.
The Design Potential FMEA does not rely on process controls to overcome potential design weaknesses, but it does take the technical/physical
limits of the manufacturing/assembly process into consideration, for example;
Necessary mould drafts
Limited surface finish
Assembling space / access for tooling
Limited hardenability of steels
Tolerance / process capability / performance
The Design Potential FMEA can also take into consideration the technical / physical limits of product maintenance (service) and recycling, for
example;
Tool access
Diagnostic capability
Material classification symbols (for recycling)
When developing countermeasure actions for potential failure modes, the supplier shall ensure that the feasibility of each countermeasure from a
manufacturing perspective is analysed before implementing the action.
The supplier shall ensure consistency throughout all documentation (e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key
Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA) for:
Operation step numbering
Product characteristics identification
Note(s):
For Renault
Unless otherwise agreed with Renault, the Supplier shall study and provide a "Product Potential FMEA" (Design Failure Modes, their Effects and
Criticality Analysis).
The Supplier shall use his own standard for FMEA evaluation or, by default; the Supplier shall use the Renault standard 01-33-200.
The supplier shall take into account the specific Vehicle Regulation requirements of each country of sale, and the EIC ("Evénements Indésirables
Client") / Feared Events (sent by Renault) when conducting this risk analysis.
For Nissan
Follow the guidelines described in the AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group) Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) manual (latest
edition).
Key Point(s):
The Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) is a technic for system analysis where system faults are analysed using a top down approach from a single potential
failure mode to identify all possible causes.
Note(s):
For Renault
Unless otherwise agreed with Renault, the Supplier shall study and provide a FTA according to Renault standard 90-00-053.
Key Point(s):
Changes list is a table to organize changing points from base design to new design by each component to clarify the changing points in new design
and judge the newness level.
Renault or Nissan Vehicle / Power train project for which the product is being developed /
R / N Project
manufactured.
Nissan Important Part Tick all boxes that apply to the product being developed / manufactured.
Renault - CSR Tick either 'S' or 'R' and '1' or '2' as appropriate.
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-9 / Ver.2
432 Doc. Rev. Date: Mar 4th 2013
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Mar 1st 2013
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: A. Taro Tel: +81-(0)46-270-XXXX
Part Name: Hood hinge Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 654XX XXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04322
Function
Parts Base Design New Design Changing Point Newness
of the part
Hood -Popping up by Hood without mechanism for Hood with mechanism for -Strengthened
input force from pop-up function pop-up function hood inner reinforce
an actuator (G37 sedan) (G37 coupe) (shape & thickness)
-moving the hinge 3
fixing position to
0X direction (--mm)
Hood -Connecting a Hood hinge without pop-up Hood hinge with pop-up -Adding the pop-up
Hinge hood to body mechanism mechanism mechanism
with openable and (G37 sedan) (G37 coupe)
closable motions Pop-up mechanism
-Popping up a hood
Key Point(s):
The DRBFM (Design Review Based on Failure Mode) Work Sheet is used to identify potential concerns (failures/dissatisfactions) related to change.
The content of the document is used in the intensive discussion between the suppliers and Renault - Nissan during the “Quick DR” process to
identify actions and eliminate potential concerns.
The DRBFM Work Sheet targets potential concerns from both design and manufacturing, including potential concerns affecting Renault - Nissan
assembly plants.
The actions taken to eliminate each potential concern are determined from the view point of the Design, Evaluation (Test) and/or Manufacturing
functions in either the supplier or Renault - Nissan. Responsibility and timing for each action shall be clearly identified.
Document Description:
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 12345 / N
X98A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/10/14
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/11/22
Supplier Name: ABC Industry Supplier Code: B023 E-mail: ebygum@abc-i.com
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: E Bygum Tel: +44 7895 156 456
Part Name: Fuel Filler Tube Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 56789 AB000
Design Note No. / DEVO: T12345
Determine all Special Characteristics and Key Features related to the product.
Determine the relationship between these characteristics and features and the manufacturing processes.
Conduct a comprehensive activity to ensure that all of these characteristics and features are incorporated into the manufacturing process and are
controlled.
Note(s):
Special Characteristics are identified by Renault-Nissan. For Renault, these include CSR. For Nissan, these include Important A, B, C and OBD.
Key Features are identified by both the supplier and Renault-Nissan.
These are features that have a significant effect upon fit, function, performance, reliability, appearance and serviceability and include all features
affecting type approval (homologation).
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity
Identify all Special Characteristics and Key Features related to the product using experience, knowledge of the
Content product, its intended use, and input from Renault-Nissan.
Use appropriate tools (HCPP (Renault), QA table A/B (Nissan)) to determine
suitable methods to ensure the control of the identified characteristics &
features.
Output Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram
Document HCPP (Renault)
QA Table A (Nissan)
Supplier Feasibility Commitment (Renault)
QA Table B (Nissan)
Key Point(s):
The HCPP (Hierarchical Organization of Product and Process Characteristics) is the resulting file of the following steps:
Hierarchical Organization of Product Characteristics according to gravity in accordance with Renault Standards 01-33-301 and 00-10-040.
Assessment of forecasted industrial feasibility.
Action plan definition depending of criticality (gravity and feasibility matching) and follow-up.
All Special Characteristics and Key Features shall be included in the HCPP study.
Note(s):
For this Renault specific tool, RENAULT CONSULTING is able to provide HCPP training sessions (www.renault-consulting.com).
Key Point(s):
QA table A is a format to fill in important control characteristics with nominal values and tolerances and potential failures of the system that occur if
the part characteristic exceeds the established tolerance. It is used to transmit important control characteristics surely from design to production.
Document Description:
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-9 / Ver.2
422 A B C OBD
Doc. Rev. Date: Mar 4th 2013
R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Mar 1st 2013
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@abc.com
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: A. Taro Tel: +81-(0)46-270-XXXX
Part Name: Claw Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 654XX XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04222
Claw No.1 1 Claw portion Position of hole to fix 1.6mm ±0.2 normal +direction:
screw The claw can not be fixed to catcher by screw
(X direction) -direction:
The claw is broken by input force of actuator
Claw 2 Pipe portion of claw Hole diameter of pipe φ8 +0.1 normal +direction:
portion of claw -0 Backlash between shaft and pipe increases
-direction:
The shaft can not be inserted to the pipe
Key Point(s):
Supplier Name: LPCA Supplier Code: 11111 Document Origin Date : 26/03/11
With this Feasibility Commitment, the supplier undertakes with Renault to supply a product which can be manufactured, assembled, packed and sent by
answering the quality requirements, Cost and Delay of Renault. For that purpose, the supplier must be able to answer in a positive way the following questions
(which are not exhaustive). For any negative answer, the supplier has to argue all the anxieties or the changes proposed so as to allow answer the specified
requirements.
YES NO
Can the product be manufactured as it is specified in the engineering drawing and in the engineering product specification ?
Is the product correctly defined to enable feasibility evaluation ? Does it fulfill the REACH requirements ?
Can all specified characteristics be manufactured with the capability target that meet requirements ?
Is the manufacturing process known as mastered, or was it enough analyzed to anwer pertinently this evaluation of feasibility ?
Can the proposed manufacturing process answer the requirements of the levels of foreseen quantity ?
Does the study of Handling and Packaging Means demonstrate their efficiency ?
Can the product be manufactured without unusual risk of additional cost (tooling, alternate manufacturing methods…) ?
Name, position and signature of the person having to participate to the analysis of feasibility:
The product can be manufactured as specified, but some minor changes are needed to improve the
Feasible with proposed improvement
product, or to decrease its Cost.
Feasible with restriction The product as specified can be manufactured with difficulty. Minor changes are asked.
Major changes of the product are imperative so as to obtain a practicable industrial feasibility and a
Non feasible
production answering the Quality, Cost, Quantity and Delivery Dates Targets required by Renault.
definitive paint color not available on time for MA apply standard black for MA (covered by signed dispensation) 15/06/2011 Mr Manuf
apply serial black after 2 weeks for serial production
logistic flows not serial until 10/06/2011 apply agreeg final logistic flows 10/06/2011 Mr Log
Page 1 of 1
QA table B (Nissan)
Key Point(s):
The QA table B is an association table between important control characteristics described in the QA table A and related production process. It is
used to organize process assurance methods for each important control characteristic.
Key Point(s):
The Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram is a document which identifies all key features and special characteristics.
The Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram shall be used :
to define production and laboratory ongoing periodic testing.
as a template for identifying the reporting items for trial inspection reports
The Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram shall include as a minimum:
All Special Characteristics
Dimensional key features. These may be in the form of a diagram with dimensions, tolerances etc. appended, a diagram with reference table
showing relevant dimensions, tolerances etc. and a table of dimensions, tolerances.
Materials key features; (e.g. Specification type/grade. Mechanical and or chemical properties).
Performance/ Function related key features (e.g. spot weld nugget size / strength, plating, contamination etc.)
All key features shall be uniquely identified.
The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation (e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key
Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA) for:
operation step numbering
product characteristics identification
Items or features controlled by SPC (Statistical Process Control) should be identified as such on the document.
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X11A Doc. Rev. Date: Aug 10th 2011
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Aug 10th 2011
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: m-i@abc.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Chennai plant Author: M. Ince Tel: +81-(0)3-2456-7890
Part Name: Duct Assy Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 16640 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T43172
Special Char. /
Product Specification In Process
7 Key Feature No.
Ident'n
Characteristic /Tolerance Checks
Model
6 Material - P.P 1st off/shift change
number ABC
^
7 Foam Material Model number 1234 1st off/shift change
6 5 10kPa/10sec.
13 Foam adhesion 100% visual
/2kPa/drop
10kPa/10sec
OBD 14 Pressure test 100% Pokayoke
2kPa/drop
Activity Purpose:
Design the product to achieve Renault / Nissan design goals: performance, function, reliability, durability, structure, shape, weight, service parts
requirements, etc.
Note(s):
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Study and create technical Implement design change management activity if engineering product
Content specifications specification/drawing content is changed.
Create the engineering
drawing/ CAD data
Ensure that manufacturing
constraints are incorporated
into the product design so
that the quality and reliability
target are achieved.
Output Engineering Product Specifications & Engineering Drawings / CAD data
Document Supplier Recommendations (Renault)
Key Point(s):
The Engineering Product Specifications and Engineering Drawings/ AD data are the documents that give the product technical description.
The Engineering Product Specifications are used by the supplier to complete the Engineering Drawing/CAD data, and by Renault/Nissan to make
the product design note.
The Engineering Drawings/CAD data shall comply with Renault/Nissan Engineering Standards included in the Request for Quotation (RFQ).
For Renault
The minimum requirements are given in 00-10-415 standard.
For Nissan
3D CAD data (inc. 3D CAD data for assembly or components and supplemental documents)
Dimensional Specifications
List of sub components
Calculation and Simulation Results
Test Specifications
Technical design goal
Special Characteristics
Key Features
Material specifications
Estimated weight (mass data)
Appearance specification
Part identification/ marking methods
Additional regulation specifications (regulatory requirements)
Applicable NES (Nissan Engineering Standards)
Supplier’s own document, which shall meet Renault / Nissan engineering standards and requirements.
The supplier shall give all required information related to the use of the product by the manufacturer or the customer and the potential effect of
disregarding recommendations.
The supplier shall give all necessary recommendations and banning related to:
the relation between the product and the other parts it has to be fastened to;
the environment of the product once fitted in the car;
transport, storage, packaging and deconditioning of the product;
rules of process to be observed in fitting on the assembly line, stripping and winding up (in plant, in garage);
handling by the workers (or robots) on the assembly line or by maintenance agents.
recommendations and banning will figure efforts, temperatures, surface conditions, geometry, dampness, weights, etc …
Note:
Some of the recommendations will be useful for the owner's manual (ex : "Warnings for use")
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
4.5 Special Characteristics Management
Activity Purpose:
Renault-Nissan require that suppliers of all product/parts with Special Characteristics are able to demonstrate that they are controlling all aspects of
manufacture and that they have incorporated the Special Characteristics Management requirements within their Quality Management Systems.
The Special Characteristics Management requirements for Renault and Nissan are described separately. Follow the links below to access the
company specific requirements.
Note(s):
The supplier data (including certification) shall be submitted for the Inspection Item to Renault-Nissan department. (Refer to the DCI (Document
Completion Instruction) of the “Certificate of Certification (COC) & Conformity of Product (COP))
Renault/Nissan reserves the right at any time to audit the supplier's compliance with these Special Characteristics Management requirements.
The supplier for electric and electronic system may be required to comply with ISO 26262 (Road vehicles -- Functional safety --) requirements with
Request for Quotation (RFQ).
Renault Requirements
Renault requires all suppliers of all parts with all characteristics to be able to demonstrate that they are controlling all aspects of manufacture and that
they have incorporated the following requirements within their Quality Assurance Systems.
According to the listing of sales countries of vehicle, the Supplier shall identify the activities to carry out for the parts regarding Regulation, Certification,
"Conformity of Production" control and inform Renault about them.
At each required milestone, during development and mass production, the Supplier shall transmit to Renault the specific certificates and/or the
certification elements (Communication sheet and national certificates) and/or the self-certification elements with the Test Reports, for the parts that are
under the responsibility of the supplier for their own certification (according to each country of sale) and the Conformity of Production control.
These activities and the corresponding Certificates and/or self-Certification Reports and/or Certification Reports shall be included in the document
"Supplier Test Plan and Report".
The supplier must give the demonstration that the Special Characteristics are taken into account in the HCPP, in the Special Characteristics and Key
Features Diagrams, and in the Control Plan to be applied for each trial built.
In particular, the supplier has to consider, in his control plan, all the minimum requirements for COP control for all marketing countries. The car
Manufacturer has to provide these requirements in the RFQ.
The supplier can complete, if necessary, these minimum expectations including all adapted implementations in his control plan (new characteristics,
samples size increase or control frequencies etc...).
Characteristics CSR
When assigning personnel to the production of parts with CSR characteristics the supplier shall:
Ensure that all personnel involved CSR operations / tests must be ‘assigned workers’ with training programs which can clearly demonstrate that they
have achieved the required level of knowledge and skill.
Maintain a record of the personnel responsible for performing activities relating to the Characteristics CSR.
All machines or equipment performing operations or tests on these parts must be clearly identified with the relevant Renault symbol, as shown in the
Renault Standard 00 10 415
Characteristics CSR, level 1 and level 2.
i. All machines or equipment used for the manufacture of these characteristics must receive special attention in the maintenance program.
ii. No change to the product, to the inspection process, to the manufacturing process or manufacturing Site, or Supplier, or internal concessions will be made for
these parts without Renault agreement. This agreement must be obtained prior to shipment of new part issue level. In any case of change, the Supplier shall
identify and submit to Renault any implication regarding Regulation and Certification, and also Safety.
iii. The supplier shall carry out a program of internal process audits. These shall be documented and designed to verify that all process parameters are controlled
and effective. Any follow up actions shall be monitored to confirm effectiveness and where necessary become officially adopted countermeasures.
iv. Where Important characteristics CSR, level 1 or level 2 are subject to the controls of sub-suppliers’ processes, the Renault requirements shall be applied to the
sub-supplier.
v. The supplier must be able to demonstrate assurance of these characteristics.
vi. If any rework is performed on these characteristics to return it to specification, this must be documented and controlled. Approval by the person responsible for
Quality within the Supplier shall be obtained, and records will be retained regarding part identification.
vii. All systems shall reflect the concerns, i.e. non-conforming products (manufacturing or testing), must have a higher reporting route through the organization to
ensure that any corrective actions are implemented and are effective.
viii. On these parts the supplier must have a part traceability procedure as following in the Renault procedure HQFE 013.
Note: The term "Module Part" mentioned in the above refers to a complete functional assembly inclusive of sub-module parts defined by RENAULT part
/ order reference e.g. Cockpit module, Front-end Module, Roof Module etc. Generally, this means a functionally complete part, which composes a
device / machine / system.
The Special Characteristics shall be identified on the relevant spec tender or part drawing supplied by Nissan.
The Special Characteristic details must be transferred from the drawing onto all relevant documentation, i.e. Drawings, Control Plans, Process
Flow Charts, Part Submission Warrants, Work Instruction Sheets, Training records and any supplier related documents.
Detail definition as follows:
Important A
Characteristic Nissan requires all suppliers of Important-A parts to comply with the
Identifier A "Square Cornered" box with a solid line to be placed around Special Characteristics Requirements below.
the text describing the characteristic deemed to be important.
Important B
Characteristic Nissan requires all suppliers of Important-B parts to comply with the
Identifier A "Round Cornered" box to be placed around the text Special Characteristics Requirements below.
describing the characteristic deemed to be important.
Important C
"Important-C characteristic"
In order to achieve customers satisfaction, characteristic required to
Nomenclature control manufacturing variation:
Symbol D = φ12mm for use in Important Part Symbol column
D = φ7mm for inclusion elsewhere on drawings or within 1) Parts characteristic required to control variation in order to satisfy
other documents. vehicle performance
Definition:
2) Tightening characteristic to cause malfunction (except
Important-A or B)
3) Harness connecting to cause malfunction (higher than ASIL A)
Characteristic A "Round Cornered" box with a broken line to be placed
Identifier Nissan requires all suppliers of Important-C parts to comply with the
around the text describing the characteristic deemed to be
Special Characteristics Requirements below.
important.
OBD
Nissan requires all suppliers of all product/part with Special characteristics to be able to demonstrate that they are controlling all aspects of
manufacture and that they have incorporated the following requirements within their Quality Assurance Systems. Nissan reserves the right at any
time to audit the supplier's compliance with the characteristics requirements relating to the Special characteristics.
Sub-supplier Management:
Where Important characteristics and OBD characteristics are subject to the controls of sub-suppliers' processes, the Nissan Important
product/part and OBD product/part requirements shall be applied to the sub-supplier by the Tier 1 supplier.
Tier 1 suppliers hold full responsibility for the management and approval of sub-supplier's parts quality and associated documentation. In
cases where the Tier 1 supplier has sub-supplied parts imposed by Nissan, the Tier 1 supplier shall assume the above responsibility from the timing
of the planning for the first pre-production (off tool) trial.
Quality & Process Capability Target(s):
The supplier must be able to demonstrate 100% assurance of all Important and OBD characteristics. Process Capabilities target; Each
Important and OBD characteristic must have a process capability index (Cpk) > 1.33.
Parts Identification control:
Important product / part and OBD product / part characteristics shall be confirmed by a unique mark, specified by Nissan or pre-agreed with the
customer, on every product / part. This should be detailed on the relevant Drawings, Control Plans, Key Features Diagrams, Work Instruction
Sheets and any other supplier related documents.
Parts traceability:
On Important and OBD product/part the supplier must have a lot control / traceability procedure.
This must allow both fast and accurate lot traceability (target access and search times being within two hours) and should be based on
significant characteristics of manufacture, e.g. date, shift, process assembly, delivery.
Lot control:
In the delivery of Important and OBD product/part, the Important or OBD mark shall be noted on Lot Control card (where applicable) which
should be attached to pallets and cases.
Document Submission:
Results of inspection and testing regarding Special Characteristics, if required, shall be submitted to Nissan at the specified frequency.
The method of submission shall be confirmed with the relevant Nissan Quality Department during the Pre-Production phase.
Any modification to this submission in either frequency or method must be agreed in advance with the relevant Nissan Department.
Tier 1 suppliers of Modules and/or Parts are responsible for the management of both it and any sub-supplier data, including any Nissan
imposed sub-supplier requirements.
Note;
The term "Module Part" mentioned in the above refers to a complete functional assembly inclusive of sub-module parts defined by Nissan part /
order reference e.g. Cockpit module, Front-end Module, Roof Module etc. Generally, this means a functionally complete part which composes a
device / machine / system
When assigning personnel to the production of Important A product/part the supplier shall:
Ensure that all personnel involved in Important A operations/tests must be 'assigned workers' with training programs which can clearly
demonstrate that they have achieved the required level of knowledge and skill.
Maintain a record of the personnel responsible for performing activities relating to Important Characteristics.
All machines or equipment performing operations or tests on Important A product/part must be clearly identified with the relevant Nissan Important
A symbol, as shown in Section 1 of this Appendix.
Marking of numbers
Marking on products
a) Suppliers shall indicate lot numbers on products.
b) Markings shall be either die-stamped or printed etc., so the markings cannot easily be erased. Markings shall, as a rule, be located where
they can be seen easily, when the products are installed on vehicles.
Marking on a lot card or bar code of delivered products
a) For the product / parts defined by Nissan, as a rule, suppliers shall indicate the lot number on lot card or bar code
Internal audit:
The supplier shall carry out a programme of internal process audits. These shall be documented and designed to verify that all process
parameters are controlled and effective.
Any follow up actions shall be monitored to confirm effectiveness and where necessary become officially adopted countermeasures.
Change management:
Any modifications to the above must be agreed with the relevant Nissan department.
Key Point(s):
For the parts that are under the responsibility of the supplier for their own certification/conformity, Renault-Nissan shall ensure regulatory
compliance of these parts especially when they contribute to the vehicle approval (check of the installation of these parts in the vehicle).
The certificate of certification, the marking and the inspection record are the evidence of the regulatory conformity of these parts.
The supplier shall provide Renault-Nissan the certificates, marked parts and the inspection record in accordance with the project schedule.
Category Purpose:
Element Activity:
Key Point(s):
A Process Potential FMEA is an analytical technic used by a cross-functional team to ensure that all potential failure modes and their associated
causes have been identified and countermeasured. Complete assemblies, along with every related system, subassembly and component should
be evaluated.
Follow the guidelines described in the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis manual (latest edition)
and ensure that the Renault / Nissan specific requirements listed below are also included
Potential Cause(s)/Mechanism(s) of
List every potential cause and/or failure mechanism for each failure mode.
Failure
Study and describe the recommended action from the view of Design/ Evaluation/ Manufacturing departments,
according to the result of risk priority
Recommended Action
e.g.) Specification Change, Data collection by the confirmation of experiment evaluation or phenomenon, and
Study the action in manufacturing engineering and manufacturing process control, etc.
The supplier should use the 5W1H (What, Where, When, Why, Who and How) analysis technique to help fully describe every potential failure
mode.
The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation (e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key
Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA) for;
operation step numbering
product characteristics identification
For Renault:
Unless otherwise agreed with Renault, the Supplier shall study and provide a "Manufacturing Process FMEA" (which includes Process FMEA,
Production Facility FMEA, Flow FMEA).
The Supplier shall use his own standard for FMEA evaluation or, by default; the Supplier shall use the Renault standard 01-33-200.
The supplier shall take into account the EIC "Evénements Indésirables Client"/ Feared Events (sent by Renault) when conducting this analysis.
For Renault:
Supplier own document
For Nissan:
The supplier shall use the Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG) recommended format or Supplier own document (provided that it complies with
AIAG requirements) and shall include the above minimum content requirements.
When using the Nissan provided PFMEA format, ensure that the header is completed as described below.
Activity Purpose:
Notes:
The supplier shall provide a means to verify quality characteristics specified on the document such as Control Plan and Work Instruction.
The supplier shall develop, utilize, and maintain the required inspection related tools such as checking fixtures, gages, or other inspection/test
equipment. The confirmation frequency for these items shall be listed on the documents.
Frequencies should be set according to the duration of the test, the importance of the test and the way in which this characteristic is determined
and controlled. (Refer to the Supplier Test Plan and Report on “6.1 Design Verification and Product / Process Validation”)
The inspection standard shall consider and include inspection related criteria as indicated on PFEMA studies, etc., and the identified frequency of
inspection must be developed from process capability studies and results.
Sampling frequencies shall be specific to the inspection item being defined. (Three time per shift etc.)
In order to achieve targets, the supplier shall incorporate poka-yoke (error-proofing) devices in their manufacturing process. The purpose of these
error proofing devices is either:
Do not make non-conforming part (e.g. prevent operational error)
Do not pass non-conforming part (e.g. detect operational error)
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Study and create the process flow. Develop work instructions for all operations based
Content Define the physical location of all facilities and on the content of the Control Plan
material locations. Train all operators based on the work instructions
Define the control Define the Review the process Apply the change
methods associated with manufacturing control flow based on the management activity
prototype parts. methods and related result of off-tool trials. before any change.
Commence initial study operations associated Define the
of control methods with pre-production manufacturing control
associated with parts. methods associated
pre-production parts. with production parts.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
Review the
manufacturing control
methods based on the
result of off-tool trials.
Output Process Flow Chart
Document Floor Plan Layout
Control Plan
Work Instruction
MQA (Renault)
Key Point(s):
The Control plan is the description of all Product and Process control operations implemented in the production process. It is a living document and
shall reflect the manufacturing process and control systems at all times.
「Control Plans form a central part of the Supplier's overall process to achieve Renault and / or Nissan's requirements for Quality, Cost and Delivery.
In accordance with ISO/TS 16949, there are 3 stages of control plan used during the ANPQP phases:
The Prototype Control Plan:
A Prototype Control Plan is a description of the dimensional measurements material and performance tests that will occur during manufacture
of the prototype part.
Note: For Renault, the submission of a prototype control plan is not mandatory.
The Pre-Launch Control plan:
A Pre-Launch Control Plan is a description of the product/ process controls, dimensional measurements, material and performance tests that
occur after prototype and before full production.
The Pre-Launch control plan covers the ramp-up period and should include additional product/ process controls to be implemented until the
production process is validated e.g. reinforced controls, firewalls, containment etc.
The Production Control plan:
Production Control Plan is a description of the product/ process controls, dimensional measurements, material and performance tests that
occur during mass production.
The production control plan is a logical evolution of the pre-production control plan.
The production control plan shall not be implemented until the exit criteria of ramp-up are achieved.
Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram shall accompany the Control Plan.
The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation (e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key
Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA) for:
operation step numbering
product characteristics identification
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
- identification
- color conform to
Incoming Follow actions defined in
master
Master Sample Visual 2 each Inspection "Non-conforming
3 Metal screw B1 - no rust Visual inspection
n° 20 conformity parts batch Standard Product Management"
Conformity to
Ref 073247 0035 Procedure
Master Sample n°
20
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
- identification
- no damages Incoming Follow actions defined in
Incoming - good shape
Master Sample Apperance, 5 each Inspection "Non-conforming
4 Inspection for - glue presence Visual inspection
n°30 Shape - no loss of material
parts batch Standard Product Management"
Seal 0035 Procedure
Conformity to Ref 167845
Master Sample n°30
Incoming
Part fits Follow actions defined in
Visual and Inspection
correctly 5 each "Non-conforming
Gauge Assembly tentacle Standard for
according to parts batch Product Management"
inspection bulbs 0035 Procedure
gauge spec.
Ref 578400
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
Adjust parameters
start of Identification
Dryer system 12 Drying time 3 min. 1h Automatically 1x each shift
according to Procedure
sheet AA33
0045.
Lens injection
every
start of
shift and Inform Supervisor to
Control of upon Identification
9 Lens injection Injection press 10-a 2 Right material Visual inspection 1x Replace wrong
material reference sheet AA37
change material with correct
and every
5 hours
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
Adjust parameters of
Left: 100 +/-5g Measurement Adjust according Auto-reject injection machine or stop
each
Digital balance 10-c Lens weight 3 Right: 100 +/- Digital balance 100% instruction to spec. start of function for out the machine, call for the
part unit responsible. According
5g 967533 every shift of spec.
to Procedure 0045.
-No damage
-No flow mark Visual inspection
Lens each Follow actions defined
10-d 2 -No weld mark Visual inspection 100% standard 788990
appearance part in Procedure 0045
-No distortion
-No burr
1 every
piece start of Replace wrong material
AAA
Lens Trichromatic AAA colorimetry right shift and with correct one ->
colorimetry 10-e Check sheet
colorimetry R coordinates OK machine 1 upon Follow actions defined in
machine piece reference Procedure 0045
left change
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
Contaminatio Vacuum
Air pressure each Visual inspection Follow actions defined
11 Reflector check 11-b n vacuum of 2 Pressure meter 100% pressure by
0.5±0.05MPa part standard 002452 in Procedure 0045
Reflector Daily TPM
- No damaged
Inspection
Reflector - No scratches each Visual inspection Follow actions defined
area,illuminatio 11-b 2 Visual inspection 100%
appearance - No part standard 002452 in Procedure 0045
n
contaminations
According to the
Metalic each Follow actions defined
12 Metalic check 3 3 No damages Visual inspection 100% list of components
appearance part in Procedure 0045
CC
-temperature calibration Stop the machine, call
Start of Process Maintenance Responsible
-temperature 250±10℃ Automatically + according to
13 Welding Welding station 20 2 1x each Parameters for problem detection, set
- time - time Visually calibration correct parameters and
shift Monitoring Sheet
3±0.5sec procedure HH restart.
When
Compliant start of
Lens According to the
component shift and Replace wrong
reference Visual inspection 1x list of components
reference upon components
check reference CC
number
change
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
- no damage
Inspection - no scratches
Lens each Visual inspection Follow actions defined
area,illuminatio 10 2 - no black points Visual inspection 100%
Appearance - no white point part standard 002452 in Procedure 0045
n
- no contamination
Automaticaly Automaticaly
Metalic insert Presence of each Follow actions defined
Poka yoke 3 3 Automatically 100% inspection (Poka rejection with
presence metalic insert part in Procedure 0045
Yoke) sensor
Automaticaly Automaticaly
Clipping each Follow actions defined
Poka yoke 13 3 All clips cliped Automatically 100% inspection (Poka rejection with
control part in Procedure 0045
Yoke) sensor
When
Compliant start of
Bulb A0020 According to the
component shift and Replace wrong
reference Visual inspection 1x list of components
reference upon components
check reference CC
number
change
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
When
Compliant start of
Bulb A0030 According to the
component shift and Replace wrong
reference Visual inspection 1x list of components
reference upon components
check reference CC
number
change
When
Compliant start of
Bulbholder According to the
component shift and Replace wrong
reference Visual inspection 1x list of components
reference upon components
check reference CC
number
change
Visual conformity:
- no damages
- bulb and connector
pins not damaged
Appearance each Visual inspection Follow actions defined in
1 3 and deformed Visual inspection 100%
of Bulbholder - all plastic pins part standard 002452 Procedure 0045
heated
- good shape of
electrical paths
When
Compliant start of
Seal According to the
component shift and Follow actions defined in
reference Visual inspection 1x list of components
reference upon Procedure 0045
check reference CC
number
change
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
- No damages
each Visual inspection Follow actions defined in
5 Appearance 3 - No rust Visual inspection 100%
- good thread part standard 002452 Procedure 0045
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
Measurement in
Check of
ECE dark room/ each ECE Stop the machine, call Maintenance
20 Photometric Test Photometer 18 photometry 100% Responsible for problem detection,
Requirements Automatic part Requirements set correct parameters and restart.
performance R
machine
Functionality test Automaticaly
bulb compliant to each Follow actions defined in
21 (including 15 Stop light 2 Automatically 100% inspection (Poka light functionality
specifications part Procedure 0045
electrical Yoke)
Automaticaly
bulb compliant to each Follow actions defined in
16 Tail light 2 Automatically 100% inspection (Poka light functionality
specifications part Procedure 0045
Yoke)
Automaticaly
bulb compliant to each Follow actions defined in
17 Turn light 2 Automatically 100% inspection (Poka light functionality
specifications part Procedure 0045
Yoke)
Appearance
Final appearance final inspection Compliance to each Visual inspection Follow actions defined in
22 30-a of assembled 2 Visual inspection 100%
check station specifications part standard 002452 Procedure 0045
part
External
Dimensional dimensions Compliance to Gauge + digital 5 each Adjust welding
23 Gauge 30-b 2 X-R control chart
check of Assembled specifications indicator parts shift parameters
part
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S Doc Ref. No. / Ver.:
1 THIER-010-8/Ver. 9
X97A Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/3/1
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2010/10/20
Supplier Name: Thier & Co Supplier Code: 1111 E-mail: mway@thier.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Yokohama, Japan Author: M Way Tel: +81-45-123-4567
Part Name: LAMP ASSY, RR COMB Supplier Approval: M Tier R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 26555/0 97A00 Date: 2011/3/1 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/3/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: RN-A123 Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 123456 / Ver.2
521 Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/6
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/6
Supplier Plant: Top Parts Supplier Code: A468 Tel: fmer@topp.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Tokyo, Japan Author: F. Mercury Tel: +81-49-456-7890
Part Name: Tank Supplier Approval: S O Else R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 54010 BU00 Date: 2011/5/6 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/5/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: HEB - 66X Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
Stamping Die Hole ID = 85.00mm Production 5 Per X-R control Monthly Tool 100%
2 Pierce Reinforcer 21
(13~19) Wear 84 +/- 0 Slide Caliper Per Lot Check Sheet
Weld teardown Adjust process & back
Sub-Assenble
Welder 307 & Weld Check must pull Production Per Check all 1hour stock
bracket to 17 1 Check Sheet
Jig 5083 Storength slug of 6.00mm Vernier Hour to last 5 consecutive
3 Reinforcer diameter min. OK results
Spot Weld Current Value Weekly Welder
Ammeter Per Lot Control Chart
W12059 range 8~10kA TPM
Production
15 Black ED Film build 15~25mm Adjust process and
Elcometer Per
4 Paint Bracket ED Plant 2 coating of 1 Check Sheet back check to last OK
Production Hour
14 Reinforcer Hardness HB result
pencil test
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 123456 / Ver.2
521 Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/6
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/6
Supplier Plant: Top Parts Supplier Code: A468 Tel: fmer@topp.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Tokyo, Japan Author: F. Mercury Tel: +81-49-456-7890
Part Name: Tank Supplier Approval: S O Else R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 54010 BU00 Date: 2011/5/6 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/5/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: HEB - 66X Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
100%
Tank Weld Burst pressure Production test First & Last off Lab report and
16 Up/Downstream check &
Strength lass than 2 bar rig every shift review inform customer
10.0mm +/-
1 Flange width Adjust process and
0.5mm Per X-R control
Inspection CMM 5 back check to last OK
50.0mm +/- Hour Chart
Moulder #3 Die 2 Help positon result
5 Plastic Moulding 1.0mm
#126
Adjust process and
Hole 85.0mm +/- Per X-R control
3 Inspection CMM 5 back check to last OK
diameter 0.5mm Hour Chart
result
Production gauge
- identification 100.0mm +/- #61Production First & Last off 100% back check
4 - color
Check Sheet
1.0mm gauge every shift and containment
#61
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 123456 / Ver.2
521 Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/6
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/6
Supplier Plant: Top Parts Supplier Code: A468 Tel: fmer@topp.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Tokyo, Japan Author: F. Mercury Tel: +81-49-456-7890
Part Name: Tank Supplier Approval: S O Else R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 54010 BU00 Date: 2011/5/6 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/5/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: HEB - 66X Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
Production test
Important OBD
7 rig 100% inprocess
part & OBD 5 Gauss
and Quality all 100% test
confirmation maximum 100% back check
Residual Manager data data she
testing 19 and containment
magnetic flux submission
Inform customer
Inspection
Equipment OBD First & Last off
4.8 ~ 4.9 Gauss tester Check Sheet
calibration every shift
#321
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 123456 / Ver.2
521 Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/6
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/1/6
Supplier Plant: Top Parts Supplier Code: A468 Tel: fmer@topp.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Tokyo, Japan Author: F. Mercury Tel: +81-49-456-7890
Part Name: Tank Supplier Approval: S O Else R / N Acknowledgement: M Car
Part No. & Issue Level: 54010 BU00 Date: 2011/5/6 Dept.: Quality Assurence Date: 2011/5/10
Design Note No. / DEVO: HEB - 66X Note: Acknowledgement by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities.
Production Black ED
Confirmation Salt spray test
coating of Adjust process
Testing to Per Lab report
9 13 mild Test cabinet 1 and inform
(excluding NES SPM007 Month and review
Important /
steel customer
400 Hours
OBD tests). reinforcer
Key Point(s):
The Process Flow Chart is the document that describes the manufacturing steps to produce, assemble, check, rework, repair, store and to
send the parts to Renault and/or Nissan.
The Process Flow Chart is used to analyze the total process rather than the individual steps. It allows the user to see the impacts of variations
(machines, material, manpower, etc.) on the process.
The Supplier shall use flowchart symbols specified by an appropriate standard to complete the layout.
For Modular Assemblies (Cock-Pit Module (CPM), Front-End Module (FEM) etc.), the “Component Supply Chain Chart (CSCC)” should be
appended to the flowchart.
Note(s):
For Renault:
The following symbols should be used for the Process Flow Chart.
If the supplier wants to use another standard, they shall :
first ask for Renault agreement,
give to Renault the symbols description
For Nissan:
The supplier shall use flowchart symbols specified by an appropriate standard to complete the layout.
The supplier shall clarify the meaning of the symbols used in a legend.
Key Point(s):
The Floor Plan Layout is the document that shows the facilities installation and product flow inside the plant.
The layout should also describe complete process from incoming material to final shipping
The supplier shall confirm the flow line of parts, products and operator by using floor layout plan.
No possibility of cross-contamination and wrong parts mix
No possibility of non-conformity mix and non-conforming out flow
No possibility of physical damage for parts and components
It should be updated during the life of product.
Key Point(s):
The Work Instructions specify the actions required to carry out an operation. These documents shall be created for all employees having
responsibilities for the operation of processes that impact conformity to product requirements e.g. manufacturing operations including rework
and repair, inspection, calibration, maintenance, logistics etc.
These instructions shall be accessible for use at the work station and shall be in a format and language that is easily understandable by the
operators.
These instructions shall be derived from sources such as the quality plan, the control plan and the product realization process, and shall be
continuously improved through feedback from the operators.
Suppliers shall describe the best operation method with which they can keep the quality, delivery, cost, and also safety.
6 Gently push down on the rear of the mouse body Push until click sound is heard.
cover until click sound is heard .
If there is no sound, put the assembly into the
red box.
2
Mouse cover tab could be broken.
Click!
Total 15
Special note 5 ※Power of pushing a cover: The grade which can carry bread through with a finger.
*When it does not sound click at the time of attachment , fall and abnormalities occur on parts, stop work
immediately, report to the assistant manager or a leader, and wait for directions. Stop work immediately, report to
the assistant manager or a leader, and wait for directions.
Control No: XXXXXXX 1/1
Process No. Revise (Create) day Jul-14
Operation No.xx Revised points
Name Final inspection for Mouse Assembly
Protective
Safety Glass Review
equipment
Tools Torque driver Manager NISSAN
TARO
2 Conduct apperance check visually. Remove the burr and assure no foreign
(Tail side) 2 substance along dotted line.
5 Rotate and check the operation wheel. Wheel shall Rotate smoothly. 4-1 4-2
Check that it clicks twice and Check that it clicks twice and
When rotate is not smooth, put mouse into the operates smoothly. operates smoothly.
2
red box.
Assure no presence of contamination in the
wheel.
Click
Click
5 Confirm wheel rotation smoothly 2
【Sampling】
Sampling for first part of 1 Carton(12 Parts)
The rotation torque of a wheel is recorded as
measurement with an exclusive torque meter.
Parts Wheel
Total 11.5 Click Torque 0.01~0.02 Nm
Operation step, Instructions etc To make the contents of work easier to If only explanation by text only,
understand by figure, photo and etc. ・When educating new worker, it is harder for a new worker to
understand operation correctly.
4
④ ・Judgment is mistaken when a worker is unclear about the judgement.
・ When a superintendent does work observation, it is hard to judge
whether work is done correctly and easily.
Special note Describes for being specially careful for a
operator. There are many written examples of
⑤
5 -
correspondence of trouble shooting.
Matrix Quality Assurance (MQA) - Renault
Key Point(s):
The MQA (Quality Assurance Matrix) is the document which demonstrates that no process failure will reach the customer/client (the final
customer, an intermediate client, the following department, the following operation....).
The MQA tool aims at protecting the customer and checking the quality of this protection.
The Renault MQA shall be in accordance with the specific Renault MQA requirements (see Renault guide on the Supplier's Portal).
Supplier Name: FF Supplier Supplier Code: 000XXXXAA Document origin date : 01/10/2010
Part No & Issue level : 82000AAAAAAAA Control Plan Reference / Version : CPDER--D
SUPPLIER COMMENTS :
only one workstation still not fully impoved.
RENAULT COMMENTS :
As the MQA Study has been almost finished:
An audit on MQA implementation will be performed in January 2011
Supplier Name: FF Supplier Supplier Code: 000XXXXAA Document origin date : 01/10/2010
Part No & Issue level : 82000AAAAAAAA Control Plan Reference / Version : CPDER--D
Activity Purpose:
The supplier shall manage all necessary equipment to ensure that Renault-Nissan requirements are achieved and maintained.
As part of this management, the supplier shall ensure that all equipment is capable, reliable and in a stable condition during
use.
Note(s):
Equipment to be managed includes, but is not limited to, machinery, moulds, jigs and fixtures, tools, gauges, inspection and
test equipment.
Planned changes to equipment conditions (e.g. changes required as a result of a modification to the product or process) shall
be managed through the change management activity.
Unplanned changes to equipment conditions (e.g. damage, wear etc.) shall be managed through the suppliers' maintenance
processes.
Unless otherwise completed following steps, the supplier shall not start regular production.
Check the equipment condition/function (including poka-yoke (error-proofing)) along with the check sheet.
Inspect first article after set-up sample size along the check sheet. (e.g. Three pieces before regular production)
Assign an appropriate person (e.g. supervisor) and review the result of inspection.
Submission of Gauge Specification and Approval Sheet
Upon agreement with Renault-Nissan, the supplier's own document may be used.
Submission will be required in two stages:
Gauge specification confirmation prior to gauge manufacture.
Gauge approval after gauge manufacture, prior to the supplier's initial "off-tool" trial build.
Ownership
Part specific gauges shall be specified and procured by the supplier. Ownership of gauges will be agreed with the relevant
Renault-Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Material
All materials employed in the manufacture of the base or surface of the gauge shall be sufficiently robust and hard wearing to
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Specify equipment (including Implement the Ensure all necessary Maintain the condition
Content test equipment), tools, dies installation plan equipment is installed of all necessary
and gauges. and monitor as per the installation equipment, including
Create an installation plan progress. plan. the correct function of
related to the equipment, Conduct trials of the all error proofing
tools, dies and gauges. mass production devices.
condition to prepare If a change is required,
the system for mass follow the change
production management activity
Validate the equipment (including test
equipment), tools, dies and gauges using the
results of production at the off-tool and
off-process trials.
Output Gauge Specification and Approval Sheet
Document
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 12345
Q78 V Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/3
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/29
Supplier Name: Automotive Air Systems Supplier Code: B701 E-mail: fschultz@aas.co.jp
Supplier Plant: International Falls, Minnesota, USA Author: Fred Schultz Tel: 419-465-2045
Part Name: External air scoop Drawing No: NBX-200 [1]
Part No. & Issue Level: 27658 AB00 Gauge Reference: EAS 123
Design Note No. / DEVO: NBX-200
Gauge Specification Sheet
Interface Targets / Proximity Parts & Customer Agreed Check Points: Specification Details and Appended Support Document References:
Measuring / Check Points for Part Gauge (Visual and Coordinate Detail):
X Y Z I J K
1 ### 132 860 -1 0 -1
2 ### 99 880 0.6 -1 0.4
3 ### 120 830 -0 0 -1
4 ### 99 844 -0 0 -1
5 ### 0 845 -0 0 -1
6 ### -0 882 0.9 0 0.3
7 ### -99 844 -0 0 -1
8 ### ## 830 -0 0 -1
9 ### 99 880 0.5 0.7 0.4
10 ### ## 860 -0 0 -1
11 ### 10 860 -0 0 -1
Calibration Frequency:
Every 6 Months
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: 12345
Q78 V Doc. Rev. Date: 2011/5/3
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/3/29
Supplier Name: Automotive Air Systems Supplier Code: B701 E-mail: fschultz@aas.co.jp
Supplier Plant: International Falls, Minnesota, USA Author: Fred Schultz Tel: 419-465-2045
Part Name: External air scoop Drawing No: NBX-200 [1]
Part No. & Issue Level: 27658 AB00 Gauge Reference: EAS 123
Design Note No. / DEVO: NBX-200
Gauge Approval Sheet
Specification Required Inspection / Buy off Approval
Items Comments
Pedigree / Reference (Yes / No) Report No./ Ref. (Yes / No)
Body / Mating Part Fix Area Identification (Body / Mating Part Recreation in X.Y.Z axis) CAD Drawing 26010 Yes ISR 50019 Yes
Drawing Reference
Key Gauge Tolerances Identification (Mating Part Surfaces, Location Surfaces) Yes ISR 50020 Yes
G-22010-10
Gauge Inspection / Dimensional Report INT-S 3214 Yes R-R 50016 Yes
Gauge
Approval
Activity Bias & Linearity Report INT-S 3421 Yes R-R 50017 Yes
and
Reports
Fit & Function Report INT- S 3065 Yes R-R50017 Yes
Repeatability & Reproducibility Report INT-S 2187 Yes R-R 50019 Yes
Setting Masters Details and References 26010-333 Yes ISR 50016 Yes
Purpose:
Evaluate, monitor and manage process capability in order to maintain a capable and stable process condition that continuously achieves the
Renault-Nissan targets.
Note(s):
If process capability requirements are not achieved, all products shall be subjected to additional confirmation activities to prevent delivery of
non-conforming product until effective countermeasure(s) are implemented and verified.
In order to maintain a capable and stable process condition, the supplier shall identify an "unusual" or "abnormal" process conditions.
(Examples of an "unusual" or "abnormal" process conditions include (but are not limited to) difficulties experienced during set-up and start-up or
excessive noise or vibration from equipment during operation.)
In the event of an "unusual" or "abnormal" process condition being identified, the supplier shall implement a reaction plan, including escalation
where appropriate.
If the process capability does not achieve the Renault-Nissan requirements, the supplier shall establish root cause(s) and implement effective
countermeasure(s) to meet the requirements by the time to submit Part Submission Warrant (PSW).
The supplier shall continuously monitor and reduce variation in both product and manufacturing process characteristics.
Key Point(s):
The process capability study plan is the document that describes how the supplier will implement the process capability study during;
Phase 3 for off-tool parts if applicable
Phase 4 for off-process parts
Key Point(s):
The Process Capability Study Results is a document that records the result of the detailed capability study for each feature identified on the
Process Capability Study Plan.
The Process Capability Study Results shall include the followings (as a minimum):
Identification of all characteristics to be studied
(These shall include items from the Special Characteristics and Key Features diagram as a minimum.)
Measurement data analysis method to be used (e.g. Cpk, TAG etc.)
Target value of process capability for each identified characteristics
Specification (nominal and tolerance) of each identified characteristics
Sample size for each identified characteristics
Device/Tool for measuring/inspect characteristics of a product (e.g. Coordinate Measuring Machine (CMM))
Measured raw data and result of analysis (i.e. Raw data and Cp, Cpk calculation)
Recovery plan including containment actions and permanent countermeasures for those features that do not meet the targets.
Purpose:
Confirm that the supplier's processes are capable of producing parts at full volume condition that meet all Renault-Nissan targets by conducting
a manufacturing trial. (e.g. Supplier-Full Volume Confirmations (FVC), significant production trial, line speed demonstration etc.)
Note(s):
Confirmation of manufacturing trial as full volume condition shall be conducted and report the result to Renault-Nissan.
If any concerns arise during this manufacturing trial, an additional full volume condition confirmation manufacturing trial shall be conducted to
confirm countermeasures prior to the supplier's start of production.
Renault-Nissan will select certain suppliers and carry out an additional audit activity on their process to confirm their ability to support
Renault-Nissan requirements before, during and after ramp-up.
The date, duration, product quantity and mix for this activity shall be agreed with Renault-Nissan.
This activity will be carried out at the same time as the final manufacturing trial by supplier.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Review / audit the process prior to the start of volume production. Continue to monitor
Content Conduct a manufacturing trial that fully represents final production conditions for man, process/product
material, machine and method. performance.
The trial shall demonstrate set-up, changes and parts identification through to labelling for
dispatch etc. and cover all shifts.
All production jigs, fixtures, tooling, gauges and facilities shall be used.
Output Full Volume Confirmation Audit Results
Document
The Full Volume Confirmation Audit Results document shows the results of a full volume confirmation audit carried out by the supplier prior to
the start of production.
Activity Purpose:
Plan and implement additional activities to ensure quality and delivery requirements are maintained during the launch period.
Notes:
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Create and implement a Ramp-up Activity Plan that shall Monitor progress of the Ramp-up Activity Plan and implement
Content achieve the two objectives of the ramp-up period. countermeasures.
Output Ramp-Up Activity Plan
Document
Ramp-Up Activity Concern and Countermeasure Report
Key Point(s):
The Ramp-up Activity Plan is a document that describes the additional activities that the supplier has to implement in order to ensure that quality and delivery
requirements are maintained during the launch period.
A documented Ramp-up Activity Plan is required. This Plan may exist independently but shall be consistent with the pre-production control plan and the production
capacity plan
Examples of additional activities which may be included in the Ramp-up Activity Plan are:
Off-line, separate and independent check from the normal production process whenever possible
100% inspection
Increased frequency/sample size of receiving, process and or shipping inspections.
Sub-supplier containment and or sub-supplier support/audits
Addition of inspection/control items
Increased verification of label accuracy
The Ramp-up Activity Plan shall also specify clear exit criteria for the ramp-up period. These criteria shall cover:
Internal & external defect ratios
Capability
Capacity
Duration of activity
If the supplier is unable to meet the exit criteria, or the supplier's ramp-up activity continues to identify non-conformances, the supplier shall continue the necessary
additional activities until the quality or delivery concerns have been resolved to the satisfaction of Renault-Nissan.
The organization for the management of the ramp-up activity shall be identified on the Ramp-up Activity plan.
Key Point(s):
The Ramp-up Activity Concern and Countermeasure Report is a document that lists the concerns found during the ramp-up period, the root cause
of the concerns and the final countermeasures. It is linked to the Ramp-up Activity Plan.
No Item Contents
1 Parts name & number SEN ASSY 00000 AA001,
2 Manufacture Plant Tokyo Plant,JPN
3 Target Category Item Target number Responsibility (Dep.Name)
Quality
Qty. or PPM of rejected products
0 ppm B.Fore(QA)
at Nissan Plant
5 Control items in Ramp up activity Control item Frequency : Normal -> Ramp-up period Note
Electrical components
Components damaged
100% Visual inspection >>> Add 100%
Teared components
visual inspection in Ramp up period
Lack of components
Soldering
Insufficiencies 100% visual inspection >>> Add 100%
Soldering Excess soldering quality visual inspection in Ramp
Cuts up period
Crimping
Insufficiencies
100% crimping operator visual inspection ,
Lack of crimps
>>> Add 100% soldering quality visual
crimps damaged inspection in Ramp up period
crimping centering
Cable
Cable connector damaged
100% operator visual inspection >>> Add
Cable damaged
100% visual inspection in Ramp up period
Lack of clips
Cable length Operation is made in
100% operator visual inspection the same process
Lack of pillars
Sensor Mat
Lack of adhesive tape 100% Crimping operator visual inspection
Sensor Mat contaminated >>> Add 100% visual inspection in Ramp
Sensor Mat bent up period
Overmolding
Bubbles
Crimping area bubbles 100% Overmolding operator visual
contamination inside overmolding inspection >>> Add 100% visual inspection
Excess of overmolding material in Ramp up period
Cable out side overmolding
Labeling
Label with incorrect position
Operation is
Label printing with bad quality
100% operator visual inspection made in the
Plastic cap damaged same process
Plastic cap with bad position
6 Exit criteria for ramp-up activity Achieve all targets established in No.3, and get permission of exit ramp-up activity from Top management of
ramp-up activity.
Purpose:
To ensure that all products are adequately identified and controlled, Renault-Nissan requires its suppliers to operate an effective identification and
traceability system.
To ensure that all products/parts are adequately identified and controlled, Renault-Nissan requires its suppliers to operate an effective lot control
system. The suppliers are requested to maintain a register that can cross reference lot numbers and manufacturing characteristics to facilitate
traceability on request.
Note(s):
Traceability control method to be applied will be ordered in the document (including drawing) by Renault-Nissan design engineer.
If there is no order of control method from Renault-Nissan, the supplier shall determine the control method based on the experience or standard in
the supplier or agreement with Renault-Nissan relevant department.
The tier 1 supplier shall manage traceability for all products and components delivered to Renault-Nissan facilities.
In order to do this, the tier 1 supplier shall deploy the identification and traceability requirements to their sub-suppliers.
For selected products, identification and traceability requirements may be specified on the Renault-Nissan approved drawings and/or data notes.
If this is the case, the supplier must comply with the requirements specified on the relevant drawing and/ or data note. (Refer to the “4.5 Special
Characteristics Management”)
For products where no particular identification and traceability requirements are specified on the approved drawings and/or data notes, the supplier
must comply with the requirements contained in the ISO/TS 16949 and within the relevant requirements.
To keep the part traceability the lot size is left to the supplier to decide, but should be small enough to ensure control and to provide for identification
and traceability within a few hours from a request by Renault-Nissan.
Renault-Nissan reserves the right at any time to audit the supplier's compliance with these identification and traceability requirements.
Category Purpose:
Element Activity:
Activity Purpose:
Note(s):
When requested, the supplier shall attend the Renault-Nissan trial assembly activities to review the assembled part condition and confirm
Renault-Nissan assembly requirements.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Create a design verification Manufacture parts in the Manufacture parts in the Carry out Continuous
and product / process off-tool condition and perform off-process condition and conformance testing for
validation plan detailed measurement studies perform detailed measurement functional and performance
When requested, manufacture to confirm that the parts meet studies to confirm that the parts requirements.
Activity prototype parts and perform design specification for meet design specification for Carry out design verification
Content detailed measurement studies dimensions, material, dimensions, material, and product / process
to confirm that the parts meet appearance, etc. appearance, etc. validation activities for design
design specification for changes.
dimensions, material,
appearance, etc.
Key Point(s):
The Supplier Digital Test Report is a plan and summary of the testing carried out during the digital phase of development.
For Renault:
Supplier own document
For Nissan:
Key Point(s):
The Supplier Test Plan and Report is the summary of the test results identified for each test period (prototype, off-tool, off process).
The document begins as a test plan and is updated with results from the verification and validation tests as they are completed. The final version of the document
shall demonstrate the full conformity of the part to the functional and performance specifications.
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: A1245
D99K Doc. Rev. Date:
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: 2011/2/20
Supplier Name: BB Widgets MFG. LLC Supplier Code: X001 E-mail: chris-b@bbw.com
Supplier Plant: French Lick, Indiana, USA Author: Chris Bridgette Tel:
Part Name: Round Legged widget-Supreme Remark
Part No. & Issue Level: 12345 ZK 09
Design Note No. / DEVO: NAM-X100
Related Parts Number/ Reference and Name: Plan Agreed Report Agreed Plan Agreed Report Agreed Plan Agreed Report Agreed Note
Signature C. Bridgette D.D. Clyde C. Bridgette D.D. Clyde
Date 28-Feb-11 17-Mar-11 5-Mar-11 9-Apr-11
Formal Report
15-Mar-11 30-Mar-11
Submission Date
Test Period (Plan) From: 2011/2/29 To: 10-Mar-11 From: 18-Mar-11 To: 30-Mar-11 From: To:
Test Period (Actual) From: 2-Mar-11 To: 11-Mar-11 From: 16-Mar-11 To: 30-Mar-11 From: To:
None Spec, Tender /
S NAM-X100 NAM-X100
Design Note No.
A Manufacture
M Jan-11 6-Mar-11
Date
P
Tool Type Prototype Production Tool at Tool supplier
L
E Mould Type
OK OK OK OK
Prediction NG NG NG On-going
NG Sample Result Summary & Sample Result Summary & Sample Result Summary &
No. Test Name & Requirements Test Method Acceptance Criteria Justification & CA
NA NA NA test
Size Report No. NS Size Report No. NS Size Report No. NS
Report No. NA UT UT UT
Frequency
Key Point(s):
The Inspection Report is a standard report form used to communicate product quality data. The characteristics to be inspected will be agreed with
Renault-Nissan prior to submission.
The Inspection Report must be submitted to Renault-Nissan with each trial parts submission. An Inspection Report shall be submitted to
Renault-Nissan following any changes to the product, material, process or tooling.
Part Status:
Process Instructions & Production Facilities
Tier-N Components
Control Gauges
Packaging and Logistics
Manufacturing process status
Measurement data for all features identified on the drawing and in the Special Characteristics and Key Features Diagram. This shall include
measurement data from all suites / cavities of any multi-part tooling.
The conformity status of each measurement (OK / Not OK)
The unit for each measurement will be identified
Supplier approval signature and date
A unique report number
IMDS (International Material Data System) ID number (data validated by R/N )should be inputted in inspection report.
When there are plural parts for the inspection report, use “part number detail” and attached.
Note(s):
Measured samples are required with each report submitted (minimum 5 samples)
The measured samples shall be clearly numbered and referenced in the Inspection Report.
The supplier must ensure consistency throughout all documentation for:
operation step numbering
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
product characteristics identification
(e.g.: Control plan, Process Flow Chart , Special Characteristic and Key Features Diagram, Inspection Report, FMEA)
Document Description:
Document Reference No./ Version The Suppliers reference no. and version no. for the document.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier Company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault-Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing
Part No. & Issue Level As issued by Renault-Nissan design department
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Milestone The name of the Renault-Nissan milestone for which the inspected product is being delivered.
Control Plan Reference / Version The Control Plan reference number and the Issue Level that the parts have been manufactured
Tier N components identified as key critical (list & status) and their Status (Off Process, Off Tool, Proto)
Supplier comments:
ANPQP criteria
(complete and submit ANPQP documentation)
No. Special Characteristic Nominal Lower Results (=number,pass,OK) Conformance
Upper Method of Measurement,
(match Character Specification Dimension Tolerance Not
Tolerance 1 2 3 4 5 OK Reports, or Comments
KFD) Symbol and Tolerance (numeric only) (use - sign) OK
1 Dimension
U1
QVCC 6-1 GAP 0.5 +0.6/-0.4 0.5 0.6 -0.4 1.0 1.0 0.8 1.1 0.8 OK CALIPER GAUGE
U2
QVCC 6-1 GAP 0.5 +0.6/-0.4 0.5 0.6 -0.4 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE
U3
QVCC 6-1 GAP 0.5 +0.6/-0.4 0.5 0.6 -0.4 0.6 0.5 0.9 0.6 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE
U1
QVCC 6-2 Deviation Max. 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE
U2
QVCC 6-2 Deviation Max. 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE
U3
QVCC 6-2 Deviation Max. 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE
S1
QVCC 6-3 GAP 0.5 +0.7/-0.4 0.5 0.7 -0.4 0.7 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 OK CALIPER GAUGE
S2
QVCC 6-3 GAP 0.5 +0.7/-0.4 0.5 0.7 -0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE
S3
QVCC 6-3 GAP 0.5 +0.7/-0.4 0.5 0.7 -0.4 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE
S1
QVCC 6-4 Deviation Max. 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE
S2
QVCC 6-4 Deviation Max. 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.5 OK CALIPER GAUGE
S3
QVCC 6-4 Deviation Max. 1.0 1.0 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.4 OK CALIPER GAUGE
C1
QVCC 6-5 GAP 0.5 +0.7/-0.4 0.5 0.7 -0.4 0.8 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.6 OK CALIPER GAUGE
C2
QVCC 6-6 GAP 0.5 +0.7/-0.4 0.5 0.7 -0.4 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.6 OK CALIPER GAUGE
C2
QVCC 6-7 40 +0.25/-0.25 40 0.25 -0.25 40.1 40.1 40.1 40.0 40.0 OK CALIPER GAUGE
C2
QVCC 6-8 90 +0.3/-0.3 90 0.3 -0.3 90.1 90.0 89.9 89.9 90.1 OK CALIPER GAUGE
Component Parts (Clip ) Assembled Condition
2 OK OK OK OK OK OK VISUAL CHECK
no looseness, no missing, no breakage
Appearance colour, scratch, dent, thin paint, burr compare
3 PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS OK VISUAL CHECK
to limit sample
Approval signature:
E. Bygum Date:
June 8th 2011
Key Point(s):
The Appearance Approval Report (AAR) is a standard report form, to communicate information on product / part appearance.
The product / part to be reported upon will be agreed with the relevant Nissan department prior to submission and will normally be either:
A product / part that has a grained or other textured finish.
A product / part that has a painted or other coloured finish.
Note(s):
For Renault:
The Appearance Approval is a Renault standard procedure; the supplier should refer to this standard to manage the appearance approval of the
product / part with the Renault relevant department:
Shape approval of the visible body part see Renault norme 00 10 007
Shape approval of the injection part see Renault norme 03 20 006
For NISSAN:
This document shall be submitted at the following timing:
Trial Submission:
The AAR is used to support the Parts Submission Warrant and a copy showing the Nissan OK signature must be submitted when
submitting the Warrant pack.
Post SOP submission:
The AAR should be submitted upon Nissan request.
Areas inside the bold lines are for Nissan completion only.
Items marked * denotes if required by Nissan.
Document Revision Date The date of the latest revision of the document.
Document Origin Date The date when the document was first issued.
Supplier Name Supplier company name.
Supplier Plant Location at which the product will be produced.
Supplier Code Unique code to each supplier, issued by Renault / Nissan Purchasing Dept.
Author The name of the person who created / revised the document
E-mail The E-mail address of the person who created / revised the document.
Tel The telephone number of the person who created / revised the document
Part Name The part name or description as identified on the product drawing
Part No. & Issue Level: As issued by Renault / Nissan design department
Design Note No. / DEVO The latest design note number that applies to the product being developed / manufactured.
Drawing No. As issued by Renault / Nissan design department
Reason for Submission Tick the appropriate box. If other is used add explanation of submission.
Color I.D. The color identification number used by Nissan.
Part No. Suffix The final potion of the part number that identifies the color of the product.
Master Number The identification number of the master plaque used for the measurement .
Material Type For self-colored submissions, the name of the material.
Alliance New Product Quality Procedure (ANPQP)
Printed versions of this document are not controlled by the version management system.
For painted / other colored finish submissions, the name of the substrate
For self-colored submissions, the source / manufacturer of the material.
Material Source
For painted / other colored finish submissions, the source / manufacturer of the paint / finish.
Grain depth * The average grain depth.
Numerical results (from color computer) for submitted parts.
Color Computer Data * Note:
Supplier should agree which method of color approval will be used with the relevant Nissan department.
If required by Nissan, the gloss meter reading.
Gloss *
Include make and model of the gloss meter in the comment area.
The color assessment against the master plaque.
Visual Color Assessment - Supplier Note:
Supplier should agree which method of color approval will be used with the relevant Nissan department.
Visual Color Assessment - Nissan Nissan will add their assessment
Visual Color assessment - OK / NG Nissan will add OK or NG as appropriate.
Comment Highlight any attached documents or other relevant information.
Supplier Signature Report approval signature of supplier's senior Quality Assurance department representative.
Position Position of signatory.
Nissan Signature Report approval signature of Nissan relevant department, where applicable.
Date Date of signature of report.
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 Doc. Rev. Date: Aug 10th 2011
A B C OBD R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Jul 1st 2011
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: DOOR ASSY-BACK Drawing No: 80850 JD400-B121/B122
Part No. & Issue Level: 80850 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: A16796
Part No. Master Material Material Grain Colour Computer Data Visual Colour Assessment
Colour I.D. Gloss Comment
Suffix Number Type Source Depth DL DA Db De CMC Supplier Nissan OK/NG
AB RZ:
PC74 JD400 24 PVC 0.15 0.12 0.3 0.356 0.323 +1 Dark, +1 Blue +2 Dark, +1 Red OK
company 160.5
AB Rmax:
PC74 JD400 24 PVC 0.15 0.12 0.3 0.356 0.323 +1 Dark, +1 Blue +2 Dark, +1 Red OK
company 185.6
AB RZ:
PG05 JD401 09 PVC 0.1 0.01 0.09 0.135 0.091 +2 Light, +1 Blue +3 Light, +2 Blue OK
company 160.5
AB Rmax:
PG05 JD401 09 PVC 0.1 0.01 0.09 0.135 0.091 +2 Light, +1 Blue +3 Light, +2 Blue OK
company 185.5
AB RZ:
PK30 JD402 47 PVC 0.23 0.01 0.36 0.427 0.36 +1 Dark, +1 Blue +2 Dark, +1 Red OK
company 160.5
AB Rmax:
PK30 JD402 47 PVC 0.23 0.01 0.36 0.427 0.36 +1 Dark, +1 Blue +2 Dark, +1 Red OK
company 185.5
AB RZ:
PC80 JD403 22 PVC 0.09 0.17 0.19 0.27 0.255 +2 Light, +1 Blue +3 Light, +2 Blue OK
company 160.5
AB Rmax:
PC80 JD403 22 PVC 0.09 0.17 0.19 0.27 0.255 +2 Light, +1 Blue +3 Light, +2 Blue OK
company 185.5
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc Ref. No. / Ver.: ABC-010-8/Ver. 9
X46 A B C OBD
Doc. Rev. Date: Aug 10th 2011
R 2
Doc. Origin Date: Jul 1st 2011
Supplier Name: ABC Corporation Ltd. Supplier Code: A010 E-mail: taro@mail.nissan.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Atsugi-Plant Author: Taro Nissan Tel: +81-(0)46-270-1894
Part Name: BOX ASSY-GLOBE Drawing No: 76850 JD400-B121/B122
Part No. & Issue Level: 76850 XXXXX
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04896
Part No. Master Material Material Grain Colour Computer Data Visual Colour Assessment
Colour I.D. Gloss Comment
Suffix Number Type Source Depth DL DA Db De CMC Supplier Nissan OK/NG
Comfirmation in coloring
JAA 1C*0* 706-505 P,P XYZ corp. - -0.8 -0.7 -0.4 1.2 92 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
NAE 1C*1* 706-506 P,P XYZ corp. - -1.6 -0.4 -1.1 1.9 90 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
K23 1C*2* 401-516 P,P XYZ corp. - -2.0 0.3 0.5 2.1 100 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
K51 1C*3* 508-507 P,P XYZ corp. - 0.6 -0.1 0.5 0.8 90 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
K52 1C*4* 508-508 P,P XYZ corp. - -1.2 0.1 -0.2 1.2 91 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
KH3 1C*5* 87-18158 P,P XYZ corp. - 0.2 0.1 -0.4 0.4 88 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
QAA 1C*6* 610-509 P,P XYZ corp. - 0.23 -0.3 1.7 1.7 88 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Comfirmation in coloring
CAC 1C*7* 708-506 P,P XYZ corp. - -0.3 -0.6 -2.0 2.1 94 Compared to colo mastar:OK
judgement meeting:OK OK
Category Purpose:
Confirm that off-process products meet Renault-Nissan targets at full volume condition.
Element Activity:
Confirm that product and mass production process and mass production capacity meet Renault/Nissan requirements and get Production Part
Approval.
Note(s):
Mass production starting in supplier is not acceptable until Production Part Approval is provided.
Shipment to Renault / Nissan of product is not acceptable until Production Part Approval is provided.
Renault/ Nissan not fully approve PSW until report of Confirmation of full volume conditions is provided.
Advanced information must be provided if full approval is not expected in line with Renault / Nissan requirements.
If the Renault/ Nissan PSW judgment is "Interim approval" or "Rejected", the supplier shall develop countermeasures in order to achieve full
"Approval" status.
Master Samples from all tool suites or cavities must be retained at the supplier for the life of the product.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Complete and submit the Part Submission Warrant (PSW ) with all supporting
Content If a change occurs, follow the
documentation necessary to confirm satisfactory completion of the requirements of
change management
ANPQP.
requirements.
The submission date is defined in the Supplier Master Schedule (SMS).
Output
Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
Document
Key Point(s):
The Part Submission Warrant (PSW) is a document that affirms the ability of the supplier to deliver products that meet Renault/ Nissan
requirements.
The ANPQP Part Submission Warrant is a summary document and should be accompanied by the documents required by Renault/ Nissan.
The supplier will agree these documents with Renault/ Nissan prior to submission of the warrant.
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Doc. Ref. No.: 12345
711
A B C OBD 2
R
Supplier Name: Quality Products S.A. Supplier Code: A497 E-mail: e-wilsy@qa-p.co.jp
Supplier Plant: Barcelona Author: E. L. Wisty Tel: +34 289 47 91 46
Part Name: Trim Finisher Control Plan Reference / Version: CP J81-E612 Version 3
Part No. & Issue Level: 94258 JD100 Control Plan Revision Date: 07/10/2011
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04896 Average Weight: 3.300kg
Drawing No: 94258 JD100-B1 R / N Plant Nissan Tochigi
First Part Delivery Date: 01/02/2012
For each supporting document, indicate the issue level and date on an attached list.
Submission Acceptability
Dimensional Requirements OK The results meet all drawing and specification requirements: YES NO
Appearance Requirements OK
Material Requirements OK If NO, explanation required:
Functional Requirements OK
Statistical Process Data OK
Component Marking OK
Full Volume Confirmation Audit Result OK
Declaration
I confirm that the samples covered by this documentation are representative of production parts and have been manufactured to the relevant
drawings and specifications with no off-standard operations in the production process. Any deviations from this declaration are as follows:
Name: Name:
Position: Position:
Signature: Signature:
Date: Date:
Note: Approval by Renault and / or Nissan shall not relieve the supplier in any way from its responsibilities
Category Purpose:
Element Activity:
Activity Purpose:
Notes:
Key Point(s):
The 8D Concern and Countermeasure Report Summary is the summary of the actions taken to resolve a concern using the 8D (Discipline)
process.
Complete all 8 sections of the report following the completion instructions given below and submit to Renault-Nissan-Nissan.
The 8D Concern and Countermeasure Report Summary shall be supported by evidence of investigation activities (e.g. Fault Tree Analysis (FTA),
Cause & Effect diagrams, detailed countermeasure implementation timing plans etc.).
The minimum investigation activity required is a 5 Why analysis covering 4M (Man, Material, Machine, Method).
For each submission, the 8D Concern and Countermeasure Report Summary document must be approved & dated.
6)
7)
8)
9)
Yes No
Recurrence How are OK parts identified ? Attached green mark on the back of part 7 - Countermeasure confirmation Validation date : 2008/07/01
2 - Similar part consideration Label of first OK parts shipment 123123 Has the countermeasure been confirmed as effective? Yes No
Can the concern appear on other parts ? Delivery date 2004/8/8 Remarks : None
Yes No Comments/results 5 - Final Analysis Date of analysis end 2008/5/15 How?
Other models X34 Real root causes of concern in process : Check the issue detection level. Suspect parts were 100% rejected based on the
Generic parts l Man, Material, Machine, Method standard.
Other colours All colours l Who, Where, When Why, How
Opposite hand Right wing l Process settings, rework
Front/rear l Maintenance Number of the parts found in supplier process 600
Others Causes Resp Dept. Number of the parts found in R-N plant 500
1) In-correct stripping GB Manufacturing Attach relevant data (e.g: Dimensional report, Capabilty study, Atribute Yes
data, Fault Tree analysis & 5why analysis etc.)
3 - Initial analysis 2) Undefined rework process Manufacturing 8 - Follow-up action Date to finish act.
SD
Where should the non-conforming parts have been detected ? Do any of the following require action as a Yes Resp. (Dept) Timing
Yes No 3) Undefined package mainteanance Logistics result of this concern ?
CD
During process/manufacture In house work/inspection instructions ND (Manufacturing) 2008/06/30
Afetre manufacture (e.g final inspection) 4) Process Flowchart GD (Manufacturing) 2008/06/30
Prior to dispatch Control plan / chart ND (Manufacturing) 2008/06/30
Reason for non detection ? 5) FMEA GD (Manufacturing) 2008/06/30
Auto-control operation have not been executed although it is written in Drawings
the control plan. Level 1 audits have not been achieved. 6) Gage
Others (investigation, pokayoke…)
7) Sub-supplier follow-up
8)
Category Purpose:
Manage potential risks associated with changes to product design and process/facility site.
Element Activity:
Activity Purpose:
To manage the introduction of design changes in order to ensure that there is no negative impact
on quality, cost or delivery.
Note(s):
The scope of Design Change Management covers all design changes made by the tier 1 supplier
or their supply chain.
Design change includes any change affecting the form, fit, function, performance and/or durability
of a part. Examples of design changes include below (but are not limited to):
Changes mechanism or structure
Changes electrical function
Changes material (including supporting material such as grease, paint, welding rod etc.)
Changes dimensions or mass
Changes sub-component layout
Changes affecting homologation/safety/regulation
For software specific changes, the supplier shall declare actual areas of software to be modified
and any other software module contained within the control unit which may receive information
from the changed source.
There are two types of design changes below;
Design change instigated by Renault-Nissan
Design change instigated by the supplier
Authorization to proceed with any change is only given through the issue of an approved design
note by Renault-Nissan.
If any modifications to gauges are required as a result of a design change, it shall be detailed in
the relevant Gauge Specification and Approval Sheet. (Refer to the “5.3 Tooling, Gauges and
Facility Management”)
The shipment to Renault-Nissan of changed product is not acceptable until a Parts Submission
Warrant (PSW) has been submitted and approved. (Refer to the “7.1 Production Part Approval”)
If the tier 1 supplier or their sub-suppliers would like to make a change, the tier 1 supplier shall
submit a Design Change Request (DCR) document to the relevant Renault-Nissan department.
Design change request shall be submitted to Renault-Nissan at least 30 days before the date of
the change, unless otherwise agreed with Renaud/Nissan.
The supplier shall ensure that all requests for design changes are authorized by Renault-Nissan
prior to any change taking place.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Perform risk analysis on the proposed design change.
Content Complete the relevant change request document and submit to the relevant
Renault-Nissan design department.
If requested, participate in Joint Design Review with Renault-Nissan.
Output Design Change Request (DCR)
Document
Supplier Renault-Nissan
Review
DR DR is required?
Yes
No
Yes
End (Cancel request)
Approve?
No
Yes
Start mass production & deliver product
Notify completion
With associated doc.
End (Receive the product)
The Design Change Request (DCR) is the document used by the supplier to request Renault/Nissan agreement to proceed with formal drawing
submission.
The supplier shall provide all necessary information to describe and justify the change. This shall include:
the reason for the change request (justification of the change)
a full explanation of the change, complete with a list of associated parts
a full explanation of the effects of the change on the associated parts
a risk analysis and plan to manage all potential risks identified
complete timing plan, including the anticipated first shipment date
the cost effect of the change
The Design Change Request (DCR) document shall only be submitted for design changes which are initiated by the supplier.
3. Explanation of Process / Facility Site Change Detailed explanation of how the change or relocation will be accomplished. (Include Why, Where
from / to)
4. Risk Analysis of Change Detailed report (and countermeasure plan as required) based upon the suppliers own risk assessment of the
impact of the change on the product. Complete and issue a Risk Table as part of request submission.
5. Timing Plan Details Summary of timing to change the process/facility change (Append copy of the timing plan)
6. Cost Impacts Detailed cost impacts for the product, tooling and logistics.
(attached material if necessary such as “F4-sheet”)
7. How will Quality and Capacity Requirements be A clear statement is required from the supplier, which details how supply to the Renault/Nissan plants
Assured? will be safe-guarded during the transition phase of changing the process/ relocating the facility to its
new location. This may include contingency planning, additional inspection confirmations, safety
stock build program and/or allocated capacity at a different facility to protect planned output.
8. Other(s) Any item considered by the supplier to be relevant and / or unique, in order to support the particular
change request.
AGREEMENT TO PROCEED WITH FORMAL DRAWING SUBMISSION (Renault/Nissan)
2. Explanation of Change:
Reduce the height of flange 'Y' from 3.8mm to 3.5mm to eliminate foul condition. Drawing attached showing proposed modification.
Note: This has been verbally agreed with both affected customer plant QA and PE departments.
5. Timing Plan Details (append copy of Timing Plan): 6. Cost Impacts (Product,Tooling,Logistics):
See attached timing plan Product : -€0.25 per CAR set
Note: This plan has been discussed with both affected customer plan Tooling : +€300
change control departments. Logistics : No effect
Name: D C Mann Position: Project Engineer Date: 6th Jan.2015 Signed: D C mann
NOTE: Design Review needs to be done by the supplier before submit the request to Renault/Nissan
AGREEMENT TO PROCEED WITH FORMAL DRAWING SUBMISSION (Renault/Nissan)
Date of PSW approval: 27th Jan.2015 Date of first production shipment into Renault/Nissan: 23th Feb.2015
Reference:
Name: D C Mann Position: Project Engineer Date: 6th Jan.2015 Signed: D C mann
We hereby warrant that the process change has been carried out in the line with the requirements detailed in this process change plan,
and that the product will meet all appropriate Renault/Nissan specifications and requirements
THE SUPPLIER SHALL SUBMIT A PART SUBMISSION WARRANT (PSW) PRIOR TO THE DELIVERY OF
PRODUCT AFFECTED BY THE CHANGE
To manage the introduction of the process/facility site changes in order to ensure that there is no negative impact on supplier products.
(The scope of the Process/Facility Site Change Management covers all changes made by the Tier 1 supplier or their supply chain.)
Note(s):
The supplier shall have a change management system which includes, schedule for the changes, risk analysis & management, product
verification & validation activities.
Once the adoption of the change is confirmed as successful, mass production part approval from the Renault-Nissan is necessary before
shipment of any change affected product.
The supplier shall ensure that all requests for the Process/Facility site changes are authorized by the Renault-Nissan prior to any change taking
place.
The Tier 1 supplier or their sub-supplier shall not carry out any process/facility site changes during Phase 4 and Phase 5 Ramp-Up.
(The facility site provided for the "off-process" condition shall be in line with that agreed at the supplier sourcing confirmation.)
If the Tier 1 supplier or their sub-suppliers will make a process/facility site change, the Tier 1 supplier shall submit a Process/ Facility Site
Change Request document to the relevant Renault-Nissan department. Example of changes that require the Renault-Nissan authorization
includes below;(Routine planned maintenance activities such as Total Preventative Maintenance (TPM) do not require the application of the
Process/ Facility Site Change management activity.)
The Process / Facility Site Change Request document shall be submitted to the first customer in Renault/ Nissan, if effect for the several
number of plant in Renault/ Nissan.
Review
Y
N N
Feasible? Approve?
Y
End (Cancel request)
Designate item for Part Submission Warrant
(PSW)
Review the action item & update the plan
Production trial
Part Submission
Warrant (PSW)
Review
N
Approve?
Y
Start mass production & deliver product
Key Point(s):
The Process/Facility Site Change Request is the document used by the supplier to request the Renault-Nissan approval to proceed with the
process/facility site change.
The supplier shall provide all necessary information to describe and justify the change such as below;
Change description and justification
Complete timing plan, including the anticipated first shipment date
Risk analysis and plan to manage all potential risks identified
Plan to assure quality and capacity requirements
List of the affected parts
R / N Project: Nissan Important Part Renault - CSR S 1 Supplier Doc. Ref.: ECR00389
X11 Alliance Ref. No.:
A B C OBD 2
R
Supplier Name: Quality Products S.A. Supplier Code: 4D87 E-mail: e-wils@q-product.com
Supplier Plant: Madrid Author: E. L. Wisty Tel: +34 489 05 45 87
Part Name: Trim Finisher Drawing No.: 91457 XXXXX
Part No. & Issue Level: 91457 XXXXX Affected Vehicle(s): A11, B11, C11, D11, E11
Design Note No. / DEVO: T04587 LUP No. (Renault Only):
3. Explanation of Process / Facility Site Change (for Facility Site Change include Why Where from / to):
Set up of new facility in Chennai with staggered transfer of current production from Spanish plant to new plant. New
facility to have direct copy of existing processes and equipment in Spain
APPROVAL TO PROCEED WITH PROCESS / FACILITY SITE CHANGE Renault Unique R / N use only
Parts DCL-Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet
NOT APPROVED
Control Plan Supplier EDI Agreement
Process Flow Chart EDI Submission Warrant
APPROVED Nissan Unique
Inspection Report
Product Validation Test Report Appearance Approval Report
Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
Process Capability Study Result Completed DRBFM Worksheet
NOTIFICATION OF COMPLETION
Category Purpose:
Element Activity:
Activity Purpose:
Select the best logistics option & packaging specifications to ensure the conformity of the product is preserved.
Note(s):
The documentation used to communicate the content of this activity with Renault/ Nissan is specific by each company.
The specific requirements are outside the scope of ANPQP.
For detailed guidelines on specific requirements, see the “Other Supply Requirement” on ASG (Alliance Supplier Guide))
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Propose the logistics Review and optimize Review related Confirm and validate the If a change will occur,
Content and packaging the logistics route and documents and update packaging specification contact to
specification to be packaging if necessary. meets the requirements Renault/Nissan plant or
used.
specification in line specified in the relevant facility and request the
with the latest documents. instruction.
Renault/Nissan
request.
Output (RFQ Reply) Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet
Document
7.4 Purchasing
7.5 Production and service provision
Key Point(s):
The "Logistics and Packaging Data Sheet" is a document which is used to do the packaging specification.
The supplier uses that form to make the choice of box and pallet or container, the number of parts in the packaging, the number of boxes on the
pallet. It also indicates the logistics costs.
Renault/Nissan has to validate the data sent by the supplier. In case of rejection, Renault/Nissan will inform the supplier and negotiates a different
solution.
Renault/Nissan has specific logistics and packaging requirements for each company.
The supplier shall contact to relevant logistics & packaging department for information on their specific requirements.
Category Purpose:
Comply with laws and regulations in each country or region and with Renault & Nissan environment policies especially with Renault
Green Purchasing Guideline & Nissan Green Purchasing Guideline.
Element Activity:
Activity Purpose:
Comply with laws and regulations and anticipate changes or trends in the laws and regulations in each country or region for the
following environmental issues,
- control the substances used in parts and vehicles and prevent the use of prohibited substances
- improve recycling and encourage the integration of recycled/renewable materials in an increasing number of parts
- control the cabin air quality
Note(s):
The suppliers shall comply with laws and regulations and the following Renault-Nissan requirements concerning recycling and
environmental impacting substances and continuously improve the management of environment related issues.
for Renault: Renault-Nissan CSR Guidelines for Suppliers
RENAULT Green Purchasing Guideline
Standard 00-10-415, Renault Manufacture and supply of products general requirements
for Nissan : Renault-Nissan CSR Guidelines for Suppliers
Nissan Green Purchasing Guideline
For each environmental issue, the suppliers shall comply with following Renault-Nissan requirements.
The supplier shall input and submit International Material Data System (IMDS) data for all the parts and materials independently
of the vehicle shipment destination.
The suppliers shall refer to the following Renault-Nissan requirement when inputting IMDS data.
Phase 1 2 3 4 5
Activity Study the environmental issues not only Input all the Update the IMDS data.
Content to comply with regulatory requirements necessary
but also to comply with requests from information into
Renault-Nissan. IMDS.
Output International Material Data System (IMDS)
Document
Note
” Material Investigation Report regarding the restriction of use of environment-impacting substances” shall be submitted, refer to
6.PRODUCT CONFIRMATION and 7.PRODUCTION PART APPROVAL.
Key Point(s):
The MDS (Material Data Sheet) describes the decomposition of the part in sub parts, each sub part being discomposed in
materials, each material in substances. This is required for each part designed for and supplied to Renault and/or Nissan.
The suppliers shall comply with following Renault-Nissan requirement for the input of IMDS data.
For Renault: 00-10-050 Prohibited or Restricted Substances List and Declaration Modes
80 - 00 – 044 IMDS Documentation Rule For Renault Suppliers
For Nissan: NES M0301 "Substance Use Restrictions”
NES M0302 "Substance Data Input Standard by IMDS"