The GSIS owned land and buildings that it leased to the Republic through the OGCC. GSIS filed a case to nullify the lease agreement, claiming undue influence from former President Marcos. The OGCC argued the RTC did not have jurisdiction. The Supreme Court ruled that while jurisdiction can be raised at any time, the OGCC was estopped from doing so here after voluntarily submitting to the RTC's authority and receiving an adverse ruling. The petition was granted, nullifying the CA decision and dismissing the ejectment complaint.
ARNOLD ALVA - Petitioners HON. COURT OF APPEALS - Respondents Nature of The Case: Before Us Is A Petition For Review On Certiorari Under Rule 45 of The Rules of Court, As Amended, Assailing The Twin
The GSIS owned land and buildings that it leased to the Republic through the OGCC. GSIS filed a case to nullify the lease agreement, claiming undue influence from former President Marcos. The OGCC argued the RTC did not have jurisdiction. The Supreme Court ruled that while jurisdiction can be raised at any time, the OGCC was estopped from doing so here after voluntarily submitting to the RTC's authority and receiving an adverse ruling. The petition was granted, nullifying the CA decision and dismissing the ejectment complaint.
The GSIS owned land and buildings that it leased to the Republic through the OGCC. GSIS filed a case to nullify the lease agreement, claiming undue influence from former President Marcos. The OGCC argued the RTC did not have jurisdiction. The Supreme Court ruled that while jurisdiction can be raised at any time, the OGCC was estopped from doing so here after voluntarily submitting to the RTC's authority and receiving an adverse ruling. The petition was granted, nullifying the CA decision and dismissing the ejectment complaint.
The GSIS owned land and buildings that it leased to the Republic through the OGCC. GSIS filed a case to nullify the lease agreement, claiming undue influence from former President Marcos. The OGCC argued the RTC did not have jurisdiction. The Supreme Court ruled that while jurisdiction can be raised at any time, the OGCC was estopped from doing so here after voluntarily submitting to the RTC's authority and receiving an adverse ruling. The petition was granted, nullifying the CA decision and dismissing the ejectment complaint.
EMILIO GONZALES LAO, Petitioner, vs. REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES and THE GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, Respondents.
CORONA, J.:
FACTS:
Government Service Insurance System GSIS is the registered owner
of three parcels of land with a five-story building and other improvements thereon. GSIS entered into a lease-purchase agreement with the Republic through the office of the Government Corporate Counsel (OGCC). The lease was vitiated by force as the term was clearly in advantage of the OGCC. GSIS filed for nullification of the contract contending the former President Marcos used his influence to perfect the lease agreement. The OGCC contended, among other things that the Regional Trial Court did not have jurisdiction as the alleged transactions were under the jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan pursuant to Executive Order No. 9.
ISSUE:
Whether or not the RTC has jurisdiction over the case.
RULING:
While it is true that jurisdiction over the subject matter of a case
maybe raised at any stage of the proceedings. It is nevertheless settled that a party may be barred from raising it on the ground of estoppel. After voluntarily submitting a cause and encountering an adverse decision it is improper and too late for a party to question the jurisdiction of the court. A party who has invoked jurisdiction to secure affirmative relief cannot be permitted afterwards to deny the same jurisdiction to escape liability. Thus petitioner is estopped from questioning the jurisdiction of the courts below.
WHEREFORE, the instant petition is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly,
the assailed decision and resolution dated September 30, 1998 and February 02, 2002 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. No. SP No. 44348 are NULLIFIED and SET ASIDE. The basic complaint of respondent Emilio G. La’o for ejectment is accordingly DISMISSED.
ARNOLD ALVA - Petitioners HON. COURT OF APPEALS - Respondents Nature of The Case: Before Us Is A Petition For Review On Certiorari Under Rule 45 of The Rules of Court, As Amended, Assailing The Twin