Sierocki v. Klerck - Notice and Affidavit in Support of Filing Foreign Judgment

IN COUNTY CLERKS
' OFFICE
■• i
17-2.00760-3 49627128 FRJG 07-25.17 JUL 25 2017
a
PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
3
KEVIN STOCK, County Clerk
n p p i i T v
5
f ^
6 I N T H E S U P E R I O R C O U R T O F T H E S TAT E O F WA S H I N G T O N
FN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIERCE
r i
7
Jarred Sierocki
8 No. 17 2 09760 3
Plaintiff,
9 N O T I C E A N D A F F I D AV I T I N
v s . SUPPORT OF FILING FOREIGN
Cj 10 JUDGMENT
Paul Grant Klerck
li'l
11
f4
Defendant
■
- [■■■ 12 1. I, George A. Mix, am over the age of 18 years old, have personal knowledge of
13 the matters herein, am otherwise competent to testify, and the following is true and correct to
14 the best of my knowledge under penally of perjury ofihe State of Washington.
15 2. On April 17, 2015, Mr. Sierocki obtained a Judgment against Paul Grant Klerck
16 and other defendants. A true and correct copy of a certified duplicate copy of Judgment Filed on
17 Behalf of the Plaintiffs, Form 58, Version 1, In the matter of Jarrod Sierocki and Insolvency
18 Guardian Ltd (plaintiffs) v. Paul Grant Klerck, el al. (defendants)'. Registry Number 638 of
19 2013, entered in Brisbane, Australia by the Supreme Court of Queensland the judgment is
20 attached as Exhibit 1. The Judgment was filed on April 17, 2015 and was entered pursuant to
21 the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 Rule 661. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct
22 copy of the Amended Statement of Claim filed on April 26, 2013 which is referenced in Exhibit
23
24
N O T I C E A N D A F F I D AV I T I N S U P P O RT O F Mix Sonderi Thompion PLLC

FILING FOREIGN JUDGMENT - I 1420 Fifth Avenue. Suite 2200
S e o t t l e , WA 9 6 1 0 1
ORIGim Tel: 206-521-5969

fox: 888-521-5980
9 V
1 3. I request this judgment be recognized in Pierce County Superior Court, located
2 within the State of Washington.
3 4. First Plaintiff, Jarrod Sierocki resides in the State of Queensland and can be
4 reached at Level 8, 490 Edward Street, Brisbane QLD, 4000 (Australia). Mr. Sierocki is also
5 being represented by Ryan Solomon, of Mullins Lawyers, located at Level 21, Riverside Centre,
6 123 Eagle Street, Brisbane QLD, 4000.
7 5. The First Defendant is known to me as Paul Grant Klerck, and his last known post
8 office address is 23 Notre Dame Ct, Varsity Lakes QSD 4227 in Australia. His representative's
9 last known address is David Mansfield of Deloitte, at the Eclipse Tower, 60 Station Street,
10 Parramatta, New South Wales, 2150 (Australia).
11 6. The time to appeal the above judgment in the State of Queensland has expired.
12 Upon information and belief, there is no time limit for executing on a judgment in Australia,
13 however, a creditor has 15 years to take action on a judgment debt.
14 7. I certify that a copy of this affidavit and all attachments thereto will be sent via
15 registered mail service to Defendant Paul Grant Klerck's last known address of 23 Notre Dame
16 Ct, Varsity Lakes QSD 4227 in Australia and to his other known address Paul Klerck c/o David
17 Mansfield of Deloitte, at the Eclipse Tower, 60 Station Street, Parramatta, New South Wales,
18 2150 (Australia) upon acceptance of this filing and assignment of a Pierce County cause
19 number. 1 further guarantee that proof of mailing will be filed promptly with the Court.
20 Dated this day 18'^ day of July, 2017. ^
MD^NDERS THpMPSON, PLLC
G^fge ATîxrWSBA-Na 32864

Britany C.CWard, WSBA-d9o. 51355
Attorney for Jarrod Sierocki
N O T I C E A N D A F F I D AV I T I N S U P P O R T O F Mix Sonderi Thompson PLLC

FILING FOREIGN JUDGMENT - 2 1420 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2200
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel: 206-521-5969
Fox: 886-521-5980
I iieiHxa
r-i
g
r < SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
Registry: Brisbane
Number 638 of2013.
F i r s t P l a i n t i ff : J A R R O D S I E R O C K I
Second Plaintiff: INSOLVENCY GUARDIAN PTY LTD A.C.N. 149 298 SIS'
First Defendant: PAUL GJRANT KLERCK
Second Defendant:- II«aERACrnVE .EmEaiTAlJ«!ttENt AUSTftALiAP

LTDAjC^.OteOWiOS
And
Thiid Defendant: :SK & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD AX:.N. IS5 041491 •
Fourth Defendant: BÊ^ tHOMPSON

And
Fifth Defendant: USFOUNKIT PTV LTD A.CJS..128 081489
JDDGMI^rr
Befoie: Justice Flachagra
17 April 20.1,5
Bîs of judgment: Judgm^t-pujsuant iaUmformCml.Bf:ocedure Rtite.ilA upcm

'fee Amended .Clmin filed 26 Apitl;2pi 3
TlflB JUDQ.M1W OET3ffi.eOmTlS. TliAT
1; . Thatlhe first dsdiTOd^ tp fee plaintiff dafhages for defamation in' the.
sum of $80,00b.]^ I^lus litere^ in the amount of $I 1,627!205;
^ Thm the second defendant payfe the firstplainffffdâ^ for dcfemj^pn iu i^^
; simrp02G,OO0.bO plds inteiest.in.lhe amount of $2*906.80;
\ \^« ">- I
' 'fudêiil / /.! SieTO^ A Insblveia^^
... * >1
Filed on .*:^TWntfeeidi&.Assod
Ft^n-a^'Vbc^^J POB6x.-287;Sainf6idQLP^4S2p
30^7X39 Fax: fa7)3054.'7:i38
Rule.^1
0-
'A '
3. Thai tbc third defendant pay to the first plaintiifdamagcsfordcfamation in the

sum of $20,000.00 plus interest in the amount of $2,906.80;
4. That the fourth defendant pay to the fust plaintiff damages for defamation in the
sum pf $60,600.DO piua interest in the amount of $8,720.40;
.5. That the fifth defendant pay to the first plainliff damogcs for defamation in the
sum. of $ 10,000.(X) plus interest in the amount of $1,453.40;
6. That lhe fiisl defendant pay to the sccond plaintiirdamages for defamation in the
■' s s u m o f $ 3 0 , 0 0 0 . 0 0 p l u s i n t e r e s t i n t h e a r h o u n t o f $ 4 , 3 6 0 . 2 0 ;
r .1 7. That the Secontl defendant pay to the second plaintSf damages for defamation in
thestnn of $5,000.00 plus interest in the antount'of $726.70;
8. Thm.foe third defecd^.payfotl^scifohdphimtifFdampg^^

p.. ibe.sum"of $10,000.66 plus interest io lhe amount"of Sl;453.46;
9. That the fomthdefendantpaytp the second plainfiffdamagps for defamation in
V? the sum of $20,000.00 plus interest io theamouritof $2,906.80; and
C-r . ■
10. Hiattheiifth defendant to the socond plaintifif damages fiw defamation.in
if the sumnf $$,00p,Qti plus Inteitst in the ôuntof $726-70.
H
11. Thefi3^t.d^cn4m3t5§'p«;iroah«ifly Wstj:êd,'ly'himscilfand/oThis;sor^
êntsfrdro puhJishihghr causing tb be publish^.:.
(aj anj Of the ten maltm complained of in pajragrapihs 6,12, .18,.22,26,32,38,

45i49 and.58.of âmended statement of claim Qod 26 April.2013.in
thi^ proceedings or mattafs.substaritialy to the same effect as'.those matters
complaiDod of, on the inteniet or otherwise; and
(b) any ofthe inmotôns pleaded in the amended statement of claim, filed^
.Ajxril 2013 of^.oon^ra^ or mtyimpptalion thai does
nol'diffw in aubsthnce to any of ihosc'imputatinns.
l2; ftefoitith^^î^t'ii6.pfermanehflyi6Btrabedi
ageo^ &m irnbUûxie'Qr'cûsmgto be publiêd:
(a) any of foe twdlinafteis a^plaiped of in.para©rfyhs-38ûnd 58 of the
amehdkl statement of cWni fil^ 26 'Ai»i .201-3 in .these proceedings or
matters .substantially to.the.ranre'ejfecl'as fopSc malters-coinplainad of, on
theinienmlof oUierwisis; tod
(b) any of the imputations pleaded faj paragraphs 39. arid 59 of the amended.
statemtot of clahri-foed 26 April Ml 3 ita fo^ proceedings of arid
amcerrimg the first plainiifr, or any imputation that does not differ-in
.substance fo.aijy tif thosb iûlBtions.
T3.. The defendants pay Ihephiintiffi costs of and'iacidentarti) thcassessiiient of

damage.
z iiaiHxa
I?;}
S
ii
y
p..
F "
i-'ii
F''
F-'
-r" 1
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
Registry: Brisbane
Number: 638 of 2013
FirstPIaintiff: lARRODSIEROCKl
gtofe Second PlaintifTriNSOLVENCY GUARDIAN PTY LTD A.C.N. 149 298 313
First DefeiKlant: PAUL GRANT KLBRCK
Second Defendant: INTERACTIVE ENTBRTAIMMENT AUSTRALIA PTY LTD

A.CN. 068 003 805
Third Defendant: SK & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD A.C.N. ISS 041491
Fourth Defendant: BRENT THOMPSON
Fifth Defendant: INFOUNK IT PTY LTD A.CN. 128 081 489
Sixth Defendant: CHRISTINE WAKE
AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM
The claim in ihw proceeding is made fn reliance on the followings facts:
AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM "Name: Jcrrod .Sicroeki

Insolvency GuaHllan Ply Ltd
Filed on Dehalf of llio i'lainlini Addius; O- Gllfoyle Sollcitori
Foftn 16, V«%u«i2 PO Bon 5S8. SniulBOW Old 4017
Uinforni CWil l>ocwlorc Ru!« J 999 PbonclSo: (07)32692216
Rules 22.1-W FkNO; (07)3269 1918
1. The Rrsj PlaJntifl is, and was at all times material to liiis action:
(a) an individual; and
(b) a Director of the Second Defcnclmu.'
2. The Second Plaintiff Is, and was at all times mateiial tn this action^ a
Company witli less than lO employees registered in Hie State of

Queensland, capable of suing and being sued.
3. The First Defendant is. and was at ail times mateiial to this action:
(a) an individual; and
(b) a Director and shiwuhoWcr of the Second DcrcmJant;
(o) a Director and shareholder of the Third DcfeiKlanl;
(d) a shareholder of llio Fifth Defendant; ^
(e) the Registrant of the website http://www.scaramonster.com.
4. The Second Defendant is. and was at all times material to this action:
(n) a Company registered in the Slaie of Queensland capable of suing and

being .wed;
(b) tlve rcglslram of the website htip'//www.lnfolinlclt.oom.au;
(c) The rcgislrantofthe website http:/Av\v\v.websitepix)raoiions.ncl.au.

5. The Thii d Defendant is, and was at all tlmea material to this action;
(a) a Company registered in the State of Queensland capable of suing and

being sued.
(b) the registrant of the websKe hlip:/www.msolvcncyprofessii>nals.com.8i.
2
€
Siuaip
bH01opA
i OJd01pasu
ia
i tdpe»j|ie
l qisou
i o^nooAOq
i DP.03pae
jijpCH(«0
:S3U91PJOS3SW33U}siaqoqiu«peojSuH
jM
i unao»'q
|eunSj(e)
yj|jui8|<j puoaas ueauj m papuoiuj
OWM puB 3UV0UI /feqiS
' au
i cocuAJBn
i po
i pue pamcu Ja
j qi /Cq asneaaq
Unu?BU puoaas aqj JO iCiopjaiEjap aiaw spJOM /JOicuiejaa isJij aqi '0
-saaie( peqaiw qiiMSiusuiiutodde snoiauinu paqaDUB? pRH
uazBJd a-tnn m!A\ siuouiiujotldB snojawnn papaauEa pen U)
^3UBpuaa
j <i qvnoj aqi qM
li su
i auquo
i ddE snoaaumu paHaaow pBH (a)
^jjIlDiEid puoaas aqi JO SIBSIP
03 opA
i Od
j 03 pasu
i ocj l paq aq m
i p sauo
i an
i o OAOq
i oc 01 pancj peHCP]
paoaos OMA JO sjuajp
03 paMO sapnp jenaaejiooa lujojad 03 SuijiMin jo *a|qcoii sc/w JO S| (a)
JjU14up®ld paoaas 9MA Jfo siwoip
03 opA
i OJCt oi pasw
i od
j puq oq e
l qi satuoaqnc aAaq
j ae 03 pam
ij p^H (q)
Isiuaqa jo sisajaiuj 3S3q aqi u j pB 01 auipiMun jo 'ajqcun sj (b)
UJpufBJd JSijd aqaaBip ueaw
03 popuaitq aiaM pue lucaui Aaqi •aujuBOUi Auriipjo pue jcjineu Jjaqa Xq
asneaaq jjiiujBid ASJU aqi jo XjoiBUiejap ojaM spjoM Xjoibuiojoq iîj aqi L
jlpoj3-3a8-3UBa-aiy-3Jp3JJ
-pcq-j!edoj-3|paJ3/sM8U/nB*iuaa"sjBuojSsajojdXauaA|o$urrtAAA/w//:<i3Aq
aafsqaAA aqi u6 uiaqi 3upsocl Xq (^spjOM/OosBuaqia^
4sj»d„ aqi) utJBp JO 3uouia3P3s sJMl I sii^paipS AC spjoM aip paqs{|qnti
lUBpunjoQ pjiqj. aqA puB auepuojaa asjy oqa ziOZ joqoaao 6 inoqe jo uo '9
BpjO;Vi iioiauiBjaa i«!d aqi
(c) Is or was unable, or unwilling to perform its contractual duties;
(d) over promises and under delivers;
(e) authorlzas or permits or encourages its employees to engage In

llircatening and behaviour condxi.ct its competitors;
(f) authorizes or permits or encourages it employees to threaten its

competitors with physical violence.
(jg) Had cancelled numerous appointments with the Fourth Defendant:
(h)Had cancelled numerous appomtments witli Kuit Frazer.
[I) Had cancelled numerous appotnlmenis with Michael James.
9. When the First Defendant published the First Defamatory Words:
(a) He was actuated by il wil toward die Hrst Plaintiff
(b)he was actuated by greed and the desire to profit, either directly or
dirough the Second Defendant. Third Defendant and/or Fifth
Defendant at the First Plaintiffs expense;
(c) he intended that the Rrst Defamatory Words would cause die people
who read them to:
(IJ shun and avoltl the First Plalntifh
(2) shun nnd avoid the Second Plaintiff;
(3) lower their estimation of the character of the First PlalntilT:

(4) lower their estimation of the Second Plaintif; and
(dj he did so in contumelious disregard for the First Plaintifs and the
Second Plaintiffs rlBhls,
4
1
Suipue^s JO uoi]8}ndaj jcuoissajojd siijo uopanpaj (c)
:3u;pnpu| aSuiuBp puo ssu] pajaijns sejjitaicij
puoMS 3MJ *sp«OM XJOieiuqaa jsjij aqi jo junpiia|3a pjxtii am puc
)uepuaja(| ^sjij am Xq ooncauqnd aqi J® artuanbasuoa iq puu uosbsj Xg "ii
SuipuBjs JO uoprqndoj ênoissajoJd siq jo uopanpaj (q)
qaaiussBjJcquia puc uoncujuinq 'pnq p?uonoma (i?)
:3uipn(3U( adeuiep pire ssoj paaaxins sc
J[#UUJBl<i ^SJjj am "spjoM vCiocjeuiBaac ^sjij am J" luepuajatl pjfqi aip
lUEpuajaQ isjfj am Xq uopcajiqnd aip jo aauoobasuoa ui pne uosEai Xfl "01
9
!j[]puiE(j']SJij aip piBMOj njM {H pajeniDEscM 3H (<?)
:spjOM /fJOjcuTBjaa ptioDas paqs!iq'«i luepuojaa isj'd «9'IM SI
qjIAi ssauisnq ap pinoqs
spjOM itiojeiUBjaa pu«as P siuajdpw leqj AUKduioa r lou si [a)
•uodn
paijaj JO po^snj] oq lou ptnoa jjpuund puoaas a.ijrtpv(q)
05 aauvpe pajoaui SaiAja jo oanawd aip u\ shm jhuiew P"033S aqi («)
qetp ueaui o% papuaû}
W8M pUB 3UB3U1 /oqi "auiueaui Ajeojpjo pue leinpu Jidtp /q asciRoaq
JtlI3"IB{d pooa»s aqs J° itiojeoiejop ajaM spjOM /JOietUBpa pu<»aS aiL 'frl
•qjjMKsaaisnqop
p(noqs spjOM AJOiEiuBjaQ pDoaaj oqjjo siuajdmj jBip uosjsd b lou sj (o)
luodn paqaj jo po^snj^ oq lOO pinoo jipujcid JSjy sq^ Jfq uaA|8 ooiApv (q)
puon85 aq] jo sjiiaip oi aaiApc qnajJoau| qabS Ufnijcy ISJU 3q,t C*^)
•IBq;) ucaui oa papuaûi
ajaM pue qiiHaiu Aaip -Sumcam iCjEujpJo pue ibjo^ru jjoqj Xq asneooq
JJPUJBId }o J^JOêuiejap aja/w spjo/w XioACiuejaQ puooog aq.l XT
/jSBoo-aujqsuns-auBqsuq
-lSBoa-p|o3-d{3q-X3jdnjqucq/a3UEuy/ne iuooii3iU!iojurMMA\ •MMftv//:clwq
sqisqaM aip uci uiaq] Supsod Xq (^spjoAfi XjoiRuugaQ puoaas,. ^q')
uiieo JO luauiaios sRi oj z ainp&qas 3C sp.ioM oqi paqsjiqnd lunpuajofl
puoaas oqj pue luepuajaa ^sjij oip ZIOZ -iaqoiÔ Tl •"> "O 'Zl
spjOA\ Xjo|cniBpfr puuaas aql
3u|pue)s.iO uojiwdw icuojssajatd sjjjo uopanpai («)
:8uipnp«| oScuicp pue ssoj pajojjns sb jjpuiE{d
puoost; am 'spjo/v^ /taojcuiBjoQ pucoos J® auepaajaa pu«n®S 8^5 P"®
:)uepu9joc] isjij atp Xq uopeajiqnd oip Jo SDuanfaasum uj pus uosbbj /tu L\
Sajputqs 40 uopcjndai puoissajoid sfqjo uoponpaj Cq)
JjuooxssvjJBqiua puB uopBintunq '4Jnq iBuopouis (c)
:St[|pnpu! oaeiuop puc ssoi pajo^nfi SBq.onujB|j
4Sj|d am 'spJOM Kimeuiejaa puooas J® jUBpuajoQ puoaas aip puc
4UBpu9jau aqj ^q uopBafiqnd aqj jo wu5i»hasHo.i ui pue uosboj Aq '91
•iqq8i4 sjjnuieia puoaas
om puc sj|no!i!(<i 4S4}.| oqi 4ty (ucflaisip sconammuoa uj os pip aq (p)
puc yjlJincu puoaosoqj jO uoncuipsa ijaip aa/woj (v)
lynujeu isju oqj jo iaôereip aip jo uopctuiisa Jiam jaMOj {£)
;BnuiBia puoaas aifl P!oac puc unqs tz)
JJUnajcyawu am pioAB puB ump (x)
ss !
o) uiatp pBa4 oqM aidoad
am asne.1 pinoM spjOM Aio4buibjo(J puoaas aqx icm papusiu! aq (a)
:asua(lxo sjjpujeid asjjj aqi JB qucpuajoa
qV!d jo/puD joepuajan pjiqj. 'jucpuajaa puoaas om qSnoJm
JO /paajtp jaqqa "Xijaid oj aj;sap aqj pue paaj8 Aq paicmae sbm aq (q)
s
UCiiSJaAiun
puog am 5E MBj tti aajniaoT B se josuim sjuasojdai X|as'|ed (lu)
;]uno398 ue aq ocj jfosujjq sauosoadaj itjasfn^j (i)
tMBi-jB-jmsujeq B aq oijdsuijq sjaasajdaii{3SiBi (Ji)
;ME{ 3|Bja)30p B aABq oj jiasiujq squasaidaj ^lasjej (0
'.SHCiBSl (0
MEijcsitq)
t^jadojd |{3dsiouue^ (3)
JRAOSBM 01
Sufaq uEUinq E JOJ ssnnxa Auos t SB/A (O)
|uqij096a
-uosB(/sMa{ftaa-siujcjdiJuo3/ui03TiimsMa}Aai"MAWA//:djji| misqa/A
aqi p uo ûBpuajaQ )sjij aip jo iCjo^mUBjap |C).i3)eui parsed pey (pj
JpitesBMW
fÔIpIuBSl^M(q)
ijjnuiBid isjjd oip jeqi UBaui oj papuajui
aioM puc weaiu âip "Suyupaui Aieuipjo pua [pjipeu apm ifq asneaaq
Unuf^ld JO <tJaj6UiBjap aja« spjo^ ^40ieuJBjaQ piiqj. sqi '61
■uapsiLie^ iiqof 04 pueupumid isjjj am 04 jiBiua UB Suipuaf:
Xq {„spjoM /J04BtuBja(j pu{qj^ aip) uiiBp JO auauia4e4S Sfq4 04 £ ajnpaqas
je $pjoA\ aip paqsnqnd 4ucpuajaQ jsjij oqi EIOZ Xjcnuel ii inoqE jo uq *81
KP40A\ XxojtiuBiJa P-*I«tL 9MX
6
UurpuBjs JO uopEjndaj )CTOissojOjd suno nousnpaa (q)
poB nuouissBJUBqiua pae uonBjnumq Vnq {Eoopoiua (e)
iSoipttpuj aSeuiep
puc ssoi pojiojjns scq jjjjufeid 3S.nj aqi 'spJO/ft AiojEixrejoQ pJiqi s<p .'v]
jo )U(qTuaj9cl isjij aqi Aq uopeojjqnd oip jo aouanbasuoo iq puc uoSBOJ Xfl IZ
r ,
•i."
•!qqS|J sjBRUfeid jsajd oqq aoj pjcSoJSip soofpuipwoo ut ps ptp aq (p) i5i
3}HUlc|disj{iioqijo JOjsBJmp aipjo ncjiEUiRso j}oiiiJ3MO|(z) u
. f * \
pue IJJpuiTJirf ifiJJil aqi pfOAB puc unqs (i] .in
.'•4
:o\ uapsuitqj .)
uqof osneo pjnoM spjoM Aioiauicpa pqtu Jeip papuaûj oq (oj
rasuodxa sj[jnuicj«i puijj oqj jr lUEpuojaa G > f'i
0 g
qqy jo/puB juepiiajaQ pJiqi "jucpuojaQ puoaas am qSnojqj 3M 5"| /KvS
JO Xpoaijp jaqqa 'juoad oj pnsap aq) puc poajtS Aq pajeruJB sbm aq (q) ^ s. .1'-^
2 "S
KJ S
:tl5iu}t'id jsaid aqi pJRA\oj (um m Aq poj onue »w (b)
tspjo/w A-wjemeâa pJiqi aqj poqsnqod Jaapuajoci x-ujd aq) iioqM 'OZ
G
-siaqio pua aaijoM Auuea 'pRaisiCH "PIbuoq
j)OJS 'uoauotl laRipiW 'jucpuajaa paptL aq) o) iSuiq) Snpsnasip pm C"]
1• "'1- •
-quioq i }>'
)U|cd c auisn ApadoJd s.jnoqqSpu siq 04 aScuicp Aviadojd pasnroCu) •f.)
0
» • f
i ♦ /
■JT** Foarth Defamatory Worila
22. On or about 17 january 2013 the First Defondant and the Third Defendant
published the words at Schedule 4 to this Statement of Claim (tlie "Fourth

Defamatory Words") by posting them on the website
http;//www.webslrcprnmol:Jon.nel.au/news/beware-of-reviews-talk-
online-extortlon-review-website.
23. The Fourth Defamatory Words were defamatory of the First PlainUff
because by their natural and ordinary meaning, they meant and wore
intended to mean that the Rrst Plaintiff had:
(a) posted tmlruc and defamolory comntenis about ihe First Defendant on a
wcbshc cEilied Revie%v Talk
(b) cotniniticd tm ofience and was being investigalcd by the police.
24. When the First Defendant published the Fourth Defamatory Words:
(a) He was actuated by ill will toward the First Plaintiff;
(b) he intended that the Fourth Defamatory Words would cause the people
" who read them to:
(!) shltn and ovoid tlic First Plalnfi/T; and
(2) lower ihcir e.stlination of the chflraclcr of the First PlaiiiUffi
(c) fie did so in contumelious disregard for the First Plaintiffs rights.
25. By reason and in consequence of tlie publication by the First Defendant

and the Third Defendant of the Fourth Defamatoiy Words, die First
PlalntilThas suffcretl loss and damage including:
(a) emoliunal hurt, humtliation and embarrassment;
(b) reduction of his profe.ssional reputation or.standing
10
The Fiflb Dufamilory Words
*<J6. On or about 17 January 2013 the First Defendant published the words at
Schedule 5 to litis Statement of Claltn (the "Fifth Defamatory Words") by
posting them on tiie website
hUp:/Avw\v.scammon5tcr.com/cxcortIon/pauHderck-beg!ns-legal-
action-agalnsc-reviews-talk/.
27. The Fifth Delûnacoxy Words were defamatory of the First Plainllff because
by their natural and oi-dinary meaning, they meant and were intended to
mean that the First Plaintiff:
(a) Was waging a smear against tite First Defendant;
(b) Had been publishing lies and rubbish about the First Defendant:
(c) Had lodged feLse documents with Google L.LC;
(d) Had lodged felsc claims with Google LLC;
(e) Had lodged false docunients with an organization called Chilling

EfFects:
(f) Had lodged false daims with an organization called Chilling EfTecW;
fg) Had acted fraudulently;
(h) Had tried to have a websiie of die First Defendant *blaclt listed"
(i) Had mistreated Brent Thompson. Kurt Fraser, Michael and Kerri-Ann
Benton, Scott Donald, Mick fames. Danny McGce and Rick Halsiead;
CJ) Had defrauded Bitsnt Thompson, Kurt Fraser, Michael and ICerri-Aon
Benton, Scott Donald, Mick James. Danny McGce and Rick Halstead;
(k) Had acted unlawfully and In a way that would cau.sc the Insolvency
and TnKtec Seivlce Australia to invesii^te him;
(I) Is or was disreputable;
(m) Is or was unprofessional.
28. The Fifth Dcfeinalory Words were defamatory of the Second Plaintiff
because, by their natural and ordinary meaning, they meant and were
Intended to mean that the First Piatntifr:
(a] authorisies or permits or encouj-ages its employec.s to engage In

threatening and behaviour conduct its competitors;
(b) autlioiizcs or pennlts or encourages it employees to tin-eaten its

competitors with physical violence.
(c) It services are disreputable;
(d) Us services an; unprofessional.
29. Wlren the First Defendant published the Fifth Defamatory Word.s:
(b) he was actuated by greed and tlic desire to profit, either directly or
through the Second Defendant. Third Defendant and/or Fifth
Defendant at the First Plaintiffs expense;
(c) he intended that the Fifth Defamatory Words would cause the people
whn read Ciiem to:
(1) shun and avoid the First Plaintiff;
f2) shun and avoid the Second Plaintiff;
(3) lov/er their estimation of the character of the First Plaintiff;
[4) lower their e.sllmalion of the Second Plaintiff; and
(d) he did so In contumelious disregard for tlie First Plaintiffs and the
Second PlainiifTs rights.
12
30. By ( ca!>on and in con.sequencc of the publication by the First Defendant of
the Fifth Dcfamator)' Words, the First PlaintifT has suffered loss and
damage including:
(a) cmotio:ia) hurt, huniiJiaUoft and embarrassment;
(bj reduction of his professional reputat'on or standing
31. By rcasoo and in a>nsequcnce of the publication by the First Defendant

and the Third Defendant of the Fifth Ucfamatoiy Words, the Second
Plaintiff as suffered loss and damage including:
(a) rcductioa of Its professional reputation or .standing
13
The Sixth Defamatory Word^
32. On or about 17 lanuaiy 2013 the First Defendant and the Fifth Defendant
pubiisbed t!ie words at Sdicdiilc 6 to this Statement nf Galm (the "SixtJt

Defamatory Words") by posting them on tlic website
htvp;//www.scauuiionstQr.com/bankmpUy/beware-of-dodgy-insolvency-
scains-bankru ptcy- cnmpu nies/
33. By way of true Innuendo Ujb Sixth Defamatory Words were defamatory of
the First Plaintiff because, by their natural ami ordinary meaning, the
words used vvere meant and were intended to mean that the First PSuintlfi;
(a) Is dodgy;
(b) Is operating a scam;
(c) knows nothing about the field ofassbiing people In financial hardship;
(d) preys on innocent people;
(c) dehnuds innocent people of their money; and
(f) give clients ofttie Second Plaintiff false hope.
34. By way of true tnnuendo llie Sixth Defamatory Words were defamatory of
the Second Plaintiff because by their natuiral and ordinary meaning, they
meant and were intended to mean that the Second Plaintiff:
a. Is dodgy;
b. cannot be trusted; and
c Is operating a scam.
14
I
35. When the First Defendant published tlic Sixth Defamatory WorcLs:
(a) He was actuated by ill will toward the First PlalntifT;
(b) he was actuated by greed and die desire to proftt, either directly or
through the Second Defendatit, Third Defentît and/or Fifth

Defendant at the First Plaintilfs expense;
(c) be intended that the SIxtli Defamatory Words would cause the people
who read them lo:
(L) Shun and avoid the First Plaintiff]
(2) shun and avoid die Second PiainBfr;
(3) iofvvcr their estimation of the character of the First Plaintiff
(4) lower their estimation of the Second Plaintiff; and
(d) he did so in contumelious disregard for the First Plaintiffs and the
Second Plaintiffs rights.
36. By reason and In consaqucnce of the publication by die First Defendant

and the Fifth Defendant of the Sixth Defcunatory Words, the First Plaintiff
ha.<: .suffered loss and damage including-.
(a) emotional hurt, humiliation and ombanrassmcnt;
(b] reduction of his professional reputation or standing.
37. By reason and in niasequence of the publication by the First Defendant

and the Fifth Defendant of the Swth Defamatory Wordis the Second
Plaintiff a.s snffcred loss and damage including reduction of its
professional reputation or standing.
15
The Stycnth Dcliimntory WorJs
38. On or about 17 January 2013 the First Defendant anrt/nr thn PAurth
Defendant published the words at Sciieduie 7 to this Statement of Claim
(the 'Seventh Defamatory Words") by posting them on the website
https;//www.ripoffrepoit.com/insolvency-guardian/credit-debt-
serv{ces/vai>iity-lakes-inten«t-670C7.hhn.
39. The Seventh Defamatciry Words wore defamatory of tlic First PiaintifT
because by their natural and ordinary meaning they meant and were
intended to mean that the First PiainUfh
(a)lsaconman;
(b) Ruined the Fourth Defendant's life;
■ (c) Is toxic;
(d) Defrauded tho Fourth Defendant
(e) Defrauded a countiess number of people other than the Fourth

Defendant;
(f) isasodopath;
(g) Lacks morals
(h) fs destructive toward other peopic
(I) Is selflsh
(J) IsaiTogaiU;
(It) Believes he is "god like";
(I) Is aggressive;
(m) Acted like was a king;
i6
(n) Was smug;
(o) Has a tendency to rani;
(p) Was involved in underhanded deals;
(q) Was involved in wording for cash and avoiding income tax;
(r) Assisted others to work for cash and avoid income tax;
(s) Made promises that he did iwt keep;
(tj Made no attempt to porJorm the work that he had agreed to perform;
(u) Caused the Fourth Defendant to become a bankrupt against his wishes;
(v) Ignored the Fourth Defendant's attempts to talk to him;
(w) Licxl about employing hundreds of people across Australia
(x)made an innppropriaie or unlawful deal wUJi the Trustee in

Bankruptcy of the Fourth Defendant;
(y) deiiûded others including Kuri Trascr, John Miclwcl Jaotcs, Danny
McGee, Rkk Halsleod, Michael and Kem-Annc Benion. Scou Donald,
Some N HsJiy or Somcthhig Fi Ay Take Away Hclcnsvale, Maries Pizza;
(z) fraudulcfttly portrayed himself a* the holder of a Doctorate in I^w;
(aa) fiaudulenily portrayed hiniself as a biucistcr;
(bb) fraudulently portrayed himself as an accountant;
(cc) fraudulently portrayed himself as a law lecturer at the Bond University;
(dd) Mnde a ftlsc complwoi to police;
(cc) Was a liar,
(fO caused the police to mnke a felse arrest against a dog trainer called Scott
Donald;
(gg) caused irrqjOTable financial damage to a dog iraioer called Scoll Donald;
(hli) Acted like he was oo drngs
(ii] Acted like he was mental unstable;
Qj] He tries to tocruit others to assist him lo scam people;
(kk) Was abusive to his employees;
(II) Was abusive townrd clients of the Second I'lainliff;
(mm) Attempted to cause an employee of the Second Plaintiff to forge the

sigtianirc of a client;
(im) Hod an extra marital affair with a Russian woman by the name of Kscnia
Chcstakiva;
(oo) niailciousiy damaged the front of Sass Dcsigii studio witlt red paint;
(pp) made false claims that he could build websites for clients
(qq) made false claims thut he could provide Scorch Engine Opthnisalion
services for clients:
(rr) brcoched the copy rigid of an un-oamcd person;
(s5)rTauduient]y sold the designs for o toolbox on a volley which was a piece of
nibbish;
(tt;)dc^cd the First Defendant;
(uu) deimudcd the Fiist Defendant;
(w) is a person of limiled mcnal ability
(\vw) is mentally retarded;
(xx) defrauded Danny McGee oiid/ar Total Concept Oroup;
(yy) was sacked by Danny McCee and/or Total Concept Group;
18
(x/.) ({ffrauded an un-namcd liusbsnd and wife who ran u Itsh and chip shop at
{■idensvnlc;
(aaa) provided false documcnia to an organizatitwi called ADCO;
(bhh) maliciously InierfCTed with the contractual rclatioiia between Denny

McOce and/or Total Concept Group and the urgunizution called ADCO;
(cec) caused all types of dramas for o busiaess run by a person nmncci Rick
lialstcitd;
(ddd) was sacked by Rick Halslcad for coosing dramas;'
(eee) caused a business that supplied Kick Ilalstcad ur his company with
roslerials to issue Rick I lalstcad or his compny with unwarranted siatutoiy
demands;
(fll) dcfatncd Rick Halslcad with online postings;
Cggg) dehtmed Ridcflalsicau's busineas^with online postings;
(hhlO cause financial lutu to Rick llalatcad;
(tit)cnuscd long term fintaicial diflictillics for the First Dcfeiulant;
(uilcoused mental ongaish to iHo First Defendant;
(kkk) caused the First Defendant tu he threatened and abused by un-namc

people who were out to get ibc Ficst Ptoindfr;
(III)dcf3med the First Defendant; Is causing a trail of terror;
(mmm) is causing a uail of destruction.
40. The Svveiilh Defamatory Words were defamatory of the Second Plaintiff
btjcause by their natural and ordinary meaning, they meant and were
intended to mean that the First Plaintiff had;
(a) Ruined the Fourth Defendant's life:
19
4 4
V.'l
(b) Defrauded the Fourili Defendant
iO
l•.^
? M
(c) Defrnuded a countless number of people other than the Fourth
Defendant;
r o
(d) Was involved in underhanded deals;
f^ l §? (e) Was involved in working for cash and avoiding income tax;
r >
3 *0
}0 l>»
a B (0 Assisted others to work for cash and avoid income tax;
Q. O
■a £0
.. J
» I
V t^
•o n (g) Made promises that it did not keep;
s|: c ^
< 3
'.1^ (h) Made no attempt to perform the work that it had agreed to perform;
(0 Caused the Fourth Defendant to become a bankrupt against his

wtslics;
!•.- r
i->i
0} Ignored the Fourth Defendant's attempts to talk to the oRlcci's or staff
'.V
of Second Plaintifh
i;ii
lii (k)madc an inappropriate or unlawful deal wltlt tite Trustee in
6 Bankruptcy of the Fourth Defendant;
\-l [1] dehauded uthers including Kuil Froscr, John Michuei James, Danny
McGee, Rick Halstcad, Michael and Kcrri-Annc Benton, Sootl IXxoald,
Some N I'isby orSomcthrag Fiahy Take Away Hclcnsvide. Maries Pizza;
(m) was opetated by a man who liraudulenily pottrayed himself as ihu

holder of a DtKtomtc in Law;
!
(n) was operated by a man who fraudulcntiy portraycil liimsclf as a barrister.

L (o)wiis operated by a man who fraudulently portrayed bitnsell' as an
accountant;
(p)wa<» operated by n man who fraudulently portrayed hiroscif as a law

lecturer at the Bond Univcrsilj';
(q) was operated by a man who was a liar;
2 0
(r) was operated by a man who acted like he was on diitgs
(si was oiKratod by a man wtio acted like he was inetufU iinstabic;
(t) wns operated by a man who was abusive lowvrd clients of the Second
PlamtifT;
(u) was openttcd by a tnan wito attempted to cause an employee of the

Second PlainufTta Torge ihu signature ufa client;
(v) breached the copyrtghl of an un-naincd person;
(w)wi>s operated by a man who is a person of limited mental ability
(x) was operated by a mnn who is incntaily retarded;
(y) defrauded an un-namcd husband and wife who ran a fish and chip shop ot
Hdcrtsvalc;
(z) caused long term linancioJ difficulties for the Fiort Defendant;
(aa) caused mental aoguish to the First Defendant
41. When the First Uefendaiit published, or aided, counseled or procured the
Fourth Defendant to publish, the Seventh Defamatory Words:
(a) He was actuated by ill will coward the Firsc PHtlntifT;
(h) he was actuated by greed and the desire to profit, either directly or
through the Second Defendant, Third Defendant and/or Fifth Defeitdant
at the First PlainlilTs expense;
(c) he intended that the Seventh Defamatory Words would cause the people
who read them to:
(11 shun and avoid the First Plaintiff,
(21 shun and avoid the Second Plaintiff;
(3) lower their estimation of the chararter of the First PlalntifT;

(4) lower their esiimatioo of the Second Plaintiff; and
((]) he did so in contumelious disregard for the First Plaintiffs and the
Second PlaiDtiffs rights.
42. By reason and in consequence of the publication by the First Defendant

and tho Fourth Defendant of the Seventh Defamatory Words, the First
PlainlifTlias suffered loss and damage Including:
(c) emotional hurt. Iiiirailiatlon and embarrassnient;
(d) reduction of hisprufussional reputntion or standing
43. By reason and in consequence of the publication by tlie Fli*st DelendBnC

and the Fourth Defendant of the Seventh Defamatory Words, the Second
PlainUff ns suffered loss and damage Including reduction of Its
prcfesfdonal reputation or standing.
44. The Seventh Defamatczy Words have the taken the fom of a permanent
stain upon the First Plaintiffs and the Second Plaintiffs reputations.
Particulars;
(a) The wnb.vlte www.rlpoff.coro on whldi the First Defendant and/or the
Fourth Defendant published the Seventh Defamatory Words:
(I) is located in the United States of America; and
(ii) is protected from liability for the dehnnatory publication of the

Seventh Defamatoiy Words by the provisions of the United States
legislation, Communicailons Doccncy Act 47 U.SX;
nil) by the terms of the' United States legislation, Securing the

Protech'on of our lindurlng and Established Constitutional
Heritage (SPEECH) Act it is not amenabie to an injunction
requiring removiii or uditing of the Seventh Defamatory Words.
22
i;
The Eighth Defiirontory Words
45. On or about 17 lanuary 2015 the First Defendant published the words at
Schedule 8 to this StBtemcnt of Claim (the 'Eighth Defamatory Words") by
setidtngan email to the First Plaintifl's wife, Vedrana Vtcci Sierocki.
46. The Eighth Defamatoi^ Words were defamatory of the First PloinllfF
because by their natural and ordinaiy meaning, they meant and were
intended to mean that the First Plaintiff:
(a) Had posted defamatory comments about the First Defendant on

websites;
(b) Had an extra marital affair with a woman named Kscnia Clrestakiva;
(c) Took Illegal drags;
(d) Is an evil person;
(e) Keeps money away from his wife by storing it in safety dcjxrsit boxes;
(f) Is a liar,
Is incapable of idling die iruUi.
47. When the First Defendant pubtlslied the Eighth Defamatory Words:
(a) He was actuated by III will toward the First Plaintiff;
(h) he intended that the Eighth Defamatory Words would cause the First
Plaintiffs wife to shun and avoid ihe First Plamdff;
(c) he did so In contumelious disregard for tiie First PlaintilTs rights.
48. By reason and In consequence of the publication by the.Flrst Defendant of

the Eighth Defamatory Words, the First PlaintifF has suffered loss and
damage Including emotional liurt, humiliation and embarrassment.
23
The Ninth Defamatory Words
49. On or about 21 lanuary 2013 the First Defendant and/or the Sixth
Defendant published the wonls at Schedule 9 to this Statement of Claim
(the "Nintli Defainatoiy Words") by posting them on the website
hltps://wwwMi poffreport.com/insolvcncy-guardian/nnanclal-
serviccs/gold-coast-Jiationwlde-Cl 37 l.htin.
50. The Ninth Defamatory Words were defamatoty of the First Plaintiff
because by llicir natural and ordlnaiy meaning they meant and were
intended to mean that the I'irst Plaintiff:
(a) 'fhc First PlaiuUlTfalsely portrayed himselfto a lawyer;
(b) Threatened to ciiangc the loclw on the Sixth 'Defendant's premises;
(c) Is nasty;
(d) Is un exturitionist;
(e) Is evil;
(0 Is a thief;
(g) is a bastard.
51. By wav of falso innuendo the Ninth Defamatory Word.^: were defamatory of
the First Plaintiff because they meant and were intended to mean that the
F i r s t P l a i n t i ff :
(a) Had bullied the Sixth Defendant;
(b> Had defrauded the Sixth Dofcndant;
(c) Had been overbearing with tfte Sixth Defendant;
(d) flod earned the Si.xth I^jfcndHnt to do .<:omcth)ng which she was opposed to
doutg;
(e) t iad misled the .Sixth DclcRdaiit as to ntomcs. {tayabJd by her.
52. The Ninth Dehunatory Woixls were defamatory of the Second Plaintiff
because by their natural and nrdinaty meaning, they meant and were
intended to mean tliat the Second Plaintiff was operated by a person tlial
bad done, or thatM'as, each of tiic things set out In paragraph 50 above.
53. By way of false innuendo the Ninth Defamatory Words were defamatory of
the Second Plaintiff because they meant and were intended tu mean that
the Second Piaintifk* was operated by a person that had done, or that was,
each of the dn'ngs set out in paragraph 51 above.
54. When ilie First Defendant published, or aided, counseled w procured the
Sixth Defendant to publish, the Ninth Defamatory Words:
(a) He was actuated by IIL will toward the First PlaJiuIfT;
(b> he was actuated by greed and the desire to profit, either directly or
throu^ tlic Second Defendunb Third Defendant and/or Fiftb Def endant
at the First PlasntifTs expense;
(c) he imcnded that the Ninth Defamatory Words would cause the people
who read them to:
[1) shun and avoid die First Plaintiff;
[2) shtui and avoid the .Second Plaintiff;
[3) lower their estimation of the character of the First Plaintiff;
(4") lower their estimation of the Second Plaintiff; and
(tl)he did so in contumeUous disregard for die First PlaintifPs and the
Second Plaintiffs rights.
55. By reason and in consequence Of the publication by the First Defendant

and the Sixth Defendant of tiie Ninth Defamatory Words, the First Piaiutiff
has soffered loss and damage Including:
25 ■
9 1
)
*sp.ro/v\ XjoiBiuBjaa ipua/jas aip Jo &uijrpa in jeAOUiai Sajijnbaj
uojK>nn{ut 03 ajqcuauiB 300 si n lav (noaaJS) sSBiuajj
IBUOiuupsan^ paqsimetsa puc Suunpug jnn jo ou}330)ojj
oqj 3u{4no3s 'nopsisifla] 533035 jo 5034313 «ir» Xq(}iO --i
Zi'WV ifauwsa siiopcajmiujiuoo 'wo|3Bisi3ai |;j
5»inis ptDtuf) aip jO SQoisiAcud atp /Cq spiOM AioêuiBjsa qûaAos C'i
oqj JO uopoqqnd /jo3euiejdp aifj joj AinqBii luoij paiaaioid S} (jl)
y
piiB :B3iiaaivjo saiejS p03|un aqj U| poiKioi S| 0) 0
p.!
J .-:.i
:spi0/V\ tpuaAos poqsiiqiidiuHpuajaQ i|)jno>{
aqi JO/puB jiBpoojaa asay di|3 ipiqM uo tuoa-jjodfj-AvwM aiisqoM aiy. (u)
;sjt;[n3}3JBj c > I:'--
.J u ,*
•suo}jE3ndaj sjjnuicid pooaas atp pue sjjpaiBTd isjjd oodn ujiqs K-'
<
- 1 0
luaueuuad b jn uijqj aip uaqB3 oip oAOq sp.iO/vv ^QiBunyoQ qaui^ aqj, -^S CO ^ F''
§1
K1 ca
,
'Smpujus 40 uojaEjndaj [cuoissajoid -2:5
^ 3
53f JO uofpnpaj au]pnpu( oSBuiep pao ssoj poiajjns sr jQpuiBig S s
u >
puooas aip 'spjOjVi A«03EuiBja(i qjutfj oqj jo )uepitajag qixij oqj pue
3iiBpuajoa 3s.i«d aip uonBajiqnd aq; jo aDuanbasooo u» puo uos-boi Xa -pg
t;
SujpHBjsio iiopondaj [Btioissajoid sjqjo uotpnpa.i fq)
h'--
:3uatussej4vquja pue uopctnuinq 'jjnq (Buopouja (b)
. [
The Teath Defumator]' Word*
58. On or about 20 January 2013 the First Defendant and/or the Fourth
Defendant published the woids at Schedule 10 to this Statement of Gaira
(the "Tenth Oftfamatoty Word.s") by creating tlie website

https-://jan-Ddsierockl.wnrdpress.com and posting lite Tenth Defamatory
Wo r d s o n t h a t w e b s i t e .
59. The Tenth Defainaiury Words were defamatory of the First Plaintiff
because by their natural and ordinary meaning, they meant and were
intended to mean that the First PlaintifT:
(a) Is a filthy low life conman.
(b) Will dcfruud people who do business with him;
(c) Kiiincd Ihc Fourth Defendant's life; •
(d) Defrtiuded the Fourth Dcfendojil of ten thousand doliars (510,000);
(c) Caused the Fourth Defcndonl to spend iwnuy thousand dollars (£20,000);
(0 Is a (iltby rip ofTprick;
(g) takes advantngc of dtn^jeratc people;
(h) commits fraud oo a dnity basis;
(t) rips cash money off innocent people;
0) should be in jutl.
60. By way of false innuendo the Ninth Tentli Defamatoiy Words were
defamatory of the First Plaintiff because they ineunt and were Intended to
mean tliat the First Plaintiff is the devil or is like a devil.
1
I
61. Tlic Tenth Defamatory Words wore defamatory of the Second PJalntiflf
because by their naturaJ and ordinary meaning, they meant and were
Intended U) mean that the Second Plaiiitiff was operated by a person that
had done, or that was, each of the things set out in.paragrapli 59 above.
62. By way of false innuendo the Tenth Defamatory Words were defamatory
of the Second Plainti^bccausc they meant and were intended m mean that
the Second Plaintiff was o|)cratcd by a person that iind done, or that was,
each of tite things set out in paragraph 60 above.
63. WTicn the Pirst Defendant published, or aided, counscicd or pixx;iu-cd the
Fourth Defendant to publish, the Tenth Defamatory Words:
(b) he was actuated by greed and tlie desire to proRr, either directly or
through the Second Defendant, Third Defendant and/or Fifth Defcndeni
Cji ;U the First PlalntifTs expense;
(c) he intended that the Tenth Dehnnatory Words would cause the people
lifi who read them to:
r-!
(1) shun and avoid the First PlalntjfT;
(2) shun and avoid the Second Plaintiff;
(3) lower chetr estimation of the character of tlie First Plaintiff;
(4) lower their estimation of the Second PlaintifF; and
(d) be did so in contumelious disregard for the First Pbintiffs and the
.Second Pbintiffs rights.
28
6-C
\
'Ûjpuejs JO uopE^ndaj |eaofss3jaid
si! JO uoijanpoj Suipnpui aScuiep pnc sso( psjayns se jjiiuieid
puooas oip 'spjo/v\ iCioriBuicjac] ipuoj, otp jo mcpuajoQ i(unod aqi pue
iuepu3|aa isjij ai|) Xq uojieaiiqnd atfj jo oDiianbasnai tn pue uoseai Ag *S9
Sujpneis JO uoiiKindaj leuorssojojd aqjo uoipnpaa [q)
Iiuauisscjjeqiud pun uopHjiiiutiq "unq leaopoma (b)
:8uipnp«| a^BCuep puc ssoi pwojuns scqupujcid
iSJjj aqi *spjo/w AinjBiuryaQ ipuoi aqi jo lucpuajao qunoj a»p pue
luepuajaQ isjjjj aqj <tq uoiivaqqnd aqi jo aauanbasuoa ut pirc uoseaj <fa
I
1
Cliiiin for I)ainag«3
66. The First Plaintiff and the Second PlaintlfT claim an Injunction restraining
the First Defendant; the Fourth Defendant, the Sixth Defendant from:
(a) publishing defamatory material about the Rm Plaintiff or the Second

Plaintiff; or
0>) counselling, procuring, enabling, or aiding another person to defame

the First Plaintiff or the Second Plaintiff.
67. Use First Plaintiff claims damages for defamation in the sum of $250,000
fronj the First Defendant for publication of the First Defamatory Words.
68. The First Plaintiff claims damages for defamation in the sum of $250,000
from the the Third Defendant for publication of the First Defomatmy
Words.
69. The First Plaintiff claims damages fur dufcimation In the sum of $250,000
from the First Defendant for publlcaHon nf the Second Defamatory Words.
70. The Rrst Plalniiff claims damages for defamation in the .sum of $250,000
from the Second Defendant for publication of the Second Defamatory
Words
71. The First Plaintiff claims damages for defamation in the sum of .$250,000
from the First Defendant for publication of iheTiilrd Defamatory Words.
72. The Ffrst Plaintiff claims damages for defamation in the sum of $250,000
from the FirTit Delendani for pubiJcadon of the Fourth Defaniatoiy Words.
73- The First Plaintiff claim.s damages for defamation in the sum of $250,000
from the Third Defendant for- pHblicatlon of the Fourth Defamatory Words.
74. Ihe First Plaintiff claims damages for dehimntion in the sum of $2.50,000
rrom the First Defendant for publication of the Fifth Defamatory Words.
30
75. The First Plaintiff dalins damages for defamation in the sum of $250,000
from Uie First Defendaiit for publication of the Sixth Defamatory Words.
images for deramation in the stim
76. The First Plaintiff cl.ilms damages for defamation in the sum of $250,000
from the First Defendant for publication of the Seventh DefiMnatoty
Words.
77. The First Plaintiff claims damages for defamation In the sum of $250,000
from the Fourth Defendant for publication of the Seventh Defamatory
Words.
78. The First Plaintiff daims damages for defamation in the sum of $250,000
from the First Defendant for publication of the Gighth Defamatory Words.
79. The First Maintiff daims damages for defamation in the sum of $250,000
from the First Defendant for publication of the Ninth Deiamatory Words.
BO. The First Pialntiff claims d.-iniages for defamation in the sum of $250,000
fhnn the Sixth Defendant for publication of the Ninth Oefamaoary Words.
firom the Fu-st Defendant for puhlicatioii of the Tenth Defamatoiy Words.
from the Fourth Defendant for publication of the Tench Defamatory
83. The Second Raintiff daims damages for defamation in the sum of
$250,000 from the First Defendant for publication of the Rrst Defamatory
Words.
04. The Second Plaintiff elalnts damages for defamation in the sum of
$250,000 firom the Tliird Defendant for publication of the First Defamatory
Words.
3i
85. The Second PlaEntifi chims damages for defamation in the sum of
$250,000 from the First Defendant for publication of die Second
Dofamacory Words.
86. The Second Plaintiff claims damages for defamation in the sum of
$250,000 from the Second Defendant for publication of the Second
Defamatory Words.
$250,000 from the First Defendant for publication of the Third Defoinutoiy
Words.
Oa The Second Plaintiff claims damages for defamatioii in the sum of

$250,000 from tlie First Defendant For publication of the Ifourth
Defamatoiy Words.
89. The Second Plaintiff claims damages lor defamation in the sum of
$zr>0,DC0 from the Third Del'endant for publication of the Fourth
Defamatory Wnrds.
$250,000 from the First Defendant for publication of the Fifth Defamatory
Words.
$250,001) from the First Defendant for pubfication of the Sixth Defamatory
Words.
(. Wprdg.
92. The Second Plaintiff claims damages for defamation in the .sum of
$250,000 fi'om the First Defendant for puhiicatinn of the Seventh
Defamatory Words.
32
93. TI\e Second Plaintiff claims damages for defamalion in the sum of
$2SO,000 from the FourtJi Defendant for publication of the Seventh
Defamatory Words.
$250,000 from the First Defendant for publication of the Eighth
Defamatory Words.
95. Tl)c Second Plaintiff claims damages for defomation in the sura of
$250,000 from the First Uefendaiit for p*iblication of the Ninth Defamatory
Words.
96. The Second Plaintiff claims damages for defomalioii in tlie sum of
$250,000 from the Sixth Defendant for publication of the Nintli

Defamatory Words.
97. The Second Plaintiff claims damages for defomatlon in the sum of
$250,000 from the First Defendant for publication of the Tenth
Defamatory Words.
90. The Second Pfaintrff dairris damages for defairration in the sum of
$250,000 from the Fourth Defendant For publication of tire Tenth
Defamatory Words.
99. Tlie First Plaintiff and the Second Plaintiff daim inberest in respect of each
of the amounts daimed in paragraph.^ 67 and 96 (indusive} above.
100. The First Plaintiff and the Second Plaintiff dalms costs.
Signed:
Description; for iho First Plaintiff and Second Plaintiff
Dated: ^ ^
33
-pusjap 01 uopuaiui JO a:>pou .ino/f oj paqoejii: aq jsnui ^3Udjap jno^
a:jNad3aoisv3Du,0N
lasuno^jo uos|ahJ 'WVifp painss "jkm 9uipea|d sjqx

SCHEDULE 1
F I R S T D E K A M ATO U Y W O R D S
(lnsolvcnc>- Professionals)
Reccmly we have taken over ihree more c»«dit repnir files for new clients we have
taken these over from insolvency CiiiaTdiun because of their failure to achieve a
jxindividual
isitivc outcouie for these clients. We sat down witJi each of these clients on q
basis atxi each client vvns promised positive results by Jarmd Sierocki of
InsolvtaKv Guardian and despite nunterous phone calls ami meeting attempts with
Jartod Sieixtcki or Bcmnrd Neville of lasolveocy Guardian the ncgAtivc results
reinnin after months and months. Now we have taken over after I attempted to
contact Bernard Neville and was yelled at and screamed at down the phone line. Ho
threatzied me with phyaicAl violence and called me a piece of dog ahit.
Quite obvfou-sly the credit repair for Mr Brcai Thompson, Kurt Fraaer and Michco)
James was way out of iJicir afaliity our policy at Insolvency Professionals is to always
tmdcr ptoini.sc bnt over deliver.
Credit repair is a process tlinl may assist individuals who are seekiny to fix problems
with their credit report
An advise ctedil report nifects lens of tltousands of people in Australia and yd in

sotnc cases it may have incorrect credit reporting entries, which can be corrected.
However, most people know little about their credit report nor do not know or
understand their rights.
Your credit report Ls a lepresemaiton of your financml record so if you want a clean
fmanctal tscord deal with a company that gets results phone Paul IClerck direct 0417
$29828.
35
9Z
mj^wono itoudAiosuf JO ppoisi*; pojjsf iji{m diqaiouiicd c ui uo ^niiiiiicn oi ueijj
AVOqs UAvo Sfij ûrauiu jgo Jousq aq pinoM aq laqi papiosp oiuij jo pousd uoqs v
inq UBipjtmij /CouOAjosuf jo jo>oai;p loiof Jaiaioj ayi'suM jncj sicuoisssjojj
X3u3AfOSai JO JOiaaifd 'sutipiA (ntt'uiA3'(n:uo|srs3jatdXnQaA|osu{-MJH.«V/:d))q)
îdtuipieq jQ^ sttmKu (Bai auinaS uo soApsniaq} opud Xaq)
S]C(iOKsaj(Xi^ jfouoA{os(ii si si[n.saji uo uopuindai pjitts h i|;nq ssq jctp Xuuduioa auf)
n|I[A\ (Gap noX oqM fnjarsa
3q oi jmu noX ustpieiiS fcpuuuy jo dpq X|uo jnoX oq oi Suiuiie[d sioiiuado itjiiiu
Xq Xjj Xuuio OS qjiy^ •sja3}s urnq lou djoq jboj joj Sttujoof XiinaimK^ ?jo d]du?d Xusiti
)SCOO suiqsuns oqi puc auwjsua 'iswio pjoQ aqj swuop gsu aqi tio Xojdonjunq qi!A\
Oi vn n>"i)
»(n]OM Auoivwviaa QNODHS
Z3in03HDS
SCHEDULES
• I H I K D D E FA M ATO RY W O J I D S
(email)
Sobjccl: You area inic fuckwit
Good work Jarrod SterockU it is not Irard to work out wlio posted ilic article on
.youwannaheSerbain.Youraneas.onyexcuseo
frahuroml)ûujst
love been evil donf you.How dure you write thai I am a Con Man and nil titat rubbish
lies about me.
Anyone ibai reads the oriicles or visits vrww.howTat.com.au and reads the footer
infomiation will see 1 had nothing to do with the SchooHes and vyw\v.ho\v3rat.com-
The same applies for the bouncer anack, CCfV footage tloes not lie that !.s why the
bouncer was charged.
Just because you get sued by people then you take it all out on mc, so lets sec Ivow
smart you arc once the CIB invcstigalc the real identity bchitKi fliis post lis not liaid
to ivnrk out wdtcn }-ou ivscarcli all your little altos .sites like Australian Online News
tlial promote you and your Insolvency Guardian business. You even post under a
poorly spelled versions of Australian News and Media this was an instant give away
iliai your evil is at work.
Your lies about me really dunt warrant a reply, however 1 am going to reply becau.se
I think it is tinrc titnt people knew about the real you, so over the cooiing weeks the
world will know ubout the neal Jarrod Sicrocici afca doctiuii at law, barrister,
uccountant. Bom) Uoi Lecturer on Law ob nty god tbo list goes on and on. Dy the
way have you been paint bombing any of your neigltboma lately?
1 am going to follow through with all this Jarrod oh and by the way remember where
fnsolvcncy Guardian, started'm tlic basement of my Itomc the reason I put cameras up
was because of all the people coming arouud looking for you not mc after we parted
comixiny, and why did wc part company Jarrod? or should we usk Brent Thompson,
Michael Bentoir, Scott Donald, Rick Halstead. Danny McGee oh the victim ii.sl goes
on and on. What you have done and continue to do to people is disgusting.
Your defamation of cboractcr slagging of mc will not go uttpunisbcd.
Paul Kierck
Gold Coast
37
SCHEDULE 4
FOURTH DEFAMATORY WORDS
(w«bsifqjromclion6.necau)
Hbwait: of Reviews Tnik ffeey fail to tictivcr Ibc (rath in Iheir rcviewa.
Tb^ allow basel

individuals and e ss cominenlIscame
companies. to beacross
pîsiednthat miikhorrible
really o defamotoi
articley posted
commcni s ahow
about roe
yours truly '"Paul Klerck** it was was filled with lies and a total unwarrantod attack on
me. The coinmcnis posted about roe is total case of dclaination against my charactcc
1 know who posted the articte but I need furtlicr prrrof to commence o defamation
case ftgainsl the posicr. But all tJic same I going to seek daniages agoin.st Reviews
Ta l k .
Reviews Talk can try and run for cover bin unless ihcy take the nrtide down and then
post a public online apology to me and then provide me with the posters details 1 will
be seeking on iinmcdiatc court iiqunciion to have the .site cio^ down 1 am also
lodging a complaint to Google and Chilling Bfiects to have the site black listed.
'lltcse type of iwicw sites are low grade online cxtonion operated by small mimied
brainless extortion urtists (hat hide bdtind lalse ideniilics. Reviews lalk need to
decide if they want to publish lies and rubbish about Paul Klca-k then they want to
have the proof to back it up or you will be paying for your mindless mistakes.
This type of crap is low grade journalism should be banned from the Internet.
Reviews Talk your site should be closed down and banned from the Intcmet
Paul Klerck - Go Id Coast, Australia

PS, Jarrod Sicroeici you will be the first person that the CIB itrvestigaic for this
dctaroatory posting.
38
SCHEDULES
nfl H DEFAMAI-ORY WORDS
(scammoitticr.com
Pnul Klerek Begins Legal Action Again&t Rm icws Talk

When Reviews falk posted an article about Paul Klcrok boing a coninan HlUe did
they irohse Hat he would take tils so personally. Foul Kletck fa now having bis
lawyers prepare a damages cifiim agaiast Reviews Talk. Paul believes that this low
grade online review website uccds to think before they act and po.st defamatoiy
articles againai innocoiit people before they ^lo their homework.
They wont to post oiticlc:: about Paul KIcrck bdng o conman SKO so Paul states let
them sec Jiow good I am as tin SEO as I sfom them online for the low rate review
"c.xtortlon" website that they are. The registrant of Reviews Talk is:
REGIS FRANT CONTACT INFOCnoncOSandis KreilciJ£i7,en2iteina " 57-

10fiLlRleaDnoncrJ(.V-i0790LVGPhotte: »•!.2407644863 DEmuil Address:
0CtLtCttiburcau@tttnail.com
Paul says he loOks and laugh.«5 when I look at their website address "antitrust
buFeau@gmail.com" the keyword being Anri Trust Bureau, who tl»e hell do they
think they are? "Paul commnited".
Reviews Talk have been asked by Paul Klerck to lake down this atticlc, post an
oaline apology and provide Paul's lawyers with the posters contact derails. Failure to
do » will result in Paol Klerek tbllowing through with a damages claim which Paul
believes wil be in excess of $250,000. PatJ has tdso lodged a formni report wili titc
local CIB who will be ftirther mvestigaic this smear campnigo.
Paul Klerck believes lltot Mr. Jarrod Sicrocid his former business partner in an
Iretolvency business is responsible for the posting of the anielcs. Jarrod has lodged
false documented claims with Google ajjd Oilling Enecis against Paul's bisolveitcy
Profcssiooals wcbdtc to have his website bbcklfawd Google and Chilling Effects
have been notified and a are currently rctdewing Paul's proof that he created ail the
originnl content for Insolvency Gnatdiaji and for his own business. Quite cictuly
Siciocki hw sliil bitter over a low suit he recently settled and is still holding mc
icspiTOiblc although many people like Brent Thompson, Kurt Fraser, Michael and
Kerti-Ann Bcnlon, Scott Donald, Mick JBinca, Iânny McGcc and Rick Halsteocl
have ail been affoctcd by Sierocki one way or annthcr.
I'aul .stales that Jairod and I had a truce when wc parted ways, thus was quite simple
"leave each other alone" hut Paul claims Siciocki kccp.s having digs and trying to stir
the pot. So Paul Klerck iss now making this promise to Jarrod Sierocki that it's now
10 serious to let sleeping dogs tic so it's game on. if Jarrod wants to hide behind alias
ntunes and publish lies attd Jubbish about Paul Klerck ite xvill retaliate with the real
truth about Jarrod Sierocki including moving fonvaid with incriminating
evidence recently found buing supplied to ITSA about Jarrod .Sierocki.
39
-S93|.U9$ i(3U9A|0SU]
«.poxjDf 0){{{uii 'aaiuiuHnfl âcq âuoui %001 « posjoeq arc pini |Buotseaj(wI
pire ajqerodaz Xjsa mb saaiAias qJIS ^0 "/ttre^cx) Xiu io jpsku iscjizSe
po)sod M3IA0I JO tii3iuu:c3 paq b pnq j9A9U x\cq pus owis ssauisnq OcIS
puq jatuoju} jq; u; uaaq OABq j -ouc tuoqB smjuo pajsori iKJipjwgop pUR deio jo odM
sjqi ipiAV dn jnd jou jjim j uostsd aûtvod c uiotusj ] Jspi|M os ueipjimQ a3uoaiosu|
JO o[{uo|q )U!nua(} uiojj sipjo suoqd Sutuonwqi SAisnqn qijM. jBop oj pcq udao
s«q inoj JOU p|no3 aq jnq 3uo{b qSnoua (]j>m ya} aAsq pinoqs puiJBf i«(} sajejs jncj
SCHEDULE 6
S I X T H D E FA M ATO RY W O R D S
(scQmmonsJcr.com #2)
Bwart of Dotlg}' Insolvency Scam* and Dankrnplcy Cotupank'S
Bevvitre of dodgy insolvatcy and bankruptcy operotors claiming that liiey will help
osd assist you through harsh llnaiKial times. In recent time.s it has come to our
attention that certain operators who claim tbcy arc specialists in tltc fields of financial
hardship are exactly the opposite tbcy pray on tire innocent and suck evcr>' lost cent
tiiey can out of their victims and sUII do nothing.
(n recent times we hove had itumcnius compliunts against .vevcral insolvency and
bankruptcy companies but one in particulor kocp.s popping up. t-'orluimicly for (hem
legal reasons stop us from naming these so called insolvency specialists that make
dqims they are your last dcfcccc when it c(Hnes to creditors and debt related issues.
Tills company operates by giving its victims Hulsc hope almost like their >'our
financial guarcUans your last line of defence when it conics to bankruptcy. But
beware once you meet with these dodgy operators they will have you signed up and
having you in bankruptcy faster Hum you can blink. You will be left with nothing but
false hopo and more stress as you then have to deal with ihc.se scam ar(i.sis once they
have (heir tAlons stuck in.
Please note we on; not making reference that all insolvency and bankruptcy opciuturs
arc scammers it is just a few thai have come to cur attention in recent inotiths.
[f you have been scammcd of ri^d off by on iiieolvency or bankruptcy obinpany

register today to have your say nt Monster.
41
SaiRDULE?
SEVENTII DEFAMATOHY W0R2>S
CripofTreiwrt.com ill)
iDsoivcnt^ Cuanlbu Vty Uxt Jarrod Slercocici U(m JarmI Sbrocld Kuincd My
lAtt Ikwarc of Jarrod SlorocUl He ii u Toxic Connian. Varsity IjiRm, internet
My name is Brent Thompson I need to icli my stwy so others tton't get burned and
rppcd olTbeen
that has by Jcrfod Sicrocki
scammcd byikthi
esJsjhave. I now
king rireal
noolh tal p ulisTecon
thatartiI sam
L nut the only person
IThuu are counUcss numbers of people that have falen victim to Iiw oonman ways
and have all sulTacd nl the hand of Jarrod Sirocki^s licattlcs.s conduct.
Before this tTa(U}»tic experience I did not really understand much about sociopaths
and their toxic behaviour and the destruction that their selfishness lack of mtnuls
could cause. AAer doing sonte reading oil the subaect I can sec that every experience
I encounter it my future years l.wil have the most prime example of this type of
person to gauge all otlicrs off of.
i IMI Jarrod 81 a Birthday Party of a mutual fiiend, J stood at tlic edge of the
eaihcriag and causally chaUed to people that came and miked to me. Not far from
where 1 stood Jarrod Siiooki sat at a tabic and as I ronitmber al the lime thinking to
myself that be cither .sounded like a rcully .smart or arrogant person that seemed to be
very sure of himself or was ho just really smart as he had a comment and answer fcr
cveiythijig,
Av u group of other guests that I knew really well started to talk with mc about some
of the struggles tliai 1 was going througti 1 noriccd Jarrod^s attention turn to my
fottvcfsation very quickly and suddenly became the centre stage of my conversation.
He seêd very interested in my life and was very attentive to ray slruggl&s and
financial struggles. As he took total control of the convasotion he very pobiiclysnid
to nic, listen to mc Hrcm, do you want to own your own house one day? 1 shyly
(mainly due to the audience of guests he had drawn in) stud yes. 1 would like to own
my own hoiwe one day.
With that be loodly pronounced to PruI Klerck to bring ine into his office nnd he will
fix everything for ine and give mc a ehancc at life at if he bad some type of almighty
god like power. He looked at Paul and said to him, do you want to tell him or should
I? Paul .said tcH him wlial, Sicroeki said I am very connected nt the bigbcsi levels. I
am a Frconason of the highest level J have contacts everywhere, at Uie time J really
did not know mud» about Freemasons but J thought It was meant to remain a .secret
between thcm.sclves, and was nut meant to be discussed or announced like that.
I discussed him with Paul Klerck and Paul Mid look mate lie is okay he really is a
great guy wliai you get to know him. I suid to Paul arc you sore that he has not
cunncd you or brain washed you?. Paul replied, I build the websites and do the SEO
and Jarrod ttocs the rest, I am still ecniiig to know him better, sure he cornea over
fairly aggressive but that's ju.st Ills personality.
4 2
J
llic fotlowiiig week WB had u incetijig tliat was ansmged a( Jarrod Sirocki's small
J^l
thevcocy
grandOui irdiai offi
speech ceai
and sui teeinbravado
l th Vnreityscent
Lakes.
edOn
a litleatrover
ivnl 1thtehought to mysei
top ooosidermgf th
that
e
shoebox .sized office. He spoke like he was a king at ihc birthdav paiy and could do
ai^thtng
omcc buithat
suite somehow
he ran Idsthibusincas
s did notinsolvency
seem tnGunrdiao
gci or'sit rioui
ghtof.especialy with the liny
When 1 sat al his desk to Iwar exactly how Jarred was going to give me this gteat
knew life and futanciai frcedoni that Jjc painlcd and ptntniaed al Pausl' son.s birthday
party. I discovered tliat what 1 thought was arrogance at lite birthday party was
nothing in comparison to what was coming out of Jarrod's mouth m this time. As lie
oyer powered
liin my real sinigmy
gfcsattempts
that I distocussed
exploininmy
frontaaual situation
of him as I yonc
and evCT tiled tothat
gciday
across lo
al the
party were not my fault but cccuncd none the less from my rcsponstbilily within my
family's business.
Trying to get this (tcnws lo Jarrod in between Jarrod's constant .smug lanla and raves
and crazy loud fake laughs about him being a Freemason and il« power thai this
status gave him. All my words were pointless as my words Adl on deaf ears. Mc then
proceeded to crack hts knuckles and wave his hauds in front of bis computer screen
nnd keyboard as If he wns a magicol wizard he began to cbucklc out loudly and
confidenlly at how easy it was to wipe my past and as he described give mc a dean
shlc in life within twelve weeks via a Section 73 proposal. He scoftcd at a
jiidgcineiit I hod against me and daimud how eusy it would be to have Ibis removed
from iny Veda record.
He then t^ped on the glB.<B panllion between his office and the olfico next to his
whkh I now know (o be a cojnpictcly difTcreni accounluig company and he said
could you print off an lAVoice for accounting .services to be done for me in setting up
a trust fund called the Aqua Therapy Trost. 1 had no idea what he was doing so 1
asked he said lo mc Brcttt don't you worry about anything you will be able to cam
J lOOk per MrtJck, per month or year without creditors or the tax department being able
to touch it. 1 asked if it vras legal he laughiX] h off and said yes don't yon worry
about a that ettlicr let good old Jarrod rake care of il all. Before I was aWe lo remind
him that 1 was on a carer's pension for looking afier my 90 year old grandmother the
invoice was produced and in his hands.
I was very unsure of what was happening and where 1 was pusilioned and looked to
my friend Paul who was present In the office Air some reassurance. Paul assured me
cvaytliing wis ok itnd then Janud for the first time rctjuested (bat 1 put up the inifial
payment of J5000 to get the process started Paul stepped in and explained that he
would make the first payment on my bclialf on liis credit card as I bad no money and
tliis was to he n favour for a close friend mc as J am a close friend to Paol,
Jarrod requested ail in cash as he needed to pay the trustee cash and take care of
some Iricodlics, whatever thai meant. I again explained 1 don't have that type of cash
ifl did I would not be in the sh'l financially.
I left lasotvency Guardians office witli an invoioc for $10,000.00, $5000 paid by
Puul and $50000 I did not know how I was going to come up with, but with Jairod
4 3
t
facjng .such a powerful Prcemasoi I naively hoped I was in good hands even though
ttlarm bcils were going off in my bead As I lel the ofRce of Insolvency Guardian
uml day I did not realise my Jonrod Sioridci nightmare liad only ji&t begun.
All Jarred .Sierocki's promises have ncv«r been followeri through, all he hajt done is
taken my $10,000 and bankrupted mc. My credit file rcmHins damaged. Despite
many attempts to resolve this widi Jarrod who will no longer talk wiUi mc as lie
claims he is to busy ninning his empire as ibc Jicnd of a Nafional Insolvency practice
ihar employs hundreds of people with offices all over Atwlralia. He put me in contact
with a Bematd Nevile from Insolvency Ctuairlian and what a joke he is. He is rude
and very nasty and all ray attempts to get a resolution have failed and have felkn on
d^ etm. All Jarrod did was took $10,000 from mc and lodged bankiuptcy papcm
with Peter Dinoria of Vincents.
Oven all my attempts to oontrtct Peter Dinoris my Trustee arc impossibic he wil not
take or return my calks. I llien tried speaking with Vincents Nick Combis but still no
revive. I know Pcfcr Dcnoiis h a good friend of Janod's because Janxxl told mc that
his male from Vincents is the trustee and when he file."! my bankruptcy and Section
73 that I could still keep my passport and travel overseas if I wanted. I am now
taking my catscup with flSA and A Current Affair.
I fed thai by muking people aware of Jarrod Sierocki and the conman that he is. I
may save some other people from being rippod off just like I was.
After pertorralng a lot of research on Jarrod Sicrocki it has come to my attention that
I am not his only victim that he has lied and ripped off so many people including
Kim Praser, Jolia Michael James, Danny McGca» Rick Haisteud, Michae} and Kcrri-
Anne Bcntou, Scott Donald, Some N l-'ishy or.Somdhlng Fishy 'lake Away
Heleusvolc, Maries Plz2a and the fist of victims goes on.
1 found out that be even burned a professionol dog trainer Scott Donald with the
police because Scott Donald roid him lie was full of shit and a conman in his ofRcc
one nigh! after Sierocki iricd to convince him that he was a Barrister. Doctorate of
Law and Bond Uni lecturer of low. Sooli left the office quite upset once Siciocki got
Peter Dinoris from Vincents on the phone and got Pctw to tell Scoli that ho needed to
listen to him and Janrud and nlc for bankruptcy. .Scott asked for what purpose I came
U) you for company athdco and now your trying to bankrupt mc. Scott asked Sicrocki
if he was on drugs or just cnr/,y. The next Ih'mg lie was being wrongly arrested and
intciTOgated by the police nil because Jarrod Siexocki contacted one of his mates in
the police forec and made a false complaint diat Scotl had a pistol in his bag and was
going to shoot his software developer. All lies ofcoutse.
Whoever Jarrod comes in to contact with lie poisons them and tries to convince them
into scsmming potcutlnl clients Including ex employees. One of these ex employcc.s
Drew Mankin Icfl a good job at Apple lo work for Sturockt hut after a few short
months Iiad to leave because he could no longer deal with Sierocki's abusive manner
towards him .or Insolvency Guardian clients. Drew had enough when Sicrocki
demanded him to fraudulently sign client .signatures on service agreements as this
gave Sicrocki full power of a Homey of their af/oira. Drew even telt .sick in the gute
when he found out abnm Sierocki's extra marital affairs thai he had on the side with
44
a friend of his a young Ratsian My Kscnia Chestnkiva who managed ibc Tommy
Hilfigcx store at Marina Mirage- Sierocki would take her shopping m oite occasion
he even spent SIOOO on a pure white Versace dress for the yoiing lady Jw wi>ult{ tlicn
lake her out for cxtcndtai lunches a Versace thai turned into full days slaying at a
Vcrsncc hotel suite wliikt his wife and two young children remained at home.
1 nlso know (or a fact (bat he maliciously damaged the front ofSnsi Design .studio
uith rod p&iot a little web »nd design studio next to his Varsity Lakes oCDce located
at 128 Varsity Parade. Varsity Lakes. Why would he do such a tWng you mi^t a.sk, I
will tdl you why, so he could scare them out of their office, so he could take it over
chcnp. My best advice u> mtyone that may be cousidciing using Jarrod Sierocki from
Insolvency Guardian \» beware of him his lies and inisconduct be is evil through Hml
thiuugli.
He has even started, up a web deign company now under the

www.au9tralianonlbtcnew8aitdmedia.com.au he is claiming he can build profiessional
websites and perform S£0 etc the guy is total scammer. Ho also runs a safe work
method stoteiitcnt site AUSS WMS mind you all the content for this website was also
stolen hy Janvd front one of Rick Halstcod's ntalcs. This guy has never created
anything original in his life accept u loolbox on a hand trolley thni Itc had to sell the
patent desperately to Danny McOcc when Ite liad no nton^. Danny still scratches
head and wonders why he allowed Jarrod to con him in to buyittg ibis piece of
rubbish, as it is tiseless apparently.
Ifc hfts even stooped so low as to aUaeking his ex business partner Paul Klen^ with
online ntalicimis lies ruKl dcfamotion about him under the bloggcr name Australian
News and Medio, seriously what a retard. Apparently Sierocki convinced Paul into
building all the websites and doing till the SEO FOC for S0% of Insolvency Guardian
but keep in mind Jnnod was getting paid a very licalthy vvcekly wage from Danny
McGce from Total Concept Oruup to perform as the companies CM. Danny
eventually told Sierocki to get out of his office, life and basiness when lie icaii.sed
.Sierocki was ripping him off by drawing a weekly wage and not doing any work for
TOG jusr building up bis Insolvency Buaness whilst Sierocki should have been
doing qtiotca and work, for Danny bo WRis off rippiug off small time husband and wife
fish and chip shop owners at HcUmsvale.
1 believe that Jarrod also got even with Danny McOee from Total Concept Group by
supplying some very damaging documentation to ADCO tliat was all faJalicd by
Sierocki to try and dt3<rcdit Daiuiy fiont getting any future contracts with ADCO,
all because he was bitter with Danny after Danny tried so haid to Itelp him out.
But woh tlus gets evcu better, Danny only gave Jarrod a job because lie fell sorry (or
Jarrod after he tost his job with Rick Holstcatl of Ciipstur Pkisteiing / ASAP
lâstoring. Because Jarnxl wns causing Rick all types of dramas and loss of busiocss
with boilding companies like Matrix. Because Jarrod was abusing their top dogs by
creating legal claims and stat demands against than etc. Kick needed to cxcctrte full
damage control and boot Sierocki out fast. Rick under estimated Sierocki because in
a recent cou.n buttle that RJck wmi against Sierocki he really lost because Sierocki
instigated one of Rick's largest pMlcr supply companies to issue unwarranted stat
demands ou Rick's companies and iben Jorrod went and posted a whole lot of
45
articles online on his media websites and in m}W5i)apcrs about Clipstar Plastering and
ASAP Piastoring. Tltesc arliclia slated that if you arc owed money ftom these Is
there a RipoPTReport about you!? SEO Rcpuiniion Management WARNING!
businesses he can help recover any money out by Clipstar or ASAP as you can see
all
Click Here Now!
be wanted to do was put fires orouml Rick. Obvloisly he .<wt Uils up via another one
of his aliases. I believe Ihai Rick has nearly lost cvcrylhing he has worked so hard for
all his life because of this. So as you can see Sierocki is truly a toxic person, total
evil black biood.
Paul and J don't toik that much these days because he feels somewhat partially
responsible for my situation and 1 liclieve Paul is siiJl trying to riwxjvcr financially
ftTHi mcmafly fiotn his Slerocki dealings. Paul ha.s had to install CCTV cameras
around his home because he has liad jieople knocking on his door at all hours of the
day and night looking for Sierocki, some of which can get quite aggressive and
obtLsive. 1 ha-c uicd to speak with Paul about all this but he declined to comment due
to the ikci tltat he has filed police complaints over this and against Janod Sierocki
and all this will be going tluougli the courts now bectiasc of the defamation of
character Sierocki posted online abotil liim.
My name is Brent Tlionipson and you can contact rnc on Wc +61 402 140 356 if you
hove been conned by Jarrod Sicr^t and fnsolvettcy GuaitUan. The nwe vktiois
that step forward and apeak up the faster we can stop bU trail of tenor and
destruction.
46
SCHKDULE 8
EIGHTH DEPANUTORY WORDS
(etnttll to First Plaintiffs Wife)
From: Paul Kkick [Tnai]to:triclerck@bigpoKd.com]
Sent: Friday. January 18,2013 8:24 AW
To: jnfo@upstvieiDC.com
Subject; 0417629828
I'Tom: Paul Kkrck <ok terck^biupond ■com>

Subject: 0417629828
Message Body;
Hi Verdrana, your lovely huabarKi has gone loo fur ihis time •with posting dersmatoiy
comnienis about me onfiuc.
Fmlhermoie J was never going to let you know about ihia as you aro a too good a
person to be hurt, but you should know who yon are living with.
I don't know if you rcincnihcr Ihe name Kscnia Chcstakivn the young Russian lady
that worked ai Tommy Hilfmgcr at Marina Mirage. Out your husband rcmcrabcra her
as he bought her a $1000 white Vcrraicc dress froin Versace and spend Ihc whole day
wining and dining her and s|%ading time with her at Versace in a hotel suite and take
her to basketball games. The same as he left golf one day stonal ofl'his head and was
found by you later on at the side of the ride ask Itim Were he was in between leaving
golf and you finding htm.
I atn .sure if you wanted verification abom the aduUciy you could call her on 0434
049 409. Seriously t fed so sorry for you mid your citildren yoti Itave no idco what
this evil person kcqis frxMn yon including hiding any cash money that he gets in
safety deposit boxes.
This is itot sour grapes but }t>u need to know Utat he baa overs{cp)icd the Ibe on
many occasions including his recent defamatory cxintutenis posted atjout nie^ alt lies
of course.
I am wiDing to go on any polygraph lest to back up up wlml I am saying would your

husband.
I am not the ptoblesn your luisband i.s the problem he does not know how to idl ich
trutborbehoRc.sl.
Paul K-lcivk
0417 629828
47
SCHl!:D(iLE9
NI?*rrH DEFAMATORY WORDS
(npoiTrcporl.com tH)
Inselvciicy Cuardian Insolvency Soiutionn Anstratia Insolvency Gaartlian

scMHined ua and sent us broke Jarrod SlcroekJ is a trar and a thief that shouM
be in jail Cold Coast, Nationwide
Aiiyutic reading thiK may have olso become an Insolveircy Gnardian victim
masterminded by Jaax>d Sictocki.
Our stoty is quite liorrid, Jarrod and Iris pnrtocr visited our siuali fish oitd chip take
an-ay back in early 2011 to rtivicw our btisincsa slnictiire this all came obout from
him being u customer of our business Gist. He would irequent our busincs>i and buy
fish and chips on barlcrcBid. 1 ruado the fatal mistake one flight of asking him v/hal
he did on bzirier he replied tliat lie liad a massive insolvency business that siKcialised
in protecting businesses just like ours as weti as helping reduce our tux liabilities, l-le
came across really genuine ami well spoken. He olleied us a free consulialion
service, so J thought why iiol. This is when our Insovency Ounrdian disaster
happened.
Before you knew it Jarrod and his offsidcr a big mounlaiu of a man came down In
have a meeting one morning at our shop, before long Sierocki convinced us to hanil
over our finniicials and lca.sc rental agreements we had he had us sign an authority to
act, i asked what it was be said a fiumaiity that be could not aid for us and speak with
the ATO etc vwthout this. I asked do 1 need my soiicilnr to read over it he laughed
and said no, I am the only lawyer you will ever need. He toW us he was a IwtTtslcr as
well. Wc rccicvcd a wiiitcn proposal a few days later outling n whole new structure
and an uccutuit froin liim. Roluctantly I paid Ais and before long lie was telling us
that all Our BAS statements and fmrmcials had to be done again and then more
accounts came in and before long every week more accounts and more. We could not
sfibtd this originally he led us to believe thai we may have to spend $3000 to $4000
on barter plus u some cash outlays ofS 1000 or so to get everytliing right.
Just one accounting bill was over SrlÔO Invoice: 000001
Rcf: WAKnOOOl
18 April, 201)
Amount Due: $ 4,455.00
Register New Company $999.00 OST $99.00 $ 1098.00
Register New Discrctiunary Trading Tmst $999.00 GST $99 J1098
Register New Discretionary Asset Trust $999.00 GST $99 $ 1098
Register New ABN, fFN, GST & PA YG registntlions for cmities as per the attached
48
proposal $0 FOC
Valuation of Assets (EXll-RMAL VALUER MUST COMPIJSTH) $1250.00 GST

SI 25.00 $1375.00
rransfcr of asseLs to new Asset Tutsi (FXTF.RNAL SOLICITOR) S50.00 OST $115
$935
Lodge of Fixed and Iloaiing charge over new company and essctx (ASIC) 399.00
GST $39.90 $438.90
On the bootom of tiiis S6045 invoice I can only pay $1500 with Dartt;rcanL
Please fwie tljot cotnpany and irosl service set up wo will except q major portion of
floricrcatd bcipg $1500.00 and the rest must be cash, cheque or direct credit hotvcvcr
this can be paid In iasiailments if necessary.
the bills kept on coming and when I said we can no longa* ofFbrd tliis, Ite did not
care be said if wc did not continue to pay he would hove the looks changed and
would kick us out. I said you canT do thai, ho laughed end said listen to mc, i can do
enylhing I like, readtlra audiorily to aul. service ugreomcnt that fixed and floating
charge means I have a registered interest over your business. When 1 asked what do
you mean he said pay cr or pack up. Mc is so nusty and wc got so setewud by hint
I told htm I wns going to the police he laughed again and roinindcd me that he was a
freemason tmd had alt the right peojtle. ri{^t cuanections in all the right places. I did
noi know what to do itr lespond, we lost the business in the end wo had no mouoy
lefl and Jarred just does not care; Me failed us in so muny ways and just ripped us
off. Once he had our llnacinls and had access to our bank figures he was not stopping
till tie drained every Inst cent out of us.
Jartod Sicrocki is a total extortionist, may god forgive this evil person because wc
never will. He .stole our business and life. My warning to anyone else out there lliat
comes across Insolvency Guardian or this bastard or any of his other alios businesses,
run as fast as you can.
49
OS
*91(103(1 )n33uaoijoj[}o XsuAtu qsc^Sqildu Xq paqjoudîj <i 3^
•sis«i ^j|cp c uo pncjj
S1IUIIU03 (H(7 pnpjj e si th\ SnuApisuo? omoii .Siib3J puij i ipiifM 'oui dpq itico cx3i|od
atp OKOBSoq vSi.l DDDV ^Mi m lupi payodaj aAoq i paddojs oq jsnuc j"!ôaoi<?
soaucinunsjp snJipcIsnp ui oidoxl (ncinclsap jo pScuiOApv s3j|ci icq) >{3i.k!
.yo iJu Xipiy »s{ oh 'ojco lou saopoq inq oOtfO^SjOssaoxo ut aiu )soo soq oqaiop oj
OOO'O ($' ''AO IpAV JOj. 9(U pauiuiuos Rfaoiot^j pouof pun uwdtuoq.!. iumq tauivu Xpii
3 0 i ) fi t f i R o q v
^'H'iOOiO -»:'iU3HJi-«3T{B[-/iptfe,\/TO3(/U5S
-)qop-ljpOJ3/UB!pJ(Tn3-/(3UBAiosuiyui03-)lodajj;fodij-MA(Av/;diiq itsjAfiojn
/Cui }iouiiu pUTTijo aiu psddu i^sojais popuof MOq uo .tiois niij oqi pooj oi
'inpo[^ pue SAi3(«j ouiiiiO nKi]rj)snv
puw V<3JIN 'SUODOJOS A3U».\(ftSD| 'uvjpjRii^ 4(3U0A{0sti{ pa|iU3 Bsonisnq « suru
»H -jjo no.( dfj iijiH jinii uRmuoo api moi Xqipj « «(i>)OO.ia»s pojjwf poD.in^ ajf
URuiao3 nnp-'Biio X3iiaA|osui
])|30J3l^ pOXJRf
(lUl>3-6S0JdpJ0.S?i'!3)30r»tSp<)jJBl)
S fl a o M A a o x v w v d ' j a i i X N a x
0[ 3'itiaaHDs
[ Amended pursuant to
I UCPR 378 on 26/4/2013
PIERCE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON
S TAT E O F WA S H I N G T O N
) ss.
County of Pierce )
I, ELIZABETH P. (VIARTIN , a Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, for
Pierce County, the same being a court of record, do hereby certify that KEVIN STOCK, who
signed the preceding certificate, is the duly appointed, qualified and acting Clerk of said
Superior Court, and as such Clerk is the custodian of the records and seal of said Court;
That the signature to said certificate is the genuine signature of KEVIN STOCK; That the
seal attached to said certificate is the seal of our said Superior Court, and; That the
certificate is in due and proper form according to the laws of the State of Washington.
Dated at Tacoma, Washington, this

day of-nr.T 0 9 2017 . A.D. 20
Judge of said Su
S TAT E O F WA S H I N G T O N
) ss.
County of Pierce )
I, KEVIN STOCK, County Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of
Washington, for Pierce County, do hereby certify that ELIZABETH P. MARTIN .whose
name is subscribed to the above certificate, is a Judge of the Superior Court of the State of
Washington, for Pierce County, duly elected, sworn and qualified, and that the signature to
said certificate is the genuine signature of ELIZABETH P. MARTIN
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have

hereunto set my hand and affixed the
seal of said Superior Court, at Tacoma,
Washington, the county seat of said
county, this day ofOCT Q 9 2017 .
A.D. 20
Clerk of said Superior Court
Worddocs\Forms General\Crifn_Sec\Exemplified\Signatures.doc
11 / 2 0 0 2
DocuGard 04541 - 6 Security Features DocuGard 04541 - 6 Security Features
• Prints "VOID"on front when duplicated • Prints "VOID" on front when duplicated
• Blue background highlights • Blue background highlights
erasure alterations erasure alterations
• Watermark on back can be seen when • Watermark on back can be seen when
sheet Is held on an angle sheet is held on an angle
• Coin-reactive ink on watermark changes • Coin-reactive ink on watermark changes
color when scratched with a coin color when scratched with a coin
• Microtext border contains the • Microtext border contains the
DocuGard name and is difficult to copy DocuGard name and is difficult to copy
. Security Features Box lists • Security Features Box lists
tamper-resistant attributes tamper-resistant attributes

• Prints "VOID" on front when duplicated . Prints "VOID" on front when duplicated
. Blue background highlights • Blue background highlights
• Watermark on back can be seen when • Watermark on back can be seen when
sheet is held on an angle sheet is held on an angle
• Security Features Box lists • Security Features Box lists
PIERCE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON
JARROD SIEROCKI,
Plaintiif,
v s .
PAUL GRANT KLERCK, Case No.: 17-2-09760-3
Defendant. C e r t i fi c a t e
I, KEVIN STOCK, County Clerk and by virtue of the la\A/s of the State of
Washington ex-officio Clerk of the Superior Court of the State of Washington, in
and for the County of Pierce, do certify that the annexed and foregoing Is a true
copy of the *** NOTICE AND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF FILING FOREIGN
JUDGMENT:-*** in the above entitled action, as the same now appears on file
a n d o f r e c o r d I n t h i s o f fi c e .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my

hand and Îx my official seal at TACOMA, in
s a i d c o m m , d a y O c t o b e r, 2 0 1 7 .
County Clerk and Ex-Officio Clerk of

Said Superior Court
N;\worddocs\linx forms\crim_sec\exemplified\civil.doc
11 / 2 0 0 2
• Prints "VOID" on front when duplicated • Prints "VOID" on front when duplicated
• Blue background highlights • Blue background highlights
• Watermark on back can be seen when •Watermark on back can be seen when
• Microtext border contains the • • Microtext border contains the

. Prints "VOID"on front when duplicated . Prints "VOID" on front when duplicated
. Blue background highlights • Blue background highlights
•Watermark on back can be seen when • Watermark on back can be seen when

Sierocki v. Klerck - Notice and Affidavit in Support of Filing Foreign Judgment

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Sierocki v. Klerck - Notice and Affidavit in Support of Filing Foreign Judgment

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IN COUNTY CLERKS

14 the best of my knowledge under penally of perjury ofihe State of Washington.

N O T I C E A N D A F F I D AV I T I N S U P P O RT O F Mix Sonderi Thompion PLLC

ORIGim Tel: 206-521-5969

1 3. I request this judgment be recognized in Pierce County Superior Court, located

2 within the State of Washington.

6 123 Eagle Street, Brisbane QLD, 4000.

10 Parramatta, New South Wales, 2150 (Australia).

13 however, a creditor has 15 years to take action on a judgment debt.

20 Dated this day 18'^ day of July, 2017. ^

MD^NDERS THpMPSON, PLLC

G^fge AT^ixrWSBA-Na 32864

N O T I C E A N D A F F I D AV I T I N S U P P O R T O F Mix Sonderi Thompson PLLC

First Defendant: PAUL GJRANT KLERCK

Second Defendant:- II«aERACrnVE .EmEaiTAlJ«!ttENt AUSTftALiAP

Fourth Defendant: B^E^ tHOMPSON

Fifth Defendant: USFOUNKIT PTV LTD A.CJS..128 081489

Befoie: Justice Flachagra

B^is of judgment: Judgm^t-pujsuant iaUmformCml.Bf:ocedure Rtite.ilA upcm

TlflB JUDQ.M1W OET3ffi.eOmTlS. TliAT

3. Thai tbc third defendant pay to the first plaintiifdamagcsfordcfamation in the

8. Thm.foe third defecd^.payfotl^scifohdphimtifFdampg^^

(aj anj Of the ten maltm complained of in pajragrapihs 6,12, .18,.22,26,32,38,

T3.. The defendants pay Ihephiintiffi costs of and'iacidentarti) thcassessiiient of

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

First DefeiKlant: PAUL GRANT KLBRCK

Second Defendant: INTERACTIVE ENTBRTAIMMENT AUSTRALIA PTY LTD

Third Defendant: SK & ASSOCIATES PTY LTD A.C.N. ISS 041491

Fourth Defendant: BRENT THOMPSON

Fifth Defendant: INFOUNK IT PTY LTD A.CN. 128 081 489

Sixth Defendant: CHRISTINE WAKE

AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM

The claim in ihw proceeding is made fn reliance on the followings facts:

AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM "Name: Jcrrod .Sicroeki

(a) an individual; and

(b) a Director of the Second Defcnclmu.'

Company witli less than lO employees registered in Hie State of

(a) an individual; and

(b) a Director and shiwuhoWcr of the Second DcrcmJant;

(o) a Director and shareholder of the Third DcfeiKlanl;

(d) a shareholder of llio Fifth Defendant; ^

(e) the Registrant of the website http://www.scaramonster.com.

(n) a Company registered in the Slaie of Queensland capable of suing and

(b) tlve rcglslram of the website htip'//www.lnfolinlclt.oom.au;

(c) The rcgislrantofthe website http:/Av\v\v.websitepix)raoiions.ncl.au.

(a) a Company registered in the State of Queensland capable of suing and

(b) the registrant of the websKe hlip:/www.msolvcncyprofessii>nals.com.8i.

(d) over promises and under delivers;

(e) authorlzas or permits or encourages its employees to engage In

(f) authorizes or permits or encourages it employees to threaten its

(jg) Had cancelled numerous appointments with the Fourth Defendant:

(h)Had cancelled numerous appomtments witli Kuit Frazer.

[I) Had cancelled numerous appotnlmenis with Michael James.

9. When the First Defendant published the First Defamatory Words:

(a) He was actuated by il wil toward die Hrst Plaintiff

(IJ shun and avoltl the First Plalntifh

(2) shun nnd avoid the Second Plaintiff;

(3) lower their estimation of the character of the First PlalntilT:

published the words at Schedule 4 to this Statement of Claim (tlie "Fourth

intended to mean that the Rrst Plaintiff had:

(b) cotniniticd tm ofience and was being investigalcd by the police.

(a) He was actuated by ill will toward the First Plaintiff;

(!) shltn and ovoid tlic First Plalnfi/T; and

(2) lower ihcir e.stlination of the chflraclcr of the First PlaiiiUffi