Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sa Pro Interview
Sa Pro Interview
Joshua Jarvi
When taking a look at the student affairs profession, it is not the typical career path that is
chosen before going to college. Most individuals who find themselves working in student affairs
have very similar journeys. Ardoin (2014) discusses this idea of the typical route to becoming a
student affairs professional. My story if reflective of the typical process where I valued my extra
curricular involvements as an undergraduate student, a mentor of mine told me that I should look
into student affairs, and now I’m pursuing a Master’s degree in the field. However, I found that
this is not the path for everyone. For this assignment, my classmate, Dominic Evans, and I had
the privilege of interviewing Kelly Benkert. Kelly is currently the Director of Leadership and
this interview, Kelly described that she had a very atypical path to her current position. She
unpacked her academic career as an undergraduate at Notre Dame, her time working in the non-
profit sector, her decision to pursue a Master’s degree, and how she currently got to
Northwestern University. I realized that our stories had some similarities, but were very different
Kelly did her undergraduate coursework at the University of Notre Dame in English and
Anthropology. Throughout her four years as an undergraduate student, she was not the student
that most current student affairs professionals were. She labeled herself as a “non-joiner” who
had no interest in getting involved or diving into Notre Dame’s campus culture. Although she
was raised catholic, she struggled with the strong conservative identity of Notre Dame. As a gay
woman, she never found her “home” on campus. However, there was an increase in student
activism during her undergraduate years that did appeal to her. There was a priest who worked at
STUDENT AFFAIRS PRACTITIONER INTERVIEW 3
Notre Dame who had publically come out as gay himself. The university began to edge him out
of the curriculum in classes that he taught and scheduled him for less church masses. She was
very passionate about social justice and activism around the LGBTQ+ community, but did not
see the higher education setting as one she would thrive in.
centered on environmental issues. She worked as an organizer in Connecticut for a few years
before moving to a different organization. While working for the National Student Campaign for
Hunger and Homelessness, her task was to engage with college students about getting involved
with activism. Throughout this process, she gained a passion for educating youth on social
justice, power and privilege, activism, and society in general. After being in the work force for
seven years, she and her partner wanted a change of scenery and Kelly wanted a change in
careers. She started thinking back to practitioners at Notre Dame and how their job descriptions
aligned with some of the things she had gained a passion for throughout her work in nonprofit
organizations. She then started looking at different jobs and realized that she would have to get a
Master’s degree, and then she knew she would have to go back and get an education.
Kelly and her partner then moved to Seattle where she attended Seattle University for
her graduate coursework. She worked as a graduate assistant for one year, moved up into her
supervisor’s position after they left for another two years, and remained working at Seattle
University for a total of seven years. Throughout this experience, she developed the youth
initiative, which focused on a mentorship program with prospective first generation college
students. She also worked highly in community engagement and service learning in order to give
students a holistic educational experience. Kelly was given the opportunity to teach courses
where she developed a peer educator model that is seen as highly effective and still used to this
STUDENT AFFAIRS PRACTITIONER INTERVIEW 4
day at Seattle University. Even though she was loving her experience in Seattle, she and her
partner realized that Seattle was not the place they wanted to stay forever. Kelly is originally
from the Chicago area, and knew she wanted to return someday. She started searching for jobs in
the area and her partner knew that she would not have trouble finding a job once Kelly did.
However, Kelly faced serious hardships when looking for a job. The majority of Kelly’s
experience was outside of higher education, and the role that she did have at Seattle University
was not one that was seen as very transferrable to most student affairs positions. So, in July
2015, the stars seemed to align. Kelly and her partner decided to pack up and move to Chicago
without either having a job yet. During the drive on the way to Chicago, Kelly received a call
about the position at Northwestern, which she graciously accepted. She was excited to begin this
role, as she is the first person to be the director of this new department of Leadership and
Community Engagement.
I mentioned that I had the very typical path into the student affairs profession, while
Kelly clearly did not have the common journey. However, the common thread that we both share
is the passion for education and fostering positive social change among college students. This is
a core common thread that I believe is integral to the success of a student affairs professional. It
helps keep the work that we are doing impactful, and there is always an ever-changing goal in
mind. Another commonality that Kelly and I share is our sexual orientation identity. We both
identify as gay, so navigating that social identity in the field can be a difficult one. Some
conservative parents still may think that our main focus is to push our ideals onto their students,
which is the furthest thing from reality. Kelly and I discussed this briefly and how it has not been
too much of an issue for us, but we have both heard the horror stories that have taken place.
STUDENT AFFAIRS PRACTITIONER INTERVIEW 5
Kelly and I had several differences when it came to approaching the student affairs
profession. She had no intentions or passion towards higher education upon completing her
undergraduate coursework, where I had so much school spirit I could have exploded. I knew that
I wanted to go directly onto a Master’s program to begin my time as a full time professional as
soon as possible. Kelly went on the route of working full time for seven years before realized
student affairs is something that she is passionate about. Another difference that we have is our
experience in functional areas. Ardoin (2014) states that it is highly beneficial to gain experience
is as many functional areas as possible in order to find where one’s true passion lies. Kelly found
her passion outside of higher education, and then found a position that relates the two together. I
have the majority of my experience as an undergraduate student who dove into as many
functional areas as possible. I know have a wide range of knowledge and experience where I
could fit into several different functional areas. However, no matter the similarities or differences
that Kelly and I may share, we are both focused on serving the students in any capacity that we
A lot of the success that student affairs professionals gain from their job is related to how
they approach the position. We should see ourselves as educators who are constantly instilling
knowledge into our students that is different than what they are learning in the classroom
(Magolda & Baxter Magolda, 2011). Kelly’s approach to her position is this exact idea. The
reason she went into student affairs was due to her passion for education and interactions with
college students. If we are able to see ourselves as a pertinent component to the holistic
educational experience and gain a sense of purpose, then we will feel a greater sense of
belonging, worth, and in turn, success. If we are unable to see our overall purpose in higher
STUDENT AFFAIRS PRACTITIONER INTERVIEW 6
education and build from that, we as student affairs professionals can fall into the problem of
having an identity crisis as it relates to our career (Magolda & Baxter Magolda, 2011). Kelly
helped reaffirm Dominic and myself that we are going into the field for the correct reasons and
stated that we are going to be amazing student affairs professionals one day just due to our
interaction with her in the office. Actions such as this one is what makes our work meaningful,
and why I strive to be an impactful leader, mentor, and practitioner every day.
assessment in all areas of our position. Assessment is truly the only method to understand our
understanding if students are gaining the knowledge and skills that it takes to be a competent
professional upon graduation (Schuh, Jones, Harper, & Associates, 2011). They go on to discuss
that this is how professionals make changes to their work to be effective and impactful towards
students and grow as a practitioner. Throughout the interview with Kelly, she mentioned that
assessment occurs in her work on a daily basis. Since she is the first ever director of a new
department at Northwestern University, they are constantly still trying to find their identity on
campus. Through this process, they are utilizing assessment tools to gauge what the students
want, need, and how they intend on interacting with her department. Through this assessment,
she has been able to make very impactful changes on campus. She mentioned that one of the
most important parts of her job is programming centered on social justice education. This was a
component that got her interested in higher education initially, and she is grateful that it is a large
aspect of her job now. She feels as though she is making a direct impact on the students and the
community, which makes her feel better knowing that some of her students may go on to be very
Another aspect of assessment that Kelly touched on was self-assessment. This idea is not
new to me, but it helped me understand how I can best grow as a professional. She mentioned
that she is always benchmarking what she is doing and how impactful it is to the individuals she
supervises and her students. One way that I can see self-assessment being the most helpful is by
focusing on the outcomes. Student affairs professionals always have to develop learning
outcomes for each of the programs or ideas they implement in their work. If the learning
outcomes are reached, that indicates success (Schuh, Jones, Harper, & Associates, 2011). Kelly
mentioned that it is even good to set learning outcomes for each task that we take on as
professionals. This helps us put more meaning into the work we do on a daily basis, and it
alleviates the feeling that we are putting in all of this hard work for nothing. When she
mentioned this, I immediately thought of a retreat that I am planning with my supervisor. We are
taking the Multicultural Greek Council to LUREC in a couple weeks and we incorporated the
low ropes and high ropes courses in our curriculum. When I found this out, I saw this as cutting
connections with these students to help serve them better on a daily basis rather than enhancing
It is no surprise that professionals in student affairs face challenges, but some of them are
more unique to careers in higher education. One issue that many individuals face is creating
boundaries between their personal life and their work life and how to maintain professionalism at
all times. Student affairs professionals are seen as working in a fish bowl occupation. This means
that no matter what they do or when they do it, they have the chance of being seen and
STUDENT AFFAIRS PRACTITIONER INTERVIEW 8
recognized by a colleague or potentially a student. If the behaviors exhibited are not ones that are
idealized in society, these actions could diminish one’s credibility or professionalism. Many
student affairs professionals have to be extra careful when surrounding themselves with alcohol,
who they are getting romantically involved with, and how they present themselves on social
media (Janosik, Creamer, & Humphrey, 2004). One huge part that plays into displaying
professionalism is setting up boundaries between students. Kelly mentioned that she never lets
any student add her on social media in order to create that divide when interacting in person.
Personally, I have let students add me on social media, but I never take the action to add them
first. I also limit my student interactions on social media to Facebook in order to create some
kind of boundary. Kelly stated that it was something that got better with age and experience.
Once there is more of an age gap between the professional and the student, the separation seems
to happen more naturally. However, it is still something to keep in mind when serving as a young
professional.
Another idea that falls along the same path is self-care. One reason why self-care is so
important is because if student affairs professionals spend so much time giving to others and not
themselves, they will run out of anything to give and burn out. By not setting up any boundaries
and engaging in self-care, one’s competence level can decrease significantly (Magolda & Baxter
Magolda, 2011). One of the root issues why student affairs professionals struggle with
boundaries and self-care is due to our passion for our work. No one enters this position based off
of the salary they will make; we all enter student affairs because we care about the students. By
having such deep-rooted care for others, it blends our personal and professional lives very easily.
Also, it is difficult to identify the typical working hours of some practitioners. Residence life
staff seems to be working all day and every day, and that is difficult to manage. As a graduate
STUDENT AFFAIRS PRACTITIONER INTERVIEW 9
assistant, it seems as though sometimes my part-time work blends more into a full-time
responsibility. So, as Kelly mentioned to Dominic and myself, it is important to take the time out
of our day to do things for us because just when we need that free time to ourselves, life happens
The last issue that I drew from the interview with Kelly is the idea of having one’s
personal values and beliefs not align with the institution that they work at. As mentioned, Kelly
did her undergraduate coursework at the University of Notre Dame. While attending there, she
struggled with the conservative climate of the institution. Once attending Seattle University for
her graduate program, she found a school that was largely focused on social justice and loved
every component of it. Now, she works at Northwestern University, which she identified as
being somewhere in the middle. There are students that she works with who are highly focused
on social justice which is what she likes to see in students. However, there are components of the
institutional history of Northwestern and the pompous arrogance that floats around some students
that she mentions as hard to navigate. Magolda and Baxter Magolda (2011) identify three
different ways to address these complications. Professionals can berate themselves for not
noticing earlier, keep their conflicted feeling internalized, leave the institution, or acknowledge
During my undergraduate institution, I hardly faced any tensions with what Central
Michigan University stood for. I have since transitioned from a larger public institution in a rural
institution and I am not religious, I have not felt any type of pressures surrounding that idea.
However, there are a few ideas that I disagree with. I believe that Loyola should provide their
students with contraceptives and condoms. This factor could prevent unwanted pregnancy for
STUDENT AFFAIRS PRACTITIONER INTERVIEW 10
our students and could contribute to a healthier sex life as well. I also disagree with the fact that
same-sex couples are not allowed to get married on campus. I understand that Loyola is a Jesuit
catholic institution, however, it is not reflective of what society stands for today. As a school that
focuses on social justice, it seems as though this component labels the school as close-minded
and conservative in nature. However, these aspects are not complete deal breakers when it comes
to institutions I will work at or attend. Moving forward, I plan on doing extensive research on
each institution I apply at in order to understand what I am willing to tolerate or what I will
Conclusion
Through this interview with Kelly Benkert, I was able to gain more insight as to different
journeys and insights to the student affairs profession. This helped me realize that not everyone
in my field is the typical joiner as an undergraduate whose passions led them to a career in higher
education. I also learned more as it pertains to what it means to be a successful and competent
professional, and I hold many similar characteristics as someone who is currently at the director
level. I am very passionate about the education component of student affairs and constantly
challenging students to further grow and develop. Most importantly, what I have to keep in mind
are trying to avoid or decrease the challenges I may face as a professional. Although it is
impossible to have a perfect professional life, I will be sure to engage in self-care and other acts
of professionalism to limit the challenges that I have. Being able to interview a current
professional who could potentially be my colleague one day is very eye opening. Moving
forward, I hope to continue educating myself on the different functional areas of student affairs
and figuring out where I am best suited for my next career move.
STUDENT AFFAIRS PRACTITIONER INTERVIEW 11
References
Ardoin, S. (2014). The strategic guide to shaping your student affairs career. Sterling, VA:
Stylus Publishing.
Janosik, S. M., Creamer, D. G., & Humphrey, E. (2004). An analysis of ethical problems facing
Magolda, P. M., & Baxter Magolda, M. B. (Eds.). (2011). Contested issues in student affairs:
Schuh, J., Jones, S., Harper, S., & Associates (Eds.). (2011). Student services: A handbook for