Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Neonatal Phototherapy

Hill-Rom Micro-Lite
Phototherapy System

MAIN FEATURES
• 3 x 50W halogen bulbs
SUMMARY
• Treatment timer
Advantages: Easy to use, compact and
• Lamp life timer
lightweight phototherapy unit. It can be
mounted on a stand or placed directly onto an • Wide waveband
incubator canopy. Has a treatment timer. • Fan to cool bulbs
• Stands on incubator canopy
Disadvantages: Noticeable heating effect
due to halogen bulbs. Options
Unit may be mounted on a mobile stand.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION The mobile stand costs £595
The Hill-Rom Micro-Lite Phototherapy Unit is a
compact unit housing three 50W halogen bulbs Replacement Items
and a fan. The fan runs while the lamps are lit Bulb £19.30 each
and continues for a further three minutes after
the unit has been switched off. The Micro-Lite Life span of bulb - manufacturer states
may be placed on an incubator canopy. A mobile "nominal lamp life" is 1000 hours.
stand is also available which allows vertical and
tilt movement of the lamp once it is safely
secured to the stand. The unit displays an LCD
timer which can be reset between patients.

Price ex VAT £1,795


Manufacturer Hill-Rom Air-Shields Inc
330 Jacksonville Road,
Hatboro, PA USA 19040
Supplier Hill-Rom
Clinitron House, Ashby
Park, Ashby de la Zouch,
Leicestershire LE65 1JG
Tel : 01530 411000
Fax : 01530 411555
www.hill-rom.com
CE marking Yes, MD Directive
Notified Body KEMA (Netherlands)
Manufactured Manufactured under an
to Standard ISO9001/EN46001 quality
assurance system, audited
by KEMA,
HILL-ROM MICRO-LITE
DESCRIPTION on/standby switch is held in during the start up
The Hill-Rom Air-Shields Phototherapy System is procedure, the Bulb Life Timer is displayed.
a compact phototherapy device using halogen Releasing and then holding in the on/standby
bulbs as the light source. The unit is designed to switch again resets the Bulb Life Timer; the
stand directly on the hood of a neonatal incubator treatment timer is unaffected.
or be mounted on a mobile stand (see Front USER ASSESSMENT
Cover photo). Three 50W quartz halogen bulbs,
17 users in three hospitals participated. Two
producing white light, are arranged in a row. The
hospitals had bought the Micro-Lite and 11 users,
lamp housing contains ultraviolet (UV) and
with at least three months experience, completed
infrared (IR) filters. A fan provides cooling for the
questionnaires. Six users from another hospital had
bulbs and continues to run for 3 minutes after the
used the Micro-Lite on trial for a month.
bulbs have been switched off. The main unit
housing the bulbs has easy grip handles and The nurses completing the questionnaire rated the
moulded, padded feet to prevent scratching the facilities and attributes as unacceptable, poor,
incubator canopy. satisfactory, good or excellent. To clarify issues
raised by users' responses two neonatal units were
When the unit is switched on, by briefly
visited by an evaluator and the third unit was
depressing the on/standby switch, it goes through a
contacted by telephone. The averaged response of
self-test process. The segments of the display are
the nurses sampled is shown in Figure 1.
checked, the software version is displayed and
then a time is shown. During this start up Lamp All the respondents considered the Hill-
sequence, the three halogen lamps are lit in turn. Rom Micro-Lite to be an effective phototherapy
unit, most scored its effectiveness as good or
After the start-up procedure described above, the
excellent. The white light from the three halogen
timer display shows the length of time since it was
lamps was generally liked and one nurse noted that
last reset and is designed to be used as a treatment
even though she suffered migraine headaches
timer. Pressing and holding the on/standby switch
when nursing babies undergoing phototherapy, the
while the lights are on resets this timer. If the
therapeutic light from the Micro-Lite was not a
Figure 1 User Response

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Poor

Unacceptable

l l re
d
an
d
nd m en
t
ro tro ut ss ng
tan t ta is n t n tp G
la ne ni
s s s n tm o o u e a
of of f ha us fc c
ht
o iv Cl
e
y y to ec dj of ps g ct
li it li it n a /
am
i ff e
ob ab
e tm lt n L E
st
m
en Ti O fl
M St u m o
dj st e
ta ju Ag
h d
ig ta
He igh
He

MDA Evaluation 00091, January 2001 2


HILL-ROM MICRO-LITE
Figure 2 Irradiance Spectrum
0.04

Ultraviolet Blue Green Yellow Orange Red


Spectral Irradiance (mW.cm .nm )
-1

0.03
-2

0.02

0.01

0.00
300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700
Wavelength (nm)

problem for her. Nurses covered babies' eyes with spectroradiometer. The irradiance was measured at
bandages or used amber protective head shields. each wavelength in a band from 300nm to 700nm
CEDAR note: The baby's eyes should be shielded (see Figure 2) at the minimum treatment distance
to prevent retinal damage from exposure to bright specified by Hill-Rom, 43cm (17 inches). Total
light, as the eye is more prone to damage from irradiance from 400nm to 550nm (blue-green) and
blue light than from other wavelengths. from 300nm to 400nm (UV) are shown in Table 1
for the treatment distance 43cm. The irradiance in
Most users commented that the babies temperature
the therapeutic blue-green waveband is average
increased when using the Micro-Lite. This was
compared to current phototherapy devices.
considered a disadvantage as it required extra
Measured UV levels are below published safety
vigilance in monitoring. The Micro-Lite uses
levels for adults; separate limits for infants have
halogen bulbs which have a greater heating effect
not yet been agreed by international bodies.
than some other light sources used in
phototherapy. CEDAR Note: neonates undergoing Table 1 Irradiance through air
phototherapy should always have their temperature Bandwidth (nm) Irradiance at 43cm
monitored. 2
320 - 400 (UV) 0.0024 mW/cm
Mounting Nurses placing the Micro-Lite on the
400 - 550 2.50 mW/cm2
canopy of an incubator found the device light and
easy to manoeuvre. Those using the device Effective surface area ~1,000 cm2
mounted on a mobile stand rated this either
satisfactory or good. This device has higher levels of red and yellow
light output (above 550nm in Figure 2) compared
TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
with some other phototherapy devices and this
Our technical testing is designed to test criteria we prompted our assessment of the lamp's skin
consider important to clinical effectiveness and heating effect. To simulate phototherapy of a
safety; and takes into account the information in neonate in an incubator we monitored the
the forthcoming neonatal phototherapy standard temperature of five matt black aluminium blocks
BS EN 60601-2-50. (as described in BS EN 60601-2-21 1997) placed
in an incubator at a stable temperature. The Hill-
Light output power measurements were made
Rom Micro-Lite was positioned 43cm directly
using a Bentham double monochromator

3 MDA Evaluation 00091, January 2001


HILL-ROM MICRO-LITE
over the central disc and the lamp switched on. We thank all the medical and nursing staff in
The temperature rise recorded over four hours was Northern General Hospital in Sheffield, South
5.5°C. Without the incubator canopy in place and Cleveland Hospital in Middlesbrough, Darlington
with no additional heat source, simulating Memorial Hospital and Newham Hospital London,
phototherapy with an unheated cot, the who helped in the evaluation.
temperature rise was 6.5°C above room
Thanks also to Hill-Rom for loaning this device
temperature. These are significant temperature
for evaluation free of charge.
rises and the users were found to be aware that the
Micro-Lite causes an inadvertent heating effect
(see User Assessment).
OTHER MDA REPORTS ON NEONATAL
MANUFACTURER'S COMMENTS PHOTOTHERAPY DEVICES
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the The irradiance of this phototherapy device may be
draft report. compared with other phototherapy devices, see
Hill-Rom Air Shields favour halogen lamps as they Evaluation Reports listed below and available on
have a longer life and do not degrade as quickly http://cymruweb.wales.nhs.uk/cedar/index.htm
as tubes. Phototherapy units using halogen lamps 391 A review including evaluations of the
may cause inadvertent heating. Verification testing Ohmeda BiliBlanket Plus and the
of the Microlite phototherapy system in Medela BiliBed.
conjunction with the C2000 incubator, using a
500g simulated anatomical model showed the 00092 Ohmeda Spot Phototherapy Lamp
temperature increase was 3-4 °C in air mode and
less than 1°C in skin mode.
The Microlite user manual recommends that users DISTRIBUTION
be aware of the radiant heating effect and This report should be distributed to the following
recommends the incubator be used in skin mode to departments:
control temperature changes. When skin mode is
not an option it may be necessary to select a lower • Clinical • Neonatal Units/
air temperature. In all cases independent Engineering SCBU
temperature monitoring should be performed, this • Health Authority • Maternity
would also be the case for other types of Libraries
phototherapy lights.
• EBME • Hospital Libraries
Hill-Rom Air Shields will continue to use white • Medical Physics • Supplies
light phototherapy as it is effective, allows How to obtain copies
assessment of the baby's colour and is more "Evaluation" is free to NHS staff and is issued by
acceptable to staff, who do not suffer the side the Medical Devices Agency, (020 7972 8181)
effects of blue light phototherapy, such as Scottish Health Care Supplies (0131 244 3077),
headaches, nausea or dizziness. The National Assembly for Wales (029 2082
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3536), and Health Estates (Northern Ireland) (028
This report was prepared by Dr S D P Wentworth, 905 20025) For further information contact:
Dr D C Crawford and Dr N J Cook of CEDAR, Orders Department, Medical Devices Agency.
Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2001
Directorate, Cardiff & Vale NHS Trust, under Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of
contract to the Medical Devices Agency. research or private study, or criticism or review,
• Enquiries to : S Wentworth at CEDAR, Cardiff as permitted under the Copyright, Design &
patents Act, 1988, this publication may only be
Medicentre, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4UJ.
reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or
Email : cedar@cardiffandvale.wales.nhs.uk
by any means with prior permission, in writing, of
Tel: 029 2068 2120 Fax : 029 2075 0239
the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office
• Or : Arthur Goodman at the MDA, Hannibal
(HMSO). Enquires concerning reproduction
House, Elephant & Castle, London SE1 6TQ.
outside these terms should be made to the
Email:. arthur.goodman@doh.gsi.gov.uk Tel :
Medical Devices Agency at the above address.
0207 972 8156 Fax : 0207 972 8105

MDA Evaluation 00091, January 2001 4

You might also like