Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mejora Continua en Molinos SAG
Mejora Continua en Molinos SAG
Continuous Improvement
3D laser
scanning, ME
Elecmetal.
DEM Mill Analyst
from ANSYS® from
Solutions, a
LTM/Universi Ansys Inc., a ME UP +
discrete finite
element
dade Federal Time, time
do Rio de elements
method optimization
Janeiro analysis
software software.
of relining
(UFRJ)
SAG Mill Liner Improvement Approach
Methodology
Take operational campaign statistics,
dimensional background
Scan liner with laser for different
points during campaign.
Baseline Compare statistics of the operational efficiency
Characterization
Simulate using the EDEM the liner profile,
current design and worn profiles
Compare the results of the New Design with Proposal Liner Design
Current Design and worn profiles
Implementation and Evaluation of
Results
Industrial Case Study
Improvement of Shell Liner Design in a
38’ SAG Mill
Baseline Characterization
SAG mill parameter Value SAG mill parameter Value
Internal diameter, mm 11,500 Speed, rpm 9.8
Internal length, mm 6,600 Mill filling, % 30
Mill installed power, kW 19,500 Grinding media filling, % 14
Mineral density, ton/m3 2,8 Grinding media size, in 5
Charge trajectory of the old design (left) and the new design (center)
Simulation Results : Industrial Case Study.
Charge trajectory of the old design (left) and the new design (center) and flying charge
and attrition zone in tumbling mill (right)
Apparent Breakage Rates
Mechanistic Model Structure
DEM
(collision
Population
spectrum)
balance
Bed
breakage
Fracture
models
Particle breakage energy
models (empirical/ convolution
phenomenological)
Normal and Tangential Energy Spectrum of old and new liner design (useful pairs)
Simulation Results : Industrial Case Study.
Population Balance
Average number effective collisions in the old and new liner design
Industrial Testing of The
New Design
Industrial Testing of The New Design
Industrial Testing of The New Design
Total Charge, % 30 28 to 32 -6 to +6
Ball Charge, % 14 14 to 18 up to 28
The new configuration of liners resulted better charge liberation as it used 50% less
number lifters, thus more space between lifters.
Increasing lifters’ face angle from 20° a 35° allowed improving the particle
trajectory, transforming the milling movement from “waterfall” to “cascade” thus
achieving a better concentration of the charge and also eliminating the failures due to
broken liners.