Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Andreresto Final Research Paper
Andreresto Final Research Paper
Running head: Relationship Between Natural Environment and Depression for Adults
The Association Between Accessibility to a Natural Environment and Depression for Adults.
Andre J. Resto
Introduction:
Major depressive disorder is more prevalent in women and it can develop at any age.
According to the Department of Health (2009) 16% of the worldwide population is affected by
poor mental health at any given time. Furthermore, the World Health Organization (2013)
estimates that 300 million people suffer from depression worldwide. The severity of depression
can vary from mild to severe. Severe cases of depression leave the subject immobilized and
The severity and prevalence of depression among adults has led many researchers to
explore many factors including the impact of the environment on those that are suffering. More
specifically, if living in urban environments leads a decrease in mental health and increase in risk
of developing MDD (Mukherjee et al., 2017). The World Health Organization (2014) states that
50% of the world’s population lives in urban areas. Also studies have found that urban
environments are associated with depression (Weich et al., 2002; Galeaa et al. 2005). Most of the
studies that look for an association between access to a natural environment and depression have
focused on specific regions with populations of varying age, gender, and socioeconomic status
(Triguero-Mas et al. 2015; Mukherjee et al., 2017; McKenzie et al., 2013; Nichani et al., 2017).
The results of studies that pertain to particular regions is that they can be collected so that
their findings can be generalized and offer external validity to larger populations. The aim of this
review is to determine whether there is an association between the accessibility to nature and
depression for adults. If adults have access to parks and green space, then they are expected to
have better mental health and lower depression than if they do not have access to parks and a
green space.
3
Relationship Between Natural Environment and Depression for Adults
Body:
I synthesized five articles relating to green space, urbanization, mental health, and
depression. The first article is a cross-sectional study collected data of 8793 adults form the
Catalonia Health Survey to determine if there was an association between natural outdoor
environments and mental health. Triguero-Mas, et al. (2015) hypothesized that natural outdoor
environments have a significantly positive association with better self-perceived mental and
general health. The study used self-perceived general health, perceived risk of poor mental
health, perceived depression and/or anxiety, visits to mental health specialists, and intake of
medication as health indicators. They discovered that living close to green spaces and higher
Van der Berg, et al. (2016) discovered a similar conclusion in a study that looked for an
association between visiting green space and mental health and vitality. Using data from the
research project Positive Health of the Natural Outdoor Environment in Typical Populations in
Different Regions in Europe (PHENOTYPE), they were able to create a cross-sectional study to
evaluate if longer visits to green spaces correlate to better mental health. A significant positive
association between visits to green space and mental health and vitality was found. More
specifically, women with less nature childhood experience were most positively affected by
purposeful visits to green spaces. The more frequent they visited green space the lower perceived
level of stress and odds of depressive symptoms decreased. Those with lower level of education
were also affected by visits to green space more than those with medium or higher levels of
McKenzie, Murray, and Booth (2013) conducted analyzed data from the Scottish Neighborhood
4
Relationship Between Natural Environment and Depression for Adults
Statistical database using linear multiple regression. The study measured depression and mental
health by acquiring the data for prescribed drugs for anxiety, depression, or psychosis.
Neighborhoods that are more rural had statistically fewer prescription drugs for anxiety,
depression, or psychosis (McKenzie, Murray, and Booth, 2013). The same was true after
Mukherjee, et al. (2017) used an alternative form to evaluate green space and park
availability in their study to determine if there is an association between park availability and
system that that allowed them to measure the distance from the subject’s residence to the nearest
park and total area of all of the local parks. Along with the use of ArcGIS, the cross-sectional
survey Centre for Cardio-Metabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia (CARRS) was also utilized to
collect data on cardio-metabolic disorders like central obesity, insulin resilience, glucose
intolerance, and dyslipidemia). Mukherjee, et al. (2017) also found that individuals living in far
proximity to parks were most likely to have self-reported major depressive disorder. There was
also a statistically significant positive linear trend between small area of the nearest park and
Contrary to the previous studies, Nichani, et al. (2017) concluded that there was no
association between access to green space and antenatal depression. The study followed 6822
mothers living in New Zealand during their pregnancy. 15% of these mothers experienced
depression during the antenatal period and throughout all exposure groups (medium, high, and
very high levels), it was concluded that availability of green space was not associated with
antenatal depression.
5
Relationship Between Natural Environment and Depression for Adults
Conclusion:
The aim of this review is to determine whether there is an association between the
accessibility to nature and depression for adults. Based on the literature reviewed, the articles
confirmed my hypothesis that there is a positive association between increased access to parks
and natural environments and a decrease in major depressive disorder. Four of the five studies
synthesized concluded that increased use of natural environments improve perceived mental
health and thus decrease depression in adults. The reason parks are beneficial to mental health is
unknown but assumptions can be made. Park aid an increase in physical activity and facilitate
Because each study approach has its limitations, more research is needed. Studies that
used cross-sectional design are flawed due to the lack of causality, Other factors that impede the
reliability of these studies include self-selection bias, quality of the natural environment studied,
and socioeconomic status. Those variables might have played a role in exaggerating or
Public health practitioners can use the results of my study by promoting the mental health
benefits of visiting parks and natural environments in general. Those with chronic diseases or
have high risk of developing a chronic condition can decrease their chance of major depressive
disorder by having purposeful visits to parks. Even increasing park visits by one hour a day for a
month is associated with an increase in mental health (van der Berg, et al., 2016). Practitioners
can also implement interventions at parks to encourage community exercise. Public health
professionals can also use the results of my study to devise their own primary study that
Reference List:
Vikram Nichani, Kim Dirks, Bruce Burns, Amy Bird, & Cameron Grant. (2017). Green space and
depression during pregnancy: Results from the growing up in New Zealand study. International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(9), 1083.
van den Berg, M., van Poppel, M., van Kamp, I., Andrusaityte, S., Balseviciene, B., Cirach, M., . . .
Maas, J. (2016). Visiting green space is associated with mental health and vitality: A cross-
sectional study in four European cities. Health & Place, 38, 8.
Triguero-Mas, M., Dadvand, P., Cirach, M., Martínez, D., Medina, A., Mompart, A., . . .
Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2015). Natural outdoor environments and mental and physical health:
Relationships and Mechanisms. Environment International, 77, 35-41.
McKenzie, K., Murray, A., & Booth, T. (2013). Do urban environments increase the risk of anxiety,
depression and psychosis? an epidemiological study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 150(3),
1019-1024.
Debarati Mukherjee, S Safraj, Mohammad Tayyab, Roopa Shivashankar, Shivani A Patel, Gitanjali
Narayanan, . . . Dorairaj Prabhakaran. (2017). Park availability and major depression in
individuals with chronic conditions: Is there an association in urban India? Health & Place, 47,
54.
WHO, 2013. The European Mental Health Action Plan. WHO Regional Office for Europe,
Copenhagen.
Department of Health, 2009. Healthy Lives, Brighter Futures: The Strategy for Children and Young
People’s Health. Department for Children, Schools and Families, London.
Galeaa,S.,Freudenbergc,N.,Vlahov,D.,2005. Cities and population health. Social Science and
Medicine 60, 1017–1033.
Weich,S.,Blanchard,M.,Prince,M.,Burton,E.,Erens,B.,Sproston,K.,2002. Mental health and the built
environment: cross-sectional survey of individual and contextual risk factors for
depression. British Journal of Psychiatry 180, 428–433.
Department for Environment. Food and Rural Affairs (n/d).The rural–urban
definition.〈www.defra.gov.uk/statistics/rural/what-is-rural/rural-urban-definition/〉 (accessed
16.08.12).