This document is a project evaluation sheet for a student in their third year of a B.A. LL.B. course. It outlines the criteria for evaluating an intellectual property law project, including the cognitive content of the project, data analysis and presentation style, originality, and conclusions. It also includes a section for evaluating a viva voce presentation on the project. The total marks are split between the written project (20 marks) and the oral presentation (5 marks), with deductions possible for late submission or failure to present on the scheduled date and time.
This document is a project evaluation sheet for a student in their third year of a B.A. LL.B. course. It outlines the criteria for evaluating an intellectual property law project, including the cognitive content of the project, data analysis and presentation style, originality, and conclusions. It also includes a section for evaluating a viva voce presentation on the project. The total marks are split between the written project (20 marks) and the oral presentation (5 marks), with deductions possible for late submission or failure to present on the scheduled date and time.
This document is a project evaluation sheet for a student in their third year of a B.A. LL.B. course. It outlines the criteria for evaluating an intellectual property law project, including the cognitive content of the project, data analysis and presentation style, originality, and conclusions. It also includes a section for evaluating a viva voce presentation on the project. The total marks are split between the written project (20 marks) and the oral presentation (5 marks), with deductions possible for late submission or failure to present on the scheduled date and time.
Name of the Student: Course: B.A. LL.B., Reg. No: Year & Section: III – A Subject: INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
TO BE FILLED BY THE COURSE FACULTY:
Whether the Synopsis / Abstract is approved: Yes / No
Scheduled Date of Submission of completed project: Actual Date of Submission: Delay, if any: Yes / No Marks deducted for late submission / Redo:
Project Topic:
Plagiarism detected (URKUND Analysis Report): %
Sl. No: Particulars Total Marks
Marks Awarded A. PROJECT 1. Cognitive Content a. Review of Literature b. Research Objective / Problem / Questions 6 c. Research Methodology d. Foot Notes / End Notes / Bibliography / References e. Relevant Cases / Statutes etc. 2. Data Analysis, Reasoning & Presentation Style 6 3. Originality 5 4. Conclusion / Suggestions / Recommendations 3 Total Marks (A) 20 (-) Marks for late submission B. VIVA-VOCE / PROJECT PRESENTATION 1. Subject Knowledge 2 2. Analysis / Articulation / Presentation 2 3. General Assessment 1 Total Marks (B) 5 (-) Marks for failure to appear on scheduled date & time Grand Total (A+B) 25 Signature of the Course Faculty