Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Media Conglomerates
Media Conglomerates
Media Conglomerates
Successful media companies usually buy out or merge with other companies to make
them more powerful, profitable, and able to reach a larger viewing audience, making
media ownership more concentrated.
Over time the amount of media merging has increased and the amount of media
outlets have increased. That translates to fewer companies owning more media outlets,
increasing the concentration of ownership. In 1983, 90% of US media was controlled by
fifty companies; today, 90% is controlled by just six companies.
Critics have accused the large media conglomerates of dominating the media and using
unfair practices.
This can be seen in the news industry, where there is increasing commercialisation of
media. News corporations refuse to publicize information that would be harmful to their
interests. These practices also sensationalism at the expense of the coverage of serious
issues.
Commercially driven, mass media is primarily loyal to sponsors, i.e. advertisers and
government rather than to the public interest. Dissemination of news often caters to the
interests of the advertisers. Healthy, market-based competition is absent, leading to
slower innovation and increased prices.
3
Reporters have often seen their stories refused or edited beyond recognition. An
example would be the repeated refusal of networks to air "ads" from anti-war advocates
to liberal groups regardless of factual basis.
There is also the concern that the concentration of media ownership reduces diversity in
both ownership and programming of TV shows and radio programs.
The general view is that the media owners influence the content and structure of media
content. Healthy or balanced debates or discussions on an issue tend to get downplayed
and instead the view point convenient to the owners is put forth.
It is evident that, the mainstream media supports the fundamental tenets of capitalism
such as private enterprise, the open market, profit etc. A small cluster of powerful owners
of media conglomerates, have power over what the populace reads, watches, and
hears, or cannot access in terms of information.
They are also accused of being a leading force behind the standardization of culture and
are frequently criticized by groups that perceive news organizations as
being biased toward special interests.
Critics of media deregulation and the resulting concentration of ownership fear that such
trends will only continue to reduce the diversity of information provided. The ultimate
consequence, critics argue, is a poorly informed public, restricted to a reduced array of
media options that offer only information that does not harm the media conglomerate’s
growing range of interests.
The net result is that free expression is in jeopardy not just deliberately by authoritarian
regimes but also by international media conglomerates that have constantly lessened
meaningful diversity in expression all over the globe
One of the largest media conglomerates is The Walt Disney Company. Robert Iger, Walt
Disney Company's current CEO actively supports the Democrats. Secondly, Disney’s
ownership of ABC directly influences what television programs and news are produced.
For instance, ABC does not produce stories that show Disney sweat shops or child
laborers.
News Corporation is an emerging media giant as well. This conglomerate owns, National
Geographic, the Wall Street Journal and New York Post. News Corporation's CEO,
Rupert Murdoch admits he is politically conservative which is evident by the reputation of
4
Fox News for airing conservatively biased news programming, before Fox was bought
over by Disney.
General Electric is a perfect example of how a corporation can drive media content. The
conglomerate owns 27 television stations and multiple cable networks. As the owners of
NBC, General Electric does not allow for reporting on the inadequacies of the company
and also doesn't allow any controversial stories regarding General Electric to be
produced.
CBS Corporation not only owns multiple television and radio stations. CBS News
President David Rhodes’s brother Ben Rhodes was Obama's Deputy National Security
Adviser for Strategic Communication. This example shows there is a direct connection
between the CBS News President and the Obama Administration.
Today, media conglomerates control the majority of media outlets production and
distribution and they exercise power and influence in multiple facets of operation and
content. It is clear that programming is now driven by profit and corporate influence.
When one entity controls the information, we must question the validity of the information
we receive. As media consumers we must sift through the information and question the
source.
######