IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE
TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
CITY OF ST. LOUIS
STATE OF MISSOURI
STATE OF MISSOURI, )
)
Plaintitt, )
} Cause No. 1822-CR00642
v )
) °
ERIC GREITENS, )
)
Defendant. ) z
DEFENDANT’S SUPPLEMENT TO SECOND,
SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION TO DISMISS
With apologies to the Court, the defense submits one more significant and compelling
cause of prejudice resulting from the prosecutorial misconduct. As the Court knows, there is now
a criminal investi
jon of Mr. Tisaby and possibly Ms. Gardner related to the perjury by Tisaby,
which no one is denying, and the participation in the lies and concealment by Ms. Gardner.
If this case is not dismissed, then the defense will obviously need and be entitled to re-
depose Mr. Tisaby. We need to know, what are facts and what is made up, how did he get
debriefed by Ms. Gardner, how did he interact with the witnesses, what happened in the first ten
minutes of the interview where there still is no audio, what was said to any witness not in the
notes or on the tape, why were certain things suggested to witnesses during the interviews, and
what interaction did he have with witnesses not documented?
Bit, in all probability, Mr. Tisaby will be exercising his Fifth Amendment rights and
refuse to testify. When that occurs, none of the above questions will ever be answered. The
answers to the questions however are cr
I to being able to defend this case. There is a reason
why there were so many lies in this case. There is a reason sentences were removed frommemoranda. There is
Mr. Tisaby refuses to testif¥,
Dated: April 18, 2018
a reason they did not want the defense to see the video interview. And, if
swe will never have the answers. Nothing could be more prejudicial,
Respectfully submitted,
Down BENNETT LLP
By: 4/ James G. Martin. _
James F. Bennett, #46826
Edward L. Dowd, #28785
James G. Martin, #33586
Michelle Nasser, #68952
7733 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 1900
St. Louis, MO 63105
Phone: (314) 889-7300
Fax: (314) 863-2111
jbennett@dowdbennett.com
‘edowd@dowdbennett.com
jmartin@dowdbennett.com
mnasser@dowdbennett.com
John F. Garvey, #35879
Carey Danis & Lowe
£8235 Forsyth, Suite 1100
St. Louis, MO 63105
Phone: (314) 725-7700
Fax: (314) 678-3401
jgarvey@careydanis.com
1, Scott Rosenblum, #33390
Rosenblum Schwartz & Fry
120 S. Central Ave., Suite 130
Clayton, MO 63105
Phone: (314) 862-4332
nkettler@rsflawfirm.com
Attorneys for DefendantCERTIFICAT
OF SERVICE qi
hereby certify that the foregoing was filed via the Court's electronic filing system and
‘was also sent via email to the St, Louis City Circuit Attorney's Office this 18" day of April,
2018. ;
(s/_James G. Martin 2oO °
MISSOURI CIRCUIT COU,
TWEN' TY-SECOND JUDICIAL FQ
(City of St. Louis) APR T8 2618
an ub sinc
vs
a menial
GREITEWS
case no. [¥22- C0842 pivision 1e 41 & 1B
COURT ORDER
Exnikits AG eC YO SuppEmerTAL
MEMonAN bu pF STATE TENDELED
Fo ¢n cant Bren PEWMEW,
([Rpspearevtey SVEMIMEDY
yer
ACA
102-305 (Rev.2403)‘Cause No. Se IN THE
STATE OF MISSOURI MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT
TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
vs. (CITY OF ST. Louls)
20
Cause continued at the request of the
to for the reason(s) that:
WHEREFORE, the Court finds, for the above stated reason(8) that the ends of justice
are served by granting the continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and
the defendant in a speedy trial.
Defendant
Judge
Attorney for Defendant
Assistant Circuit Attorney