Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student Teaching - Lesson Plan 1 2
Student Teaching - Lesson Plan 1 2
Title:
Content Standard(s) addressed by this lesson: (Write Content Standards directly from the standard)
Evidence Outcome:
a. Investigate and identify two or more ways that Earth’s materials can be broken down and/or com-
bined in different ways such as minerals into rocks, rock cycle, formation of soil, and sand (DOK 1-2)
b. Use evidence to develop a scientific explanation about one or more processes that break down
and/or combine Earth materials (DOK 1-3)
- Engineering of structures
Inquiry Questions: (Essential questions relating knowledge at end of the unit of instruction, select appli-
cable questions from standard)
- What is needed for construction of buildings? What types of cements are there?
Every student will be able to: (Create your own lesson objectives from the standard, follow the ABCD
format, using student voice)
1. What are we learning: We are learning that combing different materials is necessary when us-
ing rocks, soils, and minerals for construction.
2. What we are learning? We are learning how engineers consider using different materials for
construction.
How will you know when your successful? I can explain how to choose and combine
different earth materials to create stable structures.
List of Assessments: (Write the number of the learning target associated with each assessment)
If you had to build a house out of soil, would you rather it be built out of rough sand, medium-grain slit
or fine-grain clay? Why?
Predict? Which type of structure will hold up the best with the water. Which will hold up the best with
with the added weight?
ude a play-by-play account of what students and Day 1 - Whole class, guided
her will do from the minute they arrive to the mi- 1. First introduce activity using the hook state-
e they leave your classroom. Indicate the length of ments. Read target.
h segment of the lesson. List actual minutes.)
cate whether each is: 2. Explain to students that they are going to be
making mini structures, and after a few days
cher input
testing them with weight and water. On day 1
deling they are going to make the first four of the
estioning strategies buildings following the directions on their sci-
ded/unguided: ence sheets. On day 2 they are going to make
whole-class practice the final two structures and test all the buildings
group practice using weight and water.
ndividual practice
ck for understanding 3. Have students begin activity following the di-
er rections on the provided sheets.
Day 2
- Write a conclusion about which structure was the best, why, and if your hypot
sis was supported or not.
Differentiation -If the activity is too advanced we will work closely with struggling students to help ex-
modify: If the activity is too advanced for a child, plain the concepts deeper. We will mindfully place students so that they are working w
will you modify it so that they can be successful? peers in all levels so one person in the group will be able to understand it and help out
xtend: If the activity is too easy for a child, how the other members of the group.
you extend it to develop their emerging skills? - We will be walking around and helping out with different groups.
at observational assessment data did you collect
upport differentiated instruction?
1. To what extent were lesson objectives achieved? (Utilize assessment data to justify
your level of achievement)
For the most part the lesson objectives were achieved, the students were able to predict, write
observations and then write a conclusion about which structure was the most stable and able to
hold up. They were all able to grasp that different structures held up better due to having a mix-
ture of different components in the soil. For example, most of the students predicted and were
able to explain why mixture b with equal amounts of glue and water was going to be the strong-
est.
2. What changes, omissions, or additions to the lesson would you make if you were to
teach again?
Overall, the experiment went really well. It was a little hectic with 29 students having to share
materials and work together, but I think it was a good opportunity for students to problem solve
and learn how to work together in groups. If I would change anything I would have more materi-
als available and more sand. The students ran out of sand pretty fast and weren’t able to fill up
their cups completely. Secondly, one team had to delay their start because of the lack of materi-
als available. Another thing I would change is how I gave out directions. I printed out instruc-
tions for each group and instructed the third graders to follow it. This did not go as smoothly as I
thought it would because most of the third graders were to eager to mix stuff and did not read
the instructions. I think next time I will read the instructions with students and do the experi-
ment as a whole class or read the instructions prior and make sure students aware of all the
steps they need to complete.