Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mka 03 (B) Francis Turbine
Mka 03 (B) Francis Turbine
Excellent
V.Poor
Good
Poor
Fair
CLO 1: Explain the results of hydraulics and mechanics materials experiments based on relevant standard and theories. [PLO4, C2]
Assessment Criteria Sub-criteria Level 1 2 3 4 5 Weight Score
Lab work aim/purposes Identify the lab purpose C1 1
and materials used List and include all lab materials C1 1
Report Use appropriate List and include all lab procedures C1 1
methodology and results
to interpret procedures Answer and discuss relevant questions,
C2 1
used equations and techniques
Development of Interpret proper results C2 0.5
Presentation methodology and
assumptions in study Discuss the use of materials and equations C2 0.5
Total 5
CLO 2: Display high quality of technical and interpretation skills in solving the assign problems. [PLO2, P4]
Assessment Criteria Sub-criteria Level 1 2 3 4 5 Weight Score
Descriptions of the lab work needs P1 0.5
Perform on-site lab work Correct use of measurement technique
P2 1.5
and equipments
Report Discussion on the Describe correct and precise data
applications of the lab P2 1.5
collection
work with measurement
techniques and Analyse and discuss the data trends and
P3 1.5
equations patterns using correct graphs
Solve the applications of equations with
P3 1
Use/adapt appropriate correct and accurate analyses
measurement 3 sets data measurement for accuracy P4 0.7
Presentation
technique/concept and
results Investigate, discuss and relate the use of
P4 0.8
lab work with real site situation
Total 7.5
CLO 3: Describe the laboratory testing procedures among group members throughout the experiments. [PLO5, A2]
Assessment Criteria Sub-criteria Level 1 2 3 4 5 Weight Score
Format of report follows given format A1 1.5
Convey information in
Report Team work: contribution from all members A1 1.5
group
Follows the field work instructions A2 1.5
Demonstrate importance of lab works,
A2 2
able to answers open ended questions
Convey spoken ideas in
Presentation
group Organisation of group presentation A2 0.7
Total 7.5
Total (%)
Assessor signature/ date:
FACULTY OF CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
WATER ENGINEERING LABORATORY
Section 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
STUDENTS’ ETHICAL CODE (SEC)
“I declare that I have prepared this report with my own efforts. I also
declare not receive or give any assistance in preparing this report and
make this affirmation in the belief that nothing is in, it is true”
……………………………………….
(STUDENT’S SIGNATURE)
NAME :………………………………
MATRIC NO :……………………………….
DATE :…………………………..…..
*This SEC paper sheet is compulsory to be compiled in the lab report for each student by group
FACULTY OF CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL
PAGE NO : 3/5
1/2
2/2
ENGINEERING
/
DEPARTMENT OF WATER & ENVIRONMENTAL EDITION : 1
ENGINEERING REVIEW NO : 1
WATER ENGINEERING LABORATORY EFFECTIVE DATE : 17/05/2005
1.0 OBJECTIVE
To determine the relationship between the head, flow rate, velocity, power and efficiency of Francis
Turbine.
3.0 THEORY
Hydraulic power can be obtain at the turbine inlet (usually known in watt unit) and can be calculated
as, Phyd H totQ , and Q as the volume discharge that can be read from the measuring equipment
(m3/s) and is a water weight per unit of volume (9820 N / m3).
H tot is a total head (m) which can be calculated (using theorem Bernoulli method) in a circuit section
flow just before the turbine in a location of pressure head as a total of three parameter,
H tot H man H kin H pres which is Hman is a the differences of pressure head position which
measured the pressure and the turbine shaft bar. As using the experimental table, H man 0.20m (if
the pressure decreasing at the turbine point out which cause by the mixer which count as an
available head, Hman can be calculated as the height differences between the pressure gauging point
position and the point of water level at the outflow of reservoir) is a kinetic parameter which cause by
water velocity, vm (in m / s), at the pressure gauging location, where the pipe section is Sm (this value
H kin vm / 2 g , whereas g is the gravity constant
2
is not S and v value at the inlet section).
(9.81m/s2) and vm=Q/Sm. H pres m / is a resultant parameter from water pressure, m (in unit
N/ m2) as measured by pressure gauging. In calculation table, the readable gauging value which
has been read by four gauging, all the readable value from the calculation can be added by the
related values, vm, Hman, Hkin, Hpres, Htot, Phyd, which has been described first. This following
relationship, has been used to calculated the value of mechanical power out, Pmec (usually in watt),
Pmec c 2n / 60 , whereas , is the turbine angular velocity (in rad / s), n is a turbine average
velocity obtain by reader equipment (RPM) and c is a braking torque velocity at the turbine shaft as
P
obtain by reader equipment (Nm). Lastly, the turbine overall efficiency, mec is calculated
Phyd
as the ratio of power at outlet point compared to the generated power. Last table arrangement for
the experimental value and the calculation value (for each z ) can be explained in a provided table.
FACULTY OF CIVIL & ENVIRONMENTAL
PAGE NO : 2/2
ENGINEERING
/
DEPARTMENT OF WATER & ENVIRONMENTAL EDITION : 1
ENGINEERING REVIEW NO : 1
WATER ENGINEERING LABORATORY EFFECTIVE DATE : 17/05/2005
4.0 EQUIPMENTS
Francis Turbine equipment
5.0 PROCEDURES
1. Close the delivery control shutter.
2. Fixed the distributor leverage at the chosen value (50% and 100%).
3. Open the delivery control shutter until desired flow rate.
4. Records the reading of pressure ( m ), speed ( n ), flow rate ( Q ), and voltage (V) for each
distributor leverage value in Table 6.1.
5. Repeat 3 - 4 steps with different distributor leverage value.
PRECAUTION : Must ensure the delivery control shutter should be closed before switch on the
equipment. Carelessness may cause equipment damage.
7.0 QUESTIONS
1. Plot a graph of:
a. Turbine velocity versus flow rate.
b. Turbine velocity versus output torque.
c. Turbine velocity versus hydraulic power.
d. Turbine velocity versus mechanical power.
e. Turbine velocity versus efficiency.
2. Give your comment(s) from the graph obtained.
3. State FIVE (5) safety factors that have been taken in the experiment.
Signature: Signature: