Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Young Adolescent Beliefs
Young Adolescent Beliefs
Young Adolescent Beliefs
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
Society for Research in Child Development, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to Child Development
This content downloaded from 200.37.4.239 on Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:59:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Young Adolescents' Beliefs concerning
Menstruation
Princeton University
CLARKE, ANNE E., and RUBLE, DIANE N. Young Adolescents' Beliefs concerning Menstr
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1978, 49, 231-234. In order to explore the early socialization of at
and expectations about menstruation, 54 young adolescent girls (both pre- and postmena
and boys responded to a questionnaire assessing evaluative attitudes toward menstruatio
pected symptomatology, perceived effects on moods and activities, and sources of informat
these beliefs. The results showed that even premenarcheal girls and young boys have
sonably well-defined and mostly negative set of attitudes and expectations. Most believ
menstruation is accompanied by physical discomforts, increased emotionality, and a disr
of activities and social interactions. Although the responses of the 3 groups were rema
similar, premenarcheal girls had a somewhat less negative evaluation of menstruation tha
postmenarcheal girls and boys. Other analyses showed that symptom expectations for "g
general" were more severe than for selves, though these 2 sets of responses were highly
lated. On the basis of these findings and the data concerning sources of information, the po
role of socialization processes in the menstrual experience is discussed.
Girls' early experience of menstruation is but also when ratings were done by
1976),
assumed to have major implications for theirboth men and women for "women in general"
adult experience of menstruation. One devel-(Parlee 1974), when women rated themselves
opmental textbook, for example, suggests"as that
if" they were in a particular phase (Brooks,
"it is vital" that a girl's "initial experience
Ruble, & Clarke 1977), and when women only
with this phenomenon be as favorable as believed
pos- they were premenstrual or inter-
sible" (Mussen, Conger, & Kagan 1974, p.
menstrual even though they were all tested at
about a week prior to menstruation (Ruble
520). Yet there is surprisingly little research
concerning young adolescent girls' experi- 1977). This combination of findings suggests
ences of menstruation, particularly around that
the our culture has strong beliefs about
time of menarche.
menstrual symptomatology, many of which
Menarche may be perceived, on theare negative. Such beliefs, if incorporated by
one
young adolescents, could shape their own ex-
hand, as "a symbol of sexual maturity" (Con-
perience in conformity with the cultural view,
ger 1973, p. 111), an apparently positive view.
In marked contrast, however, a study of as a kind of self-fulfilling prophecy (Rosenthal
edu-
cational materials concluded that the main & Jacobson 1968).
message conveyed to adolescent girls is that As a first step toward greater understand-
menstruation is a hygienic crisis (Whisnant, ing of the effects of menarche on adolescents,
Brett, & Zegans 1975). Furthermore, research the present study sought to determine to what
with adults suggests thatmenstruation is often extent pre- and postmenarcheal girls are
associated with a variety of negative events, aware of the cultural views of menstrual
such as physical discomfort and moodiness. women and whether they incorporate any as-
These associations have been observed not pects of these beliefs into their own
only when women rate their own cycles (e.g., "menstrual self-concept." As in Parlee (1974),
Moos 1968; Wilcoxon, Schrader, & Sherif boys were included in the sample as a "con-
Preparation of this paper was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation,
NSF-76 02137. The paper is based on a senior thesis submitted to Princeton University by the
first author. Some of the findings were presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for
Research in Child Development, New Orleans, March 1977. The authors are grateful to Jeanne
Brooks for helpful comments on an earlier draft. Requests for reprints should be sent to Diane N.
Ruble, Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.
[Child Development, 1978, 49, 231-234. @ 1978 by the Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.
0009-3920/78/4901-0031$00.75]
This content downloaded from 200.37.4.239 on Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:59:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
232 Child Development
trol" group to help interpret differences be- The analyses of symptom expectations for
tween the two samples of girls. "girls in general" were performed on the
The subjects were 18 postmenarcheal eight symptom scales given by Moos (1968)
and on one individual item, "change in eating
girls (mean age 12-11), 18 premenarcheal girls
habits."2 The scores cluster in the 2-5 range,
(mean age 12-5), and 18 boys (mean age 12-
with the majority of responses being "a little
10). All were in the sixth to eighth grades of
four junior high schools in a white, middle- to
bit" (2-3). A 3 x 2 repeated measures ANOVA
upper-class area. Subjects were recruited via (group x phase) showed that all groups rated
girls' experience of symptoms significantly (p
advertisements in two local newspapers, and
parents' consent was obtained. < .001) higher in the menstrual phase than in
the intermenstrual phase, for all variables ex-
The subjects individually completed a cept Arousal, which was higher for the inter-
questionnaire assessing general attitudes to- menstrual phase. Similar to previous research
ward menstruation, expected symptoms, per- (e.g., Moos 1968; Parlee 1974), the largest
ceived effects on moods and activities, and phase differences were for Pain, Behavioral
possible sources of information. First, all Change, and Negative Affect. A main effect of
three groups of adolescents completed the group was found for only two of the scales,
Moos (1968) Menstrual Distress Question- Behavioral Change and Pain (p < .05). These
naire (MDQ) according to what they think group effects were not in a consistent direc-
"girls in general" experience during the tion and are not very meaningful, since the
menstrual phase and during the inter- interaction with phase, necessary to indicate
menstrual phase.' The order of presenting the differences in perceived changes over the cy-
two scales was counterbalanced across sub- cle, did not emerge.
jects. Then, girls only completed the MDQ a
Factor analyses were performed on the
third time, according to what they themselves
ratings of the effects of menstruation on ac-
experience (postmenarcheal) or expect to ex-
tivities and moods and on general attitudes,
perience (premenarcheal) during the
menstrual phase. Next, all subjects were resulting in three "effects" factors and two
"attitudes" factors.3 Overall, the effect of
asked to rate, from 1 (very negatively) to 6
(very positively), the effect of having the first
menstruation was seen as being either neutral
or second day of a menstrual period on 21 (49%) or negative (42%). One-way ANOVAs
performed on the three factor scores revealed
items representing "a girl's" moods and par-
ticipation or performance in several activities. that boys and postmenarcheal girls considered
Then, girls only were asked to indicate on a menstruation to have more of a negative effect
on the Moods and Schoolwork scales than did
six-point scale how much they agree (1) or
disagree (6) with 13 statements representing a premenarcheal girls, F(2,51) = 4.16, p < .05,
range of positive and negative attitudes to- and F(2,51) = 6.12,p < .01, respectively.
ward menstruation. Finally, all subjects rated The girls' responses to the attitude items
on a four-point scale (from "nothing" to "a seemed to indicate an ambivalent or mixed
lot") how much they have learned about reaction to menstruation. Neither group is
menstruation from each of 14 possible very comfortable talking about it, especially to
sources. All subjects completed the question- males; and over 50% of both groups indicated
naire in 30-40 min and received $2.00 for par- that they were worried someone would know
ticipation. they were having their periods. In contrast, ap-
1Ratings for the premenstrual phase were not included, since the questionnaire was quite
long and the girls were already rating the MDQ symptoms three times.
2Scale scores were computed by adding a subject's responses to each of the items in a scale
and dividing by the number of completed items. In Moos's (1968) and Parlee's (1974) work, scale
scores were computed by simply adding the responses to the items in each scale. Since average
scores are more easily interpretable in terms of the 1-6 scale, and since using sums of ratings
rather than averages would provide misleading comparisons whenever an item was uncompleted,
the present choice of scoring seems appropriate for our purpose.
3A varimax rotation procedure was used, and an eigenvalue > 1.5 was the cutoff criterion.
The three "effects" factors were (a) Activities (e.g., performance in sports; going out on a date), (b)
Moods (e.g., how easily a girl gets tired; getting along with family), and (c) Schoolwork (e.g., how
well a girl does on exams and homework). The two "attitudes" factors were (a) Comfort in Talking
(e.g., "I am comfortable talking about menstruation with my father), and (b) General Dislike (e.g.,
"Menstruation is something I would prefer not to have").
This content downloaded from 200.37.4.239 on Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:59:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Clarke and Ruble 233
This content downloaded from 200.37.4.239 on Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:59:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
234 Child Development
In conclusion, these results suggest that velopment and personality. New York: Harper
physiological explanations of "menstrual dis- & Row, 1974.
tress" may be overemphasized. Specific as-Parlee, M. B. Stereotypic beliefs about menstrua-
pects of the role of socialization processes in tion: a methodological note on the Moos
the menstrual experience, such as the nature Menstrual Distress questionnaire and some
and timing of information received from new data. Psychosomatic Medicine, 1974, 36,
others, must be carefully considered in future 229-240.
research. Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. Pygmalion in the
classroom: teacher expectations and pupils' in-
tellectual development. New York: Holt,
References Rinehart & Winston, 1968.
Ruble, D. N. Premenstrual symptoms: a re-
interpretation. Science, 1977, 197, 291-292.
Brooks, J.; Ruble, D.; & Clarke, A. College women's
attitudes and expectations concerning Sherman, J. A. On the psychology of women.
menstrual-related changes. Psychosomatic Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1971.
Medicine, 1977, 39, 288-298. Whisnant, L.; Brett, E.; & Zegans, L. Implicit mes-
Conger, J. S. Adolescence and youth: psychological sages concerning menstruation in commercial
development in a changing world. New York: educational materials prepared for young ado-
Harper & Row, 1973. lescent girls. American Journal of Psychiatry,
Ernster, V. L. American menstrual expressions. Sex 1975, 132, 815-820.
Roles: A Journal of Research, 1975, 1, 3-13. Wilcoxon, L. H.; Schrader, S. L.; & Sherif, C. W.
Moos, R. H. The development of the menstrual dis- Daily self-reports on activities, life events,
tress questionnaire. Psychosomatic Medicine, moods, and somatic changes during the
1968, 30, 853-867. menstrual cycle. Psychosomatic Medicine,
Mussen, P. H.; Conger, J. J.; & Kagan, J. Child de- 1976, 38, 399-417.
This content downloaded from 200.37.4.239 on Thu, 06 Apr 2017 22:59:43 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms