Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Competency 4 Curriculum Instruction Supervision - Completed
Competency 4 Curriculum Instruction Supervision - Completed
Competency 4 Curriculum Instruction Supervision - Completed
Narrative of Competency:
The to-be evaluated teacher was called into Mr. Zuehlke’s office for the pre-
observation meeting a couple of days prior to the actual observation. I was in
attendance to observe, take notes, and maybe even have input into the process. I
have been in the art teacher’s shoes many times myself and know how nervous you
can get. I could tell that the teacher was very nervous as one of his answers to a
question about what he wants to get out of this observation was ‘to keep his job”. I
found this to be kind of disturbing because he was actually commenting seriously.
As our administrator kind of smiled, I reassured the teacher to take a deep breath
and that everything would be just fine. I knew this teacher and he had his stuff
together having been an art teacher in the elementary schools, as well as in the
middle school, and now the high school. The teacher described to us what his
lesson was about and what he would be shooting for as a result. There were some
specific questions that Dave asked of the art teacher. He was basically reading the
questions from a piece of paper like a script. These must be questions that he asks
of all of the teachers. As Dave asked the questions the art teacher gave his answers.
Questions such as “How will you engage the students in learning?” and “What will
be examples of higher level thinking?” “What do you want feedback on - any
specific items?” “What do you think your strengths are?” “Do you have any
questions for me?” “Will I still have a job?” was the teachers reply.
Dave stated that he would be sitting among the students blending in with his
laptop keying away on what he is observing. I would be off to the side or in back at
an unoccupied workstation. There were no further comments or questions from
either Mr. Zuehlke or the teacher, so I took the opportunity to ask a few questions.
I asked the teacher why he is so nervous about this and just like myself in the past
it was due to the job on the line scenario. This was my inclination, but wanted him
to say it out loud for Mr. Zuehlke to hear. I reassured him that Mr. Zuehlke was a
fair and honest man and that would not be the case. I also asked Mr. Zuehlke if
those were questions that he asked everybody and his reply was yes. “It’s easier for
me to just have them written and I read them.” I thought this was kind of
impersonal for something that was very personal.
Reflection:
As a first time evaluator, I found it very difficult to know what I was looking
for on the evaluation tool itself. I was initially overwhelmed trying to keep up
because I had never used this tool before in this manner. During the observation, I
found myself trying to find areas that the teacher should consider for future
growth. I found a few things and made my suggestions in the post-observation
meeting. I realized that teachers are willing to take advice when it is presented in a
way that shows you want them to succeed; this is the importance of a professional
relationship. Although I do have a personal relationship with this teacher, I found
that I could keep it strictly on a professional level during this process. Our district
model is lacking in the area of useful feedback for positive growth of its teachers.
This has to be done in the notes or a separate document. Lastly, I found the process
of evaluation to be very time consuming. To be efficient doing
observations/evaluations, I would have to become quite familiar with the tool
through experience and/or training before I attempted another.
ARTIFACTS: