Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How To Detect Lies
How To Detect Lies
• Liars sometimes avoid "lying" by not making direct statements. They imply
answers instead of denying something directly.
• The guilty person may speak more than natural, adding unnecessary details to convince you... they are not
comfortable with silence or pauses in the conversation.
• A liar may leave out pronouns and speak in a monotonous tone. When a truthful statement is made the
pronoun is emphasized as much or more than the rest of the words in a statement.
• Words may be garbled and spoken softly, and syntax and grammar may be off. In other
words, his sentences will likely be muddled rather than emphasized.
• The use of distancing language.
Also see our article on Statement Analysis for a more in-depth look at word analysis techniques used by
interrogators.
Other signs of a lie:
• If you believe someone is lying, then change subject of a conversation quickly, a liar follows along willingly
and becomes more relaxed. The guilty wants the subject changed; an innocent person may be confused by the
sudden change in topics and will want to back to the previous subject.
• Using humor or sarcasm to avoid a subject.
Final Notes:
Obviously, just because someone exhibits one or more of these signs does not make them a liar. The above
behaviors should be compared to a persons base (normal) behavior whenever possible.
Most lie detecting experts agree that a combination of body language and other cues must be used to make
an educated guess on whether someone is telling the truth or a lie.
The Statement Analysis techniques are very accurate because they are based on the English language
specifically word definitions and the rules of grammar. For example, when a person states, “I am trying to be
honest” he is telling us he is not being honest. The word “tried” means he is only attempting to be truthful.
When a rape victim uses the pronoun “we” in her statement she is revealing she is being deceptive. The
pronoun “we” not only shows plurality but it also means a partnership was formed. We would not expect a
rape victim to partner up with her attacker. When a person uses phrases such as “later on” or “afterwards” he
has withheld some information by skipping over something in his story.
An example of utilizing the rules of grammar would be to analyze the verb tenses in a statement. When a
person is telling us what happened, he is required to speak in the past tense. Therefore, if present tense
language appears in his statement, this is a sign he is making up the story. Consider the following statement:
“I was sitting in my car when a man opened my door,
pointed a gun at me and tells me to get out.”
While the person starts out using past tense language, he switches to present tense language with the word
“tells.” The present tense language is an indication he is not drawing his story from memory.
Another example of using the rules of grammar to detect deception is how a person uses articles within his
statement. When we introduce someone or something that is unknown, we are required to use the indefinite
articles “a” or “an.” Once the introduction has been made, we then use the definite article “the.” We see this
in the following statement:
“A man approached me and pointed a gun at me.
He stuck the gun in my ribs and forced me into the car.”
In the first sentence, the victim properly refers to the attacker and the weapon as “a man”
and “a gun.” Having identified the gun, he then correctly refers to it as “the gun” in the second sentence. A
problem arises when he refers to the vehicle as “the car.” Since this is the first time he mentions the vehicle,
he should have called it “a car.” Using the article “the” tells us the victim either recognized the car or he is
making up the story.
Many times the truth goes unnoticed because people like to interpret what a person has said. However, you
should never interpret. First, one cannot read someone else’s mind. Secondly, people mean exactly what they
are saying.
We see a good example of this with O.J. Simpson’s so called suicide letter. This was the letter that was
discovered when Simpson failed to turn himself into the police. The letter starts out saying, “First everyone
understand, I had nothing to do with Nicole’s murder.” That is how you heard it read on television. That is how
you saw it printed in the newspapers and magazines. The problem is that is not what Simpson wrote. In his
letter, he crossed out the words “I had.” His letter actually reads, “First everyone understand, nothing to do
with Nicole’s murder.”
He took himself out of the denial.
So, why do most people include the words “I had?” Most likely because they believe this is what Simpson
meant. However, people mean exactly what they say or in this case write. Simpson meant to cross out those
words.
By using the Statement Analysis techniques, you can determine exactly what people are telling you. This
allows you to obtain additional information that sometimes goes unnoticed. These techniques will also show
you if they are lying or telling the truth.
http://www.statementanalysis.com/onlinetraining/
The word “never” is often used by deceptive people when making a denial. This is because people do not want
to lie. Therefore, they will choose the easiest form of deception. It is easier for a person to be dishonest using
the word “never” as opposed to directly telling a lie by saying “I didn’t do it.” For example, if a person was
asked if he took the money he may state, “I would never do that.” In addition to recognizing the use the word
“never,” we also see the person did not deny the action. He did not say he did not take the money. He only
stated this is something he would in no way do.
The word “never” means “not ever.” If a person was asked if he “ever” cheated on his taxes, it would be
appropriate for him to respond, “I have never cheated on my taxes.” The use of the word “never” would be
correct since he was asked if he “ever” defrauded the government. He is replying that he has “not ever”
cheated.
The word “never” does not mean “no.” Therefore, you cannot substitute the word “never” for the word “no”
which is something deceptive people like to do. Consider the following question and answer:
Because the word “never” is a negative word, it sometimes fools the interviewer into believing the subject has
answered the question and denied the accusation. This question requires a “yes” or “no” answer. The subject
chose to answer the question using the word “never” instead of using the word “no.” This shows us the
subject is most likely being deceptive. Although he gave an answer, he did not answer the specific question.
He did not state, “No, I did not sell him drugs.”
We see a similar use of the word “never” with former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. In March of 2006,
she was asked about the possibility of her running for President.
Rice used the word “never” as a substitute for the word “no.” She is not necessarily being deceptive but is
giving a good political answer. If she were to have said “no,” that would probably end any Presidential dreams
she may have had. If she would have answered the question with a “yes,” that would have caused a firestorm
amongst the press. So, she chose to remain in the middle of the road. She gave an answer that sounded like
she was saying “no” but in reality she did not say “no.” Her answer tells us that part of her wanted to run for
President.
John Connolly is a former FBI agent who in the 1970s developed Boston Irish mobster James “Whitey” Bulger
into an informant. Bulger was a valuable asset in helping the FBI dismantle the Italian Mafia in the Boston
area. Connolly retired from the FBI in 1990. With Connolly gone, the FBI stopped using Bulger as an informant
and instead turned their attention to his illegal activities. Their investigation uncovered that over the years
Connolly had accepted bribes from Bulger and falsified reports about Bulger. In 1999, Connolly was indicted
on these charges. That same year, Dateline NBC profiled John Connolly’s case. Correspondent Dennis Murphy
asked Connolly the following questions:
In the first answer, Connolly states that “anyone” in his business knows not to cross that line. The problem is
he did not tell us that he did not cross that line. In his second answer, Connolly clearly uses the word “never”
as a substitute for the word “no.” In 2002, Connolly was convicted of racketeering, obstruction of justice and
lying to an FBI agent. He was sentenced to 10 years in prison.
The use of the word “never” does not automatically mean a person is being deceptive. There are correct ways
one can use the word. For example, I can state, “I have never been skydiving” because it is a truthful
statement. However, if a person uses the word “never” as a substitute for the word “no,” it is a strong
indication the person is withholding information and possibly being deceptive.
When people use the word “actually” they are comparing two thoughts. Take a look at the following question
and answer:
In this example, it is easy to see why the subject used the word “actually.” The interviewer suggested that
perhaps the subject bought a new car. The subject answered that he did not buy a new car but bought a new
truck. He was comparing “car” with “truck.”
When the interviewer has not proffered anything and the subject uses the word “actually” we then have some
undisclosed information. I once asked a friend the following question:
By using the word “actually,” my friend was comparing going to the party with something else. Since I didn’t
suggest anything she may have done, this meant she was thinking about something else that she did or
wanted to do. Upon hearing the word “actually,” I asked her what she wanted to do. She told me that she
wanted to go shopping but then she remembered she had a birthday party to attend. Because she was
thinking about going shopping, it caused her to unknowingly use the word “actually.”
In Statement Analysis, the shortest sentence is the best sentence. Extra words give us extra information. “I
went to a birthday party” is a good answer. “Actually, I went to a birthday party” means something else was
going on. If a burglary suspect uses the word “actually” in his alibi, the police should take a closer look at him.
The word “actually” tells us he probably was not at the movies but was doing something else. He knows he
committed the crime but he wants to lie and say he was at the movies. Because he is thinking about these two
thoughts it causes him to use the word “actually.”
We find the word “actually” in a statement given by Casey Anthony who is currently on trial for the murder of
her daughter Caylee. On July 15, 2008, Cindy Anthony, Casey's mother, called 911 to report that her
granddaughter, Caylee, was missing. While on the phone, the 911 operator asked to speak to Casey.
In stating that she talked to her daughter on the phone, Casey tells the 911 operator, “I actually received a
phone call today.” By using the word “actually,” Casey is comparing receiving a phone call with what? Not
receiving a phone call? There is no reason to use the word “actually” unless she is thinking about something
else. She uses this word to make her statement sound believable but instead it indicates she is being
deceptive. When we look at the rest of her statement we see she states she knows who has Caylee but she
does not give the 911 operator the name of this person. She says that she received a phone call but does not
say who called her. The number that called her is disconnected the very same day.
At her trial, her attorney stated that Caylee accidentally drowned in the family pool. This means Casey was
lying when she said she received a phone call in which she spoke to her daughter. Anyone who was listening to
what she was saying almost three years ago would have known she was lying.
Listen for the word “actually.” Most of the time you will be able to see what the person is comparing; “Is you
car blue?” “Actually, it is red.” When you cannot see the comparison, you then have some undisclosed
information. You may want to find out what information the person is withholding.
Crows Feet
Happiness. We all know that when someone smiles they are happy. But it isn't to difficult to "fake" being
happy. This can occur when someone is saying something you don't agree with or don't like and you pretend
to think its funny or good. There are numerous other cases when someone will pretend to be happy. Other
times, someone may flash a sign of being happy when they shouldn't be. This will often be the case when
someone is proud of something they are being scolded or reprimanded for. Often times when a serial killer is
asked about their crimes in jail, they will flash a quick microexpression for happiness because they are proud
of what they've done.
The key attribute of happiness is, yes, the smile. But is isn't just any smile. In true happiness you will see the
corners of the lips turn up and the cheeks will raise slightly. But the tell tale sign of true happiness are the
crow's-feet that appear at the corners of the eyes. If you don't see movement from the muscles around the
eyes or crows-feet, the smile is a fake.
o 3
Sadness
Sadness. Most of us can tell when someone is feeling a bit blue. But there are times when it's very important
to know someone is truly sad, even if they swear up and down they are fine. Many people who really want to
end their lives will appear very happy just before letting go. But you can always catch that hint of sorrow
behind their front. On a happier note, many people will pretend to be happy when they are not because they
don't want to bring others down. They really want to talk to someone about it, but will never admit it, being
able to spot their sadness can be a helpful hint that they could use a good conversation.
In sadness the upper eyelids and outer edges of eyebrows will droop. The subject will appear to have very
little focus in their eyes. Also, the corners of the lips will be pulled slightly down.
o 4
Anger
Anger. Anger is usually pretty easy to spot. But sometimes there lies anger hidden beneath the surface and it
good to be able to spot this incase someone is about ready to snap.
Anger's microexpression consists of the lips being narrowed and pressed together tightly. You will also see the
eyebrows slanted down and towards the nose. And perhaps the most revealing characteristic of anger; glaring.
The subjects eyes will glare intensely.
o 5
Contempt
Contempt. Contempt is my favorite microexpression, and coincidentally it's the easiest to spot. Interestingly, it
is the only microexpression that is unilateral, that is, the only one that is biased to one side of the face. All
other microexpressions are equally distributed across the face about a vertical center-line.
The dead giveaway to contempt is the raising of one side of the lips. It can be very subtle and even look like
just a twitch. Occasionally the lip raise is paired with the head tilting back slightly so that the subject can look
down slightly at the focus of their contempt.
o 6
Disgust
Disgust. This is another one of those indicators that someone does not like what you are talking about, or very
much disagrees with something you have done or believe. Also, if you have secretly passed a bit of gas, it is a
good indicator that someone knows you have as it seems to be a instinctual response that Darwin suggested
closes off the nasal passages.
Disgust is characterized by the upper lip being raised generally exposing the teeth. This will be coupled with a
wrinkling of the nose.
o 7
Fear
Fear. Fear is feeling we all know. Wether someone makes us uneasy, we are in a situation we don't like, or we
are watching a scary movie, we show the expression for fear.
In fear you will see the lips stretched horizontally towards the ears. The lower eyelids will be tensed and the
upper eyelids will be raised. You will also notice the eyebrows being raised and pushed together.
o 8
Surprise
Surprise. This is a very important micro-expression. It can be used to help in the lie detection process. If you
accuse someone of something, and they seem surprised, it could be the that your accusation is incorrect.
However, it is easy to fake surprise, but what people don't know is that faked surprise is easily recognizable.
Surprise can be spotted by widened eyes and raised eyebrows. Also the mouth will open a little bit.
Note that in a true expression of surprise the eyebrows will be raised for less than a second. So if someone is
acting surprised, but leaves their eyebrows lifted for more than a second, they are lying, no questions asked.
o 9
Learning micro-expressions. Learning micro-expressions can take time. But, one of the best ways to learn
them is to just read and read. Pictures and videos are also a great tool. Fox has a TV show called Lie To Me,
most people think it is just TV, but I did a bit of research and the show is based of a real person named Dr.
Eckman who was the pioneer researcher in microexpressions. The information in the show is true and they
have a scientific adviser that helps them stay true to the facts. I've noticed that watching it has greatly
improved my ability to spot microexpressions.
One of the things you will hear over and over again from people who train in microexpression detection is to
learn to make the faces yourself. Find pictures of the expressions, and then get in front of your mirror and
mimmic them. The muscle memory of the expressions will your brain recognize them.
There are a few tests that I've found helpful in testing the effectiveness of my training. Also, the tests can be
used as a training tool by learning from your mistakes. You can find a practice test created by Dr. Eckman
himself at www.mettonline.com. I will post this in the related links section. Another one that is a little more
fun and focuses more on lying are the Lightman Tests on Fox's Lie to Me website. I will post this link as a
related link as well.
The last training tip I can offer is to not be afraid to practice. When you are practicing, make sure its with
someone you know well and who won't get mad at you. Also, it might be a good idea to ask them if you can
use them as practice. Don't sit down and have a "practice session", instead inform them you plan to use them
as a test subject at random, and then sometime later, when you spot a micro expression ask them if you are
correct. Until you are very comfortable with your abilities you should probably not use the micro expression
detection in any arguments or accusations.
Also, please note that Test 1 of the Lightman tests is pretty much useless, its just a quiz about lying statistics.
Test 2 is the best.
I hope this information has been helpful to you. Once you learn it, its not something you can make go away so
be careful, it's not always a blessing; you may learn things you didn't want to know. Use this information
responsibly.
Read more: How to Detect Micro Expressions | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/how_5311172_detect-micro-
expressions.html#ixzz1lh180x00
Liar!
Liars reveal themselves in many ways, whether in personal relationships or in the workplace. Unconscious
communication patterns and body gestures can go against a habitual liar once they are detected. Getting
familiar with common body language signs of deceptive people can help you find that sometimes there's more
than meets the eye.
Related Searches:
Pimsleur Approach Tagalog
Body Language
Difficulty:
Moderate
Instructions
1.
o 1
Generally people who are lying will not look you in the eye, although very practiced liars may be able to tell
lies and do it with eye contact.
o 2
People who are lying may appear to be very stiff and still, with little to no animation.
o 3
When someone tells a lie, it may raise his blood pressure and cause him to become red in the face, neck or
chest.
o 4
The liar will often withdraw himself physically, crossing his arms or legs to hold himself in, or hiding his hands
under the desk or in his pockets.
o 5
Liars will usually touch their face or neck when fibbing.
o 6
Liars might fake an emotion like happiness or sadness. The expression may be limited to their mouth, but will
not reach their eyes.
o 7
Look for twitches. When someone is lying they may have a physiological reaction such as an eye, lip or cheek
twitch. Other physiological reactions include sweating or fidgeting.
Microsigns are not usually this obvious - but they're there. Pay attention.
Don't be fooled by the stereotypes. Not all liars blink, dart their eyes away from you, rub their noses, or shift
uncomfortably.
In fact, practiced liars DON'T. They'll give you a good, firm, look in the eye.
To get to know whether people are lying, pay attention to their mannerisms. Start now. Is this a person who
USUALLY rubs their nose, shifts uncomfortably, or darts their eyes? If so, when they are lying to you, they may
not. Pay attention to DIFFERENT behavior.
What you will be looking for, in general, are what psychologists call "microsigns." They last less than a second,
but they indicate "inappropriate emotions."
Giveaways - very, very slight - that the person is telling one thing, but feeling another.
o 3
Only less than 15 of almost 20,000 people studied have a natural ability to detect these signals, and they
aren't all law enforcement officials. Look for a shrug in the middle of a positive statement, for instance, or a
sigh. Although some people are naturally good at it, with practice, this technique can be learned.
o 4
Liars who are telling you WAY more than you need to hear about their excuses are probably not
believable.
Some things to look for in a liar include either a lack of specific detail in a story or too much detail. Consider
the circumstances. For instance, often a liar has to make up a story on the spot. In that case, to ferret out the
lie, casually get the liar to repeat the story by asking questions. Details will muddy or be inconsistent. In the
case of too many specifics, this will be obvious, because the liar will be talking way too much.
o 5
Watch carefully for signs that you are being lied to.
You may suspect someone is lying, but it's hard to know for sure. If you think you are being worked over, there
are a few telltale ways to tell if someone isn't being entirely truthful. Check for all the signs before you try to
bust them in a lie. Of course, sometimes listening to your gut instincts is enough to tell you something isn't
right, so never discount your own intuition when confronting a liar.
Related Searches:
Pimsleur Greek Lesson
Pimsleur Korean Review
Difficulty:
Moderately Easy
Instructions
1.
o 1
Look into his eyes. A liar can't maintain direct eye contact for long while telling a blatant lie. He may shift his
gaze away from you or even look at the floor.
o 2
Listen to her speech. Sometimes when someone is lying, their voice changes tone or pitch and her words may
even seem different or unusual from her normal speech or phrases.
o 3
Watch for storytelling. If he is lying and you ask him questions he doesn't know the answers to, it may take
him a second to formulate a story to tell you. This pause could be the sign he is lying. Also, liars generally don't
provide much detail so pressing for some extras to the story may cause a slip up.
o 4
See if she is stressed out. Sweating, pacing, blinking excessively, lifting shoulders up and down and fidgeting
are all common responses to being confronted with a lie. Someone that can't stand or sit still without acting
nervous is probably not telling the truth.
o 5
Watch for signs of anger. If she is telling the truth she may be impatient with you, but not angry. Liars will keep
insisting they are telling the truth and even begin to get mad when you don't believe them. This isn't a good
sign at all.
Read more: How to Spot a Lie in Five Simple Steps | eHow.com http://www.ehow.com/how_2100892_spot-
lie-five-simple-steps.html#ixzz1lh1wYFld
Psychology BA in Israel - Study in English. Scholarships Available! Enter for More Details - www.RRIS.IDC.ac.il/Psychology
The Mini-MBA Programme - The 12 module Mini-MBA on-line learning course for £1050 - www.falconburyonline.com
Reading the face of a person who is trying to conceal fear or other emotions is a tricky business, according to a new
Northwestern University study of electrical activity in the brain.
Though such 'microexpressions' as a brief flash of fear are unlikely to be consciously noticed, they still get picked up by
the brain and make their way through the visual system. The effect can alter perception and the way other people are
treated or judged, the study concludes.
"Even though our study subjects were not aware that they were viewing subliminal emotional expressions, their brain
activity was altered within 200 milliseconds," said Ken Paller, co-investigator of the study and professor of psychology in
the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences at Northwestern. "As a result, the ratings of facial expressions they did see
were biased."
In other words, sometimes when it seems like you are acting on the vagaries of instinct, your brain is actually responding
to real information about others that bubbles just beneath your consciousness.
The study included tests to determine whether study volunteers had a tendency to experience anxiety, particularly in
social situations. Those who tended to be socially anxious had the strongest brain response to subliminal expressions of
fear.
"The findings have direct implications for understanding psychiatric disorders such as phobia, obsessive-compulsive
disorder and generalized anxiety disorder," said Wen Li, lead author of the study and postdoctoral fellow at
Northwestern's Feinberg School of Medicine.
"Neural and Behavioral Evidence for Affective Priming from Unconsciously Perceived Emotional Facial Expressions and
the Influence of Trait Anxiety," will be published in an upcoming issue of the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Besides
Li and Paller, the study's co-authors include Stephan Boehm, currently at the University of Wales at Bangor, and Richard
Zinbarg, associate professor of psychology at Northwestern.
The study utilized neuroelectrical activity recorded from 64 EEG electrodes placed on the scalps of the volunteers to
monitor their brains' analyses of sensory input. Volunteers evaluated 70 different surprise faces. Half of the faces were
primed by fearful expressions and half by happy expressions. The prime faces -- with happy or fearful expressions --
were shown for 30 milliseconds immediately prior to each surprise face.
The expressions of surprise could be interpreted as positive (the sudden arrival of a friend) or as negative (a sudden
violent act). Each was rated as 'extremely positive,' 'moderately positive,' 'mildly positive,' 'mildly negative,' 'moderatel y
negative' or 'extremely negative.'
The volunteers rated the surprise faces primed by fear more negatively on average than those primed by happiness.
Results of the study revealed that the visual system differentially processed the fearful and happy faces, even though
this processing did not lead to conscious experiences.
"Environmental events that signal danger, such as someone's facial expression of fear, may be preferentially detected so
as to alert the individual to make an appropriate response," Paller said.
Yet participants only noticed the surprise faces. When asked about the stimuli, volunteers were surprised to learn that
prime faces with other expressions briefly appeared prior to the surprise faces.
"Our results show that an unconsciously perceived signal of threat, such as a brief facial expression of fear, can still
bubble up and unwittingly influence social judgments and how we act," said Li.
Those with a more anxious personality exhibited more biased negative evaluations of fear-primed surprise faces and
also greater brain-wave indications of threat processing. Greater brain responses to threat in those prone to anxiety may
thus lead to larger influences on social evaluation.
"Although people can do their best to avoid situations that they perceive as threatening, their brains may still be highly
attuned to subtle environmental signals of threat," Paller said. "A heightened sensitivity to subliminal threat may thus
cause excessive anxiety."
Microexpressions that people make may differ from voluntary expressions of emotion. But in either case, fear can be
signaled by contraction of muscles that raise the inner brow, the outer brow, the upper lid, plus stretching the lips,
parting the lips and dropping the jaw.
"The ability to detect microexpressions may allow an observer to be more empathetic and sense someone's true
intentions or motivation," said Paller. "Valuable as this ability may be, when someone is paying you a compliment it is
sometimes better to take it at face value rather than read more into it."
When asked a question a "normally organized" right-handed person looks (from your viewpoint, looking at
them):
To the Left
Indicates: Auditory Constructed (Ac)
If you asked someone to "Try and create the highest the sound of the pitch possible in
your head", this would be the direction their eyes moved in while thinking about the
question as they "Auditorily Constructed" this this sound that they have never heard of.
To the Right
Indicates: Auditory Remembered (Ar)
If you asked someone to "Remember what their mother's voice sounds like ", this would be
the direction their eyes moved in while thinking about the question as they "Auditorily
Remembered " this sound.
Down and to the Left
Indicates: Feeling / Kinesthetic (F)
If you asked someone to "Can you remember the smell of a campfire? ", this would be
the direction their eyes moved in while thinking about the question as they used
recalled a smell, feeling, or taste.
Raised lip corners and crinkled eyelids indicate that the person’s happy. Look for crow’s feet to indicate
whether a smile is genuine or not. True smiling, like all expressions, involve muscles beyond our control, so a
trained eye can tell the real from the fake simply by noting whether the muscles surrounding the eye socket
are in use.
Fear is often characterized by parted lips, wide-open eyes, and raised eyebrows that bunch together.
However, thinly-stretched lips on a closed mouth can also mean someone is nervous or scared about
something.
Anger’s not too hard to recognize—furrowed eyebrows, a frowning mouth, chin jutting out, and narrowed
eyes all suggest that the person’s mad.
Sad people also have downturned mouths, but also a wrinkled, wavering chin (think of what happens to it
when you’re trying not to cry), and a wrinkled, creased forehead.
Did you detect a slight sneer or did the side of his or her mouth raise a little? That could mean he or she’s
feeling contempt.
Surprise looks similar to fear, but the mouth and eyes are open a little wider and the eyebrows are raised
without being bunched up.