SOODS SOLS AND DELIVERED.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF MUNSIF AT TIRUCHIRAPPALI

O.S.No. 211/2016

Sudhashu,

Manager,

Apple Showrooms, Trichy- 620 009…………………………………………………….Plaintiff

Vs.

Shreya………………………………………………………………………………..Defendant

PLAINT FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 1 OF CPC FOR GOODS SOLD AND
DELIVERED

The Plaintiff above named submits as follows:

1. The Plaintiff Mr. Sudhanshu, Manager of Apple Showrooms, HN Cross, Thillai

Nagar, Trichy- 620 009 is the Son of Mr. Raghavan, Hindu, aged about 23 years and
residing at No. 13H1/95, HN Cross, Thillai Nagar, Trichy- 620 009.
2. The Address of the Plaintiff for service of all Notices and other processes from this
Court of Law is that of his Advocate Mr. Akash, B.A.B.L, having his office at No.
111, HN Cross, Thillai Nagar, Trichy- 620 009.
3. The Defendant Ms.Shreya D/o Mr. Krishna, Hindu, aged about 25 years residing at
No. 100, Ganapathy Street, Karumandapam, Trichy- 620 009, which is also the
address for service of all summons and other notices from this Court of Law.
4. The Plaintiff, therefore, states that the defendant is liable to him for the amount of Rs.
34,000/- (Rupees Thirty four Thousand Only) which he has defaulted in paying after
buying the Mobile phone of the brand Apple from the plaintiff on 15/04/2015.

Allegations/Averments stated in Paragraphs 1 to 16

17. The Plaintiff states that the cause of action for this suit arose at Karumandapam on
01/05/2015 when the Defendant had defaulted in paying the amount due on the
 month; on the day the good was bought the first instalment of Rs. 12,000/- (Rupees
Twelve thousand only) was paid by the defendant out of the total consideration of Rs.
70, 000/- (Rupees seventy thousand only); the good was delivered to the plaintiff on
15/04/2015 itself; on 15/08/2016the defendant had also defaulted in paying the fourth
and fifth installments amounting to Rs. 34, 000/- (Rupees thirty four thousand only);
on 14/01/2017 when the Plaintiff had sent an Advocate’s Notice to the Defendant, on
the Defendant has acknowledged the receipt of the Advocate’s Notice and
subsequently.
18. The Plaintiff states that this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to try the suit as the whole
cause of action arose at Thillai Nagar and values the suit at Rs. 34, 000/- (Rupees
thirty four thousand only) and pays thereon a Court Fee of Rs. 1492 (Rupees
Thousand four hundred and ninety two only) as per Section 7 of The Tamil Nadu
Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act.
19. The Plaintiff therefore prays for a Judgment and Decree against the Defendant
i. in the sum of Rs. 34, 000/- (Rupees thirty four thousand only), being the principal
and interest amount due from the date of default till the date of filing this suit;
ii. for further interest at the rate of 10% from the date of filing the suit till the date of
passing of the decree;
iii. for further interest from the date of decree and till the date of realization of the full
amount;
iv. for Costs of the suit and
v. for such other reliefs which the Plaintiff is entitled and which this Court deems to
be fit and proper in the interest of justice.

VERIFICATION

I, R. Ram, the Plaintiff above named, do hereby verify and state that the
allegations/averments set out in Paras 1 to 16 are based on knowledge, what has been stated
in Para 17 is based on information and what has been stated in Para 18 is based on belief and
that the same is true.

Dated at Trichy this, 9th day of May 2017

(Sd.)xxxxxxxx
 Plaintiff

VALUATION
1. Valuation for the purpose of jurisdiction and Court Fees
for relief (a)Principal amount 70000
Interest from 15-04-2015 to 15-08-2015 0
Total 70,000

2. Court Fees thereon under Section 22, read with Schedule I, 500
Article 1 of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 500
Court Fees paid under Section 4A of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits Valuation

Dated at Trichy this 24th day of April 2018.

SUITS AGAINST COMMON CARRIER.

SUIT FOR COMPENSATION AGAINST COMMON CARRIER

IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT MUNSIFF AT CHENNAI

O.S.No.293/2017

Mahesh………………………………………………………………………....Plaintiff

Vs.

Praksah roadline service (P) Ltd…………………………………………………………Defendant

PLAINT FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 1 OF CPC FOR COMPENSATION AGAINST COMMON CARRIER

The Plaintiff above named submits as follows:

1. The plaintiff, Mr. R. Mahesh, son of Rajesh M, aged about 23 years and residing at
plot no- 10, Andheri Road, Chennai - 600012
2. The Address of the Plaintiff for service of all Notices and other processes from this
Court of Law is that of his Advocate Mr. A. Sharma, B.A.,LL.B (Hons), having his
office at No. 25 Kagalnagar, P.O Bistupur, Chennai- 831001
3. The Defendant, Prakash Roadline Service (P) Ltd, residing at No 65, 10th Cross,
Gurgaon Bangalore – 122001, is also the address for service of all summons and other
notices from this Court of Law.
4. The plaintiff therefore states that the defendant had made a commitment to deliver a
package, containing Fifteeen articles, to Anusha, wife of R. Mahesh, residing at plot
no- 10, Andheri Road, Chennai - 600012, from Bangalore to Chennai. Upon delivery
of the same, it was found out that 2 sets were missing. Hence, Prakash Services (P)
Ltd is liable to provide compensation for the same.
5. The plaintiff states that the cause of action for this suit arose at Chennai on 15/5/2016
when the plaintiff paid a consideration of Rs 30000 for delivery of a package
containing 15 articles, to Anusha, wife of R. Mahesh, residing at plot no- 10, Andheri
Road, Chennai - 600012, from Bangalore to Chennai. The bill regarding the same was
 furnished to the plaintiff in Chennai. Upon delivery of the package on 13/4/2017, it
was discovered that 2 out of the 15 sets of articles missing, and to that effect, Prakash
Service (P) Ltd. has failed in meeting its commitments promised to the plaintiff.
6. The Plaintiff states that this Hon’ble Court has jurisdiction to try the suit as the whole
cause of action arose at Chennai and values the suit at Rs.40,000/- and pays thereon a
Court Fee of Rs…../- as per Section 24 of The Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits
Valuation Act.
7. The Plaintiff therefore prays for a Judgment and Decree against the Defendant
vi. in furnishing the 2 missing sets of Articles, or compensation for the same
vii. for further compensation for mental harassment, loss of wages suffered by the
Plaintiff due to the delivery of defected good
viii. for Costs of the suit
ix. for such other reliefs which the Plaintiff is entitled and which this Court deems to
be fit and proper in the interest of justice.

VERIFICATION

I, Mr.R.Mahesh, the Plaintiff above named, do hereby verify and state that the
allegations/averments set out in Paras 1 to 5 are based on knowledge, what has been stated in
Para 6 is based on information and what has been stated in Para 7 is based on belief and that
the same is true.

Dated at Trichy this 18th day of May 2017.

(Sd.)xxxxxxxx

Plaintiff
 VALUATION
3. Valuation for the purpose of jurisdiction and Court Fees
for relief (a)Principal amount 40000
Interest from 01-01-2016 to 01-02-2016 0
Total 40000

4. Court Fees thereon under Section 22, read with Schedule I, 400
Article 1 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 400
Court Fees paid under Section 4A of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suits Valuation

Dated at Trichy this 18th day of May 2017.