12 Reasons Jesus’ Trial Was Illegal

Part 1

Have you considered that, even by man’s laws, Jesus’ trial was illegal? Here are 12 reasons!

It is just after midnight on the Passover of A.D. 31. An ominous gathering of people, wielding
swords and clubs, has assembled in the midst of Jesus and His disciples on the Mount of Olives,
their intent mostly unknown. A man named Judas steps forward from the multitude and greets
Jesus with a kiss, saying, “Good evening, Master.”

Jesus responds, “My friend. Why are you here tonight?”

Immediately, several members of the large crowd move forward and seize Jesus, prompting one
of His disciples to grab a sword and strike one of the attackers.

“Put down your sword,” Jesus exclaims. “It is of no value. Those who rely on swords will die with
their swords in hand. They are of no use. If I wanted to, I could call upon My Father to send more
than 70,000 angels to free Me. But if this were to happen, the Scriptures would not be fulfilled.”

Then Jesus says to the crowd, “Why have you seized Me tonight with swords and clubs, as if I
were a criminal? Did you not see Me many times teaching in the temple? Why did you not lay
hands upon Me then?”

At that very moment, Jesus’ disciples—His close friends, who have been with Him for the better
part of three and a half years—flee. Every last one of them forsook Him, as it is written, “I will
smite the Shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad” (Matt. 26:31).

Jesus is eventually taken to the palace of the high priest, whose name is Caiaphas. There, a
sizeable group of scribes and Pharisees is anxiously assembled. For years, Jesus’ popularity
among the common people of Judea has threatened their positions of authority. Now, they
finally have a chance to try Jesus and convict Him of a crime, one punishable by death.

You are probably at least somewhat familiar with the rest of story: Jesus is tried, convicted and
put to death—crucified on a stake. But have you ever closely examined the court proceedings
leading to Jesus’ crucifixion? Have you considered that, even by man’s laws, Jesus’ trial was
illegal?

Commonly Held Views of the Trial

Many believe and try to prove that Jesus was legally put to death. For example, in his 1916
book The Prosecution of Jesus, Richard Wellington Husband, a lawyer, wrote, “The arrest was
legal…The hearing by the Sanhedrin was legal…The course of trial in the Roman court was
legal…The conviction was legal, and was justified.”

Here is how Husband supports his assertions: “The arrest was legal, for it was conducted by the
proper officers, acting under instruction from the Sanhedrin. There was no illegality in the
circumstances under which the arrest was affected. The hearing by the Sanhedrin was legal, for
it was merely a preliminary hearing, and was not a formal trial. The course of trial in the Roman
court was legal, for it harmonized with the procedure shown in the sources to be pursued by
governors of provinces in hearing criminal cases.”

“The conviction was legal, and was justified provided the evidence was sufficient to substantiate
the charges, and the records do not prove the contrary.”

As you can see, according to Husband, the entire process leading to the death of Christ was legal.
And, to him, the Bible does not provide sufficient evidence to indicate otherwise, as he states
that other “records do not prove the contrary.”

Similarly, Max Radin, a former professor and author of the book The Trial of Jesus of Nazareth,
believes the accounts in the Bible are not credible, since Matthew, Mark, Luke and John were
not physical eyewitnesses to the secretive proceedings. In his book, Radin claims there is “no
clear statement of how the knowledge of the trial came to those who reported it.”

The author, however, does not take into account the possibility that Christ could have explained
everything to His disciples when He was resurrected from the dead. Jesus was a personal
eyewitness to the trial and could have accurately conveyed everything to His followers to record
in the pages of the Bible. (Of course, the author also does not believe that Scripture is inspired.)

Later in the book, Radin provides insight into a common trial in Judea during Christ’s time: “We
are, most of us, familiar with the procedure of criminal investigations. The accused person is
arrested, arraigned before a committing magistrate, specifically accused and formally tried. He
may, and he generally does, appeal to a higher court, if he is convicted. All these things take
time, and there is almost necessarily an interval of weeks and months between the later stages
of the procedure. But above all, the procedure is strictly regulated by law, and any serious
deviation is not merely an irregularity but will probably prevent punishment from being
inflicted.”

By the above description alone, Jesus’ trial was fraudulent. All of the above-mentioned events
take time, and usually lots of it! Radin himself admits this. Yet the trial of Jesus was completed
about nine hours after He was arrested. And due to the privacy of the proceedings, there were
no witnesses to testify on behalf of Jesus—but there were many witnesses to
testify against Him! How many court cases are you aware of that are similar to this? Probably
none.

Several pages later in the book, Radin attempts to reconcile his description of a lengthy criminal
investigation with Jesus’ nine-hour process: “Mark’s version, even by his own testimony, cannot
be more than a guess. Instead of a hurried night meeting, a harsh and brief interrogatory, a
disregard of established rules of evidence and procedure, the trial may have been formally
correct, and the judgment formally correct even from the point of view of an upright judge just
though severe.”

As is the case with most scholars, Radin dismisses the Bible as a source of historically accurate
information. He assumes that Mark guessed what “may have” happened and, as such, believes
the investigation could have occurred some other way. Yet the accounts in the Bible are the only
sources of information that cover the trial. One cannot justify his position based on another
resource; he can merely render a guess or an assumption. When one believes what was written
by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, only one conclusion can be drawn: Christ’s trial was illegal,
even by men’s standards.

What’s the Charge?

Some might wonder: “Why did the Jews deliver Jesus to the Romans to be killed? Could they not
have put Him to death themselves?”

A common view is that the Jews did not have the authority to execute criminals. Continuing
in The Prosecution of Jesus, Husband states, “According to the common view, the right to try
capital cases [cases involving the death penalty] and even the right to pronounce sentences, still
rested with the Sanhedrin, but the actual penalty could not be inflicted until the governor had
given his sanction.”

Those who believe Jesus’ adversaries had no legal basis to execute Him usually cite John 18:31,
where Pilate, the Roman governor, said to the Jews, “Take you Him, and judge Him according to
your law. The Jews therefore said unto him, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death.”

Lifted from its context, this verse does appear to indicate that the Jews were unable to execute
criminals. Yet the truth is that they did have the power to try, convict and execute
people, except in cases that involved treason or sedition against the Roman government.

Consider the following: Stephen was accused of blasphemy and as a result was stoned to death
by the Jewish authority, as described in the book of Acts (6:11; 7:59). The Romans were not
consulted in this execution and there is no indication they disapproved.

On several occasions, the scribes and Pharisees sought to kill Jesus (Mark 11:18; 14:1; Luke
19:47; 22:2; John 10:31). If this were illegal, it is doubtful they would have even attempted to do
so.

In one instance, elders of Judea brought before Jesus a woman who had been caught committing
adultery, and said, “Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what
say you?” (John 8:5). If the Jews did not have the authority to put this woman to death, Jesus
might have replied, “Aren’t you aware of Roman law? You don’t have the power to execute
anyone.”

But He didn’t. He simply said, “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her”
(vs. 7). Jesus knew full well that the Jews were legally able to execute adulteresses and criminals.
Also, if it were not legal for the Jews to perform executions, consider what might have happened
if word of this event reached Roman authority? Surely, if such were the case, the Jews would not
have been so public about it.

Finally, the apostle Paul was stoned by a crowd in Asia, among whom were Jews.

Wherever the Jews settled during the time of Roman rule, they had the legal right to execute
people under their law.
So then what is the statement in John 18:31 referring to? “From the earliest period the Roman
governor took cognizance of all matters that had relation to the public security or the majesty of
the Empire. Consequently there was not a time at which the Roman magistrate would not step in
when a charge of treason was made, or a seditious movement began. The case against Jesus is
one especially in point, for the charge against him [treason] could under no circumstances be
tried by any tribunal except that of the governor” (The Prosecution of Jesus).

The Roman government would only intervene in criminal affairs when matters of treason, civil
disobedience, incitement to revolution or attacks against Caesar were involved. Otherwise, local
administration was conducted by local officials and the regular courts of the conquered nations.
Roman authorities were not involved in every criminal proceeding throughout the vast empire.

Jesus’ opponents accused Him of blasphemy, but since they did not want to execute Him
themselves, they created charges of treason against Him. This way, the trial could be brought
before Pontius Pilate, and, in their minds, he and the Romans would be responsible for Jesus’
death, not them.

Events Leading to Jesus’ Death

Before identifying the precise reasons Jesus’ trial was illegal, it will be helpful to briefly examine
events leading up to His crucifixion.

After Judas Iscariot had entered a deal with the religious authorities, the Bible tells us that Satan
entered into Judas surnamed Iscariot, He went his way, and communed with the chief priests
and captains, how he might betray Jesus unto them. And they were glad, and covenanted to give
him money. And he promised, and sought opportunity to betray Him unto them in the absence
of the multitude” (Luke 22:3-6).

Soon after Judas entered into a pact with the religious leaders, Jesus and His faithful disciples ate
their final meal together on Passover evening. Then, Judas arrived at the Mount of Olives with a
large mob of various people, including Jesus’ future judges and jury, who stirred up the mob to
arrest Christ (Luke 22:8-39).

After the arrest, a former high priest named Annas examined Jesus first (John 18:13). Next, the
mob brought Jesus to the high priest’s palace, where Caiaphas (the high priest) and the
Sanhedrin were gathered (Matt. 26:57-58). Here, numerous false witnesses came before the
Sanhedrin to give testimony against Him. Eventually, Christ was condemned to death, apparently
on the charge of blasphemy (vs. 65-66). The next morning, the Sanhedrin formally condemned
Jesus in an attempt to make the previous evening’s procedures legal. A multitude of people then
led Jesus to Pilate (Luke 23:1) and pronounced different charges, saying, “We found this fellow
perverting the nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, saying that He Himself is Christ a
King” (vs. 2). Notice they did not accuse Christ of blasphemy in front of Pilate. Instead, they
charged Him with treason against the Roman Empire.

Pilate initially desired to free Jesus (vs. 4), but the people continued to push for His death,
saying, “He stirs up [incites] the people, teaching throughout all Jewry, beginning from Galilee to
this place” (vs. 5).

When Pilate heard that Jesus was from Galilee, he sent Him to Herod, since Galilee was under his
jurisdiction (vs. 6-7). Herod was happy to see Jesus, as he heard many things about Him. He
desired to see Jesus perform some miracles (vs. 8). But Jesus neither performed any miracles nor
answered his questions (vs. 9). Meanwhile, the chief priests and scribes stood by and accused
Jesus (vs. 10). After being mocked, He was quickly sent back to Pilate (vs. 11).

Pilate sought to release Jesus once again, as he found no reason to condemn Him to death: “You
have brought this Man unto me, as one that perverts the people: and, behold, I, having
examined Him before you, have found no fault in this Man touching those things whereof you
accuse Him: No, nor yet Herod: for I sent you to him; and, lo, nothing worthy of death is done
unto Him. I will therefore chastise Him, and release Him” (vs. 14-16).

But the crowd cried out with a loud voice, “Crucify Him, crucify Him” (vs. 21).

Pilate, a third time, responded to the multitude, “Why, what evil has He done? I have found no
cause of death in Him: I will therefore chastise Him, and let Him go” (vs. 22).

The people responded all the more loudly: “Crucify Him, crucify Him!”

Pilate finally gave in to the people’s demands, and delivered Jesus to be crucified.

Keep in mind that this entire process lasted only about nine hours, from after midnight to around
9:00 in the morning. Jesus was seized, then tried, condemned and crucified—all within a matter
of nine hours! At 3:00 in the afternoon, Jesus was speared in His side and killed (John 19:34).

In that short period of time, the world eliminated the Savior!

With this backdrop, we are now ready to examine 12 paramount reasons the arrest, trial and
conviction of Jesus Christ were illegal.

First Reason

Recall that Judas was bribed to betray Jesus in the absence of the crowds who favored Him. The
plan was to seize Jesus in the dark of night, sentence Him just before sunrise—to make
everything appear legal—transport Him to Pilate, stir up a mob of people to condemn Him, and
crucify Him in the morning before those who supported Him were aware.

Who constituted the crowd of people who arrested Jesus? The answer leads to the first blunder
in Jesus’ arrest, trial and conviction: Jesus was arrested illegally.

Any trial may be dismissed as a mistrial, or illegal, if there is prejudice against the individual
being tried on the part of those participating. The accused must be given full recourse of law to
be able to sufficiently present his side.

Jesus, however, was both arrested and tried by those prejudiced against Him, and was not
allowed opportunity to present His case. Further, His judges were the same individuals who
bribed Judas! Surely one cannot say these people were impartial!

In addition, Jesus was arrested secretly at night and was not formally charged of any offense.
Judas simply pointed out Jesus, and a crowd arrested Him. There was no legal basis for this.

In his book Criminal Jurisprudence of the Ancient Hebrews, Samuel Mendelsohn states, “The
testimony of an accomplice [in this case, Judas] is not permissible by Rabbinic law…and no man’s
life, nor his liberty, nor his reputation can be endangered by the malice of the one who has
confessed himself a criminal.”

Since Judas accepted a bribe from a judge, certainly Judas would be considered a criminal. And
since Jesus’ judges bribed Judas, they would be considered criminals as well. This alone should
have led to a mistrial!

Second Reason

Jesus was examined by Annas in a secret night proceeding (John 18:12-14, 19-23).
According to the Talmud, the Sanhedrin is forbidden from convening between the time of the
evening and morning sacrifice. In the book Jesus Before the Sanhedrin, M.M. Lemann states that
“no session [including a preliminary examination] of the court could take place before the
offering of the morning sacrifice.”

Furthermore, “An accused man was never subjected to private or secret examination,” as stated
in Institutions de Moise, by J. Salvador.

Third Reason

The indictment against Jesus was false.

In the book Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, Alfred Edersheim states that “the Sanhedrin did
not, and could not, originate charges.”

But as we saw, the Sanhedrin did so in the case against Jesus.

Alexander Taylor Innes, in The Trial of Jesus Christ, reveals that “until they [the witnesses] spoke,
and spoke in the public assembly, the prisoner was scarcely [never] an accused man. When they
spoke, and the evidence of two agreed together, it formed a legal charge, libel or indictment, as
well as the evidence for its truth.”

In a correctly conducted procedure, the evidence of the leading witnesses constituted the
charge. But with Jesus, no witnesses—and therefore no charges—were presented at the outset
of the proceedings. Those in opposition to Jesus, including those who would be in the court,
simply arrested Him. They then needed to find witnesses—false ones!

Fourth Reason

The Sanhedrin court illegally held its trial before sunrise.

Annas’s preliminary examination of Jesus resulted in no evidence. But instead of dismissing the
case, the Sanhedrin proceeded to hold an illegal court.

Mendelsohn reveals why it was illegal: “Criminal cases can be acted upon by the various courts
during the day time only, and by the Lesser Sanhedrins from the close of the morning sacrifice till
noon, and by the Great Sanhedrin till evening.”

The Jewish Mishna states, “Let a capital offense be tried during the day, but suspend at night.”
Moses Maimonides explains why trials are to be held during the daylight: “The reason why the
trial of a capital offense could not be held at night is because…the examination of such a charge
is like the diagnosing of a wound—in either case a more thorough and searching examination
can be made by daylight.”

Convicting someone of a crime punishable by death was serious business. It required those
deciding the fate of the accused to be at their best mental state, which is hardly true in the early
hours of the morning.

Fifth Reason

The Sanhedrin illegally convened to try a capital offense on a day before an annual Sabbath.

The Mishna reveals why: “They shall not judge on the eve of the Sabbath, nor on any festival.”

In Martyrdom of Jesus, Isaac Wise, a Jewish Rabbi, provides decisive evidence: “No court of
justice in Israel was permitted to hold sessions on the Sabbath or on any of the seven biblical
Holy Days. In cases of capital crime, no trial could be commenced on Friday or the day previous
to any Holy Day, because it was not lawful either to adjourn such cases longer than overnight, or
to continue them on the Sabbath or Holy Day.”

Jesus, however, was arrested on Passover evening in A.D. 31, which is the day before the First
Day of Unleavened Bread—an annual Holy Day!

Sixth Reason

The trial concluded in one day.

Again, reading from the Mishna, we learn, “A criminal case resulting in the acquittal of the
accused may terminate the same day on which the trial began. But if a sentence of death is to be
pronounced, it cannot be concluded before the following day.”

Forcing a trial to last longer than one day allows time for witnesses in support of the accused to
come forth. Of course, Jesus’ court did not want any such witnesses to manifest themselves, so
they ended it quickly.

So far, you have seen six reasons the trial of Jesus was illegal. In the May-June issue of The Pillar,
we will examine six more.
After Judas Iscariot betrayed the incarnated God with 30 pieces of silver, the Lord
Jesus was immediately arrested by the temple guards and the Jewish leaders and
Pharisees. Seeing that His Lord is in danger, Peter took his sword and struck the ear
of one of Jesus’ captors. However, Jesus rebuked Peter and stopped him from
retaliating or from fighting back because if He wishes to do so, Jesus could just call
out His legion of angels to fight the battle for Him. It is said that one angel can kill
125,000 men. (II Kings 19:35) A legion, on the other hand, comprises of 6000 highly
trained and skillful military men. Thus, when Jesus said that He could summon 12
legion of angels, in effect, He is saying that He can summon 1,850,000,000 angels;
enough to wipe out the entire humanity in a twinkle of an eye.

However, He chose to submit himself to the arrogance, malevolence, wickedness,,

ill will and cruelty of men in order to appease the Father’s wrath. The righteous Son
of God suffered injustices at its worst. He was indicted at night; a violation of the
Jewish law. He was indicted in a wrong court; a violation of jurisdiction. He was
prosecuted without a counsel; a violation of the due process clause. He was
prosecuted unjustly but was found innocent; but instead of releasing Him, Pilate
condemned Jesus.

On the other hand, Pontius Pilate endeavored to release Jesus after finding Him
innocent but because he is afraid of the people, he submitted to the ill-will their
and released Barrabas instead.

Thereafter, Jesus was scourged. The majority of bandits and criminals, defiant and
furious, would yell curses and insults while being nailed to a cross, but Jesus, filled
with an amazing calmness and an inexplicable love, interceded with the Father for
the forgiveness of his torturers. As J.C. Ryle, the famous Anglican Bishop of
Liverpool expressed so well, “While the blood of the greatest sacrifice started to
flow, the greatest of all high priests started to intercede.” Jesus, since he was God
in the form of man, could have condemned his torturers or destroyed them with
his breath. But then what would his sufferings have accomplished? He came to die
so all who would believe would live. He preferred to die for the guilty, which
required of him even more strength and courage.
Praying for one’s torturers is not human. Jesus was able to do it because of his
intimate relationship with the Father. By so doing, he accomplished the words of
the prophet Isaiah, “He poured out his life unto death, and was numbered with the
transgressors. For he bore the sin of many, and made intercession for the
transgressors.” (Isaiah 53.12)

7th Last Word

“Father Into Thy Hands I Commend My Spirit”

.” Jesus also, during the last six hours of his life, hanging between heaven and earth,
enduring great suffering, pronounced seven statements revealing the richness of
his inner being.

Crucifixion was a form of torture that literally knocked the wind out of a person.
The weight of the body suspended by the arms caused immediate pain in the chest,
paralyzing the pectoral muscles and making breathing extremely difficult. The
person being crucified could inhale but had great difficulty exhaling. To exhale he
had to push on his feet and straighten his legs to release the pressure exerted on
his arms and chest. But the pain that this caused to his feet was so excruciating,
because of the nails, that he would immediately cease any such effort. Death
usually occurred within two or three days. But when the Romans wanted to shorten
his agony, they would break his legs. So, unable to straighten himself with the help
of his legs, the man would suffocate rapidly. The soldiers broke the legs of the two
thieves crucified with Jesus to hasten their deaths, but Jesus’ legs were not broken
because he was already dead (John 19:3133). Thus was accomplished a prophecy
from Scripture saying that none of his bones would be broken (John 19:36). It is in
this context, while he was fighting for his every breath, that Jesus uttered his last
words.
Question: "What were the seven last words of Jesus Christ on the cross and what do they
mean?"

Answer: The seven statements that Jesus Christ made on the cross were (not in any particular
order):

(1) Matthew 27:46 tells us that about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, “Eloi,
Eloi, lama sabachthani?” which means, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” Here,
Jesus was expressing His feelings of abandonment as God placed the sins of the world on Him –
and because of that, God had to “turn away” from Jesus. As Jesus was feeling that weight of
sin, He was experiencing a separation from God for the only time in all of eternity. This was
also a fulfillment of the prophetic statement in Psalm 22:1.

(2) “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing” (Luke 23:34). Those who
crucified Jesus were not aware of the full scope of what they were doing because they did not
recognize Him as the Messiah. While their ignorance of divine truth did not mean they deserved
forgiveness, Christ’s prayer in the midst of their mocking Him is an expression of the limitless
compassion of divine grace.

(3) “I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise" (Luke 23:43). In this passage,
Jesus is assuring one of the criminals on the cross that when he died, he would be with Jesus
in heaven. This was granted because even at the hour of his death, the criminal had expressed
his faith in Jesus, recognizing Him for who He was (Luke 23:42).

(4) “Father, into Your hands I commit my spirit” (Luke 23:46). Here, Jesus is willingly giving up
His soul into the Father’s hands, indicating that He was about to die – and that God had accepted
His sacrifice. He “offered up Himself unblemished to God” (Hebrews 9:14).

(5) “Dear Woman, here is your son!” and “Here is your mother!” When Jesus saw His mother
standing near the cross with the Apostle John, whom He loved, He committed His mother’s care
into John’s hands. And from that hour John took her unto his own home (John 19:26-27). In this
verse Jesus, ever the compassionate Son, is making sure His earthly mother is cared for after
His death.

(6) “I am thirsty” (John 19:28). Jesus was here fulfilling the Messianic prophecy from Psalm
69:21: “They put gall in my food and gave me vinegar for my thirst.” By saying He was thirsty,
He prompted the Roman guards to give Him vinegar, which was customary at a crucifixion,
thereby fulfilling the prophecy.

(7) “It is finished!” (John 19:30). Jesus’ last words meant that His suffering was over and the
whole work His Father had given Him to do, which was to preach the Gospel, work miracles,
and obtain eternal salvation for His people, was done, accomplished, fulfilled. The debt of sin
was paid.
Recommended Resource: Jesus: The Greatest Life of All by Charles Swindoll