Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Redone Rhetorical Analysis
Redone Rhetorical Analysis
Dante Marcucci
7 October 2017
Terrorist attacks shake Americans to their core. The scariest part of any attack is not the
damage done, but the questions that it brings to the forefront of our minds. “What if that was my
family?” “Where will they strike next?” Most distressingly, “How would someone be driven to
do something so horrible?” Americans have been spoiled by their distance from the rest of the
world and the relative safety provided by this distance. While Americans have been lucky, the
Islamic State has worked to ensure that the rest of the world is not so lucky, continuing violence
in the Middle East through warfare and broadcast media. In their propaganda, the Islamic State
uses rhetoric more effectively than the United States does. ISIS has capitalized upon American
ideologies, the kairotic situation, ethos, and pathos by using propaganda videos to reach potential
The United States propagates the ideology of the glory of war and the commonplace of
pride in our military, which ISIS twists for its own benefit. This love of military permeates
society in all forms of media, where civilians are reminded incessantly of veterans who put their
lives on the line and earned glory on the battlefield. This pride in military, often referred to as
patriotism, is uniquely American and extremely valuable to the government for its ability to
unify Americans against everchanging exigences. By glorifying our military and reminding
citizens of the wars of the past, the United States builds up the ideology surrounding the glory of
war. ISIS then uses this same ideology to bolster their own cause. As shown by the propaganda
Marcucci 2
video, ISIS advertises a chance to earn glory through war, allowing recruits to fight and earn the
respect of their comrades. Utilizing the familiar commonplace of war as a proving ground, the
Islamic State convinces recruits to fight against the United States by advertising the glory of war.
To fight the Islamic State, the United States tries to show the faults in the ideology of
ISIS, but these attempts fall flat, because the United States shares these flaws with the Islamic
State. In showing these faults, the United States is trying to reach the same audience as the
Islamic State, middle eastern citizens who are unsure of which side to take. American
propaganda videos, forced to brandish the State Department seal, must convince the audience
that ISIS cannot be trusted despite the video’s obvious bias. The most well-known and
controversial of these American anti-ISIS videos, “Welcome to Islamic State Land,” focuses on
betrayal and the brutal murder of Muslims committed by the Islamic State. “Welcome to Islamic
State Land” shows graphic images of members of ISIS being shot in the back, making the clear
statement that ISIS betrays its own. This rhetorical argument falls short, however, because in the
past, the United States has shown no mercy on those deemed to be traitors, exemplified by
America’s treatment of Edward Snowden. The most graphic and egregious of ISIS’s crimes may
be the brutal murder of Muslims and other civilians. The video displays the results of these
senseless ISIS-led attacks and executions. An uncomfortable fact of the matter, though, is that
American remote bombing attacks have killed an unnecessarily high number of civilians.
Through their creativity and skill with rhetoric, ISIS deflects any criticisms by the United States
Using negative attitudes toward the United States, the Islamic State exploits the kairotic
situation of America and the Middle East. To understand the kairotic situation, one must
understand some history from the region. The United States declared war on Iraq in 2003. After
Marcucci 3
removing Saddam Hussein, the US worked hard to establish new central leadership for and by
the local citizens of Iraq. The prolonged presence of foreigners, however, increased tensions
between locals and the United States, which formed the current kairotic situation within Iraq.
Recognizing this kairotic situation formed by American occupation and the opportunity provided
by fighting within Syria, the Islamic State formed, hoping to create global jihad (Glenn). ISIS
uses the frustrations of Iraqi locals to demonize America and fuel a global holy war. In the
Islamic State propaganda video, ISIS relates Americans to evil and destruction by juxtaposing
flames and American troops with scenes of explosions and brutal warfare. Identifying the
kairotic situation that has been building over more than a decade, ISIS uses Iraqi frustrations to
strengthen their own cause and ensure the continuation of their mission towards global jihad.
Just as the Islamic State so keenly recognizes and exploits kairos, the United States fails
to acknowledge the kairotic situation. In “Welcome to Islamic State Land,” the United States
goes on the offensive against ISIS as it calls out the many faults of the Islamic State. The
decision to go on the offensive is bold, but this choice does not consider America’s place in the
eyes of the audience. The Islamic State has built upon the kairotic situation to convince their
audiences that America is destructive, and, by being the aggressor, the United States has
complied in furthering that message. In order to stop their losses against the Islamic State,
America must consider kairos to the same extent that ISIS scrutinizes pathos and ethos.
The Islamic State utilizes pathos to reach the emotions of viewers and ethos to reinforce
their stated position as a righteous savior within their community, both of which strengthen the
volatile rhetoric presented by the ISIS propaganda video. At a time that people are feeling
disconnected and lost, ISIS offers an identity and camaraderie. The Islamic State pounces on
emotionally vulnerable individuals suffering from a lack of identity, hoping to take advantage of
Marcucci 4
them. Effectively employing pathos, the Islamic State offers an identity and camaraderie to those
who seek it. An important part of the Islamic State’s propaganda video is the focus on the group
dynamic. Many of the video scenes focus on the groups of men connecting with each other; an
entire minute of the video is dedicated to the soldiers standing around and talking to one another.
Recognizing the kairotic situation, the Islamic State uses ethos to paint itself as the righteous
counterpoint to America. Convincing the Iraqi public that America is unwanted is not difficult;
those reaching fighting age have had two constants through their life: American occupation and
warfare. The Islamic State offers locals a chance to fight against these “infidels” who have
occupied their homeland for more than a decade. The Islamic State exploits the situation to build
ethos with the locals. ISIS utilizes pathos to connect with viewers, offering camaraderie and an
identity, while simultaneously employing ethos to depict itself as a righteous defender against the
While ISIS bolsters its rhetoric with pathos and ethos, the United States manages to
weaken its own rhetorical arguments with these same principles. America’s video focuses on
attacking the arguments of the Islamic State, so much so that it comes off as heartless and fear-
mongering. There is no way for the audience to connect with the pathos of the American
propaganda, because, as the United States fixates on fighting the arguments of ISIS, they fail to
provide an alternative with which the audience can connect. A by-product of these ruthless
arguments is an inability to build ethos with the audience. The audience that America is trying to
reach, those who are on the cusp of supporting ISIS, does not want a heartless organization,
because the Islamic State already does that and does it better. The audience wants a friendlier
alternative. Instead, they are greeted by the State Department seal, a symbol of the group who
issues the bombing orders that have destroyed their homeland, effectively putting off any of the
Marcucci 5
remaining locals who were previously on the edge. Due to the United States’ inability to
effectively use ethos and pathos, the video’s emotional and character arguments weaken rather
The Islamic State takes advantage of American ideologies, the kairotic situation, pathos,
and ethos to incite violence and hatred towards the United States in their propaganda videos.
Using pathos and ethos, the Islamic State convinces observers that ISIS is a righteous rebel
against a destructive United States while offering camaraderie and identity to those who seek it,
meanwhile America fails to take advantage of ethos and pathos at all. In a way that America
cannot seem to match, ISIS recognizes the kairotic moment and seizes it to fuel their mission of
continued violence. Strengthening their goal of sustained violence, the Islamic State creatively
crafts their propaganda using the American ideology of the glorification of war, hampering the
United States’ ability to counter this propaganda without appearing hypocritical. ISIS is an evil
organization, but they are undoubtedly good at effectively using rhetoric to spread their message.
Marcucci 6
Works Cited
Fernando, Alberto M. “Here to stay and growing: Combating ISIS propaganda networks.” The
Brookings Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World, October 2015,
www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/IS-Propaganda_Web_English.pdf.
Glenn, Cameron. “Timeline: Rise and Spread of the Islamic State.” The Wilson Center, 5 July
1 Oct. 2017.
Miller, Greg, and Scott Higham. “In a propaganda war against ISIS, the U.S. tried to play by the
www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-a-propaganda-war-us-tried-to-play-
by-the-enemys-rules/2015/05/08/6eb6b732-e52f-11e4-81ea-
Tomson, Chris. “+18 graphic propaganda video: ISIS conducts deadly raids across
graphic-propaganda-video-isis-conducts-deadly-raids-across-western-iraq/.
www.military.com/video/operations-and-strategy/terrorism/welcome-to-the-islamic-state-
land/3775821940001.
Winter, Charlie, and Jordan Bach-Lombardo. “Why ISIS Propaganda Works: And why stopping
it requires that governments step out of the way.” The Atlantic, 13 Feb. 2016,
www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/02/isis-propaganda-war/462702/.