Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Campus Calendar - Exam-Prof. Kahliq MKTG
Campus Calendar - Exam-Prof. Kahliq MKTG
This case was prepared by William R. Wynd of Eastern Washington University as a basis for class discussion rather
than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a managerial situation
The idea of a campus calendar is not new. Several other schools in the Pacific
Northwest had produced calendars at one time or another. Since the marketing research
section of their beginning course had taught them to start by finding out what others had
done, they developed a questionnaire and conducted a telephone survey; the results of
that survey are in Table 1. Based on the results of the survey, the students concluded
that quality was particularly important.
We are students in a marketing class at Eastern Washington University. We are conducting a survey to
decide the possibility of a campus calendar. We would appreciate your answer to the following questions.
Please answer fully and honestly, all information is anonymous. Thank you for your time and trouble.
1. We would like to produce a quality E.W.U. campus calendar. We plan to use students from the
campus as models. Would you be interested in a calendar with only E.W.U. students in it?
253 (a) yes 76 (b) no
3. What kind of photo poses would you prefer? (check all that apply)
107 (a) fully clothed body shot 36 (c) face and chest shot
12 (b) swimsuit body shot 86 (d) partially clothed
6. If we produce a calendar which is pleasing to you what is the most you would be willing to pay?
0 (a) $12 19 (b) $10 48 (c) $8 70 (d) $6
Several cross tabulations were run on the data. These revealed that 54 percent of the
students who expressed interest in the calendar were male. In addition, 68 percent of
those who said they were interested lived on campus or in Cheney. Seniors were less
interested than underclassmen. Student preferences for poses are shown in Table 2.
Most male preferred females in swimsuits, whereas most females preferred males with
their clothes on.
Several printers were contacted to obtain quotes. There were variations in both
price and quality. Production quotes for the best quality and price combination are
shown in Table 3.
There was a minimum order of 2,000 and 15 percent for each additional 500.
Production costs included paper, printing, and binding. Typesetting was an extra
$1,000.
Since the pictures were the central part of the product they had to be of good
quality. A number of professional photographers were asked to submit their portfolios.
The best work was far ahead of the rest. Their charge was $250 per setting with a
minimum of 12 settings. This price included travel, set-up charges, several negatives
and a final camera-ready print.
Selecting the students to pose for the pictures was a problem. One idea was to
have students nominate whom they wanted in the pictures. One of the student partners
in Collegiate Images was an amateur photographer and agreed to take the preliminary
snapshots that would later be screened by another group of students. Film and
developing costs were estimated at $75.