Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Paper
Research Paper
Research Paper
Bella Voglino
Recent trends in society and mainstream media have left millions of rape and sexual
assault survivors saying, “me too”. This is due mainly to the “Me Too” movement started by
Hollywood elites as they stand up to their co-stars, producers, and directors that have engaged in
Rape On College Campus 2
sexual misconduct. Coming forward with sexaul assault allegations against individuals of great
stature is a brave act nonetheless, but may not have the appropriate repercussions, depending on
the stature of the accuser. This is what rape survivors at college campuses across the country
have come to find. Despite numerous amounts of evidence, college rape cases often go
unreported and uninvestigated. This begs the question: Do universities handle rape and sexual
assault allegations on their campuses fairly? Unfortunately, in accordance with research, polls,
and countless confessions of survivors, the answer is no. When a rape allegation goes
unreported, it creates a false perception of the university it presides at. Some of the most
prestigious universities in the country are guilty of this including Stanford University and
Harvard Law. Reasons for ignoring these allegations vary, but most are rooted in the upkeep of
reputations and the protection of “valuable” students. Incoming college freshman are often
taught that universities have programs and people available to help in times of crisis such as
these, and that there is “zero tolerance” for sexual misconduct. However, this is not the case in
regards to star athletes, fraternity presidents, and the maintenance of ratings and reputations.
Keeping rape allegations “under the table” makes for a wholesome university image that is
attractive to students, and to their parents who pay upwards of $40,000 a year tuition. Students
and incoming freshman deserve to know the truth about what happens on college grounds, and
The time to investigate these allegations is now. Society has spoken and is no longer
willing to protect the sexual perpetrators that continue to rome free and endure success. The “Me
Too” movement of 2018 has started a revolution, revealing the truth about entertainments finest,
and inspiring millions to come forward with their survivor stories. The list of stars Hollywood
has exiled includes big names such as: Matt Lauer, Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey, and Louis
Rape On College Campus 3
C.K.. If Hollywood is willing to risk ratings and reputations in order to assert justice to victims
of sexual misconduct, universities should do the same. No one wants to go to a school with a
“rape problem”, but it seems that almost every university in the country has exactly that. The
institution's decision to not report, investigate, and punish sexual perpetrators has a number of
effects. By allowing these predators to walk freely on campus and free of any consequences, the
student body is put at a greater risk. Most sexual predators are repeat offenders. Every time they
commit an act of sexual violence and receive no punishment, it is almost an incentive to sexually
assault again. For victims, it is very likely they will cross paths with their perpetrator, as sexual
violence often occurs with people of familiarity. This causes unnecessary stress, pain, and fear to
the survivors who desperately wish to forget the abuse they endured. On a larger scale, the
disregard of sexual assault creates a misdemeanor that men are more powerful than women.
Ultimately, this will set society back decades in terms of progression in gender equality. With a
president who brags about sexual assault of women, the last thing this country needs is an
education system that promotes the same message. 2018 has announced that time is up for sexual
predators. Countless amounts of men and women have spoken out and the truth about sexual
assault is more prevalent than ever. Student body communities are no longer blind to the rape
To say that rape has become an epidemic on college campus first requires extensive
research. The Hunting Ground, a 2015 documentary by CNN films directed by Kirby Dick and
produced by Amy Ziering, follows women and men who have been sexually assaulted on college
campuses, and denied the help and support seeked from their institutions. The purpose of this
documentary is to expose the truth of sexual assault on college campus. It is intended for all
Rape On College Campus 4
audiences but mainly targets the attention of students, parents, and universities. The film focuses
on two UNC Chapel Hill students as they fight against their institution for the disregard of their
rapes on campus. Their main source of defense lies with in the title IX clause which states:
Under Title IX, schools are legally required to respond and remedy hostile educational
environments and failure to do so is a violation that means a school could risk losing its federal
funding. As the film progresses, the viewer discovers the success of the UNC students, and is
In regards to research on sexual assault on college grounds, this documentary has proven
to be very helpful and informative. The decision to chose this film for research is due to a few
reasons. For one, it is a different medium than the usual newsletter. Being able to see and hear
survivors provided more depth to the argument and more emotional appeal. From studying this
film, Title IX laws are more clear and concise. The purpose of using these laws against
institutions is to cut federal funding and force them into caring and protecting their students. As a
researcher, this film is particularly valuable because it provides first hand accounts with campus
sexual assault from every perspective including: students, parents, faculty, and convicted sexual
predators. It also provides an array of facts from varying years and varying outlets. This ensures
that the information stated is accurate and unbiased. The documentary also offers numerous
reasons for the growth of this epidemic, putting blame on universities for trying to maintain a
certain image, and protect certain students (Dick). Although The Hunting Ground has thus
proven to be reliable, one must question its validity in regards to its production company: The
Weinstein Company. Harvey Weinstein has recently been the target of sexual assault allegations
The second source used to research this topic comes from RAINN.org. This article is an
overview of statistics regarding college rape within the past few years. The purpose of statistics
as an article is to inform the public on the truth about campus rape. Just as the first source, this
article is intended for all audiences, but pertains heavily to members of a student body. RAINN’s
article is centered around sexual assault on college campus, but also answers a variety of
questions through their research. These questions include: are college women more likely to be
sexually assaulted, is sexual violence more prevalent at college compared to other crimes, and
why college victims of sexual assault do not report to law enforcement. Through the study of this
source, the reader is made aware that college women from the ages of 18-24 are three times more
likely to be sexually assaulted compared to all other women. College women reportedly are also
twice as likely to be sexually assaulted than robbed (RAINN). As a researcher, this article is
important to analyze because it provides statistics of sexual assault not just in numbers, but also
The two sources analyzed both compare and contrast one another. They both center
around the same idea of sexual assault, and inform their audiences that it is a growing epidemic
on college grounds. The Hunting Ground, being a full length documentary is able to provide
more detail on the matter and is discussed from an array of view points. It discussed the
perspective of the victim, their parents, law enforcement, the universities, and even a sexual
perpetrator. RAINN’s statistic chart however, only provides the reader with one perspective: the
female victim’s. The information in RAINN’s article matches that of the information in the
documentary, but is completely biased and one sided. This appears to make this article a weaker
Through extensive research, I have learned that universities care more about ratings and
reputations than the actual safety of their students. The way university administration treats rape
and sexual assault allegations on their campuses is without a doubt unfair. It can be seen from
survivors at campuses across the country, and even here. In 2013 a young woman and James
Madison University student attended spring break where she was filmed being raped by three
fraternity brothers. Even with tangible evidence, her case was not processed for over a year.
After her case was settled, the only punishment to the three men involved was expulsion upon
graduation. In short, these men were able to attend JMU and remain on campus freely until after
they graduated (Cruise). Settlements like this is what continues to drive rape culture on college
campus. Although in recent years, many universities have been taking a step in the right
References
https://www.rainn.org/statistics/campus-sexual-violence
Dick, K. (Director). (2015). Erica’s story (uncut) [Video file]. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38P3Gt15xQk
Rape On College Campus 7
Ziering, A. (Producer), & Dick, K. (Director). (2015). The hunting ground [Motion
Cruise, G. (2014, June 17). Former JMU student speaks out on sexual assault. WHSV.
Out-on-Sexual-Assault-263548111.html