Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paradigm Shift
Paradigm Shift
Paradigm Shift
Hundreds of thousands of people were forced to leave their homes, and not in a foreign
country. In the United States of America, citizens were put into detainment camps on the premise
of either being born in Japan, or having at least one parent that was born in Japan. This racism
started with the reason why Americans disapprove of most immigrant populations; the idea that
they are taking jobs away from Americans and not contributing to the economy. However, in this
case there was a sharp escalation in racial distrust at the start of the 20th century because of
Japan’s threat as a rising world power. It continued to rise due to attacks on countries that the
United States had ties with and failed negotiations near the beginning of the second World War,
until the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor gave an excuse for the government to take action. The
entrance of the United States into the war plays a key role as it was fueled by the combination of
public outcry over Pearl Harbor and the deep history of the Japanese American relations. The
Day of Infamy for constitutional legislation was provoked by deep fear and hatred for Japanese-
Americans. The gradual shift of attitudes toward Japanese-Americans began turning negative
through the turn of 20th century until the attack on Pearl Harbor allowed the United States to
Chinese laborers were the first major Asian immigrant population to come to the United
States for work opportunities. American treatment of that initial group set the precedent for how
Japanese immigrants were treated shortly after. As with many laborers, the Chinese males that
came to America in the 19th century intended to make money and then go back to China - this
led to a deep distrust, bordering on hatred, of labor communities that continues to today
(Daniels). The American people were, and continue to be, outraged by this trend of coming to
America to profit off the economy without putting money back into the economy by staying the
country and paying taxes. This outrage led to widespread hatred of Chinese and Asian people as
whole, as well as the passing of debatably racist legislature. California’s first legal code in 1850
barred the testimony of blacks and Indians as whites, and Chinese were soon barred as well.
Tensions got so high that eventually Congress passed the Chinese Exclusion Act in 1882, with
President Chester A. Arthur signing it. It was then extended twice more for another ten years
each (Daniels). This extreme step in banning a certain group of people from entering the United
States contributed significantly to the escalation of tensions between the United States and Japan
As soon as Japanese immigrants began imitating the Chinese laborers, the United States
saw it as more of a threat than ever before. Japan won the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905
which proved their military prowess. Japan established themselves as the most powerful Asian
nation and was well on its way to becoming a world power. The anti-Japanese immigration
movement started the same way that the anti-Chinese immigration movements, with opposition
based on the limitations of availability for jobs. All three major political parties at the time,
Republicans, Democrats, and Populist, advertised their anti-Japanese immigration stances. It was
such a popular opinion that few politicians during the time to openly go against the internment of
Japanese-Americans, including Governor Ralph Carr of Colorado and Senator Robert Taft of
Ohio. They both made statements that what is happening to Japanese-Americans is unacceptable,
but they received backlash. People would threaten and attack Japanese people, or supporters of
Japanese immigration. Not was open discrimination acceptable, so was violence. A law
preventing the naturalization of Asian immigrants was soon passed. Racism against the Japanese
was not only custom by this point, but statutory as well (Daniels and Paul).
The tides started to turn when the Japanese began to invade China.Through journalists in
China, the American people learned about the war crimes committed against the Chinese, such as
the Nanking Massacre. Reporters brought back images and stories about the mass murder and
rape of Chinese citizens by the Japanese. Despite the open hatred of Chinese people prior to the
turn of the 20th century, many Americans became sympathetic towards Chinese people. There
were several large campaigns across the nation to boycott goods made in Japan and collectively
put an economic strain on Japan’s market (Ikuhiko). Even before World War II, Japan’s actions
sparked public outcry in America, which only increased after Japan began targeting American
interesting during the war. While the United States was not officially involved at the time,
Americans felt strongly about supporting allies and American interests. Japanese actions
continued to outrage the American public; events such as the Bataan Death March, Kamikaze
attacks on Allied ships, and malicious mistreatment of prisoners of war stoked the flame of
American anger. The attack prior to Pearl Harbor that dramatically increased American hatred of
Japan was the invasion of French West Indochina in 1940. The purpose of this invasion was to
control the support that was coming to China from countries like the United States, the United
Kingdom, and France. In response to this, the United States stopped all exports to Japan besides
oil, which the Japanese saw as deeply unfriendly (Department of State). When Japan continued
expansion in 1941 after the fall of France, the United States had no choice but to stop oil exports
as well, feeling that Japan was refusing to heed their economic-base warnings. However, Japan
viewed this act as a declaration of war (Lightbody). Japan needed to take action, but their options
were to withdraw out of China or continue expansion to take over resources in other territories.
The attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, sent American opinion on Japan from
deeply negative to a fever pitch of hatred and racism. Americans felt a desperate need for justice.
All acts of racism towards the Japanese up until this point were small things that presented a
minor inconvenience to Japanese-Americans. The attack on Pearl Harbor infuriated the whole
nation. It was a show of poor taste for the Japanese to initiate a secret attack on American
territory while in the middle of negotiations. Within seven hours of this attack, the Imperial
Japanese Air Navy Service also attacked some of our territories like the Philippines, Guam, and
Wake Island and our allies’ territories like Malaya, Hong Kong and Singapore. This was all part
of an elaborate plan to stop interference of the Japanese routes to military attacks in Southeast
Asia against the territories of the United Kingdom, Netherlands, and the United States. The
Japanese sunk many war ships and destroyed almost two hundred aircrafts in the attack on Pearl
Harbor. Not only did they murder 2,403 Americans and wound another thousand, they also killed
their chance to a peaceful resolution. Pearl Harbor was the event that dragged one of the largest
world powers into the second World War. This direct attack on the United States allowed for the
racist beliefs of the people to manifest into violent and xenophobic legislature.
One of the most infamous pieces of legislature in American history is Executive Order
No. 9066. Signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, this order forced roughly 110,000
Japanese-Americans from their homes in California, Oregon, and Washington. They were
relocated to one of ten detention camps in desolate parts of the United States. While not nearly as
violent as concentration camps during World War II, they were stilled guarded with soldiers and
fenced in with barbed wire (“Relocation and Incarceration of Japanese-Americans During World
War II.”). It was now a matter of national security for the country. A misconception that led to
further racism was the belief that all Japanese people were taught that their duty is to die for the
emperor, thus making each individual a potential threat to the United States. Many Americans
believed that their neighbors were spies and had no trust in Japanese-Americans, even though
they might have been born here (Dower). Over 70% of the people sent to these camps were
American citizens and many of them were kept in the camps once the war was already over
principles of the United States, and many of the laws instituted during their detainment were in
direct violation of the Constitution. Some examples of these are that the Shinto religion was
prohibited in these camps, going against freedom of religion, the Japanese language was banned
from being used in public meetings, going against founding ideals of democracy, and the FBI
search and seizure without a warrant. Despite obvious violations of the Bill of Rights, there was
not a single vote against this action from Congress, and it was upheld as constitutional by the
Supreme Court. This order was executed in an atmosphere of fear and anger at Japan and was
Even though legislation is a huge part of the change in attitudes, how the public saw the
Japanese-Americans was what gave the legislation its power. Public opinion swayed many
decisions in media and our military strategies. The way that the American public felt was
portrayed in the military actions against not only Japanese-Americans, but prisoners of war as
well. An opinion poll taken in 1944 found that 13% of the United States public were in favor of
the extermination of all Japanese (Bagby and Feraru). They were seen as “animals” and
“subhuman” (Weingartner). Not only were the characteristics of Japanese culture embellished by
wartime filmmakers, but Japanese characters usually were seen as evil, rat faced enemies
(Sheppard, Palmer, and Legg). Books such as “The Yellow Peril” by Greenberry G. Rupert and
“The Rising Tide of Color” by Lothrop Stoddard talk about the ‘Yellow Peril’. These books
played into the xenophobic theory of East Asia’s danger to the western world, and many
propaganda posters portrayed the Japanese as rats or as the targets for violence. Nationwide
agreement that the Japanese were not even humans made them unworthy of normal treatment as
citizens, let alone as prisoners of war. The treatment of prisoners of war was worse than ever
before, and it was justified through the public opinion of the Japanese (Fergusson). This
stemmed from how the Japanese were treating America and its allies before and during the war,
from the attacks on United States territories to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, to allowing for the
United States government to easily make legislation aligning with the racist ideals of the
American people.
The negative public opinion of Japan was amplified because of the actions the Japanese
were taking against the United States and our allies or territories. In turn, public opinion
influenced American legislation and military actions against Japan. American fear and hatred of
Japanese-Americans shifted from the belief they were somehow stealing American jobs to the
belief that all Japanese-Americans were a threat to American national security. President
Franklin D. Roosevelt himself justified this violation of civil and human rights on the basis of
military necessity. Today, however, Executive Order No. 9066 is acknowledged to be based on
racial prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure on the part of American leaders to protect the rights
of citizens. Through the turn of the 20th century and leading through World War II there was a
gradual shift of attitude towards Japanese-Americans that allowed the United States to officially
codify their racism towards them. The immense hatred targeted at Japanese-Americans only
grew with time and thousands of Japanese American citizens suffered. An infamous day for civil
and human rights was seen as constitutional at the time because of the escalation of racism
Daniels, Roger. “Japanese Americans: The War at Home.” World War II Remembered,
Scholastic, www.teacher.scholastic.com/activities/wwii/ahf/mineta/background.htm.
Daniels, Roger. “Prisoners Without Trial: Japanese Americans in World War II.” Penn State
com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/books?hl=en&lr=&id=S_-t04-o-
M0C&oi=fnd&pg=PP11&dq=%22japanese%2Bamericans%22%2B%22pearl%2Bharbor%22%
2B%22post-
war%22%2Bprejudice&ots=XdFZwKeeXc&sig=nVf4sKiUQv28eVWep6Kb7h914z8#v=onepa
ge&q&f=false.
Department of State. “United States Foreign Policy 1931-1941.” Peace and War, United
Dower, W. John, War Without Mercy: Race & Power in the Pacific War p53 ISBN 0-
394-50030-X
Feraru, A. N. (1950). "Public Opinion Polls on Japan". Far Eastern Survey. 19 (10): 101–
103. doi:10.1525/as.1950.19.10.01p0599l.
Ikuhiko, Hata. “The Nanking Atrocities: Fact and Fable.” The Nanking Atrocities: Fact
web.archive.org/web/20110228031202/http://www.wellesley.edu/Polisci/wj/China/Nanjing/nanji
ng2.html.
Lightbody, Bradley (2004). The Second World War: Ambitions to Nemesis. London &
Niall Fergusson, "Prisoner Taking and Prisoner Killing in the Age of Total War: Towards
Palmer, M. and Legg, S: The Mask of Nippon, Black and White film, NFB/ONF, 1942,
Paul, Jesse. “In Gov. Ralph Carr, Colorado Has a Shining Light in the Painful History of
Japanese Internment.” The Denver Post, The Denver Post, 27 Mar. 2017,
www.denverpost.com/2016/12/06/ralph-carr-colorado-japanese-internment/.
“Relocation and Incarceration of Japanese Americans During World War II.” Calisphere,
www.calisphere.org/exhibitions/essay/8/relocation/.
Rupert, Greenberry G. The Yellow Peril; or, The Orient vs. the Occident as Viewed by
Stoddard, Lothrop. The Rising Tide of Color against White World-Supremacy. General
Books, 1920
Weingartner, James J. (February 1992). "Trophies of War: U.S. Troops and the
Mutilation of Japanese War Dead, 1941-1945". Pacific Historical Review. 61 (1): 53–67. JSTOR
3640788.