Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intro Elevator Speech 1
Intro Elevator Speech 1
Intro Elevator Speech 1
In 2011 the Office for Civil Rights sent the “Dear Colleague” letter to all schools and universities
receiving federal funding in the United States. Three years later a Q&A would sent to help
answer questions that were raised as a result of the DCL. These letter were not new policies but
instead gave extensive guidance about how universities should carry out their grievance
procedures for cases that fall under Title IX such as sexual harassment and sexual violence.
● The three focal points of the letter pertained to the standard of evidence that would
out.
■ the respondent may have to face the same trial twice which is an
Due Process
● 14th Amendment protects citizens against state action. Schools are state actors. One of
the protections that citizens have against the state is due process. “No person shall be
deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of the law”. Students can show
that they had the liberty to obtain an education and future opportunities but a case has
taken the opportunity away from them. Public education is a property interested that is
protected by the 14th amendment. As a result, students are entitled to due process in Title
IX cases.
● There are several critiques on the guidance given by the OCR particularly to how the
○ Preponderance of evidence
I want to explore the critiques to these three policies emphasized by the OCR and how
the complainant, respondent, and university are affected by these policies. Is Title IX effectively
respecting the 5th and 14th amendment rights of student? And is Title IX in place to be a form of