Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Habaluyas vs. Japson
Habaluyas vs. Japson
*
No. L-70895. May 30, 1986.
_______________
* EN BANC.
209
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000162cf5a108b0a5eab75003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/6
4/17/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 142
210
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000162cf5a108b0a5eab75003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/6
4/17/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 142
days. (Moya vs. Barton, 76 Phil. 831; Heirs of Nantes vs. Court of
Appeals, July 25, 1983; 123 SCRA 753.) If the court denies the
motion for extension, the appeal must be taken within the
original period (Bello vs. Fernando, January 30, 1962, 4 SCRA
135), inasmuch as such a motion does not suspend the period for
appeal (Reyes vs. Sta. Maria, November 20, 1972, 48 SCRA 1).
The trial court may grant said motion after the expiration of the
period for appeal provided it was filed within the original period.
(Valero vs. Court of Ap-peals, June 28, 1973, 51 SCRA 467;
Berkenkotter vs. Court of Ap-peals, September 28, 1973, 53 SCRA
228).
RESOLUTION
FERIA, J.:
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000162cf5a108b0a5eab75003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 3/6
4/17/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 142
211
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000162cf5a108b0a5eab75003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/6
4/17/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 142
212
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000162cf5a108b0a5eab75003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/6
4/17/2018 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 142
SO ORDERED.
——o0o——
http://www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/00000162cf5a108b0a5eab75003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/6