Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Final Draft
Final Draft
Final Draft
Bailey M. Nixon
Introduction
Within the last several decades, astonishing statistics and increasing horror stories have
revealed a sad truth: America is experiencing an epidemic unlike any other-the distribution and
use of heroin in the United States. This issue has become an increasingly difficult situation to
To put it in perspective, Jen Christensen and Sergio Hernandez compare the heroin crisis
to the HIV epidemic when the United States had no treatment to turn to (2017). Similar to this
crisis, the use of heroin in the United States originated in urban, low income areas and has
plagued the lives of many Americans. Contrary to popular belief, however, both researchers
claim that the increase in heroin use has spread so drastically due to the use in small towns and
rural areas compared to industrial and urban areas (Christensen & Sergio 2017). No longer is this
an issue that solely affects large cities across America. In fact, West Virginia, New Hampshire,
and Kentucky are currently the top three states with the most overdoses in the entire country
(Christensen & Sergio 2017). West Virginia alone holds six of the twenty counties in the country
that have the most heroin overdoses (Christensen & Sergio 2017). Additionally, updated research
has introduced that minority groups are no longer the group affected most by the epidemic; it is
white Americans that are using heroin the most. The heroin epidemic extends beyond the classic
minority race stigma; this is an issue that affects individuals from all races nationwide. In a study
done by the Department of Psychiatry at the Washington University in St. Louis, it was found
that heroin use has evolved from an “inner-city, minority-centered problem” and developed into
a issue involving “white men and women...living outside of large urban areas” (Cicero et. al
2014). The impact of this epidemic is enormous and is reaching men and women across the
Shooting Down 3
country in every age, race, and socioeconomic status. It has become increasingly clear that this
issue must be reviewed and resolved in order to prevent the overdoses of addicted Americans.
But what happens to the individuals who are not aware of the repercussions of their choice to use
heroin? In this paper, the causes and effects of a heroin addiction on a person’s life are discussed
in order to reveal why individuals choose to alter their lives to get high. This subject is extremely
relevant to society today, as this issue has transitioned from a nationwide epidemic resulting less
from race and socioeconomic status, and more on opioid prescriptions and biological
dependence. Given that more individuals are becoming influenced by heroin, it is imperative that
citizens nationwide should become informed on the detrimental effects of a heroin addiction.
While the recent phenomenon of prescribed opioids has played a major role in the
increase of nationwide heroin addictions, research about the biological causes of addicts provide
insight on the reasoning behind the exponential use of heroin and heroin addictions in the United
States. In an article designed for nurses treating patients with addictions, Georgina Casey
describes the biological causes and effects of substance abuse and addiction. Casey claims that
drug use causes “changes in the brain that lead from recreational use to addiction, and the
neurological mechanisms underlying relapse” (2017). As the brain becomes comfortable with the
use of a drug, it often changes and starts to become dependent upon the chemically altering
substance. She explains the debate between “addiction” and “dependence” within the DSM-IV
and discusses the two types of dependence that occur within an addiction. Physical dependence
occurs due to “repeated use of many chemical substances” that cause tolerance to said substances
cravings an individual experiences as a result of the repeating use (Casey 2017). Due to brain
cravings, addictions are often hard to overcome. More often than not, the cravings and
withdrawal symptoms make it harder for addicts to make the switch to sobriety. While these
symptoms play a major role in drug addiction, Casey also discusses the dopamine theory on how
While some studies show that opioids do not have a large effect on the dopamine release process,
it is clear that other brain regions are involved. Drugs often have the tendency to overpower the
chemicals in the brain, causing an unstable reuptake of certain neurons, making the repetition of
drug use occur before an addiction has even begun. In her article, Casey describes the insula,
which feeds into both the amygdala and prefrontal cortex (2017). The insula interprets “stress,
sleep, and drug deprivation,” and causes impulsive behavior when these sensations are not
the Ningbo Addiction Research and Treatment Center in China tested the effect of a drug
addiction on the levels of the dopamine receptor D4 methylation. In general, higher dopamine
levels in a person’s brain causes the need for higher reinforcement from a substance, causing
dependence on drugs that give the brain an elated sensation (Ji 2017). Within their study, there
addiction used as a control (Ji 2017). As stated in their results, “DRD4...methylation levels were
significantly higher in all heroin and meth addicts compared with 52 controls” (Ji 2017). It was
also stated that males who were addicted to either drug were more likely to have increased
methylation levels as well (Ji 2017). Therefore, addicts typically have increased levels of
dopamine and according to their study, this is more prominent in male users. Compared with the
2017 article by Georgia Casey, it can be inferred that dopamine levels do play a role in the
causes of a heroin addiction. As dopamine levels increase, it is predicted that the likelihood for
addictions can increase. Taking into account the current state of our society, it is common for all
races and individuals from socioeconomic statuses to experience this. Therefore, the dopamine
theory disproves the common urban, low-income stigma that addictions are formed based upon
who you are and where you live. While the dopamine theory is an impressive observation about
the causes of addictions, this is not the only feasible theory on why and how individuals become
In an article analyzing the heroin epidemic from the lenses of three historic psychologists,
Nancy Dyer introduces the short and long term effects as well as the causes of addiction from
their perspective. Dyer questions how the symptoms can get as worse as “skin crawling”, but
people are still willing to put their lives through an addiction (2004). Such powerful drug
addictions tend to be aided by the biological expectancy for dependence. Accepting this fact,
Dyer explains her ideas on the concept of causes of addiction as she states:
Coming off of a drug as powerful as heroin can be nearly impossible once the brain
acknowledges its neuromic effects. Dyer also references Emile Durkheim who compares an
addiction to a “religious ritual” where individuals use drugs like heroin to find peace just as
many turn to their religion to find peace (Dyer 2004). In many ways this is true, relating to the
dopamine theory, where the drug supplies feelings of euphoria for the user. Dyer claims that
Durkheim’s quote, “religion, or some substitute for it, will always be with us”, is an omen for
current substance abuse within society (Dyer 2004). Because of the brain’s tendency to feed
addictions, assuming the cause of a heroin addiction is based upon race or socioeconomic status
is not only accusatory, but also faulty; biological processes play a major role in the production of
addictions.
As society continues to prescribe pain relieving opioids for medical purposes, the
correlation between prescription drugs and heroin use has increased. After major surgeries or
other painful health complications, many patients turn to opioids after their prescription
medication has run out. Eventually, heroin often becomes a more viable source of a high because
of lower costs and easy accessibility. Due to the prescription drug to heroin addiction pipeline,
more Americans nationwide are becoming exposed to outlets to begin addictions. With the
current stigma of correlating race and class to causation of addition, society will deem the heroin
epidemic as less credible in areas such as West Virginia and New Hampshire, who suffer some
of the worst levels of heroin users and overdoses across the nation. Due to not only biological
causes of addiction, but also the increase of prescription opioids as painkillers, the levels for all
individuals increase daily as the epidemic continues to plaque many within the United States.
Shooting Down 7
Regardless of race or socioeconomic status, Americans everywhere can easily obtain heroin,
evidence that some prescription opioid abusers, particularly those who inhale or inject their
drugs, graduate or shift to heroin...because it has become more accessible and far less expensive
than prescription opioids” (Circeo et. al 2014). Researchers in this study interviewed addicts
through two different programs: Survey of Key Informants’ Patients Program (SKIP) and
Researchers and Participants Interacting Directly (RAPID) program. Specifically within the
RAPID interviews, every respondent, which consisted of over 150, “who indicated heroin as
their primary drug also endorsed lifetime abuse of prescription drugs” (Cireco et. al 2014).
Additionally, 94% of participants said they chose heroin simply because it is cheaper and easier
to find than prescription drugs (Cicero et. al 2014). Represented by such a large amount of
respondents in their research, it is obvious that prescription opioids can act as a gateway into a
heroin addiction. In their final discussion of the study, they noted the heroin crisis has become a
major issue due to three primary reasons: the misuse of prescription opioids, the common use of
individuals using other opioids after prescriptions, and the easy availability of heroin compared
to prescription pills (Circeo et. al 2014). With easier outlets for distribution, more Americans are
To counteract the prescription to heroin theory, Jacob Sullum writes to prove that the
opioid crisis has nothing to do with the use of prescription pills. In his article “Don’t Blame Pain
Pills for the Opioid Crisis”, he explains a viewpoint that is not so typical in this field. Sullum
states that opioid addictions and deaths have little to do with prescriptions, but more to do with
Shooting Down 8
“multi-drug users with histories of substance abuse and psychological problems” (2018). He
references a 2015 review between the prescription to opioid addiction pipeline. In the study,
former patients treated with narcotics were followed for thirteen years, yet only 1 in 550
individuals died from an overdose related to opioids (Sullum 2018). Throughout the article,
Sullum argues that overdose occur less from former treatment and more from past decisions to
experiment with illegal narcotics. While Sullum’s viewpoint counteracts those of Cicero and his
counterparts, his admits that the true cause of an opioid addictions occurs from past drug use.
Thus supporting the increasingly modern view of causes pertaining less to race and
socioeconomic status, and more to previous drug use and biological dependence.
Similar to the causes of addictions, the effects tend to vary from addict to addict.
Depending on the person, an addict will either stop using, admit themselves into a type of
treatment, or overdose. In 2014 alone, 10,574 out of the 28,647 opioid related deaths were from
heroin (Christensen & Sergio 2017). As the heroin epidemic has spread and the number of
overdoses have increased, more treatment options have arised for struggling addicts.
Beginning in the late 1960’s, the use of methadone to treat heroin became commonplace.
Even currently, many treatment centers give heroin users methadone to wean them off of their
While the use of methadone is not an end-all-be-all, it does provide an easy transition from the
use of heroin. According to 1967 article, it was found that a 100mg dose of a methadone
“blockade” was equivalent to the “euphoric action of 80mg or more of heroin” (“New
Treatments for Heroin Addiction”). The same article also recommended the use of cyclazocine
where 4mg challenged 15mg of heroin (“New Treatments for Heroin Addiction” 1967). Around
the same time period, a study was done through the Black Action Methadone Program that tested
the outcomes of addicts who were treated with methadone and social services compared to those
with no treatment. The 223 patients in this program were predominantly black and white males
aging from 18-71 years (Cleveland et. al 1974). After analyzing the retention in program, relapse
on heroin, employment, and arrests one year after their admission, the program featured a
successful treatment rate for 76.6% of the former addicts (Cleveland et. al 1974). Due to the use
of methadone to control heroin addictions, patients in this program were able to end their
While methadone has been tested and established as an effective form of treatment for
heroin users, many researchers argue that long-term social programs are paramount for success
in addicts. In a 2015 study completed in Bologna, Italy, Raimonda Pavarin researched the
standardized mortality ratios between public treatment center patients and non public treatment
center patients. The Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) is based on the deaths found in a study
compared to the average number of deaths that would be expected (Pavarin 2015). The study was
completely voluntary and featured 959 subjects from ages 15 to 64 (Pavarin 2015). Featuring a
large amount of voluntary participants, this demonstrates the desire for addicts to reach out for
help. Pavarin states, “448 subjects went to a PTC...434 went to an emergency department… and
Shooting Down 10
77 were admitted to the hospital” 2015). Individuals treating in the public treatment center
experienced 18 deaths compared to 29 deaths within the non-PTC group (Pavarin 2015). Due to
their decision to get help and get clean, these addicts saved their lives. After following the PTC
subjects, over 24% successfully completed the treatment, 61% remained in therapy, and 14.7%
ended their treatment entirely (Pavarin 2015). The study was concluded with the suggestion to
treat addicts from a large population scale compared to small and specific groups of individuals
While this study proved effective for a number of addicts, working with large groups may
not always create successful outcomes. In contrast, many addicts thrive knowing they have the
full attention from their supporters. Without feeling cared for and appreciated during the process,
addicts will not be able to overcome the mental urge to relapse. John Owens supports this idea
with his personal viewpoint of effective treatment for heroin users. He claims that there must be
a “therapeutic team which will aim at a long-term continuous sympathetic contact with the
individual patient” (1967). This team must include doctors, a social worker, a psychologist,
probation officer, occupational therapist, and a clinical pathologist who will work united together
in order to come up with the best solution for the individual (Owens 1967). In a facility such as
the one Owens proposes, an addict is much more likely to successfully overcome their struggle
with heroin and opioids. In order to combat the heroin epidemic, programs like these are
necessary for change. Implemented in an effective and neat manner, these programs have the
power to change the lives of addicts with no other options. To parallel Owens’s point of view,
Charles O’Brien states that “the treatment of addicted patients must always be individualized”
(2008). O’Brien also believes in the power of mental and behavioral treatment in addition to
Shooting Down 11
medical detoxification. He claims that the “key to successful treatment is long-term prevention of
relapse by behavioural and pharmacological means” (2008). With a balance between the two,
heroin addicts should receive effective treatment powerful enough to combat their previous
burges.
Local to Henrico County, Virginia, the ORBIT Program represents an ideal image of a
balance between medical and behavioral treatment. Featuring 137 Henrico-based inmates, the
program includes a four-step process to not only end addictions, but also start new beginnings for
the participants’ lives. The first step in the program is called “Rise”. This step features two
phases of recovery, that aim to detoxify and adjust the participant into jail life. During this step
(and throughout all steps), the participants are involved in numerous relapse prevention and
coping classes as well as groups that allow them to share their experiences with others. The
second step features the “green team” where inmates work inside of the jail to demonstrate
commitment and responsibility. Those who move onto step two are well-trusted and allowed
minimum security in the jail. The third step is a major turning point for the inmates in this
program. When reaching this step, participants are able to leave the jail on work release where
they find real jobs to save up their money as well as attend therapy groups outside of the jail.
Leaving the jail creates a lot of trust between the correctional officers and the inmates. Finally,
the fourth and final step for this program is home incarceration.
Nora Burnette and Lisa Harvey, two women in the program, describe the ORBIT
program as life changing. Nora Burnette explained that she “[did not] feel like [she] was an
inmate” (personal communication, April 20, 2018). Burnette shared her story of opioid abuse
Shooting Down 12
and how she wound up in the the ORBIT program. Before she was arrested, she was “beyond
control” and had lost grasps with her former life. She explained how the classes, groups, and
lessons learned in this program have “taught [her] not to be triggered” and have given her hope
for the future (personal communication, April 20, 2018). Lisa Harvey shares a similar story
about her alcoholism that led her life astray. At the beginning of her prison sentence, Harvey was
“too proud to ask for help” (personal communication, April 20, 2018). However, after relapsing
on home incarceration and returning to the ORBIT program, she knew that it was time to take
control of her addiction. A couple months into her second round of the program, she began
leading a Relapse Prevention group for participants at the jail. Harvey explained that this was
very “eye-opening” and helped with her own personal coping (personal communication, April
20, 2018). Both women continuously repeated their gratitude for the program and admitted that
ORBIT saved their lives. Treatment programs such as ORBIT safely and successfully improve
the lives of struggling addicts who would otherwise be suffering in jail. By not only being
medically treated, but also admitted into classes, participants in this program are pushed and
Conclusion
This paper enforces the conception that the heroin epidemic in the United States has
reached a point where change must be instituted. Using a variety of research methods including
research journals and surveys, it has been found that heroin majorly affects the lives of addicts.
This subject is extremely relevant to society today, as the epidemic has transitioned from an issue
prescriptions and biological dependence. Given that more individuals are becoming influenced
Shooting Down 13
by heroin, it is imperative that citizens nationwide should become informed on the detrimental
References
Buckman, D. Z., Leece, P., & Orkin, A. (2017). The epidemic as stigma: The bioethics of
opioids. The Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics, 45(4), 607-619. Retrieved from
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1073110517750600
Byrne, A. J., et. al. (2006). Emergency naloxone for heroin overdose. British Medical Journal,
Casey, G. (2017, September). Dealing with addiction. Kai Tiaki: Nursing New Zealand, 23(8),
http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A507185361/GPS?u=henrico&sid=GPS&xid=ece33b
a4
Christensen, J. & Hernandez, S. (2017, June 23). This is america on drugs: A visual
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/23/health/heroin-opioid-drug-overdose-deaths-visual-guid
e/index.html
Cicero T. J., Ellis M.S., Surratt H.L., & Kurtz S.P. (2014). The changing face of heroin use in the
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/fullarticle/1874575?;resultClick=3
Cleveland W. H., et. al. (1974). Outcomes of methadone treatment of 300 innercity addicts.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4595122
Crews, F. T. (2012). Immune function genes, genetics, and the neurobiology of addiction.
Shooting Down 15
http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A460060778/GPS?u=henrico&sid=GPS&xid=a2be79
a5
Dyer, N. O. A. K. (2003). Durkheim, mead, and heroin addiction. Human Architecture: Journal
http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A227788678/GPS?u=henrico&sid=GPS&xid=77d9b
18b
Ji, H., et al. (2018). Dopamine receptor d4 promoter hypermethylation increases the risk of drug
http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A525840893/GPS?u=henrico&sid=GPS&xid=320a2
34e
“New treatments for heroin addiction” (1967). The British Medical Journal, 2(5552), 588.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/20208741
Owens, J. (1967). Centres for treatment of drug addiction: Integrated approach. The British
jstor.org/stable/20388077
Pavarin, R. M. (2015). Mortality risk among heroin abusers: Clients and non-clients of public
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.3109/10826084.2015.1027932?scroll=top&
needAccess=true
Soykut, B., et. al. (2013). Oxidative stress enzyme status and frequency of micronuclei in heroin
http://informalhealthcare.com/txm
Sullum, J. (2018, February). Don’t blame pain pills for the opioid crisis. Reason, 49(9), 15.
Retrieved from
http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A522210607/GPS?u=henrico&sid=GPS&xid=9ed64a
d7