Chapter 2 THE DoctRINE OF THEOSIS, OR BECOMING A Gop Jesus took with him Peter, James, and John, and after they had climbed a high mountain, something amazing happened. The face of Jesus “shone like the sun and his clothes be white as the light.” This account of the transfig- uration of Christ became a key text when patristic writers, and specifically the Greek Fathers of the Church, attempted to understand and explain the doctrine of theosis, or salvation as human di- vinization.’ The transfiguration was interpreted as a revelation illustrating what happens when a human body is divinized, when it participates “in the divine nature.” In the words of St. Gregory me as 1. Matthew 17:1-8, Jerusalem 9:28-36. Palamas (1296-1359), it was a revelation of “what ‘we once were and what we are to be” when dei fied by Christ.‘ These gospel passages were also significant because they so handily encapsulated a number of issues central to the content and ex- perience of theosis: the unearthly light which em- anated from Christ's body, the vision of that light by human persons, the relationship between di vinity and humanity, and, at the center of it all, the person of Christ himself. From the very beginnings of the Church the centrality of Christ has been recognized; he is the ‘one who makes salvation—human divinization— le (hereafter referred to as JB), Parallel passages are in Mark 9:2-8 and Luke Vladimir Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, ed. John H. Erickson and Thomas E. Bird (Crestwood, New York: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1974), 60-61; Andrew Louth, trans., Maximus the Confessor (New York: Routledge, 1996), 70-71, 108-9; Georgios I. Mantaridis, The Deifcation of Man: St. Gregory Palamas and the Orthodox Tradition, trans. Liadain Sherrard (Crestwood, New York: St. Vladimin’s Semi- nary Press, 1984), 100, 123; Jaroslav Pelikan, The Spirit of Eastern Christendom (600-1700), vol. 2 of The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974), 260-61; Symeon the New Theologian, The Discourses, trans, C. J.de Catanzaro (Mahwah, New Jer- sey: Paulist, 1980), 357. 3. 2 Peter 1:4, KIV. 4, St. Gregory Palamas, Homilies 16, quoted in Pelikan, The Spirit of Eastern Christendom, 266.10 + "Partakers of the Divine Nature” a possibility. Two classic texts which come from the early centuries of the Church clearly demon- strate this belief. St. Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130-c. 202)—who had known St. Polycarp, who had known the Apostles’—wrote, “the Word of God, Jesus Christ our Lord, who because of his im: measurable love became what we are in order to make us what he is.” St. Athanasius of Alexandria (295-373) also explained that “God became man, so that we might be made gods” Thus, at the root and core of the doctrine of theosis was not only a belief in the centrality of Christ but also the belief that he makes theasis possible precisely because he is both God and human. Before pro- ceeding, then, to analyze Christ’s divinized hu- manity, it will be useful to first back up and present the patristic doctrines on the nature of God and the nature of the human person. After having done that, it will become possible to adequately discuss the divinization of human nature which Christ accomplished in his person and what the implications are for human persons who can thus become divinized themselves. The Nature of God The fundamental teaching regarding the na. ture of God is the doctrine of the Trinity: that the three divine persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, are the one God. The source and guarantee of their oneness is the monarchy of the Father. The Father is the source of divinity for the Son and Holy Spirit: the Son is eternally begotten by the Father while the Holy Spirit eternally proceeds from the Father.* While each divine person is un- created and eternal, transcending the created cate gories of time and space, it is the Father alone who is the unbegotten source of divinity; the terms begotten and proceeding are used in reference to the Son and Holy Spirit to indicate that while they both receive their divinity from the Father they are, nevertheless, distinct persons. Thus there is order in the Trinity without subordination. Another way of expressing the doctrine of the Trinity is to say that there is one divine nature and three divine hypostases.* Nature answers the question of “what”; hypostasis answers the question of “who.” Hence, there is one God, one “what,” because one divine nature, and there are three di- vine persons, three “whos,” because each possesses the fullness of the divine nature. The eminent theologian Vladimir Lossky explains it this way: There is no partition or division of nature among the three Persons of the Holy Trinity. ‘The Hypostases are not three parts of a whole, of the one nature, but each includes in Him- self the whole divine nature." And beyond the real distinction between nature and person in God is the distinction between essence and energy. St, Irenaeus of Lyons, On the Apostolic Preaching, with an introduction by John Behr (Crestwood, New York: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1997), 1 Robert M. Grant, trans., Irenaeus of Lyons (New York: Routledge, 1997), 164, Athanas us, On the Incarnation of the Word 54, quoted in Christoforos Stavropoulos, Partakers of the Di: vine Nature: An inspiring presentation of man’s purpose in life according to Orthodox theology, trans. Stan- ley Harakas (Minneapolis, Minn.: Light and Life, 1976), 24. Anthony Meredith, The Cappadocians (Crestwood, New York: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1995), 119-20. Hypostasis being an equivalent term for “person.” Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 118-19. Ibid, 106,‘The reason for distinguishing between essence and energy in God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—is to preserve the following antinomy: on the one hand, God is uncreated and wholly tran- scendent, unknowable, and unparticipable; on the other hand, God has spoken to his creatures, is wholly immanent, knowable, and participable." Lossky again offers a masterful synopsis, this time on the difference between essence and energies in God: Moreover distinction isnot separation: it does not divide God into knowable and unknow- able. God reveals Himself, totally gives Him- self in His energies, and remains totally un- knowable and incommunicable in His essence. He remains identical in these two modes of existence: the same, and at the same time, dif- ferent... . If one must distinguish in God ‘essence and that which is not essence, that is precisely because God is not limited by His ‘essence. He is more than essence, if He is truly the living God, the God of Abraham, of Isaac, and of Jacob, the Holy Trinity—and not the God of the philosophers and the scholars.” Furthermore, it needs to be noted that the ener- gies of God are not a consequence of the divine activities of creation or revelation; the energies are an eternal aspect of the divine nature. God is always and forever both unknowable (a function of God's essence) and knowable (a function of God's energies)."" If God is essentially unknowable and unpartici- pable, that is because he is eternal and uncreated, eee tetttereteee reer ert The Dactrine of Theosis, or Becoming a God + 11 wholly other and different from anything which has been created, which has been brought into being from nonbeing. The essence/energies dis tinction helps to emphasize the fact that what God is by nature, what God is essentially, cannot be shared or participated in by any creature or created reality." Only the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit possess—can possess—the divine na- ture essentially because only they are eternal and uncreated persons. By definition, any created re- ality can share in the divine nature only through God's divine energies. But, given what was said before by Lossky, to share in the divine energies is to possess God himself as he communicates him- self to creatures, In sum, the energies of God are the uncreated God himself as he communicates himself to created beings. Ultimately this antino- mic doctrine of the divine energies will become supremely important when discussing in what way created human nature can become divinized. The Nature of the Human Person As with God, one can distinguish between person" and nature in a human being. Person answers the question of “who,” while nature an- swers the question of “what.” In other words: Person” signifies the irreducibility of man to his nature—‘irreducibility” and not “some- thing irreducible” or “something which makes man irreducible to his nature” precisely be- cause it cannot be a question here of “some- thing” distinct from “another nature” but of 12, Ibid, 54-56, 68; John Meyendorff, Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes (New York: Fordham University Press, 1979), 77-78; John Meyendorff and Robert Tobias, ed., Salvation in Christ: A Lutheran-Orthodox Dialogue (Minneapolis, Minn.: Augsburg Fortress, 1992), 108, 1185 Pelikan, The Spirit of Eastern Christendom, 269-70; Timothy Ware, The Orthodox Church (New York: Penguin, 1993), 67-68, 208-9. 13, Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 55-56, 14. Ibid, 55. 15, Meyendorff and Tobias, Salvation in Christ, 108-9. 16. See note 9 in this chapter.12 + "Partakers of the Divine Nature” someone who is distinct from his own na: ture, of someone who goes beyond his nature while still containing it, who makes it exist as. human nature by this overstepping and yet does not exist in himself beyond the nature which he “enhypostasizes” or personalizes] and which he constantly exceeds. Furthermore, strictly speaking, persons act, natures do not: persons act through their nature. Since a human person is one who possesses a human na- ture, a human person will act in a human way. There are two distinct elements which make up human nature: a material element (the body) and an immaterial element (the soul). However, a human person does not possess two natures, one material and the other immaterial. Rather, the human person has one nature which is compos- ite, containing both a material and an immaterial element." ‘Matter, in its origin, was created out of noth- ing and each human soul is created out of noth- ing. Therefore, a human person is created when matter, which most immediately comes from parents, is vivified by a human soul. Thus a hu- ‘man person is a created hypostasis—as opposed to the uncreated hypostases of the Trinity— forever dependent on God for being and life.” Although in essence the human person is on- tologically different from God, the human per- son has nevertheless been created for communion 17. Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 120. with God, for divinization: to become by grace or free gift what God is by nature, essentially." This possibility for divinization is summarized by the Greek Fathers of the Church through reference to the statement in Genesis* that human beings are created in God's “image and likeness.” The image, or to use the Greek term the icon, of God signifies our human free will, our reason, our sense of moral responsibility — everything, in short, which marks us out from the animal creation and makes each of us a person. But the image means more than that, It means that we are God's ‘ofispring’ (Acts xvii, 28), His kin; it means that between us and Him there is @ point of contact and similarity. The gulf between creature and Creator is not impassible, for because we are in God's image we can know God and have communion with Him. And if we make proper use ofthis faculty or communion with God, then we will become ‘like’ God, we will acquire the divine likeness; in the words of John Damascene, we will be ‘assimilated to God through virtue’ To acquire the likeness is to be deified, itis to become a second god? a'god by grace: Thus “image” refers to what is given, the human reality, whereas “likeness” refers to what is poten- tial. The “image of God" is potential likeness, and “likeness” is realized image.” 18. Irenaeus, On the Apostolic Preachings, 46-47; Mantzaridis, The Deification of Man, 19; Meyendorff,Byzan- tine Theology, 140-41, 19. Grant, Irenaeus of Lyons, 145-46; Irenacus, On the Apostolic Preachings, 42—43. 20, That is, on the level of being (created vs. uncreated). 21, Nicholas Cabasilas, The Life in Christ trans. Carmino J. de Catanzaro (Crestwood, New York: St. Viadimit’s Seminary Press, 1974), 190-91; Meyendorff, Byzantine Theology, 135, 153, 225; Meyendorff and Tobias, Salvation in Christ, 60-61; Ware, Orthodox Church, 231 22. Genesis 1:26, KIV. 23. Ware, Orthodox Church, 219, 24, Mantzaridis, Deification of Man, 20-21.If the primordial man, Adam, was created in the “image and likeness of God,” this means that from his first moment of existence he was in re- lationship with God, he had the gift and com- panionship of the Holy Spirit. Adam was in the process of progressing and of being divinized, of acquiring the divine likeness. But then Adam sinned. ‘The real content of Adam's “original sin” con- sisted in the fact that Adam attempted to “be- come a god without God”; he was disobedient. As a result of Adam's sin he lost the companionship of the Holy Spirit and his progression stopped. He could no longer be divinized, attain the divine likeness. But more resulted than just this inabil- ity to actualize the image of God within him; the image of God itself was “tarnished ... man’s rea- son was obscured, his will weakened.” ‘Through sin Adam became subject to emo- tional discord, suffering, sickness, and death. ‘Adam's human existence became unnatural, less than natural. Having been created in commun- ion with God, to lose this relationship and to ex- {st without it signified an “inhuman” existence.” What Adam transmitted to his children was not the guilt of his sin; that was his alone. Instead, his descendants inherit the consequences of his sin: a corruptible, mortal nature, separated from God, which is inclined to sin.” “[Adam’s sin] spread 25. Meyendorff and Tobias, Salvation in Christ, 60. 26, Ibid, 38. 27. Ibid., 39. It needs to be stressed that the “image of God” in fallen humanity, although “tar ‘The Doctrine of Theosis, or Becoming a God + 13 from his soul to his body, and from his body to the bodies which derived from his, and from those bodies to the(ir] souls: How then could human persons once again enjoy the companionship of the Holy Spirit? How would the image of God be healed so that humans could once more progress and realize their divine potential? This would re- quire the work and ministry of a new Adam, a second Adam—Jesus the Christ. Christ: The Second Adam For the first time, Christ, in his very person, accomplished the divinization of human nature.” To understand how this occurred, one must first reflect on Christ's divinity. Before Christ’s incar- nation, that is, before he became human, he was the preexistent, uncreated, eternal Son of God, one of the members of the Trinity. Thus, before ‘mortality, Christ is a divine person—an uncreated hypostasis who possesses a divine nature. What occurred then at the moment of Christ's incarnation—his conception in the womb of the Virgin Mary—was that he assumed to himself a created human nature, a body and a soul, and personalized or enhypostasized it.” After the in- carnation the Son of God, an eternal, uncreated di- vine person, possesses two natures: an uncreated divine nature and a created human nature.” The ed," or blurred or covered, was not fundamentally damaged or destroyed. Even in thei fallen condition, human persons are still essentially good. 28. Mantearidis, Deification of Man, 24. 29, Ibid,, 2; Meyendorff, Byzantine Theology, 139. 30. Meyendorff, Byzantine Theology, 143-46; Meyendorft and Tobias, Salvation in Christ, 39, 60-61 31. Cabasilas, Life in Christ, 77. 432. Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 104; Louth, Maximus the Confessor, 34; Mantzaridis, Deification of Man, 128; Meyendorff, Byzantine Theology, 163-65. 33, That is, he made it his own, 34, Louth, Maximus the Confessor, 185.rartakers of the Divine Nature’ separation between divinity and humanity is for- ever abolished in the person of the Son of God. The same person is both human and divine.” A further consequence of the incarnation is that the Son of God, called Jesus Christ after his incarnation/assumption of a human nature, pos: sesses a human nature which has been divinized. The “image of God” is not only healed but it is actualized, the “likeness” is attained. This comes about because the energies of Christ’s divine na- ture completely interpenetrate his human nature.” In other words, the incarnation does not result in an obliteration of Christ's human nature. Nor does his human nature merge with the divine na- ture to produce something which is a mixture of the two natures. Instead, Christ shows that the divinization of human nature means that human nature is perfected—what was meant to occur in the first Adam has been realized in the second Adam, Communion is restored in the person of Christ between humanity and divinity, ‘The humanity of Christ is wholly united to God precisely because it is God's own humanity, Recalling that natures do not act, but that per- sons act through their natures, we can say that, since Christ is God who now possesses a created human nature, God learns, suffers, feels pain, even dies—but not because of his divine nature but through his human nature. Likewise, Christ can heal and raise the dead—but not because of his human nature but through his divine nature. The same person possesses distinct yet inseparable natures because they are the natures of one single person: the eternal Logos, the second person of the 35. Ware, Orthodox Church, 20-22. 36. Vladimr Lossky, The Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church (Crestwood, New York: St. Vladimir's Semi- nary Press, 1976), 146; Mantzariis, Deificaton of Man, 30. 37. This ability to predicate the operation of the two natures (divine and human) to the one person who pos- sesses both natures (Christ) is technically called the communicatio idiomatum. 38. Meyendorff and Tobias, Salvation in Christ, 41,44, 39. Cabasilas, Life in Christ, 106 Trinity, who after the incarnation is called Jesus Christ and who can, precisely because of the incar- nation, act both by means of his uncreated divine nature as well as by his created human nature.” All this explains the centrality of the incarna. tion of Christin the teachings of the Greek Fathers of the Church. Everything that Christ did throughout His earthly life was based on the presupposition that humanity was already saved and deified, from the very moment of His conception in the womb of Mary. .. . Therefore, salvation, as life in communion with God, is already present in Christ’s humanity on the basis of the hypostatic [or personal] union of human and divine natures in Christ. What needs to be done, is for the other obstacles to be abol- ished, so that humanity (and the entire cos ‘mos in it) may be freed from the additional consequences of the “ancestral sin” (personal sin and death].” Ultimately, Christ overcame the obstacle of sin through his atoning suffering and death, and over- came the obstacle of death through his glorious resurrection.” Having now considered the cen: tral role of Christ as the second Adam, it will be helpful to first revisit the scene of Christ’: Trans- figuration, which opened this chapter, before specifically focusing on what it means to say that a created human person is divinized. According to the Greek Fathers of the Church, what the Apostles saw at the Transfiguration of Christ was a natural consequence of the diviniza- tion of Christ’s humanity. What naturally occursto a body that is wholly divinized, or completely interpenetrated by the divine energies of the di- vine nature, is that it becomes luminous and bril- liant like the sun. The light which emanated from Christ's body was in fact the light of Christ’s divinity—Christ’s divinity which was inseparably united to his humanity, his body and soul. What the Apostles experienced on the Mount of Trans- figuration was the normal state of Christ’ body. Atall other times the Apostles’ eyes were shielded or “blinded” so that they did not see the radiance and glory of Christ’ divinized humanity." Theosis or the Divinization of Created Human Persons What exactly takes place, then, when a human person is divinized? What does it mean to say that “humans become gods”? In a sense, we are to replicate in our own persons what first occurred in the person of Christ. ‘The human person was called, according to St, Maximus, ‘to reunite by love created with uncreated nature, showing the two in unity and identity through the acquisition of grace. The unity and identity here refer to the per- son, to the human hypostasis. Man is thus to reunite by grace two natures in his created hypostasis, to become ‘a created god! a ‘god by grace; in contrast to Christ who being a divine person assumed human nature." ‘What is deified in Christ is His human nature assumed in its fullness by the divine person. What must be deified in usis our entire nature, belonging to our person which must enter into union with God, and become a person created 40. See note 2 in this chapter. The Doctrine of Theasis, or Becoming a God + 1S in two natures: a human nature which is de ified, and a nature or, rather, divine energy, that deifies.” Like the divine Person of the Word who as sumed human nature, human persons in ‘whom union with God is being accomplished ‘ought to unite in themselves the created and the uncreated, to become, so to speak, per- sons of two natures, with this difference, that Christ is a divine Person while deified men are and alvvays will remain created persons.” Clearly, then, human persons become “partakers of the divine nature” in a way that is existentially different from the way Christ is divine. The supreme difference between human per- sons and Christ is that while humans are created persons, Christ is an uncreated person.** What Christ is by nature, divine, we are called to be by grace or participation. In the tradition of the Eastern Church grace usually signifies all the abundance of the divine nature, in so far as it is communicated to men; the deity which operates outside the essence and gives itself, the divine nature of which we partake through the uncreated energies.” Recalling what was said previously regarding the real distinction in the divine nature between essence and energies, it becomes clear that Christ is divine essentially; and by definition only Christ, along with the Father and the Holy Spirit, can possess the divine nature essentially, as they are the only three persons who are uncreated and eternal, Humans are, by nature, human. God— Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—is, by nature, divine. When a human is divinized, a human is united to 41. Lossky, Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, 126. 42. Ibid. 155. 43. Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 65. See Lossky, Mystical Theology ofthe Eastern Church, 182. 44, Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 65; idem, Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, 119. 45. Lossky, Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, 162-63whic ing divi sofa and god one 46. 47. 48, 49, 50, 51 16+ God but God's divine energies” himself but only insofar as God is participable." “Partakers of the Divine Nature” God's divine energies—the “divine nature’ in ich humanity participates is not the essence of which are God To paraphrase St. Maximus the Confessor (580-662), a divinized human person becomes all that God is except for identity in essence.” In other words, a divinized human person does not cease to be human and created when participat- in the uncreated and divinizing energies of God, just as Christ did not cease to be divine in nce and uncreated when he united to himself a created human nature. Timothy Ware expresses itn this way: Nor does the human person, when it “be- comes god cease to be human: ‘We remain creatures while becoming god by grace, as Christ remained God when becoming man by the Incarnation’ The human being does not become God by nature, but merely a ‘cre- ated god; a god by grace or by status" The significance and magnitude of human inization becomes evident when one takes into account that just as it is possible to predicate both divine and human attributes of Christ, in- as he is one person who is both divine and human, s0 too it is possible to predicate divine human attributes of a divinized human per son—‘for they will be by grace everything that God is by nature.” A person who has “become a through union with the divine energies can be called “unoriginate and eternal,” granted that understands what one is saying, The uncreated and imperishable grace of God dwelling in man renders him, too, im- Meyendorff and Tobias, Salvation in Christ, 49. perishable, eternal and unoriginate. These bold terms, used to describe the man who through God's grace is regenerate, are not met with for the first time in [Gregory] Pala- ‘mas; Maximus the Confessor had already used the same words to characterize the man who is alive in Christ and who is guided by His grace, They do not, of course, alter the basic distinction between man and God as created and Creator, but they express the truth of the ‘genuine regeneration as experienced by the man who enters into communion with the divinizing grace, which makes him a god in every respect “save identity of essence.”* But when man shares the uncreated divini2- ing gift, he acquires supernatural attributes. Without ceasing to be created as regards his nature, he is nevertheless placed beyond the category of created things because of the grace within him. He is now in possession not only of his created nature but of an uncreated and indwelling grace, and he can be defined not only according to his natural characteristics but also according to the qualities of the ‘grace dwelling within him: “He who achieves deification is fittingly defined by both: he is on the one hand unoriginate, eternal, and heavenly, as we heard just above, on account of the uncreated grace that eternally derives from the Eternal God; he is on the other a new creation and a new man and things sim- ilar to these, on account of himself and his own nature: Thus, a divinized person, insofar as remaining human by nature, is created; but insofar as one Louth, Maximus the Confessor, 158; Pelikan, Spirit of Eastern Christendom, 267, Ware, Orthodox Church, 232, emphasis in original Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 65. Mantearidis, Deification of Man, 42-43. Ibid, 112. The portion in quotation marks is from Gregory Palamas.becomes divine by grace, united to the divine en- ergies, then one is also, at the same time, “unorig- inate and eternal.” Finally, it needs to be noted that for human persons, divinization is both an immediate reality and a matter of progression. A person is truly di- vinized from the first moment they are united to God's energies; but the full transformation that di- vinization effects on a person will not be fully com- pleted until after death, at the time of the resur- rection of the body.” This time of resurrection has been evocatively described by Nicholas Cabasilas: Then each one of us can shed forth rays brighter than those of the sun. ... A solem: nity unsurpassed! A whole people of gods around their God, of beautiful creatures around him who is the Beautiful, of servants around their Master. .. . The choir of the lect, the company of the blessed... . Such dazzling wonder descends from the skies to arth, and suns in their turn will rise from earth to glorify the Sun of Righteousness himself... al is flooded with light.* Even after the resurrection of the body, however, progress continues. Salvation is not a static reality, If the human person crosses a threshold through the divinization of the body, still a threshold is not the whole house. Perhaps the most noteworthy writer on the subject of the eternal progression of the human person who has become a “god by grace” is the The Doctrine of Theosis, or Becoming a God + 1 fourth-century bishop, Gregory of Nyssa (c. 335- ¢. 395). Nearly a century and a half before Gre- gory’s birth, however, St. Irenaeus, in his treatise ‘Against Heresies, had begun to speak on the topic: “And those to whom He says, ‘Come, you blessed cof my Father, receive the Kingdom prepared for you for eternity’ (Matt. 25:34), will receive the Kingdom and progress in it for ever.”” In another passage St. Irenaeus, in referring to the “age to come,” speaks of how God will be “always teach ing and man always learning fom God.“ Gre- gory of Nyssa remains, nevertheless, as the great teacher on the doctrine of eternal progression.” In his treatise The Life of Moses Gregory ex- plains that human perfection consists in a person's eternal growth and progress in virtuous activity Made to desire and not to abandon the tran- scendent height by the things already at tained, it makes its way upward without ceas- ing, ever through its prior accomplishments renewing its intensity for the flight. Activity directed towards virtue causes its capacity to {grow through exertion; this kind of activity alone does not slaken its intensity by the ef- fort but increases it... the place with [God] is so great that the one running in itis never able to cease from his progress.” In this teaching eternal progress is rooted in the infinite nature of God. A divinized person will never stop growing and learning and doing pre- cisely because the source of divinization, the 52. Lossky, Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, 90; Pelikan, Spirit of Eastern Christendom, 268, 53. Cabasilas, Life in Christ, 43; Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 65; Ware, Orthodox Church, 233. 54, Cabisilas, Life in Christ, 166-67. 55. Hans Urs von Balthasar, ed., The Scandal of the Incarnation: Irenaeus Against the Heresies, trans. John Saward (San Francisco: Ignatius, 1990), 110. Grant, Irenaeus of Lyons, 118, 184, 1978), 30-31, 111-20 passim, Gregory of Nyssa, The Life of Moses, trans. Abraham J. Malherbe and Everett Ferguson (New York: Paul Meredith, The Cappadocians, 77; Meyendortf, Byzantine Theology, 219, , 225, 226; Meyendorff and Tobias, Salvation in Christ, 63, . Gregory of Nyssa, Life of Moses, 113, 117.18 + “Partakers of the Divine Nature” uncreated energies of God, is limitless and int nite, Divinized persons will never exhaust God's ability to empower them for virtuous activity.” During mortality, however, a divinized person is still subject to suffering and death. Sin is still a reality with which to contend, What then are the ‘means for divinization to begin and progress? How is the divinization of human nature, accomplished by Christin his person, to become a reality in our human lives? To answer that question we need to turn to another member of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit. How Theosis is Accomplished ‘The mission of Christ was to divinize human nature, to restore communion between God and humanity. As was seen above, in the subsection “Christ—The Second Adam,” he did that in his person by uniting to himself human nature. But how is this divinization of human nature, accom- plished in Christ, to be communicated to human persons? That is the mission of the Holy Spirit. (One may say that the work of the Spirit serves that ofthe Son, for itis by receiving the Spirit that human persons can bear witness in fall consciousness to the divinity of Christ. The Son has become like us by the incarnation; we become like Him by deification, by par- taking of the divinity in the Holy Spirit, who ‘communicates the divinity to each person in a particular way. The redeeming work of the Son is related to our nature. The defying work of the Holy Spirit concerns our persons. But the 59. Ibid., 12-13, 60. Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 109-10. 61. Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 42-43; Mantzaridis, Deification of Man, 41-45 passim. 62. Ibid, 41 63. Ibid, 42. 64, Meyendorff and Tobias, Salvation in Christ, 32-53. 65. Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 43-44. 66, Mantzaridis, Deificaton of Man, 43. two are inseparable. ultimately they are but one dispensation of the Holy Trinity, accom- plished by two Divine Persons sent by the Fa ther into the world. This double dispensation of the Word and of the Paraclete has as its {goal the union of created beings with God.® And the Holy Spirit communicates the gift of di- vinization through the instrumentality of the sacraments. ‘The sacraments are rituals through which the grace of Christ is communicated to persons by the power of the Holy Spirit operative in their administration.” The sacraments are created media which transmit the uncreated grace of God. Man as a created being has need of these things if he is to approach and receive the uncreated grace of the Holy Spirit ‘The sacraments of the Church make it poss- ible for man to enter freely and personally {nto communion with the divinizing grace which the Logos of God bestowed upon hu- man nature in assuming it” “Some of the major sacraments are:” Baptism, Chrismation (or Confirmation), the Eucharist, Confession, Holy Orders (Holy Priesthood), Mar- riage, and Oil of the Sick." Two of these seven, however, Baptism and the Eucharist, are regarded as preeminent and are the key sacraments for the divinization of the human person. “The two chief sacraments, according to [Gregory] Palamas, are those of the Holy Eucharist and of Baptism, and on them depends man’s salvation.” For the idem, Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, 183;sake of economy, discussion of the sacraments will thus be limited to brief overviews of Baptism and Eucharist.” As noted above, through natural descent we inherit our human nature. The fallen humanity of ‘Adam which is liable to suffering, disorder, and death is what we receive at birth. On the other hand, the humanity of Christ is a divinized one, a reality which occurred at the incarnation. There needs to be a way for human persons to join their human natures to the already divinized human nature of Christ so that we can become “one body” with Christ to counteract the effects of the nature we share with Adam. This new way or new birth is the sacrament of Baptism." The sacra- ment of Baptism is received when a person is im- mersed three times in water (or has water poured over him or her three times) and invocation of the Trinity is made: “In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit" Through Baptism one’s personal sins are forgiven, and one is brought into relationship with Christ, united to the divine energies which flow from Christ to the newly baptized person. At Baptism, while the soul is immediately divinized in an invisible way, the body is divinized by way of promise and hope.” In this sense, Baptism divinizes one im- mediately while also placing one on a path that leads to continued progression and growth in di- vinizing grace since, as was noted above, human divinization is both immediate and a process that is only fully realized at the resurrection of the The Doctrine of Theosis, or Becoming a God + 19 body when one’s body is divinized—experiences the full effects of divinization—as well. Through baptismal grace that which is “in the mage” is purified and brightened and acquires the power to achieve likeness to God, oF de- ification, which the fall had made impossible.” ‘The key point regarding Baptism is that it is the sacrament which unites a person to Christ; by it “life in Christ” begins, and through union with Christ's divinized humanity we begin to partake of the divinizing energies of God.” In the sacrament of the Eucharist a person re- ceives the bread and wine, which have been conse- crated by a man holding the priesthood to become the body and blood of Christ. Thus, in the Eu- charist, when a person consumes the consecrated bread and wine, that person is receiving into his or her bodies the person of Christ himself.” ‘That of which we partake {the sacrament of the Eucharist] is not something of His, but [Christ] Himself. It is not some ray of light Which we receive in our souls, but the very orb ofthe sun, So we dwell in Him and are indwelt and become one spirit with Him, The soul and the body all their faculties forthwith be ‘come spiritual, for our souls, our bodies and blood, are united with His... . What a thing itis for Christ's mind to be mingled with ours, our will to be blended with His, our body with His Body and our blood with His Blood!" By way of more clearly understanding what takes place through reception of the Eucharist, it helps to recall the meaning underlying the Transfiguration 67. Arguably, the greatest writer on the role of sacraments in the attainment of theosis is Nicholas Cabasilas. For his discussion of Baptism: Cabasilas, Life in Christ, 65-102 passim; on Eucharist: Cabasilas, Life in Christ, 113-48 passim. 68. Mantzaridis, Deification of Man, 42 69. Cabasilas, Life in Christ, 73 70. Mantearidis, Deification of Man, 48. 71. Ibid. 46 72. Cabasilas, Life in Christ, 65-66; Mantzaridis, Deification of Man, 45-51 73. Mantearidis, Deification of Man, 51-56 passim; Meyendorff, Byzantine Theology, 203, 206. 74. Cabasilas, Life in Christ, 115-16.20 + “Partakers of the Divine Nature" Christ’s body is divinized because it is com- pletely interpenetrated by the energies of his di vine nature. By receiving the Eucharist again and again a person is progressively divinized more and more through a union with Christ that is ac- complished by means of union with his divinized body. In other words, the divine energies which interpenetrate Christ's body interpenetrate ours as well whenever we become one with Christ's body through receiving the sacrament of the Eucharist.” In addition to the sacraments—the most significant of which are Baptism and Eucharist—prayer, obedience to the commandments, and ongoing repentance are reception of the also crucial elements in the life of a person who is gradually being transformed and shaped by the divinizing energies of God. St. Maximus the Con- fessor expressed it in this way: ‘The Logos [Jesus Christ] bestows adoption on us when He grants us that birth and deification which, transcending nature, comes by grace from above through the Spirit, The guarding and preservation of this in God depends on the resolve of those thus born: on their sincere acceptance of the grace bestowed on them and, through the practice of the command- ments, on their cultivation of the beauty given to them by grace.”* This doctrine of divine-human cooperation in the process of divinization is termed “synergy?” While the doctrine of synergy is meant to underscore the need for human acceptance and response to God's divinizing grace, it is often misunderstood to mean that human: way “earn” their salvation or that human works alone, apart from God's grace, are meritorious and deserving of divine reward. Of course, noth- ing could be further from the truth. What is at stake is a very real antinomy which seeks to bal- ance two truths: that God is the sole source of salvation, or deifying grace, and that human ac ceptance and rejection of such grace is always a real possibility.” Within the context of the mod- ern Lutheran-Orthodox dialogue, synergy has been described as follows: in some With regards to the work of God, we can af- firm that divine initiative precedes human response, stricted to our response to grace, a response possible because the human will isnot in to tal bondage but remains sufficiently free to “seek first the kingdom of God”... Election can be voided by acts of unrighteousness and faithlessness. Predestination is not absolute. Freedom of the willis manifest in the coming to faith and in the sinful rejection of grace.” Synergy or cooperation is re- As was noted previously, prayer, obedience to the commandments, and ongoing repentance are all 75, To forestall any misunderstanding, it bears repeating that the way in which Christ is divine is fundamen tally and existentially different from the way humans become “partakers of the divine nature” Christ is divine by nature, in essence, and atthe incarnation hypostatically united to his divine person human na- ture, which nature is divinized through complete interpenetration by the energies of Christ’s divine na- ture, Human persons are by nature “ ind are divinized by participating in the energies—not essence—of the divine nature, which in this instance are mediated through Christ’ eucharistic body: 76. Louth, Maximus the Confessor, 33-34 77. Cabasilas, Life in Christ, 159-94 passim. 78. ‘The Rev. Fr John Breck states that “Synergy implies a fundamental antinomy: a person must accept God's sgrace to be saved (through an exercise of free will); but such acceptance is only possible through the sanc- tifying power ofthe Spirit” Meyendorff and Tobias, Salvation in Christ, 153, 79, Ibid, 152-53aspects of our human cooperation with God's di- vinizing grace." Likewise, the ongoing and faith- ful reception of the sacrament of the Eucharist is another key way in which human persons freely unite themselves ever more closely to the person and grace of Christ. The need for repentance in the life of a person who has experienced the “already” of diviniza- tion, through union with God's energies, under scores the “not yet” aspect of divinization.” The grace of God eliminates neither human weakness and susceptibility to temptation nor free will. Ac- cordingly, baptized persons still do sin in large and small ways. The process of repentance in- volves the admission of personal guilt, the recog- nition of an ongoing need for God’s sustaining grace, and the firm intention to reject sinful acts and habits in favor of a more virtuous and loving manner of living. For serious transgressions of God's commandments, normally recourse will also be had to the sacrament of confession wherein a repentant person confesses his or her sins to a man possessing the priesthood, who is then au- thorized to grant absolution.” The Experience of Theosis While the human person is “fully” divinized with the resurrection of the body, fully being in quotation marks because, as was also seen, theo- sis involves progression eternally; nevertheless, theosis or human divinization begins in mortality and is a reality which therefore can—and indeed must—be experienced, beginning in mortality.° The Doctrine of Theosis, or Becoming a God + 21 ‘The following is from St. Symeon the New The- ologian (942-1022), a Byzantine Abbot and the- ologian, who is, without a doubt, the greatest teacher on the human experience of theosis: What a terrible misfortune that we who have been born of God and become immortal and partakers of @ heavenly calling (Heb. 3:1), who are “heirs of God and fellow-heirs with Christ” (Rom. 8:17) and have become citizens cof heaven (Phil. 3:20), have not yet come to the realization of so great blessings!" There are two basic kinds of experience of theosis while in mortality: the more ordinary one, the ex- perience of the companionship of the Holy Spirit, and a rarer, more infrequent one, the vision of, uncreated light. All baptized persons can expect to experi- ence, as a natural consequence of their union with the divinizing energies of God, the compan- ionship of the Holy Spirit. As was noted previ- ously, it is the Holy Spirit—a divine person, member of the Trinity—who communicates the salvation of Christ to individual human persons. For this Spirit, when He descends on you, be comes like a pool of light to you, which en: compasses you completely in an unutterable manner. As it regenerates you it changes you from corruptible to incorruptible, from mor: tal to immortal, from sons of men into sons ‘of God and gods by adoption and grace— thats if you desire to appear as Kinsmen and fellow-heits ofthe saints and enter with all of them into the kingdom of heaven." 80. Cabasilas, Life in Christ, 198; Mantzaridis, Deification of Man, 61-85 passim; Symeon the New Theolo- gian, Discourses, 151, 164; Ware, Orthodox Church, 303-6. 81, Ware, Orthodox Church, 236. 82, Mantzaridis, Deification of Man, 44, 67-68; Meyendorft, Byzantine Theology, 195-96; Ware, Orthodox Church, 288-90. 83, Meyendorff, Byzantine Theology, 215. 84. Symeon the New Theologian, Discourses, 145, 85. Ibid, 337.22 + “Partakers of the Divine Nature” What the Holy Spirit enables a divinized person to have is the same kind of conscious relationship with the Eternal Father that Jesus had while He walked the earth.!* The mission of the Holy Spirit is to enter our lives so that through our union with Christ we can be consciously aware, in a way that transforms our lives, of having a relationship with God the Father—the father of Christ by na- ture, our father through adoption.” The vision of uncreated light is another way of experiencing the effects of theosis while still in mortality.” By way of background and explana tion, it should be noted that the Greek Fathers of the Church took very seriously the revelation contained in 1 John 1:5 that “God is light.” Keep. ing in mind the real distinction in God between essence and energies—between God as uncre- ated, unknowable, and unparticipable, and God as communicable, knowable, and participable— the term uncreated light is synonymous with God's energies as well as the term grace, Lossky quotes St. Gregory Palamas who wrote, “God is called light not according to His essence, but ac- cording to His energy” and writes that [Uncreated light] isthe visible character of the divinity, of the energies in which God com- municates Himself... This uncreated, eter- nal, divine, and deifying light is grace, for the name of grace also refers to divine energies insofar as they are given to us and accom- plish the work of our deification .... [grace] is God Himself, communicating Himself and entering into ineffable union with man.” Thus whenever God unites himself to a person, it is God's uncreated light which divinizes; in other words, it is God himself who divinizes, God who 86. Ibid, 17. 87. Ibid, 350. 88, Mantzariis, Deification of Man, 96-104 passim. 89. Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 58, 59. 90. Symeon the New Theologian, Discourse, 298. is light as he shares his uncreated nature with created persons. St. Symeon the New Theologian offers this powerful testimony on this doctrine of God as light: We bear witness that “God is light,” and those to whom it has been granted to see Him have all beheld Him as ceived Him have all received Him as light, be- cause the light of His glory goes before Him, and it is impossible for Him to appear without light. Those who have not seen His light have not seen Him, for He is the Light, and those who have not received the Light have not yet received grace. Those who have received grace have received the Light of God and have re- ceived God, even as Christ Himself, who is the Light, has sad, “T will live in them and move among them” (2 Cor. 6:16). ht. Those who have re- This passage makes it clear that while God always communicates himself—divinizing us—as light, this uncreated light is not usually seen by the human eye. However, when God so wills He can appear to those who have become “gods by grace”—hence the experience of the vision of un- created light. This vision of uncreated light is an experience which is analogous to our vision of physical, earthly light and to our experience of intellectual light, that is, our experience of intellectual illu mination (often graphically portrayed as a light bulb switching on above a person’s head). It is enlightening, allowing us to see and know and understand in a divine manner. Yet the vision of uuncreated light is perceptible to the sense of sight and to the mind precisely because it transcends both these human faculties.This light simultaneously fills reason and the senses, manifesting itself to the total man, and not just to one of his faculties. The divine light is immaterial and contains nothing sensible in it, but neither is it an intelligible light." Moreover, insofar as the vision of uncreated light is an experience in which the body shares, it is @ tangible reminder that the final destiny of those who are divinized is the divinization of both soul and body.” Clearly, not all baptized persons, that is, those who have been divinized through union with God’s energies—his uncreated light—experience the vision of God’s uncreated light. It is a special blessing God gives to those who are worthy of it and whom he chooses.” However, in the next life, all who have been divinized will experience the vision of uncreated light and progress in that vi- sion eternally. ‘The vision of uncreated light is by nature dy- namic, and is more obscure or more transcen- dent according to the individual’s degree of perfection, But as a progressive revelation of God's infinite glory it never comes to an end, cither in the present age or in the age to be.” ‘Thus, even if uncommon in mortality, the vision of uncreated light is always a real possibility for every baptized person since the vision is simply a more intensified manifestation and experience of an already existing relationship between God and the divinized human person who is, by definition, divinized through union with God's energies or uuncreated light. What is the vision of uncreated light like from a phenomenological standpoint? Enough instances have been recorded throughout the Church's 92. Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 63-64. 93, Ibid. 58-59, 59-60; Symeon the New Theologian, Discourses, 365 94, Mantzaridis, Deification of Man, 104, 95, Symeon the New Theologian, Discourses, 245-46, 91. Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 58; see Ware, Orthodox Church, 68-69, The Doctrine of Theosis, or Becoming a God + 23 history—both in the Latin West and the Greek East—so that documentary evidence is readily available. The experience of St. Symeon the New Theologian, which he narrates in the third person in his Discourses, is representative. He recounts: ‘One day, as he stood and recited, “God, have ‘mercy upon me,a sinner” (Lk. 18:13), utering. it with his mind rather than his mouth, sud- denly flood of divine radiance appeared from above and filled all the room. As this hap pened the young man lost all awareness (of his surroundings) and forgot that he was in a hhouse or that he was under a roof. He saw nothing but light all around him and did not know whether he was standing on the ground. He was not afraid of falling; he was not con- cerned with the world, nor did anything per- taining to men and corporeal beings enter into his mind. Instead, he was wholly in the presence of immaterial light and seemed to himself to have turned into light. Oblivious of all the world he was filled with tears and ‘with ineffable joy and gladness.” In another section of his Discourses, St. Symeon, this time speaking in the first person, recounts another of his visions 1 fell prostrate on the ground, and at once 1 saw, and behold, a great light was immaterially shining on me and seized hold of my whole mind and soul, so that I was struck with amazement at the unexpected marvel and I [the Light] scat- tered whatever mist there was in my soul and ‘was, as it were, in ecstasy cast out every earthly care. It expelled from all material denseness and bodily heaviness that made my members to be sluggish and numb. What an awesome marvel! It so invigorated24 + “Partakers ofthe Divine Nature” and strengthened my limbs and muscles, which had been faint through great weariness, that it seemed to meas though I was stripping myself of the garments of corruption. Besides, there was poured into my soul in unutterable fashion a great spiritual joy and perception and a sweetness surpassing every taste of visible objects, together with a freedom and forget- fulness of all thoughts pertaining to this i In a marvelous way there was granted to me and revealed to me the manner of the depar ture from this present life Thus all the percep- tions of my mind and my soul were wholly concentrated on the ineffable joy of that Light. Thus, it becomes evident that the teachings and insights of St. Symeon the New Theologian on the subject of the experience of theosis were grounded in the revelations and visions he himself had been blessed to receive. At this point, given the context and vocabulary provided by this section on the vision of uncre- ated light, it will be useful to revisit one last time the story of Christ's transfiguration. What were Peter, James, and John really experiencing on the mountaintop as they beheld Christ’ transfigura- tion? It was a vision of uncreated light. These three chosen Apostles were permitted to see with their human eyes the light of Christ’s divine na- ture, This light, the energies of Christ's divinity, completely interpenetrated his humanity—his body and soul—and from the first moment of His incarnation had divinized it. What the Apostles saw was, quite simply, the natural consequences of the divinization of Christ's human nature; a reality which other persons were not permitted 3. Tbid. 200, 201. 97. Lossky, In the Image and Likeness of God, 57 to see or experience during the course of Christ’s mortal ministry. Summary Theosis, or the doctrine of human diviniza tion, as understood and taught by that subset of patristic writers who are the Greek Fathers of the Church, centers around the concept of participa- tion. The triune God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—uncreated divine persons, incommuni cable and unparticipable in their essence, freely will that created human persons, created out of nothing, should share or participate in their di- vine nature, Vladimir Lossky aptly and succinctly wrote of this great mystery of divine love: Everything proceeds from the Trinity and everything leads o It: to the Father, who is the source of all divinity; to the Son and to the Holy Spirit, who proceed from Him in the unity of the inaccessible nature, The energies which flow eternally from this nature, being communicated to us by the Holy Spirit, deify us and make us participate in the life of the Holy Trinity, which the Gospels call the King. dom of God.” An Image: Iron and Fire To help concretize the patristic doctrine of theosis presented in this chapter, consider the fol- lowing image.” Taken from the writings of St. Maximus the Confessor, it underscores the con cept of participation.” Reflect on what occurs when iron is plunged into fire, as happens when a sword is being shaped. A definite change takes The fire penetrates the metal and communicates 98. Similarly atthe end of the next chapter, which will eview the LDS doctrine of exaltation, another image will be suggested, 99. Lossky, Mystical Theology of the Eastern Church, 146; Louth, Maximus the Confessor, 178-79,to it some of its own properties. The metal begins to glow. It becomes hot and burning. It becomes malleable. None of these things is a natural prop- erty of iron; as is well known, by nature iron is in- flexible, cold, and dense. It is only when the iron participates in the nature of the fire that it be- comes what it was not while still retaining its es- sential identity as iron, In similar fashion, the doctrine of theosis ex- plains human divinization as being fundamentally a matter of participation, Between the persons of the triune God and human persons there is an infinite ontological divide—the difference between The Doctrine of Theosis, or Becoming a God + 25 the uncreated and the created. God, however, bridges this ontological divide. The three persons who are God by nature—the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit—make created persons who are human by nature to be “gods by grace” through participation in their divinizing energies. Di vinized human persons, without ceasing to be human, become what they were not—gods. The revelation of Christ and the dispensation inaugu- rated by him, according to the Greek Fathers of the Church, makes clear and accomplishes what in God's plan is the purpose of human existence— to become a god.