Department of Education

Cordillera Administrative Region

DIVISION OF BAGUIO CITY
STO. TOMAS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sto. Tomas Central, Baguio City

October 24, 2016

VIRGINIA C. ALINDAYO
School Head
Sto. Tomas National High School
Sto. Tomas Central, Baguio City

Ma’am,

Respectfully submitting my Training Proposal as a RESOURCE SPEAKER on the topic ‘Failure Rate
– Status Report and Mid-Year Adjustment’ as stated in the STNHS training matrix for the Mid-Year In-Service
Training (INSET) activities from October 24-28, 2016 in support to the STNHS stakeholders to make corrective
adjustments in the implementation of the school program/s such as reducing failure rate in the achievement of
improved learner outcomes.

Thank you very much.

Very Truly Yours,

ARACELI K. TAMIRAY
FRRP - Chairman
 Department of Education
Cordillera Administrative Region
DIVISION OF BAGUIO CITY
STO. TOMAS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sto. Tomas Central, Baguio City
Mid-Year In-Service Training
S.Y. 2016-2017

SESSION GUIDE

I. Session Title: Failure Rate – Status Report and Mid-Year Adjustment

II. Duration: 2 hours

III. Venue: Sto. Tomas National High School Conference Hall

IV. Target Participants: 23 Faculty and Staff Members

3 PTA Officers (Day 1 & 2)
3 Barangay Officials (Day 1 & 2)
9 SSG Officers/Representatives (Day 1 & 2)
9 Club/Organization Officers (Day 1 & 2)
V. Link to the previous
session/topic: Every end of the school year, each school assess learning outcomes to check
school performance if the school is performing or not. One indicator of school
performance is to have zero failure rates. For S.Y 2015-2016 STNHS the failure rate is =
5.6% which is relatively alarming, it is with this reason why this session topic will be
undertaken to re-visit the status of the implemented process flow for FRRP if functional
or not for necessary adjustment .
VI. Link to the next
session/topic: It is the intention of this session topic ‘Failure Rate – Status Report and Mid-
Year Adjustment’ for the teachers, administrators and other school stake holders to
continuously do their part and responsibility in helping students who are at risk of failing
in their academic subjects with the aim to reduce school failure rate.
VII. Learning Objectives:
At the end of the session, participants should be able to:
1. To list the number of students who failed in the different subjects per year level for
the first quarter as determined from subject teachers data of the current class record
and grading sheets;
2. To assess the academic subject/s where students are having difficulty for the subjects
teachers to do necessary adjustment and actions to reduce the number of students
failed in their subject;
3. To investigate the reasons why students failed for the teachers, administrators and
parents to design vital actions and interventions in reducing failure rate from the
previous school year;
4. To re-visit the process flow in addressing failure rate and plan specific actions to be
undertaken to lessen students failures for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarters.

VIII. Key Understandings:

Facilitating early student engagement and success is not an immediate interest or movement. It is
likely to be a continuing attribute and responsibility in all education contexts. The school challenges
arising from increased student diversity, wider access and varied entry pathways requires school to
consider a broader range of strategies beyond those would normally associate with classroom teaching
and the role and responsibilities of a teacher. It is also increasingly recognized that risk of student
occurs across the student lifecycle, but is particularly salient at points of transition, rise of academic
challenge or study-life conflict.
 Supporting student success and reducing academic risk necessitates that teachers should develop
new and creative partnerships between academic, administrative and professional staff. Thus, supporting
student success in the present context involves shifts in traditional strategies, skills and roles, and is
genuinely everyone’s business. Thus, while accepting these responsibilities in this regard, teachers also
need to design strategies that are both effective and sustainable and embed these as ongoing core
business in each of the school stakeholders.

The topic focuses on the school performance indicator such as failure rate as school
responsibility in responding to students who may be at risk of academic failure. However, it is
recognized that students face a wide range of personal, social and financial risks, which can impact on
their studies and their lives.

VII. Methodology:
A. Pre-implementation
Date Activity Person-in-charge Logistics
October 17 Faculty meeting – distribution Copy of the INSET proposal
of teachers task for the INSET Virginia C. Alindayo Training Schedule, Function Of The
School Training Program
Management Team
Session Guide
October 21 Gathering of data for first Araceli K. Tamiray Computer
quarter failures All subject teachers Printer
Bond paper
October 22-23 Preparation of hand-outs and Araceli K. Tamiray Computer
presentation slides Printer
Bond paper
Reproduction Cost

B. List of Resource Speaker

Name and Qualification of Resource Speaker Topic Session
No.
Virginia C. Alindayo – School Head Review: SRCs and 2016-2017 AIP D1 – S1
Virginia C. Alindayo – School Head Re-orientation: SBM and SBM assessment Tool, D1 – S2
MOVs
Status Report: Performance Indicators D1 – S3
Marissa M. Binmangon – School DORP Chairman a. Monthly Attendance and Dropout Rate
Araceli K. Tamiray _ School FRRP chairman b. Failure Rate Per Learning Area
Marissa M. Binmangon – School DORP Chairman Status Report: School DORP D1 – S4
Marissa M. Binmangon – School DORP Chairman Mid-Year Adjustment : School DORP D1 – S5
Araceli K. Tamiray _ School FRRP chairman Status Report and Mid-Year Adjustment: School D2 – S1
Failure Reduction Program
Marie Tina T. Gabriel – Program Coordinator Status Report: Program/Organization/Work/Action D2 – S2
Plan and Implementation
Joyce M. Balusdan - Program Coordinator Continuation…Status Report: D2 – S3
-SSG and Clubs
-PTA
-Barangay Education Committee
Program Coordinator Workshop: Re-alignment of Work/Action Plans D2 – S4
Organization/club presidents -program coordinators
SSG -organization presidents
PTA -SSG and clubs
Barangay Education Committee -PTA
-Barangay Education Committee
Virginia C. Alindayo – School Head Presentation and Critiquing of Outputs D2 – S5
Facilitator - DRRM
- Brigada
Program Coordinator Continuation… (presentation and critiquing of D3 – S1
Organization/club presidents outputs)
SSG - programs
PTA
Barangay Education Committee
Danny Marquez – HT1 Continuation… (presentation and critiquing of D3 – S2
Facilitator outputs)
 - organization
Lourdes B. Lomas-e - PSDS Positive Discipline D3 – S3
Bing Apacguid – ICT – SHS Teacher Discussion: 21st Century Teachers for the 21st Century D3 – S4
Learner
Marilou T. Gomeyac, SEPS Discussion: Non-Traditional Forms and Assessment D3- S5
and Rubric Design
All Teachers Workshop: Designing Non-Traditional Assessment D4 – S1
Presentation and Critiquing of Outputs
Marisa G. Dacpano – Aral Pan. JHS Teacher
Facilitator
Rufino Domillo – Aral Pan. SHS Teacher Discussion: The Learning Action Cell D4 – S2
Danny Marquez – HT1 Discussion – The Fine Art of facilitating Peer D4 – S3
Teaching, Group Discussion and Practice by Doing
Virginia C. Alindayo – School Head LAC AND LM Plans D4 – S4
Facilitator

Per Learning Area Workshop: Preparing NAT style assessment of the D4- S5
Cognitive Dimensions by Anderson and Krathwohl
Marjorie B. Saingan – English SHS Teacher Presentation and Critiquing of Outputs D5 – S1
Facilitator
Virginia C. Alindayo – School Head Re-orientation of the OPCRF and alignment of the D5 – S2
IPCRF
All Teachers Finalization and Submission of IPCRF D5 – S3
Crisma L. Bautista, Lorielyn Daping and Group Dynamics D5 – S4
Marie Tina T. Gabriel
Facilitators

C. Training Matrix – See attached copy

D. Post-Implementation
Date Activity Person-in-charge Logistics
Nov. March Adjusted Process Flow/Work Plans for Virginia C. Alindayo Computer Unit
FRRP Danny Marquez Printer
Araceli K. Tamiray Bond paper
All Subject Teachers
PTA
Parents
Nov. March Teachers’ prepared list of requirements All Subject Teachers Computer Unit
for performance task Printer
Bond paper
List of PT requirements
Nov. March Subject teachers give the list of All Subject Teachers Computer Unit
requirements for performance task to Class Adviser Printer
the adviser Bond paper
List of PT Requirements
Nov. March Grade level coordinator summarizes Class Adviser Computer Unit
the requirements for performance task Grade Level Coordinator Printer
in all learning area Bond paper
List of PT requirements
Nov. March Orientation of Parents and students on Virginia C. Alindayo Computer Unit
failure reduction program Danny Marquez Printer
Araceli K. Tamiray Bond paper
Sound System
Nov. March Adviser distribute the list of PT Class Adviser Computer Unit
requirements to the students w/ their Printer
parents Bond paper
Written Requirements
Reproduction Cost
Nov. March Students are given two (2) meetings to All Subject Teachers Computer Unit
do the Performance Task in the Printer
classroom Bond paper
Nov. March Quarterly Monitoring of PT FRRP – Chairman and Computer Unit
requirements list members Printer
Bond paper
Nov. March Gathering of data and documents for FRRP – Chairman and Computer Unit
Failure Rate Reduction Program members Printer
Bond paper
Accomplishment Report

Prepared by: Recommending Approval:

ARACELI K. TAMIRAY DANNY MARQUEZ

FRRP-Chairman HT1

Approved:
VIRGINIA C. ALINDAYO
School Head
 Department of Education
Cordillera Administrative Region
DIVISION OF BAGUIO CITY
STO. TOMAS NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Sto. Tomas Central, Baguio City
Mid-Year In-Service Training
S.Y. 2016-2017

SESSION GUIDE

I. Session Title: Failure Rate – Status Report and Mid-Year Adjustment

II. Duration: 2 hours

III. Venue: Sto. Tomas National High School Conference Hall

IV. Target Participants: 23 Faculty and Staff Members

1 PTA Officer
3 Barangay Officials
9 SSG Officers/Representatives
9 Club/Organization Officers
V. Link to the previous
session/topic: Every end of the school year, each school assess learning outcomes to check
school performance if the school is performing or not. One indicator of school
performance is to have zero failure rates. For S.Y 2015-2016 STNHS the failure rate is =
5.6% which is relatively alarming, it is with this reason why this session topic will be
undertaken to re-visit the status of the implemented process flow for FRRP if functional
or not for necessary adjustment .
VI. Link to the next
session/topic: It is the intention of this session topic ‘Failure Rate – Status Report and Mid-
Year Adjustment’ for the teachers, administrators and other school stake holders to
continuously do their part and responsibility in helping students who are at risk of failing
in their academic subjects with the aim to reduce school failure rate.
VII. Learning Objectives:
At the end of the session, participants should be able to:
5. To list the number of students who failed in the different subjects per year level for
the first quarter as determined from subject teachers data of the current class record
and grading sheets;
6. To assess the academic subject/s where students are having difficulty for the subjects
teachers to do necessary adjustment and actions to reduce the number of students
failed in their subject;
7. To investigate the reasons why students failed for the teachers, administrators and
parents to design vital actions and interventions in reducing failure rate from the
previous school year;
8. To re-visit the process flow in addressing failure rate and plan specific actions to be
undertaken to lessen students failures for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarters.

VIII. Key Understandings:

Facilitating early student engagement and success is not an immediate interest or movement. It is
likely to be a continuing attribute and responsibility in all education contexts. The school challenges
arising from increased student diversity, wider access and varied entry pathways requires school to
consider a broader range of strategies beyond those would normally associate with classroom teaching
and the role and responsibilities of a teacher. It is also increasingly recognized that risk of student
occurs across the student lifecycle, but is particularly salient at points of transition, rise of academic
challenge or study-life conflict.
 Supporting student success and reducing academic risk necessitates that teachers should develop
new and creative partnerships between academic, administrative and professional staff. Thus, supporting
student success in the present context involves shifts in traditional strategies, skills and roles, and is
genuinely everyone’s business. Thus, while accepting these responsibilities in this regard, teachers also
need to design strategies that are both effective and sustainable and embed these as ongoing core
business in each of the school stakeholders.

The topic focuses on the school performance indicator such as failure rate as school
responsibility in responding to students who may be at risk of academic failure. However, it is
recognized that students face a wide range of personal, social and financial risks, which can impact on
their studies and their lives.

IX. References:
Sto. Tomas National High School-Students Manual
Sto. Tomas National High School-Annual Report
Sto. Tomas National High School-School Improvement Plan
Sto. Tomas National High School – Teachers Class Record and Grading Sheets
http://cop.hlcommission.org/Learning-Environments/cherif.html
http://www.howtolearn.com/2012/02/the-top-five-reasons-why-students-fail-to-succeed-in-school/

X. Stage/Step/Phase and Methodology:

Methodology Key Points Tools/Materials/ Slide Time Allotment

Resources
Number Of Students at Slide #10
Risk of Failing Per
Section
No. of Failures Per Grade Slide #12-16
Level for the Different
Lectures Subjects Laptop 1 hour
Total Failures Per LCD Slide #17
Subject
Total Failure Per Grade Slide #18
Level
No. of Failures Slide #19
Considering Gender
Total Failures Slide #20
Discussion Reasons of Failures Slide #21
Process Flow

Prepared by: Recommending Approval:

ARACELI K. TAMIRAY DANNY MARQUEZ

FRRP-Chairman HT1

Approved:
VIRGINIA C. ALINDAYO
School Head