The fertility clinic used the wrong sperm in an in vitro fertilization procedure, resulting in a child with significantly darker skin than the parents. The couple is raising the child as their own but filed a malpractice suit against the clinic.
A Tampa surgeon mistakenly removed the wrong leg of a patient during an amputation procedure due to a chain of errors. The surgeon's medical license was suspended and he was fined and required to pay damages.
An elderly woman was taken for an invasive open heart procedure, despite having no heart issues. Doctors made an incision and threaded a tube into her heart before realizing the mistake over an hour later when another doctor called. The unnecessary procedure put the woman at risk of complications.
The fertility clinic used the wrong sperm in an in vitro fertilization procedure, resulting in a child with significantly darker skin than the parents. The couple is raising the child as their own but filed a malpractice suit against the clinic.
A Tampa surgeon mistakenly removed the wrong leg of a patient during an amputation procedure due to a chain of errors. The surgeon's medical license was suspended and he was fined and required to pay damages.
An elderly woman was taken for an invasive open heart procedure, despite having no heart issues. Doctors made an incision and threaded a tube into her heart before realizing the mistake over an hour later when another doctor called. The unnecessary procedure put the woman at risk of complications.
The fertility clinic used the wrong sperm in an in vitro fertilization procedure, resulting in a child with significantly darker skin than the parents. The couple is raising the child as their own but filed a malpractice suit against the clinic.
A Tampa surgeon mistakenly removed the wrong leg of a patient during an amputation procedure due to a chain of errors. The surgeon's medical license was suspended and he was fined and required to pay damages.
An elderly woman was taken for an invasive open heart procedure, despite having no heart issues. Doctors made an incision and threaded a tube into her heart before realizing the mistake over an hour later when another doctor called. The unnecessary procedure put the woman at risk of complications.
When Nancy Andrews, of Commack, N.Y., became pregnant after an in vitro fertilization procedure at a New York fertility clinic, she and her husband expected a new addition to their family. What they did not expect was a child whose skin was significantly darker than that of either parent. Subsequent DNA tests suggested that doctors at New York Medical Services for Reproductive Medicine accidentally used another man’s sperm to inseminate Nancy Andrews’ eggs. The couple has since raised Baby Jessica, who was born Oct. 19, 2004, as their own, according to wire reports. But the couple still filed a malpractice suit against the owner of the clinic, as well as the embryologist who allegedly mixed up the samples.
2. The Surgeon who removed the wrong leg
In what was, perhaps, the most publicized case of a surgical mistake in its time, a Tampa (Florida) surgeon mistakenly removed the wrong leg of his patient, 52-year- old Willie King, during an amputation procedure in February 1995. It was later revealed that a chain of errors before the surgery culminated in the wrong leg being prepped for the procedure. While the surgeon’s team realized in the middle of the procedure that they were operating on the wrong leg, it was already too late, and the leg was removed. As a result of the error, the surgeon’s medical license was suspended for six months and he was fined $10,000. University Community Hospital in Tampa, the medical center where the surgery took place, paid $900,000 to King and the surgeon involved in the case paid an additional $250,000 to King.
3.An open heart invasive procedure… on the wrong
patient Joan Morris (a pseudonym) is a 67-year-old woman admitted to a teaching hospital for cerebral angiography. The day after that procedure, she mistakenly underwent an invasive cardiac electrophysiology study. After angiography, the patient was transferred to another floor rather than returning to her original bed. Discharge was planned for the following day. The next morning, however, the patient was taken for a open heart procedure. The patient had been on the operating table for an hour. Doctors had made an incision in her groin, punctured an artery, threaded in a tube and snaked it up into her heart (a procedure with risks of bleeding, infection, heart attack and stroke). That was when the phone rang and a doctor from another department asked “what are you doing with my patient?” There was nothing wrong with her heart. The cardiologist working on the woman checked her chart, and saw that he was making an awful mistake. The study was aborted, and she was returned to her room in stable condition.