Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WQIcalculation PDF
WQIcalculation PDF
ABSTRACT
The present study was intended to calculate Water Quality Index (WQI) of an urban waterbody,
Gopishettykere, in Shimoga town, Karnataka in order to ascertain the quality of water for public
consumption, recreation and other purposes. This paper deals with the study on the influence of
environmental parameters on the water quality of waterbody. There are several ways to assess the quality of
water as deemed fit for drinking, irrigation and industrial use. Water Quality Index, indicating the water
quality in terms of index number, offers a useful representation of overall quality of water for public or for
any intended use as well as in the pollution abatement programmes and in water quality management.
A number of parameters affect the usability of water for a particular purpose. In this study Water Quality
Index was determined on the basis of various physico-chemical parameters like pH, electrical conductivity,
total dissolved solids, total alkalinity, total hardness, total suspended solids, calcium, magnesium, chloride,
nitrate, sulphate, dissolved oxygen and biological oxygen demand.
Key words: Lentic waterbodies, Eutrophic, Physicochemical parameters and Drinking water quality
INTRODUCTION there are many other water quality parameters that are
not included in the index. However, a water quality
The fresh water is of vital concern for mankind, since it index based on some very important parameters can
is directly linked to human welfare. The surface provide a simple indicator of water quality. In general,
waterbodies, which are the most important sources of water quality indices incorporate data from multiple
water for human activities are unfortunately under water quality parameters into a mathematical equation
severe environmental stress and are being threatened as that rates the health of a waterbody with number.
a consequence of developmental activities. Shimoga is
a district head quarter, which lies in the foothills of STUDY AREA
Westernghats comprising numerous lentic waterbodies.
These waterbodies are man made or artificially Shimoga, the district head quarter is situated roughly in
constructed reservoirs to provide water for irrigation mid-south-western part of Karnataka state (Between
purposes or domestic use. There is something very 13° 27' and 14° 39' North latitude and between 74°38'
beautiful about these waterbodies not just aesthetically, and 76° 4' East longitude). It is rich in small
but also intellectually. They do not just mirror their waterbodies and most of the agricultural lands are
environment, they also reflect the society around them dependent on these for water source.
and accumulate all the ‘Sins’ of humanity. The For the present study, an urban waterbody,
condition of these waterbodies is rather pathetic. Most Gopishettykere of Shimoga was selected. This
of the waterbodies disappeared due to encroachment waterbody located towards western part of Shimoga
and pollution. It is with this background, the present city at a distance of 3kms. The water is held by raised
work was undertaken between April-2006 and March- east-west running earthen bund, with a water spread
2007. area of about 14.99 hectares. The Karnataka Housing
Water quality index provides a single number that Board has already converted the catchment area of this
expresses overall water quality at a certain location and waterbody into residential site. This waterbody
time, based on several water quality parameters. The practically receives domestic wastes and drainage
objective of water quality index is to turn complex water from this residential area throughout the year.
water quality data into information that is
understandable and usable by the public. A single
number cannot tell the whole story of water quality;
MATERIALS AND METHODS q n =Quality rating for the nth Water quality parameter
Vn=Estimated value of the nth parameter at a given
The water samples from the water body were collected sampling station.
at an interval of 30 days and analysed for 13 Sn =Standard permissible value of the nth parameter.
physicochemical parameters by following the V io = Ideal value of nth parameter in pure water. (i.e., 0
established procedures. The parameters pH, electrical for all other parameters except the parameter pH and
conductivity and dissolved oxygen were monitored at Dissolved oxygen (7.0 and 14.6 mg/L respectively)
the sampling site and other parameters like total
dissolved solids, total alkalinity, total hardness, total Unit weight was calculated by a value inversely
suspended solids, calcium, magnesium, chloride, proportional to the recommended standard value Sn of
nitrate, sulphate and biological oxygen demand were the corresponding parameter.
analysed in the laboratory as per the standard
procedures of APHA (1995). Wn =K/ Sn
In this study, for the calculation of water quality Wn= unit weight for the nth parameters.
index, sixteen important parameters were chosen. The Sn= Standard value for nth parameters
WQI has been calculated by using the standards of K= Constant for proportionality.
drinking water quality recommended by the World
Health Organisation(WHO), Bureau of Indian The overall Water Quality Index was calculated by
Standards (BIS) and Indian Council for Medical aggregating the quality rating with the unit weight
Research (ICMR). The weighted arithmetic index linearly.
method (Brown et. al.,) has been used for the WQI=∑ q n Wn/ ∑Wn
calculation of WQI of the waterbody. Further, quality
rating or sub index (qn ) was calculated using the
following expression. Table 1. Water Quality Index (WQI) and status of
water quality (Chatterji and Raziuddin 2002)
q n = 100[V n -V io] / [S n -V io]
Water quality Index Water quality status
(Let there be n water quality parameters and quality Level
rating or subindex (qn) corresponding to nth parameter 0-25 Excellent water quality
is a number reflecting the relative value of this 26-50 Good water quality
parameter in the polluted water with respect to its 51-75 Poor water quality
standard permissible value.) 76-100 Very Poor water quality
>100 Unsuitable for drinking
Table 2. Drinking Water standards recommending Agencies and unit weights. (All values except pH and Electrical
Conductivity are in mg/L)
343
RESULTS
344
Table 6: Calculation of Water Quality index in summer season
345
Low dissolved oxygen, high bio-chemical oxygen Munawar, M., 1970. Limnological studies on fresh water
demand and high nitrate concentrations indicate the ponds of Hyderabad, India-II, J. Hydrobiologia.
eutrophic status of the waterbody. A relatively higher 35:127-162.
Naik,S. and Purohit,K.M.,1996. Physico-chemical analysis of
concentration of chlorides and sulphates also indicate
some community ponds of Rourkela. Indian Journal of
the unsuitability of water for domestic use. Hence, Environmental Protection, 16(9): 679-684.
application of Water quality index technique for the Naik,S. and Purohit,K.M.1998 Status of water quality at
overall assessment of the water quality of a waterbody Bondamunda of Rourkela industrial complex-Part-I:
is a useful tool. Physico-Chemical Parameters, Indian Journal of
Environmental Protection, 18 (5) : 346-353.
REFERENCES Petre, T. 1975. Limnology and fisheries of Nyumba Yamung,
a man made lake in Tanzania, J. Trop. Hydrobiol. Fish.
Ambasht, R.S., 1971. Ecosystem study of a tropical pond in 4: 39-50.
relation to primary production of different vegetation Reddy, K.R.P.D. Sacco, D.A Graetz, K.L. Campbell and L.R.
zones. Hydrobiologia 12 : 57-61. Sinclair. 1982. Water treatment by aquatic ecosystem:
APHA. 1995. AMPHA. Standard methods for the Nutrient removal by reservoirs and flooded fields. J.
examination of water and waste water, 19th Edition, Environmental Management, 6(3): 261-271.
American Public Health Association, WashingtonDC. Shastry, C.A.K.M., Aboo, H.L. Bhatia and A.V. Rao, 1970.
BIS 1993. Analysis of Water ad Waste water, Bureau of Pollution of upper lake and its effect on Bhopal water
Indian Standards, New Delhi. supply. J. Environmental Health., 12: 218-238.
BIS 1983. Standards for Water for Drinking and other Shardendu and R.S. Ambasht, 1988. Limnological studies of
purposes, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi. a rural pond and an urban tropical aquatic ecosystem:
Chatterjee, A.A., 1992. Water quality of Nandakanan lake. oxygen enforms and ionic strength. J.Tropical
India., J. Environ. Hlth. 34(4): 329-333. Ecology. 29 (2): 98-109.
Chaterjee,C. and Raziuddin, M.2002. Determination of water Sinha S.K., 1995. Potability of some rural ponds water at
quality index (WQI) of a degraded river in Asanol Muzaffarpur (Bihar)-A note on water quality index, J.
Industrial area, Raniganj, Burdwan, West Bengal. Pollution Research, 14(1): 135-140.
Nature, Environment and pollution Swarnalatha, N. and A. Narasingrao, 1993. Ecological
Technology,1(2):181-189. investigation of two lentic environments with reference
Ghosh, A. and J.P. George, 1989. Studies on the abiotic to cyanobacteria and water pollution. Indian J.
factors and zooplakton in a polluted urban reservoir Microbial. Ecol., 3:41-48.
Hussain Sagar, Hyderabad: Impact on water quality and Venkateswarlu, V., 1993. Ecological studies on the rivers of
Embryonic Development of Fishes. Indian Andhra Pradesh with special reference to water quality
J.Environ.Hlth. 31(1): 49-59. and pollution. Proc. Indian. Acad. Sci. (Plant Sci).
Horton,R.K., 1965. An index number system for rating water 96:495-508.
quality. Journal of Water Pollution.Cont.Fed.,3:300- WHO, 1992.International Standards for Drinking water.
305 World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
346