Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A New Type of Anti-Heave Semi-Submersible Drilling Platform: CHEN Bo, YU Zhiyong, LYU Yong, LI Xiaojian, LI Chunfang
A New Type of Anti-Heave Semi-Submersible Drilling Platform: CHEN Bo, YU Zhiyong, LYU Yong, LI Xiaojian, LI Chunfang
Cite this article as: PETROL. EXPLOR. DEVELOP., 2017, 44(3): 487–494. RESEARCH PAPER
Abstract: A new type of semi-submersible drilling platform is designed. The numerical simulation software is used to analyze the heave
response of the new platform in the frequency domain and time domain, and the semi-submersible drilling platforms with double-floating
four-column structure and heave plate structure are compared with the new platform. This paper introduces the design principles of the
new platform and the theoretical basis, mathematical model and boundary conditions during correlation analysis. The numerical simula-
tion results show that the maximum and mean values of the heave response of the new platform are significantly reduced in the frequency
domain analysis compared with the double-floating four-column and the heave-plate structure platform; and the new platform has a sig-
nificant increase in the natural heaving period of the new platform, which can effectively prevent the occurrence of resonance. In the
mooring time domain coupling analysis, the surge, sway and roll response of the new platform is small, and the heave response is greatly
reduced. In the spectral analysis, the new platform has a smaller peak response and better wave frequency characteristics. The new plat-
form has excellent anti-heave performance, reasonable structure and feasibility, and can provide reference for the design and selection of
new generation semi-submersible drilling platform.
Key words: drilling platform; semi-submersible drilling platform; heave prevention; frequency domain analysis; time domain analysis
where the vliu is the velocity of ocean current. The current ① Statics boundary conditions. For the upper end of the
velocity of the South China Sea is about 0.2m/s, so relative to mooring anchor:
wave force on the platform, the force of the ocean current on v l La vtop (11)
platform is negligible. For lower end of the mooring anchor:
The wave force and torque of platform are respectively: v l 0 vbot (12)
π 2 r 2 HL
Fwave Cm 1 e kh sin (4) ② Dynamic boundary conditions. For the upper end of the
T2 mooring anchor:
π 2 r 2 HLh 1 e kh v l La vtop
M Cm sin 1 (5)
T 2
kh
v l La vtop
(13)
Motion balance equation of platform under the wave load
For lower end of the mooring anchor:
is:
M m X CX D1 X D2 f ( X ) KX Fsum (6) v l 0 vbot
(14)
Determining the hydrodynamic parameter of the platform v l 0 vbot
motion response in waves is the basis of the numerical calcu-
1.3.3. Flow field boundary conditions
lation. When the platform is subjected to a slight oscillatory
motion in a specific mode, an outward radiation flow field is ① Free surface boundary conditions. At each point of the
generated in a stable flow field to form radiated waves[18]. free surface:
Separating the velocity and acceleration of the corresponding 2Φ Φ
g 0
structure from radiation wave load, we can get the parameters t 2 z (15)
of the radiation wave load related to the velocity and accelera- In the local coordinate system, column surface immersed in
tion, namely, additional damping parameter and additional sea water should meet the requirements of:
quality parameter are collectively referred to as hydrodynamic Φ
parameters[18]. z 0
(16)
The radiation wave load force is:
Φ 0
Fjpq p jp n j ds r
Sj
②Surface boundary conditions. Instantaneous normal ac-
(j=1, 2, …, N; p=1, 2, 3; q=1, 2, 3) (7) celeration of fluid particle is zero for the area where surface
where the pjp is pressure vector at any point in flow field, de- total force is zero:
termined by Bernoulli's equation[18]. 2Φ 0 (17)
The relation between radiation wave force and hydrody- ③ Seabed boundary conditions. Seabed as a rigid wall,
namic parameters is: normal velocity component of the fluid particle is zero.
Fjpq Ajpq vjp B jpq v jp (8) ④ Radiation conditions of infinite point. Wave forms
With further analysis, the calculation formulas of hydrody- spread from near to far, that is when r approaches infinity,
namic parameters are: approaches zero.
Fjpq 1.4. Design principle
Ajpq Re (9)
v
jp Since the external excitation time cannot be controlled, in
488
CHEN Bo et al. / Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(3): 487–494
order to effectively reduce the vertical displacement of the m, 1.552 m respectively, all by more than 36%. At wave an-
platform, reducing the instantaneous acceleration is an effec- gles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, compared with the original platform,
tive way. According to Newton's second law of motion, the the mean values of unit wave of the new platform heave re-
mass of the platform should be increased or the resultant force sponse decrease by 0.283 1 m, 0.253 1 m, 0.239 5 m, 0.269 6
on the platform should be reduced to reduce the instantaneous m respectively, all by more than 48%; compared with the
acceleration of the platform. The resultant force of the plat- heave plate platform, the mean values of unit wave of the new
form is the difference of wave force and damping force. platform heave response decrease by 0.241 5 m, 0.231 9 m,
Therefore, in the design of the new platform, we have tried to 0.243 3 m, 0.277 4 m respectively, all by more than 47%.
reduce the heave response of platform by increasing the plat- Therefore, under the action of unit regular waves, the new
form's overall quality and the damping force. Under normal platform has a good anti-heave characteristic. From Table 2, it
conditions, when the water depth is more than 30 m, the sea can be seen that with the increase of wave angle from 0° to
water is stable, almost unaffected by the waves. Full water 90°, the maximum values of platform heave increase, and the
tank with a large cross-sectional area and quality, can provide average values first decrease and then increase.
large vertical damping force, and increase the quality of plat-
2.2. Natural period of heave
form. In order to validate the rationality and feasibility of the
new platform structure, the platform structure has been com- Analysis shows that the natural periods of the original plat-
pared with double floating four-column structure semi-sub- form, heave plate platform and the new platform are 18.92,
mersible drilling platform and heaving plate semi-submersible 16.31 and 39.81 s respectively. The waves in the ocean have
drilling platform. Main sizes of 3 kinds of platforms, simula- uneven periods, but the waves with periods of 130 s occupy
tion environment, platform (columns, floating) working depth more than half of the total energy of the ocean waves, and the
and other parameters are the same (Table 1). corresponding energy peak period is about 10 s. In the selec-
2. Frequency domain analysis tion and design of platform, the heave natural period should
be kept away from 10 s, the new platform has a maximal
In this study, the platform model was established by AN-
SYS software, and the hydrodynamic analysis was carried out Table 1. Main dimensions and draft of the platform model
by classical hydrodynamic analysis software AQWA. AQWA Parameter Parameter
software is the software has the loosest restriction on the Parameter Parameter
value/m value/m
number of nodes among various hydrodynamic analysis soft- Floating body length 101.23 Heave plate width 20.00
ware, so the grid unit can be smaller and the accuracy of cal- Connecting column
culation and analysis can be improved. Fig. 1 shows the fre- Floating body width 18.60 1.50
diameter
quency domain analysis model for the platform. Connecting column
Floating body height 10.72 40.00
length
2.1. Heave response under unit wave
Column length 18.51 Full tank length 101.00
Fig. 2 shows the heave response of the platform under unit Column width 18.51 Full tank width 40.00
regular waves of different wave directions, and the statistics Transverse brace
are shown in Table 2. Table 2 shows that at the wave angles of 2.15 Full tank height 20.00
diameter
0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, compared with the original platform, the Transverse brace Tank transverse brace
60.31 2.00
maximum values of unit wave of the new platform heave re- length diameter
sponse decrease by 1.790 m, 1.880 m, 2.031 m, 2.094 m re- Platform main Tank transverse
20.00 20.00
spectively, all by more than 49%; compared with the platform body draft brace length
of heave plate, the maximum values of unit wave of the new Heave plate and
Heave plate length 40.00 60.00
platform heave response decrease by 1.041 m, 1.173 m, 1.428 tank draft
489
CHEN Bo et al. / Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(3): 487–494
Fig. 2. Platform heave response under the action of unit regular wave at different wave angles.
Table 2. Statistics of platform heave response under the action ertia force to the acceleration of the platform is the additional
of unit regular waves mass of the platform, and the larger the value is, the larger the
Wave Minimum Maximum Average resistance of the accelerated motion of the platform will be.
Platform type
angle/(°) value/103 m value/m value/m Due to space limitation, only the additional mass components
Original platform 4.662 3.637 0.549 8 curves of heaving and rolling are shown (Fig. 3), it can be
0 Heave plate platform 6.700 2.888 0.508 2 seen that vertical and rolling additional mass of the new plat-
New platform 1.430 1.847 0.266 7 form increase significantly compared with the original plat-
Original platform 16.580 3.731 0.512 0 form and heave plate platform, so the new platform can effec-
30 Heave plate platform 9.348 3.024 0.490 8 tively inhibit heave and roll.
New platform 2.097 1.851 0.258 9
3. Time domain coupling analysis
Original platform 7.998 3.890 0.490 4
60 Heave plate platform 9.400 3.287 0.494 2 In the time domain coupling analysis, JONSWAP spectrum,
New platform 1.555 1.859 0.250 9 which is similar to South China Sea spectrum was used, tak-
Original platform 30.610 3.956 0.524 6 ing 0.026 2 and 1.520 0 Hz as the lower limit and upper limit
90
of frequency, significant wave height was 3 m, peak fre-
Heave plate platform 14.010 3.414 0.532 4
quency was 0.698 1 Hz, and peak factor was 4; The platform
New platform 4.837 1.862 0.255 0
was fixed with 12 mooring anchor chains, and the angle be-
heave natural period of 39.81 s, far longer than the heave tween two adjacent anchor chains is 30° (Fig. 4). Considering
natural periods of original platform and heave plate platform, the key factors affecting platform motion response, surge,
so the new platform can prevent the occurrence of resonance sway, heave and roll are selected to be main responses for
effectively. analysis, especially for the heave response.
2.3. Additional mass 3.1. Time course of surge, sway and roll
The reaction force of the drilling platform is called the ad- From Figs. 5 and 6, it can be seen that the new platform has
ditional inertia force, which is opposite to the acceleration of much smaller surge and sway response compared with origi-
the platform. In accelerated motion of platform, additional nal platform and platform of heave plate, so the possibility of
inertia force acts as a resistance, but it acts as a dynamic force fatigue failure due to excessive longitudinal and lateral motion
in decelerated motion of platform. The ratio of additional in- is reduced; the new platform also has much smaller roll
490
CHEN Bo et al. / Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(3): 487–494
response, lowering the possibility of ship water on deck due to frequency in the irregular wave, also called energy spectrum.
excessive rolling, so the new platform meets the requirements The response spectrum is equal to the product of wave spec-
of safe operation in harsh sea conditions. tral density function and transfer function RAO squared. Time
domain coupling heaving response spectrum curve of plat-
3.2. Time course of heave
form is shown in Fig. 8. It can be seen that, the responses
Fig. 7 shows that, compared with the original platform and concentrate in the range of 0.30.4 Hz for original platform,
heave plate platform, the new platform has much smaller time with peak of 6.50 m2s, showing wave frequency response; for
domain coupling heave response, indicating that the new platform of heave plate, the responses concentrate in the range
platform has excellent anti-heave performance. of 0.30.7 Hz, with peak of 0.85 m2s, presenting wave fre-
quency response; for the new platform, the responses concen-
3.3. Time domain coupled heave response spectrum
trate in the range of 0.30.6 Hz, with peak of 0.13 m2s, pre-
The wave spectrum density function is used to express the senting wave frequency response mainly with some low fre-
distribution of the wave energy to the platform relative to quency responses. Compared with the original platform and
491
CHEN Bo et al. / Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(3): 487–494
Fig. 6. Roll response time course curves. Fig. 7. Heave response time course curve.
the heave plate platform, the new platform has smaller peak of instantaneous vertical effective excitation of platform.
response spectrum and better characteristics of heave wave In waters of less than 1 500 m deep, the semi-submersible
frequency. drilling platform is positioned mainly by mooring, the new
platform has much smaller surge, sway, and roll in time do-
4. Conclusions
main coupling analysis of mooring, and the heave response is
In the frequency domain, compared with the original plat- much smaller than that of the original platform and heave
form and heave plate platform, the new platform has much plate platform, so it has much better anti-heave performance
smaller maximum and mean values of heave response, indi- in the same conditions, better operation ability, better adapta-
cating that the new platform has excellent anti-heave per- bility and stability. Compared with the original platform and
formance. Natural period of heave is an important parameter heave plate platform, the new platform has smaller peak value
for platform performance evaluation, natural heave period of of response spectrum and better wave frequency characteris-
the new platform is about two times of the original platform tics.
and heave plate platform, can effectively prevent the occur-
rence of heave resonance, and improve the security of the Nomenclature
platform. Additional mass value reflects how difficult it is to
change the platform motion state, the heaving additional mass A—projection area of structure in the direction perpendicular to
of the new platform is much larger than that of the original the current, m2;
platform and heave plate platform, and thus can reduce the Ajpq—additional mass parameter, kg;
492
CHEN Bo et al. / Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(3): 487–494
493
CHEN Bo et al. / Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(3): 487–494
ing in managed ice. Cold Regions Science and Technology, tivity of self-elevating unit leg strength to different chord
2015, 111: 67–79. space. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(5):
[14] DENG S, FAN H, SHEN W, et al. An optimization method of 656–661.
top tension in drilling riser-conductor system. Arabian Journal [17] GuoHaiqiang, ZHU Renchuan, MIAO Guoping, et al.Test and
for Science and Engineering, 2016, 41(7): 2707–2714. analysis technology of hydrodynamic coefficient of ship of
[15] FANG Huacan, CHEN Shiyi.Analysis of heave motion of numerical wave in the pool. Shipbuilding of China, 2008,
semi-submersible drilling platform. ActaPetroleiSinica, 1986, 49(S1): 58–65.
7(1): 83–91. [18] DONG Yanqiu.Wave load and response of deep-sea platform.
[16] ZHU Yazhou, SUNChengmeng, ZHANGXiaoyu, et al. Sensi- Tianjin: Tianjin University Press, 2005: 225–246.
494