Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Guide To Abolishing Affirmative Action For Women (Christoff's Dear Colleague Letter)
Guide To Abolishing Affirmative Action For Women (Christoff's Dear Colleague Letter)
Q2: Are there any ethical reasons for justifying affirmative action for women?
A2: No. Women are a solid majority in American colleges: their numbers are increasing, not
decreasing. Offering special opportunities to an ever-increasing majority is indefensible and
irrational.
Q3: Is affirmative action on the basis of race the same as affirmative action for women from a
legal perspective?
A3: No. Affirmative action on the basis of race is covered by Supreme Court rulings.2 There
is no Supreme Court ruling about affirmative action for women. While the Department of
Education circulated a Dear Colleague Letter (2015) which justified sex-selective scholarships
for the “underrepresented sex,” this Letter is now of dubious value3 because women are no
longer the underrepresented sex in colleges.
Q7: My educational institution offers initiatives and programs which are available to women
only. What can I do about this?
A7: You have multiple choices.
You can file an internal Title IX complaint with your University. Title IX is a federal
law which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex.
You can file a Title IX complaint with The Office for Civil Rights [OCR], a function
of the Department of Education. It might make sense to attempt to solve the problem
with your University first; if they dismiss your concerns, do file an OCR complaint.
You may use state law mechanisms to dispose of these programs.
Q8: Can I file a complaint about any program if men are excluded?
A8: There are certain exceptions in which sex-selective programs are allowed.
Athletic scholarships and resources are subject to a different system of inquiry.
Fraternities and sororities are exempt from Title IX.4 This may seem obvious, but
there are activists who want to abolish the Greek system.
1
Parody is protected by the First Amendment.
2
Grutter v. Bolinger and Gratz v. Bollinger.
3
The letter has not been officially rescinded, as far as I am aware. The letter does not cite
adequate case law and it was in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.
4
As per an internal memorandum from 1989.
1
A program that is entirely external is not covered by Title IX. The program/initiative
must either receive money from the University, or it must be using campus space.
The overall effect must be discriminatory. For example: your campus has a Lounge
for Men, and a separate Lounge for Women. The two lounges are similar in terms
of quality. Here, a Title IX complaint is unnecessary.
Q9: Why did you specifically file a complaint against Yale University?
A9: The first complaint was against the University of Southern California. At that point, I
considered filing a complaint against Harvard University, since it is the largest academic
corporation in the world. The objective was to create a binding precedent. Upon careful
consideration, I decided that Yale is a better choice. I also wanted to avoid the legal disputes
about Harvard’s final clubs.
Q12: Who can file a Title IX complaint with the Office for Civil Rights?
A12: Anyone can file a complaint against any institution. This is consistent with long-standing
OCR practice. You do not have to be a lawyer to file a Title IX complaint against your
institution, or any institution. However, filing a complaint against an institution with which you
are familiar is common sense.
Q17: Do you have a template that I can use in order to file such a complaint?
5
https://www.wsj.com/articles/meet-the-student-whistleblower-who-pushed-stanford-to-
rethink-financial-aid-1517425678
6
https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/complaintform.pdf
3
A17: Yes. Please contact me at titleixstudentadvocacy@gmail.com and I will be happy to
supply you with a copy.
Q18: The Department of Education has dismissed your complaint in part and accepted your
complaint in part. Is this decision final?
A18: No. If additional evidence of disparate treatment emerges, I will amend the complaint
against Yale University. Other persons who possess such evidence may be able to abolish more
programs in other institutions. In addition, state laws may be more restrictive than federal law
in terms of abolishing such programs (for example, California’s Unruh Act).
4