Sta Lucia East Commercial Vs Secretary of Labor Digest PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

STA.

LUCIA EAST COMMERCIAL CORPORATION On November 2001, THE CORPORATION or THE


vs. HON. SECRETARY OF LABOR AND CORPORATION filed a motion to dismiss the
EMPLOYMENT and STA. LUCIA EAST petition. It averred that it has voluntarily
COMMERCIAL CORPORATION WORKERS recognized SMSLEC as the exclusive bargaining
ASSOCIATION (CLUP LOCAL CHAPTER), agent of its regular rank-and-file employees,
and that collective bargaining negotiations
G.R. No. 162355 August 14, 2009 already commenced between them. THE
CARPIO, J.: CORPORATION argued that the petition should
On 2001, Confederated Labor Union of the be dismissed for violating the one year and
Philippines (CLUP) instituted a petition for negotiation bar rules under the Omnibus Rules
certification election among the regular rank- Implementing the Labor Code.
and-file employees of Sta. Lucia East
The CBA between SMSLEC and the corporation
Commercial Corporation (THE CORPORATION)
was ratified by its rank-and-file employees and
and its Affiliates. The affiliate companies
registered with DOLE.
included in the petition were SLE Commercial,
SLE Department Store, SLE Cinema, Robsan East In the meantime, on December 2001, the union
Trading, Bowling Center, Planet Toys, Home filed its Opposition to THE CORPORATION’S
Gallery and Essentials. Motion to Dismiss questioning the validity of
the voluntary recognition of [SMSLEC] by [THE
On August 2001, Med-Arbiter Bactin ordered CORPORATION] and their consequent
the dismissal of the petition due to negotiations and execution of a CBA. According
inappropriateness of the bargaining unit. to [THE UNION], the voluntary recognition of
Later CLUP in its local chapter under THE [SMSLEC] by [THE CORPORATION] violated the
CORPORATION reorganized itself and re- requirements for voluntary recognition, i.e.,
registered as CLUP-Sta. Lucia East Commercial non-existence of another labor organization in
Corporation Workers Association (herein THE the same bargaining unit. It pointed out that
UNION), limiting its membership to the rank- the time of the voluntary recognition on 20 July
and-file employees of Sta. Lucia East 2001, appellant’s registration which covers the
Commercial Corporation. same group of employees covered by Samahang
Manggagawa sa Sta. Lucia East Commercial,
On the same date, THE UNION or THE UNION was existing and has neither been cancelled or
filed the instant petition for certification abandoned.
election. It claimed that no certification election
has been held among them within the last 12 The Med-Arbiter’s Ruling
months prior to the filing of the petition, and Med-Arbiter Bactin dismissed THE UNION’s
while there is another union registered covering petition for direct certification on the ground of
the same employees, namely Samahang
contract bar rule. The prior voluntary
Manggawa sa SLEC [SMSLEC], it has not been recognition of SMSLEC and the CBA between
recognized as the exclusive bargaining agent of THE CORPORATION and SMSLEC bars the filing
[THE CORPORATION’s] employees.
of THE UNION’s petition for direct certification
THE UNION raised the matter to the Secretary. labor organizations upon issuance of the
certificate of registration.7
The Ruling of the Secretary of Labor and
Employment Bargaining Unit

The Secretary held that the subsequent The concepts of a union and of a legitimate
negotiations and registration of a CBA executed labor organization are different from, but
by THE CORPORATION with SMSLEC could not related to, the concept of a bargaining unit.
bar THE UNION’s petition. THE UNION
constituted a registered labor organization at A bargaining unit is a "group of employees of a
the time of THE CORPORATION’s voluntary given employer, comprised of all or less than all
of the entire body of employees, consistent
recognition of SMSLEC.
with equity to the employer, indicated to be the
THE CORPORATION then filed a petition for best suited to serve the reciprocal rights and
certiorari before the appellate court. duties of the parties under the collective
bargaining provisions of the law."
The Ruling of the Appellate Court
The fundamental factors in determining the
The appellate court affirmed the ruling of the appropriate collective bargaining unit are: (1)
Secretary the will of the employees (Globe Doctrine); (2)
Issue: Whether THE CORPORATION’s voluntary affinity and unity of the employees’ interest,
recognition of SMSLEC was done while a such as substantial similarity of work and
legitimate labor organization was in existence in duties, or similarity of compensation and
the bargaining unit. working conditions (Substantial Mutual
Interests Rule); (3) prior collective bargaining
Held: The petition has no merit. history; and (4) similarity of employment status.

Legitimate Labor Organization (eto yung important) The UNION’S initial


problem was that they constituted a legitimate
Article 212(g) of the Labor Code defines a labor
labor organization representing a non-
organization as "any union or association of
appropriate bargaining unit. However, The
employees which exists in whole or in part for
union subsequently re-registered as THE
the purpose of collective bargaining or of
UNION, limiting its members to the rank-and-
dealing with employers concerning terms and
file of THE CORPORATION. THE CORPORATION
conditions of employment." Upon compliance
cannot ignore the union was a legitimate labor
with all the documentary requirements, the
organization at the time of THE CORPORATION’s
Regional Office or Bureau shall issue in favor of
voluntary recognition of SMSLEC. THE
the applicant labor organization a certificate
CORPORATION and SMSLEC cannot, by
indicating that it is included in the roster of
themselves, decide whether CLUP-THE
legitimate labor organizations.6 Any applicant
CORPORATION and its Affiliates Workers Union
labor organization shall acquire legal
represented an appropriate bargaining unit.
personality and shall be entitled to the rights
and privileges granted by law to legitimate The inclusion in the union of disqualified
employees is not among the grounds for
cancellation of registration, unless such
inclusion is due to misrepresentation, false
statement or fraud under the circumstances
The union having been validly issued a
certificate of registration, should be considered
as having acquired juridical personality which
may not be attacked collaterally. The proper
procedure for THE CORPORATION is to file a
petition for cancellation of certificate of
registration of CLUP-THE CORPORATION and its
Affiliates Workers Union and not to
immediately commence voluntary recognition
proceedings with SMSLEC.

You might also like