Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shin-2011-International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Shin-2011-International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
0.4, 95% CI 0.2–0.7, X2 ¼ 8.2, p ¼ 0.004). When all the the non graded nature of the KADL and the
variables were controlled for, only functional impair- impossibility of implying any causal direction in a
ment consistently remained independently associated cross sectional investigation are some of the obvious
with emotional distress with a trend for physical illness weaknesses of this report.
(OR 3.5, 95%CI 1.1–10.3, p ¼ 0.03, OR 2.2, 95%CI 0.8–
6.1, p ¼ 0.06).
Conflict of interest
Copyright # 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 26: 545–549.
Letters to the Editor 547
Copyright # 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 26: 545–549.
548 Letters to the Editor
Dear Editor of the MMSE with either the Modified Mental State
Examination (3MS; six studies) or the ACE (seven
Detection of early dementia has been identified as a studies). This included comparison of the MMSE with
health service priority and the use of cognitive revised versions of the ACE (ACE-R; one study) and
screening tools is recommended to facilitate this. the 3MS (3MS-R; one study).
Cognitive screening tests consist of systematic, The meta-analysis was based on the method of
structured questions or tasks that are easily scored, Hasselblad and Hedges (1995) for integrating data on
and can usually be equated to a ‘caseness’ or ‘non- diagnostic and screening tests. The effect size was
caseness’ category highlighting where further clinical calculated for each test in each study using the
assessment is indicated. This meta-analysis considered standardized difference between the means for control
studies that directly compare the effectiveness of the and dementia sample groups. Where means and
MMSE with revisions/developments of it in identifying standard deviations were not reported, values of
dementia populations. sensitivity and specificity were used to calculate
The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the effectiveness values. A value of combined effectiveness
most widely used cognitive screening test. It was across each group of studies was derived using the
developed as a bedside tool to evaluate the cognitive standard error to weight the effectiveness values.
status of elderly people in clinical settings. Attempts The effectiveness values calculated for each of the 13
have been made to develop the MMSE by extending its studies showed that the extensions (ACE or 3MS) had
content (Modified MMSE, 3MS/MMMSE; Adden- the same or a higher effectiveness value than the MMSE
brooke’s Cognitive Examination, ACE). Thirteen in every comparison. Effectiveness values were found
papers were included that reported direct comparisons to be homogeneous, therefore a random effects model
Table 1 Weighted mean effectiveness values for ACE/MMSE and 3MS/MMSE studies
Tests compared No. Total no. Total no. Test Weighted mean 95% Confidence
studies cases controls effectiveness interval
Copyright # 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2011; 26: 545–549.