An Introduction to Cyclic Voltammetry

Gary A. Mabboil
Department of Chemistry and Geology, Clemson University. Clemson. SC 29631

~.
Cvclic voltammetrv has become a nonular tool in the last
fifteen years for stud;ingelectrochemwal reactions. Organic
chemists have amlied the techniaue to the studv of hiusvn-
th,,tic reaction pathways ( I ) and io studies of el&tro~hemi-
callv eenerated free radicals (2). An increasing numher of
inoig&ic chemists have been using cyclic voltammetry to
evaluate the effects of liaands on the oxidation/reduction
potential of the central metal ion in complexesand multinu-
clear clusters 131.This type
. . uiinformatim plays an intrgrnl
part in many of the approaches direcwd tuwanl snlar energy
convenion 14) and in model studies of enz)mstic cataly~is15).
Knoaledge of the electrochemistry of a metal complex can he
useful in the selection of the proper oxidizing agent to put the
metal complex in an intermediate oxidation state r f i L Elec-
trochemical methoddogy has also heen exploited as a novel
means of introducing f&tional groups and removing blocking
agents (7).
There are several good texts that deal with the theory and
practice of modern voltammetry in depth (8-10). Also, many
mstrumental analysis textbooks give avery brief overview of
the method. However, the needs of a researcher interested in
applying the technique for the first time are somewhere he-
tween these two extremes. Instructors of instrumental analysis
who want to teach modern electrochemistry are faced with a
similar dilemma due to the lack of suitahle background ma-
terial for the students to read. This article is intended to help
meet those needs.
The CV Experiment
T h e voltage applied to the "working"electrode is scanned
linearly from an initial value,Ei, to a predetermined limit, Ehl,
(known as the switching potential) where the direction of the
scan is reversed (see Fig. la). The operator can halt the scan F l w 1. a) Appliedpotential program. EA, and Elp are switching potemials.
anywhere or let the instrument cycle between E h l and some b) Typical cyclic voltsm-am of 1 mMKaFe(CN)aa1a platinum elernode in
BQUKWEI 0.1 M KC1 solution.The scan rate was 100 mV/sec and the reference
other preselected value, Eh2.The current response is plotted
s l ~ c h d was
e Ag/AgCI in 0.1 M KCi solution
as a function of the applied potential. Often there is very little
difference between the first cycle and successive scans.
However, the changes that do appear on repetitive cycles are conditions.) The term ii is known as the transfer coefficient.
important keys to unlocking information about reaction It arises becauseonly a fractionof theenermthat is put into
mechanisms (as will he shown later in this paper). the system (in the form of the applied potentiall luwers the
Figure l b shows a current-voltage curve (or voltammogram) activation energy harrier. Its value \,aries from zeru to unity
for Fe(CN)r3. As the potential is scanned in the negative di- (often -0.51 depend~ngon the shape of the iree energy sur-
rection the current rises to a peak and then decays in a regular faces for the reactants and products.'
manner. The current depends on two steps in the overall The exounmtial denendence oikron the annlied .. potential
process, the movement of electroactive material to the surface accounts for the steep rise in the current. However, the elec-
and the electron transfer reaction. The electron transfer rate trolvsis of the reactant denletes its concentration near the
constant for a reduction process is a function of potential and surlace. Since the experiment ii performed at a stationary
can be described theoretically. electrode in an unstirred solution, diiiusion is the nrincipal
means of moving the reactant to the surface. This relatively
anF
k r = k" enp (%(E - E'O) (1) slow mode of mass transport cannot maintain a steady-state
concentration profile i n the region close to the elekrode.
k o is the standard heterogeneous electron-transfer rate con- Therefore, the depletion zone grows. I n a sense, the average
stant. (Its value is a property of the reaction between the distance that the ieactant molewles must travel to reach the
particular compound and the electrode surface used.) The surface increases. Consequently, the rate of mass transport,
number of electrons transferred per molecule is n ;F is the decreases. The dependence on mass transport, and the fact
Faraday; R is the universal gas constant; T is the Kelvin that a finite rate for the reverse electron transfer process is
temperature; and En' is the formal reduction potential. (The possible, prevent the current from increasing exponentially
prime signifies that the effect on the free energy of the reac-
tants and products embodied in activity coefficients has been This Is a sirnplificatlon. For a well-written and much more detailed
combined with the thermodynamic reduction potential to explanation of the significance of Me transfer coefficient and symmeby
form a term that is directly measurable but subject to solution factors see pp. 917-929 of ref.(27).

Volume 60 Number 9 September 1983 697

with putential. Eventually thr mass transport rtrp hecumri
rate determining and thv current reaches ;I maximum. Since
the nmcentration yradirnt continues I,, decrease, thr rate o i
mass tramport wnrlnuep to derrwie causing the current I I I
dwny. Heymd the peak the current i, actuall!. ~lrpendenton
t i m e m d i n d q ~ m d e n oitheapplied
t lx,tentiul. In thisdiffu-
-.
sion.limitrd region thr current is p r n l x ~ t i m a lt u 1 -.'
An ndvnntagc uf the cyclic voltammetry exprriment is the
fact that a s~gniiisnntcmcrntratlull of pruduct tin thia casr.
the rrduced iurm, has hren generatnl uear the electrode on
t h r forward scan. When thr >can direction is nwr.;ed, the
reduced form is oxidized back to the original starting material
and the current for the reverse process is recorded (see Fig.
l h ) . The electron transfer rate constant for the reverse (or
oxidation) process is similarly controlled by the applied po-
tential.
(4)
Determinallon of the Formal Reduction Potential
It is common oractice to reoort the averaee of the forward
~~ ~ ~
and return peakpotentials asthe formal rezuction potential
for the redox couple. This is an approximation that is most
accurate when the electron transfer process is reversible and
the diffusion coefficients for the oxidized and reduced forms
are the same. If the reaction is reversible, then the separation
in the peak potentials, AEp,will be close to 58ln mV (at 25°C).
(This relationship can be used to evaluate n.)
By reversible, electrochemists mean that the reaction is fast
enough to maintain the concentrations of the oxidized and
reduced forms in equilibrium with each other a t the electrode
surface. The proper equilibrium ratio a t a given potential is
determined by the Nernst Equation:
where 0 is the oxidized form and R is the reduced form.
How fast is fast enough? Many systems lwk reversible when
the voltage is scanned slowly hut a t higher scan rates Up
appears greater than 58ln mV. Reversihility is, then, a matter
of degree and depends on the stress that is applied to the
system. Matsuda and Ayabe indicated that for scanning vol-
tammetry any deviations from reversible behavior will be
imperceptible if the value of k" (in cmlsec) is greater than the
numerical value of 0 . 3 1 ~ "(where
~ u is the scan rate in V/sed3
. . Voltammoerams
(11). " recorded a t scan rates UP to 10 Vlsec
are common. Some instruments are capable of scanning up
to 1000 Vlsec. Therefore, electron transfer reactions with rate
constants greater than 10 cmlsec will be reversible even in the
very fastest experiments.
Redox couples whose peaks shift farther apart with in-
creasine scan rate are categorized as auasi-reversible. (Some
authors merely say irreversible.) There are some cases in which
the oeaks are so widelv separated ( k o s 2 X 10-"112 cmlsec)
that'no parts of the t& peaks overlap on the potential axis a t
all. These are generally known as "totally irreversible" sys-
tems. A subset of this class are those reactions that yield
products that cannot be recycled electrochemically to give
back the original reactants (for example, those that involve
extensive bond breaking andlor loss of substituents to solu-
tion). These are "chemically irreversible" reactions, and many
vield no return peak a t all.
Another char&teristic of reversible systems is the depen-
dence of the peak height on the square root of the scan rate.'
At 25°C the peak current is
The current will be in amperes when A is in cm2, Do is in
cm'lsec, u is in volts/sec, and C;i is the bulk concentration in
moleslcm? The peak current for a quasi-reversible system is
698 Journal of Chemical Education
not proportional to u1l2except when the peaks are so widely
separated that the system is more appropriately described as
totally irreversible.
Althoueh " the averaee of the . oeak . ootentials can be a eood
estimate of the E D 'fur a reversible redox reaction, one must
be careful not to attribute high accuracy to the determination.
In Nicholson and Shain's classic paper on the theory of vol-
tammetrv a t stationarv electrodes (12). thev. . point out that
the position of the return peak, even for a reversible system
can shift as much as 5 mV depending on the choice of the
switching potential, EA.(The farther Eh is from Ep,the more
nearlv. svmmetric
. about the reduction potential the peaks will
he., .Alscl t h w work indicates that thcmdp#,int hetween the
,leaks is reitlly all estimate ot I.:, l.'* \ E l .15 H term from pw
iarography that was given to thepotent%l where the current
is half the value of that on the current plateau.) Fortunately,
the diffusion coefficients have a small effect. Even if D ~ I D R
= 2, the error introduced by assuming E1,2 = Eo'would be
only -9mV for a single electron exchange process.
Some workers have found that the broad point a t the top
~~ ~~~~ ~
.
of the current oeak makes it difficult to determine the true
position of the peak precisely. They prefer to read the po-
tential where the current is half the value of the peak current.
This half-peak potential (for a reversible redox couple a t
25°C) is related to the polarographic E1/2 value by the fol-
lowing equation:
28.0
EP/2= Ei12f -mV (71
n
(The sign is positive for a reduction process.)
Estimating formal reduction potentials from quasi-re-
versihle voltammograms is less reliable the farther the peak
separation deviates from the reversible case. Theoretical work
shows that as the scan rate is increased, slow electron transfer
kinetics can make the peak potentials shift in such a manner
t b.1 .iur the rt.110~
that they are n u lungrr s\.mmrtrii. h ~ u the
cuuple. The prublrm is wursr the fart her t hr rlrctnm trmsier
c~eificient, ,I, is from 0.5.A ruugh indlrati~rlluf the rn;~gnirude
d t h e errnr that may he inrruducrd IIV wrrsginr the pair 01'
cathodic and anodic peak potentials for a quasi-reversible
voltammogram can be derived from graphical data prepared
by Matsuda and Ayabe ( 1 1 ) . For an 0-value of 0.3 and peak
separations of 108,312, and 592 mV, the midpoint between
the peaks would be on the negative side of the actual Eli2 value
by 2,44, and 104 mV, respectively. (For an a-value of 0.7 the
error would have the same magnitude with the opposite
sign.)
The mathematics that describe a scanning experiment are quite
complicated. However, an application of Fick's First Law of Diffusion
tells us that lhe current at any time is proportional to the concentration
gradient for the reactant:
A 1s the electrode area. 0, is the dnffusoon coeff~c~ent of the oxldlzed
specres, 1 is tame, and x s the dlstance from lhe electrode surface An
erperment in wh ch the voltage 8s stepped Instead of scanned out to
a potential where the current is diffusion controlled is much easier to
model mathematically. (This is chronoamperometry.)in that case
(aco~ax).=,,,= c&=t (3)
where Cb 1s the concentration of the oxld.zed materlal In the bulk so-
lullon (on moles/cm'l It seems reasonable, Inen tnat scannmg to the
same voltage would also cause the current to fa I 011 as
Rates of heterogeneous reactions are referenced to unit surface
area and have units of moi sec-' ~ m - Since~ . the rate is expressed
as the product of kc, the rate constant, k, must have units of cm sec-'
when- concentration is aiven in mol cm-=.
'Eq-atoon (61assumes a planar e~echode.For a spher cal electfle
~~ ~~ ~
(such as a hang ng mercuw drop): I, =
where ro is the radius of the electrode.
I,,,,.
+ (0752) nFADoColro
5E,,2 = Pr- RTlnF In
 The point to remember is that one should use conditions tionship is plotted in Figure 3. Experimentally we can use the
that give the most reversible behavior possible. For quasi- graph to obtain an estimate of k for the chemical step. (For
reversible systems the scan rate should he slowed down to experimental values of ip./ip,, find the corresponding theo-
minimize LIE,. There is a lower limit for the scan rate, how- retical value of log (kr). Solve for k r and divide by the ex-
ever. This limit is set by our ability to maintain a convec- perimental value of r.)
tion-free solution. Convection often sets in after times as short Other electrochemical mechanisms can he identified. A list
as 30 seconds, unless special precautions against stray vibra- of some of the more common ones is given in the table. Figure
tions and other sources of convection are taken.
The type and conditim of tht, working electrt,de surface can
make a differenre in the elecrnrn trnnifw k~ntfics.Often solid
electrodes need to be polished and/or cleaned by exposing
them to oxidizing agents. In some cases workers advocate
"activating" the electrode surface (particularly carbon elec-
trodes) by application of a sequence of extreme positive and
negative potentials. (For more discussion about surface effects
and pretreatment procedures see references (13-15).
Peak Currents and Coupled Chemical Reactions
The height of the current peak can be used to determine the
concentration of the reactant in the bulk solution. However,
other electrochemical methods (such as differential nulse
voltammetry) are better suited fo; this task. The real fake of Figure 3. Ratio of anodic to camodic ( a reverse to fwwsrd) peak current as a
this techniaue is the analvsis of homoeeneous chemical re- function of k f a a reversible elechon transfer followed by a chemical step.
actions t h a t are coupled to the electrontransfer process. Di- (Adapted wilh permission from Anal. Chem., 3%706-723 (1964).)
agnosis of coupled chemical reactions is often based on the Eleclrochemlcal Mechanism lnvoivlnp Coupled Chemical
relative heights of the anodicand cathodic peaks. For example, Reactlorn
consider a reversible charge transfer followed by an irrevers-
ible chemical reaction (entry 111in the table). If the conversion I. Reversible elernon transfer, no chemical mmplicatims
of R to Z is fast and the potential is scanned slowly, some of
R will be lost to Z. Less R will be available for the oxidation
back to 0 on the return scan and, therefore, the anodic peak 11. Reversible e i e n r m transfer followed by a reversible chemical
will be smaller. In the extreme case, k may he so fast relative reaction-E& mechanism
to the scan rate, that all of R will be converted to Z and the
return peak will be absent entirely. Figure 2 illustrates how
the voltammograms change depending on the ratio of the R&Z
chemical rate constant to the scan rate. (Note that the v-axis I-,

is the normalized current as given by the function: Ill. Reversible electron nansfer followed by an irreversible chemical
il(n3/2FADA'2CEu1/2).)
. , reaction-E,Ci mechanism
~ i c h o l s o dand ~ h a i ' nhave demonstrated that the ratio of
the anodic to cathodic neak currents can be ~ r e d i c t e dfrom
the rate constant for t i e chemical step, k , and the time, r ,
spent between Ell2 and the switching potential, EL (15). (E112
will be the midpoint between the peaks a t very high scan rates iV. Reversible chemical reaction peceding a reversible electron
where the following chemical reaction does not have time to transfer-CE, mechanism
consume a significant amount of R.) The theoretical rela-
z&o
L,

O + m e R

V. Reversible chemical reaction preceding an irreversible elmron

transfer-CE mechanism

zL
-0
*-,
o t m - R

VI. Reversible eimron transfer followed by an irreversible regeneration

of staning materiai-catalytic mechanism

R+Z*O
k

VII, Ineversible electron transfer followed by an ineversible regeneration

of starting material

VIII. Multiple electron transfer with intervening chemical reaction-ECE

mechanism
F l g ~ l e2 Cyc ic voltammoqrams for a revers ole e ectron transfer tolloww oy
an irrever%o e Chemcal Eleo for varl0.s rat or ot me chem car rate conrunt
to scan rate, k f / a where a = nFv1RTand v is vaitslsecond. (Adapted with per-
mission from Anal. Chem., 36, 706-723 (1964))

Volume 60 Number 9 S e ~ t e m b e r1983 699

 SCAN RATE

Figure 4. Ratio of anodic to cathodic (or reverse to forward)peak currents as

a function of rate of voltage scan for various elechochemical mechanisms.
(Adapted with permission from A M C h m . 36. 706-723 (1964))

I I
0.01 0.1 1.0 10 100
Figure 6. Methods for determining the proper baseline for measurement of the
SCAN RATE peak current for the reverse scan. (a) RecMding the signal versus time and
stopping lhe first scan at h.(b) Using an X-Y recorder and stopping the scan
Figwe 5. Rate of shin of potmliil as a functionof scan rate ta variws elemode st EL until iapproachesa steady state befwe scanning back. (c) Parameters
mechanisms. (Adapted with permission from Anal. Chem.. 38, 706-723 used lor calculation of lhe current ratio using Nicholson's method, eqn. (10).

There are occasions when neither of these two methods is

4 shows the general trend that the peak current ratio follows convenient. Nicholson (19) has indicated that the proper
as a function of scan rate for each of the cases involving re- current ratio can also be calculated using the following
versible electron transfer listed in the table. Also of some di- equation.
agnostic value is the rate a t which Epl? shifts as a function of
scan rate. These trends are presented m Figure 5. (Reference i -
- -
+-0.485(ih+ 0.086 (8)
(12) gives a detailed development of each i f these cases. Pol- Lpr 'pr 'PC

cyn and Shain also described multistep charge-transfer re- In eqn. (8), ,i is the peak current for the forward process; (id0
actions where an intermediate oxidation state is formed (16). is the absolute current at the switching potential; and (i,.)~
Treatment of a multi-electron reaction with an intervening is the uncorrected return peak current measured from the
chemical step has also been given (17,18). Data from other current axis. (See Fig. 6c.)
types of electrochemical experiments is often needed to There are some systems in which a coupled chemical reac-
evaluate rate constants for reactions with coupled chemical tion ~ i e l d electroactive
s by-products. In these cases multiple
steps.) scans can be beneficial. For example, the product of electron
Measurement of the peak current is fairly simple for the transfer in the oxidation of aniline is thought to he a free
forward scan. The proper baseline can be obtained by re- radical that very rapidly dimerizes (13).
cordine" the hackmound
" current for a scan without the anal*
under the same conditions (same electrolyte, surface pre-
treatment. etc.). The reverse scan is more complicated since
the electrolysis for the forward prores~stillruntributes tuthe
total current until the scan ha3 passed the foot of the (forward)
wave again. The generally accepted approach is to assume that
the contribution of the forward process to the total current
continues to decrease with the square root of the time during
the reverse scan. The baseline curve for the return scan can
be obtained by stopping the forward scan at the switching The p-arninodiphenylamine (111) that is formed is much
potential with the recorder sweeping along the x-axis as a more easily oxidized at the applied potential and a further two
function of time. This is shown in Figure 6a. electron oxidation occurs.
A second approach is to stop the scan at a convenient spot
(at least 35 mV past E, for the forward scan) and hold the
potential until the current is relatively constant. The appro-
priate baseline is shown in Figure 6h (13).

700 Journal of Chemical Education


F gwe 7 CV of an llne at a g l a s s y Carbon e l e m m e m 0 1 MKCI and 0 0 5 M
~ O ~ S S hyxogen
I U ~ p h m l a l e 501R10n w h 4 ) Scan rates 50 m v l s e c . AgIAgC8
n 0 1 MKCI reference Donea lone noocates second scan
This last reaction is a reversible process and the reduction step
is observed (Fig. 7) at 0.2 V on the return scan. The oxidation
of thep-aminidiphenylamine appears as a new peak on the
second scan (dotted line). The appearance of the new peak was
an important clue to the identity of the product of the oxi-
dation reaction.
The Calculation of Formation Constants
The formation constants for complexes in both the oxidized
and reduced forms are useful in evaluating the a-donor and
a-acceptor properties of the ligands (20,21). The shift in the
formal reduction potential for the complex from the reduction
potential for the aquo-complex is dependent on the ratio of
the formation constants for the reduced and oxidized forms.
For example, consider the reactions below.
Often the formal potential can he evaluated by cyclic vol-
tanmetry when one of the complexes is too unstable to permit
a direct determination of En' by potentiometric measurement
of an equimolar solution of the two forms. If either Kru or K I I
can be evaluated independently (22), then the other can be
calculated from En' data.
Practical Conslderatlons
Most modern equipment uses a three-electrode cell in which
a counter or auxiliary electrode provides the current that is
needed at the working electrode (23,241. Therefore, virtually
no current flows through the reference electrode and its po-
tential remains constant. (For discussion of reference elec-
trodes see references (25) and (261.) A three-electrode system
close to the working electrode surface. The voltage represented
by the product of the current and uncompensated resistance
(mainly the solution resistance between the reference and
working electrodes) is wasted and does not appear across the
electrode/solution interface. Since the peak current increases
with the square root of the scan rate, the voltage error in-
creases at the same rate. In cases where the error is of the order
of millivolts, the peaks from even a totally reversible redox
couple will appear to separate as though the system were
quasi-reversible. Therefore the experimenter should be cau-
tious about drawing conclusions concerning electron transfer
kinetics when either the current or uncompensated resistance
is large. Some manufacturers incorporate a positive feedback
circuit in their equipment to compensate for iR loss.
Another source of error in the applied voltage arises from
the variation in the rates at which ions diffuse across the ion
bridge separating the reference electrode from the sample
solution. The net difference in the movement of cations
compared to anions results in a charge separation and,
therefore an electrochemical potential difference. These
junction potentials can be minimized by chwsing supporting
electrolyte ions with similar diffusion coefficients (such as K+
and C1-).
Mercury working electrodes are limited to the negative
potential range. Platinum and various carbon electrodes are
popular for performing oxidations. However, solid electrodes
are susceptible to adsorption, or surface fouling, and surface
oxidation. For example, platinum forms an oxide film that
shows a large reduction peak near +0.8 V in 0.5 M HzSOa
versus the normal hydrogen electrode. Fortunately, a surface
current can be identified easily as such since the peak height
is directly proportional to the scan rate. Often, judicious choice
of solution conditions and electrode pretreatment can mini-
mize this problem.
In summary, cyclic voltammetry is a convenient tool for
-
ol-iainine oualitative information about electron transfer
s
processes. I t is also a rapid method for obtaining good esti-
mates of formal reduction potentials, formation constants and,
sometimes, the number of electrons transferred per reactant
molecule and rate constants. if the user is aware of its limita-
tions.
Acknowledgment
The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful comments
and encouragement of Dr. James C. Fanning and Dr. John D.
Petersen in the preparation of this article
Literature CHed
(11 B0hbitt.J. M.,and Wills,JohnP..rl O r # Chrm.45.1978 (19801.
(2) Nelaen. Stephen F., Kessel, Carl R., Bzien, David J., and Weinhold. Frank, J. Org.
Chom.,45.2116(198(1).
(3) Powers,Michael J.. and Meyer, Thomas J., J. Ampr Chem S o c , 102,1289 (19W).
(4 Kalvanssundaram.. K..Kiwi
. J.Gratre1. M..Hdu. Chim. Aeto.61.272U (1978).
isi ~ i iC., A , and spenm,J. T., jnorg. c h m , IS, 2 ~ w5e n ) .
(61 Headridre. J. R.."Eledrachomicsl Techniques for l n o ~ a n i eChemist*." Academic
.....
ILL! \lal.uaa.)l aud A v s k . Y . / E k r r ,hrm .5¶.194 .J's
o.'t U I . ~1, ~ n . Hi.and 5bn.t,.1 .)no1 ( n r m .x.: ntl'm,
t l l . A.lnm.. l u p h h . F l a i r . r l , ~ m ~ h tatn ilhd Fl*trdn." M n r d Uckker. h r YI rk.
!SSP.
(14) G i l m a n . S . , E l ~ r f r m ~C
I .h m . , 2.111 (1967).
(15) Parsons. R.. J. Elsclrmnol. Chem., 21.35 (19691.
(16) Polcyn. D..sndShain,I..Anal. C h ~ m . 3 8 . 3 7 0 . 3 7 6(1966).
(17) Nicholmn. R.S.,sndShain,l..Awl. Chem., 37, 178 (1965).
(18) Ssvssnt, J. M.. Elarfrmhim. A d o , 12,753 (1967).
(19) Nicholson. R. S.. A w l . Cham., 38.1406 (1966).
(201 Kachn.C. L a n d Tauhe.C.G.. J. Arne,. Chem S m . 9 8 . 6 8 9 (1976)
Volume 60 Number 9 September 1983 701
702 Journal of Chemical Education