Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Traditional Definition of Organization Development
Traditional Definition of Organization Development
(OD)
Social scientists have learned that our paradigms have a powerful effect on how we
interpret the world around us. The following definition of organization development is
rather standard.
The definition was developed in 1969 at a time when an organization was considered to
be much like a stable machine comprised of interlocking parts. OD diagnoses an
organizational problem and then prescribes an intervention to fix it, much like a
traditional medical doctor treats a body today. The above definition is often cited when
describing the field of OD. OD courses explain methods in terms of diagnosis,
interventions and evaluations.
Holistic medicine works from a systems perspective rather than the linear model of
traditional medicine. Service providers in holistic medicine consider the patient to be so
dynamic that cause-and-effect perspectives can’t grasp the true nature of the patient
“system”. Providers consider all aspects of the patient, including physical, mental,
emotional and spiritual. Providers harbor no illusions of “fixing” anything. Instead, they
work toward wellness, toward improving the overall quality of life for the patient.
Providers believe that the patient’s system knows how to take care of itself. That is, the
wisdom is there, but the provider and patient must work together to let this wisdom come
out.
Holistic services include varied forms of treatment, for example, training about stress
management, exercise, adjustments to diet, counseling, massage, acupuncture, herbal
medicine, etc. Often these treatments are highly integrated into comprehensive treatment
programs, including ongoing support to patients as they accomplish necessary life
changes. There’s concerted effort on the part of service providers to train about methods
of holistic treatments. Courses are held in homes and communities.
Beginnings: Holistic OD
Actually, developers have been adopting various forms of holistic development for
several years. Many practitioners now take a systems view of organizations. They focus
as much on the processes between the parts of an organization as on the parts themselves.
They talk of patterns in organizations rather than events. They talk of paradoxes and
polarities, rather than fixing. They count on guiding principles as much as verified facts
from social sciences.
Self-organizing systems and self-managed teams are now mainstream in the literature.
Spirituality in the workplace has become a common topic. Many management books
reference principles from Eastern philosophies. Management development programs now
include forms of self development as well. Dialogue groups enhance meaning for
members. Interventions, such as coaching and peer-coaching seem to be on the rise.
Consultants specialize in facilitating the rituals inherent in managing change. Consultants
promise “learning relationships” with clients.
Yet to Be Done
However, much remains to be done. We recognize that leaders are faced with many
anxieties while facing constant change. Yet we provide few avenues for leaders to get
ongoing support to deal with these anxieties. Research indicates that adult learning is
very organic in nature and occurs from ongoing actions, reflection and feedback. Yet too
many of us resort only to traditional classroom techniques for leadership development.
We recognize that change takes time. Yet we cave in to client demands to shorten the
length of projects. Too many of us see only those symptoms that match the treatments
only we can provide. Many continue to question why MBA programs include few, if any,
courses in OD.
This definition places priority on "candidness" of organization members and their taking
"greater responsibility for their own actions.” This definition places priority on nurturing
the authenticity needed for members to continuously learn from themselves and each
other. As Terry asserts: “authenticity self-corrects” (from “Authentic Leadership: Courage
in Action”, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993). This definition is probably one of
several that could serve as basis to define or suggest what OD is today.
A recent discussion in the online ODNET discussion group discussed whether OD has a
credibility problem or not. One of the major outcomes from the discussion was that the
profession of OD means many things to many people. As with most things in life, this
ambiguity has its advantages and disadvantages. As with most things in life, the benefit
from this struggle comes not from the solution itself, but from the struggle.