Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2017 Symposium Poster
2017 Symposium Poster
Bekah Ashpole, Julia Joo, Stuart MacGeorge, Anna Lee, Brady Hearn, Kaelah Gendron, and Alan J. Herr
Department of Pathology, University of Washington
Abstract Key Questions Results
Mutator phenotypes due to mutations in genes encoding DNA polymerases or mismatch
repair proteins lead to increased error rates during DNA replication that accelerate the How do cells escape error-induced extinction? Extragenic antimutators affect genes involved in dNTP
evolution of cancer cells and contribute to chemotherapy resistance. Work in the yeast
Saccharomyces cerevisae indicates that excessive DNA replication errors can lead to
synthesis.
error-induced extinction (EEX), where every cell within the population dies due to a How do the affected pathways influence mutator-driven
random lethal mutation. Thus, a possible direction for cancer therapy may be to modulate cancers?
mutation rates of mutator cells – to either increase mutation rates to a lethal level or
suppress mutation rates to their baseline levels in order to slow the rate of tumor
evolution. Genetic pathways that may be targeted to modulate mutator phenotypes have
yet to be fully elucidated. To identify such pathways, we isolated spontaneous haploid
Methods
yeast eex mutants that escaped from error-induced extinction caused by combining a
mismatch repair defect (msh2Δ) with the pol2-L439V allele, which models a human Using an engineered yeast strain deficient in MMR and
cancer mutation affecting DNA polymerase epsilon. We crossed the eex mutants to wild
type yeast, generating diploid strains that were heterozygous for msh2Δ, pol2-L439V, and
the Pol ε exonuclease, we selected strains that escaped
the eex mutation. Following sporulation, we measured the mutation rates of haploid error-induced extinction.
MMR-proficient pol2-L439V progeny in order to assess the presence or absence of the
antimutator mutation. For each mapping experiment, cells showing evidence of
suppressed mutation rates were pooled separately from those exhibiting the normal
pol2-L439V mutator phenotype. Unique mutations present only in the antimutator pool
were identified by Illumina Next Generation Sequencing. Candidate eex mutations were
engineered into fresh strains to assess the antimutator phenotype. Our compiled list of
antimutator mutations and their functions in yeast may allow us to identify analogous
mutations in the human genome and explore new methods of cancer therapy by which
specific genes can be targeted to lower mutation rates to normal levels.
Antimutator mutations affecting Dun1, RNR1, and RNR2 may increase
replication fidelity by lowering dNTP pools. Ctf18 deficiency may also
Introduction affect dNTP pools through the S-phase checkpoint or directly influence
replication fidelity through the loss of its known association with Pol ε.
Polymerase proofreading and MMR cooperatively guard
against mutations.
Dissected colonies were genotyped and mutation rates of Re-engineering of rnr1-R503I into pol2-L439V msh2Δ
pol2 MSH2 segregants were assayed. strain recapitulates the eex phenotype.
Conclusions
PPpro
Results
● Intragenic Pol2 antimutators may allow alternative
New potential antimutators within Pol ε. editing pathways to repair mismatches.