Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity Guide and Rubric - Act. 3 Writing Assignment PDF
Activity Guide and Rubric - Act. 3 Writing Assignment PDF
Activity Guide and Rubric - Act. 3 Writing Assignment PDF
Environme
nts to its
developme Collaborative Learning – Monitoring and Evaluation
nt
Individual:
Products to
submit by Part 1: Send in the forum the picture and a brief
th students comment about it.
Part 2: Send in the forum your answers about the
city.
Collaborative:
Part 4: Send in the forum your comments about
the partners’ contributions.
Evaluation Rubric
Individual Collaborative
Type of activity: ☐ ☒
activity activity
Intermedia,
Moment of evaluation Starting ☐ ☒ Final ☐
unit
Peformance level of individual activity
Item Score
High score Media score Low score
The sutdent
Grammar used
did not handle
in the writing
gramar
assignment
sttructures in
shows a good
the writing
handle of The student
assignment
structures. The did not
according to
stduent participate
Grammar the level. The
expressed in the 20 points
student used
situations using activity.
different
modal verbs,
structures from
phrasal verbs
the established
and future tense
ones in the
appropriately.
guide.
(Up to 20 (Up to 10
(0 points)
points) points)
Ideas and
It was possible
gramatical
to understand
construction in The student
clearly the
the writing did not
message and
Coherence were not participate
main idea of the
and coherent, it was in the 15 points
text. The
cohesion disorganized activity.
content met the
and the aim
guidelines.
was not clear.
(Up to 15 (Up to 8
(0 points)
points) points)
In the text the It lacked a The student
Vocabulary
student used good use of did not 15 points
and Spelling
appropriately the proper participate
vocabulary vocabulary in in the
addressed in the the writing activity.
units and it is assignment,
according to the besides it was
guidelines. The too limited.
student used
properly the
order of
adjectives to
describe his
feelings.
(Up to 15 (Up to 8
(0 points)
points) points)
The student
developed and
submitted the
The student
final paper but
submitted
it was The
appropriately the
incomplete. The student did
final paper
assignment met not
follwing the
Final the structures participate
instructions. The 15 points
product partially. The in the
student met all
students did activity.
the steps of this
not send the
activity.
final taks in the
correct
environment.
(Up to 15 (Up to 8
(0 points)
points) points)
Performance levels of collaborative activity
Item Low Score
High score Media score
score
Participations The student’s
were relevant, participations The
Participatio
linked and were por and/or student
n and
contribute to the did not met the did not
interaction 30 points
construction of requirements. participate
in the
the final paper. The student did in the
forum
The student not choose a activity.
contributed role nor made
appropiately and comments about
meaningful his partners’
according to his contributions.
role. The
student’s
contributions
follow the
netiquette rules
and were sent on
time. The student
met his roles.
(Up to 30 (Up to 15 (0
points) points) points)
Final score 95 points