Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

We're not against helmets

Some people feel more comfortable


cycling with a helmet. Ask me
We're against claims that: why I cycle
portray cycling as far more

dangerous than it is;
ECF Position on Helmets:
without a
portray bicycle helmets as offering far Cyclists typically live longer and healthier
helmet

more protection than they do. lives; serious head injuries are rare and the
evidence in favour of helmet wearing and
helmet laws is weak. The main effect of
helmet laws has not been to improve cyclists’
safety but to discourage cycling, undermining
its health and other benefits.

We therefore call upon authorities to: Curious?


• focus on well-established measures to Read this brochure and question helmet
promote cycling and cyclists' well-being; propaganda.

• recognise that the benefits of cycling far Want an easy way to help?
outweigh the risks;
Wear a button and bring truth to the
• refrain from promoting or enforcing helmet discussion.
helmet wearing without sound evidence
that this would be beneficial and cost-
effective compared to other safety Want to help even more?
initiatives. Take part in the European Cyclists’
Federation (ECF) Helmet Working Group.
This brochure is the work of the ECF Helmet
Working Group. All representatives of ECF
member organizations are invited to join this
group. Find more helmet information see
Cycling is a safe, fun and healthy www.ecf.com/3500_1 (Policy / Safety) and
activity whether you wear a how your organization can become an ECF
helmet or not. member at: www.ecf.com or email Dr. Randy
Rzewnicki at randy@ecf.com
Helmet laws and shock-horror Cycling is a healthy activity whose Bicycle helmets do little to improve
promotions discourage bicycling: benefits far outweigh the risks safety. The best way to improve cyclists’
Claim: "Cycle helmets prevent 85% of head safety is to promote cycling!
injuries and 88% of brain injuries." (Thompson ‘89) Cycle use and obesity in Europe The risk of cycling is small – amounting to
Response: This study, quoted since 1989, circa 2002 (years vary) one cyclist death per 33 million km of cycling.
has never been proven in the real world. It would take the average cyclist 21,000 years
Increased helmet use has been linked to 1000 25
Cycle use to cycle this distance (Cavill & Davis 2007).

Km cycled per person per year


900
sharp reductions in cycle use but never to
800 Obesity, 20 Unlike motorcycle helmets, cycle helmets are
detectable improvement in cyclists’ safety. % of pop.
700 lightweight, soft and break on impact (Walker
Claim: “Children and adults should wear a 600 15 2005) making them useless after initial impact
bicycle helmet every time they ride a bicycle.” 500 and useless in most crashes serious enough
(NHTSA 2007) 400 10 to cause a fatal head injury. Cycle helmets
Response: Cyclists suffer fewer head injuries 300 have also been shown to cause rotational
than drivers or pedestrians (ONISR 2005) so, if 200 5 brain injury in some crashes (St. Clair & Chinn 2007).
we follow this claim, drivers and pedestrians 100
should also wear helmets all the time. 0 0 Increases in helmet-wearing (e.g. in places
like Australia and New Zealand which banned
Claim: “Cycling without a helmet is suicidal.” cycling without helmets) have not been linked
Response 1: Helmets do not prevent to improved safety, only reduction in cycle
crashes, only safer streets and good Based on EU cycle use data and OECD obesity data
use.
education for drivers and bicyclists prevent
crashes. Cycling gets safer with more cyclists. By
Response 2: Helmet laws and propaganda A study in Copenhagen (Andersen 2000) found reducing cycle use, helmet laws also reduce
create a “blame the victim” reaction which that people who cycle regularly have a 29% the “safety in numbers.”
government and insurance officials use to lower annual mortality rate than non-cyclists.
avoid providing for bicyclists. An adult who cycles regularly will typically Safety in numbers
have a level of fitness equivalent to being 10 Cycle modal share vs fatality rate and
years younger (Tuxworth 1986), and a life- helmet wearing rate
expectancy 2 years above the average.
30 Cycling % 120

BEWARE! 25 100

% trips by cycle
The health benefits of cycling outweigh the Cyclist deaths per
risks involved by a factor of 20:1, thanks to 20 bn km cycled 80
added years (Hillman 1993). 15 60
10 40
A 2003 Department of Transport study of 5 20
deaths in Britain in 2003 compared 114 0 0
cyclist deaths to 30,000 deaths from obesity
and 42,000 deaths from heart disease.

Countries (% helmet-wearing in brackets)

You might also like