Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Family Health Assessment Guide Final
Family Health Assessment Guide Final
1. Identifying Data
a. Family surname: Emanuel Burabuza and Ana Sengoli
d. Ethnicity: Emanuel: Nyamwezi tribe and Ana: Nzigua tribe from the Tanga Region.
2. Family Characteristics
a. Extended family
i. Relatives living outside household:
1. Emanuel
a. Parents: Tori (father) & Rehmi (mother)
b. Siblings: Emanuel (first born), then girl, girl, boy
2. Anna
a. Parents: Nuhu (deceased father) & Grena (mother)
b. Siblings: Anna (first born) then one brother younger
b. Family mobility
i. Length of time living in residence:
1. They have been living in their current residence for one year now as a family.
c. Family structure
i. Employment history:
1. Emanuel said he is self-employed and that driving has been his only employment.
He started off driving with a motorcycle and now drives his van.
2. Anna said her preaching has been her only employment history.
e. Family adaptation
i. Flexibility in role change:
1. As stated above, Emanuel stated that if Ana was unable to care for the children or
something of that nature he would most definitely take over her role. There seems
to be a very good sense of team work.
ii. Flexibility in power structure:
1. Overall there was some flexibility of power structure but it was very minimal, and
as stated above, Emanuel has the final say on pretty much every decision.
f. Family processes
i. How members communicate:
1. Members of the family talk in person, the have cell phones and they also have
email.
ii. How decisions are made:
1. The decisions are made together. They stated that they are a team. Ana did say
that if Emanuel disagreed with her she would back down and what he thought or
said would go.
iii. How problems are solved:
1. They talk about the problems as a couple and then decide where to go from there.
iv. How conflict is handled:
1. Conflict is handled together. If there is an issue the couple had stated they would
work together to figure it out. But once again Emanuel got the final say.
3. Interpersonal Needs
a. Identified subsystems and dyads: Anna primarily takes care of the children, so that is one
subsystem, Anna and Emanuel are a strong parental dyed
b. Parent-child interactions: Anna takes full care of the children during the week. This includes
playing with, feeding, bathing etc. On Sunday when Anna works, there is a house girl that cares
for the children. Emanuel plays with the children when he is home, but only performs care when
Anna is sick.
c. Spousal relationships: Anna and Emanuel have a very strong, happy, and healthy spousal
relationship. It appears they have strong communication as well.
d. Sibling relationships: Christian and Christina play and dance together well, but also fight like
normal siblings over toys, cell phone, etc. A kind of “monkey-see-monkey-do” relationship was
observed where Christina followed everything Christian did.
e. Concerns about elders: Anna and Emanuel are both first born, so the responsibility of their
parents is on them. However, they explained that if their parents are to get ill, they would go to
their homes to care for them and it would be no problem. If necessary, their parents would also
be welcomed to their home to be looked after. Even though it would seem like a burden in
America, they explained that this was not so here and it would be no problem at all.
f. Caring for other dependent members: Anna and Emanuel are always the first family members to
call when in need for money from parents or siblings. Sometimes this is hard for them because
they only have money for their own family, but they are very willing to care for their family
members when in need.
4. Family Needs
a. Developmental
i. Children and ages
1. Christian - 4
2. Christina - 2
b. Loss or Illness
i. Non-normative events or illnesses: Anna and Emanuel have dealt with loss in their
family. On Emanuel’s side he lost his sisters first born child and grandfather. On Anna’s
side she lost her father and uncle.
ii. Reactions or perceptions of ability to cope: When asked about the families ability to cope
with these situations they mentioned their faith and prayer. Anna told us there isn't much
time to mourn, she said you have to be strong, being the first born there is a lot of
responsibility and things to take care of.
iii. Coping behaviors used by individuals and family unit: Faith was a major coping behavior
for the family. Siblings/clan didn't help however, Emanuel and Anna were supportive of
each other.
iv. Adjustments family has made: Some adjustments made included Emanuel helping more,
Anna stated it made their faith stronger, and at one point during the assessment she stated
“life goes on”.
v. Roles and tasks being assumed by members: After Anna lost her father Emanuel began
helping more to support her during the stress of that event.
vi. Any one individual bearing most of responsibility: Anna was bearing the most
responsibility during this event. Being the oldest sibling she was responsible for making
sure her mother was okay.
vii. Family idea of alternative coping behaviors available: They put emphasis on the stress of
their first born responsibilities. They did not mention other coping behaviors. Faith and
support from one another were the coping behaviors.
viii. Level of anxiety now and usually: When asking Anna and Emanuel if they had any
worry, they told us “not much”.
iii. Internal sources of instrumental support (available from family members): Family
members in traditional African culture provide all monetary support to its members. The
family has their own car.
iv. External sources of affective support (emotional and social support, help with problem
solving): The family’s main source of external support is from the health care facility
when they are ill. The family expressed that there are not any social programs that are
available to them.
v. Internal sources of affective support (who in family is most helpful to whom?): Both Ana
and Emanuel are first born children which in traditional African culture means that they
have the most responsibility as internal support to the family. They each have to rely
majorly on each other for support.
vi. Family more open or closed to outside assistance? The family expressed willingness to
accept outside assistance. The culture in this community involves help from Good
Samaritans. If the family needed help with various types of expenses, the community
would come together to meet those needs for money, transportation, health care
treatment, etc.
vii. Family willing to use external sources of support? The family conveyed a strong
willingness to accept external support, especially with healthcare. They had many
questions about health promotion and ways to meet specific health status goals.
d. Environment
i. Type of dwelling: Anna, Emanuel, Christian, and Christina live in a single family home
that is made of brick and stone with a mental roof and concrete floors. The windows had
screens but the rooms are not closed in.
ii. Number of rooms, bathrooms, stairs; refrigeration, cooking: The home had a sitting room,
kitchen, two bathrooms, and three bedrooms. There were no stairs inside of the home and
all of the rooms were located on a single level. There was no refrigeration in the home
and cooking was done over charcoal and with gas. There is no electricity in the home but
solar energy is used by the family.
iii. Water & sewage: There is one communal water source (a pipe) that is used by everyone
in the community, there is no running water inside of the home. There is a cement sewer
system inside the home that is connected to the toilets, but they are in need of another
one.
iv. Sleeping arrangements: Emanuel, Anna, and Christina all sleep together in the master
bedroom while Christian sleeps in his own bedroom. Christina will move into her own
room once she is finished breastfeeding.
v. Types of jobs held by members: Anna works as a minister at an angelic church and
Emanuel drives a van to transport people. He previously worked driving a motorcycle
taxi.
vi. Exposure to hazardous conditions at job: Anna reported that she is not exposed to any
hazardous conditions at her job in the church while Emanuel reported hazards in regards
to traffic accidents and poor road conditions that can lead to injury.
vii. Level of safety in the neighborhood: Both Anna and Emanuel reported a high level of
safety in the neighborhood and denied any feelings of danger. There was no community
watch program or security measures seen in the neighborhood
viii. Level of safety in household: Emanuel and Anna both reported high levels of safety in
the household and denied any feelings of danger during both the day and at night. Anna
reported that when Emanuel is away from the home for work she feels safe during the
day but feels a decreased level of safety during the night.
e. Internal Dynamics
i. Roles of family members clearly defined?: Emanuel’s family role is to work as a driver
and provide the majority of the money for the family, he also does the grocery shopping/
food buying for the family as well. Anna does the cooking, cleaning, and all of the child
care needs, such as bathing, dressing, feeding, and entertaining the children. Christian
goes to school but doesn’t have a specific role in the family and neither dose Christina,
since they are just children.
ii. Where do authority and decision-making rest? At first Emanuel stated that he makes the
decisions in the family, but immediately Anna turned her head to him and sort of laughed
and gave him a look and then Emanuel laughed as well. They talked it through and both
agreed that they talk through the decisions with each other and make a joint decision on
most things. They said that they make joint decisions with the main focus being on their
children and what is best for their family.
iii. Typical patterns of interaction: They interacted well together, they laughed and smiled at
each other when answering all of our questions. Their interactions were positive and
happy between each other and with their children.
iv. Communication, including verbal and nonverbal: They communicated very well with
each other, and did a lot of talking back and forth especially when they were having
trouble understanding our questions. Their verbal communication was difficult to
understand at time because when they talked amongst each other they spoke in Swahili,
but it was encouraging to see them help each other understand. Their nonverbal
communication was seen through eye-contact, smiling, and laughing with one another.
v. Expression of affection, anger, anxiety, support, etc.: In Tanzania they don’t express their
affection with one another like they do in the United States, through hand holding and
kissing. Their expression of affection was a playful tap on the shoulder or leg along with
a laugh and smile. They didn’t show any expression of anger or anxiety. They were very
supportive of one another and talked through struggles with the communication barrier
and supported each other with difficult times/ family deaths.
vi. Problem-solving style: The said that when they come across a problem they talk amongst
one another calmly and decide on a solution together that will best benefit the family.
vii. Degree of cohesiveness and loyalty to family members: Emanuel and Anna are very loyal
to each other and you can clearly see how much they love and care about each other and
their family through their interactions. Emanuel mentioned that if Anna were to get sick
he would take over her roles of cooking, cleaning, and taking care of the children so
Anna can rest. Emanuel was also Anna’s support system when her father passed away.
These statements showed how loyal he was to his family. Anna is also very loyal to her
family by caring for the children and cooking for Emanuel and being the head of the
house while Emanuel is gone for work many days. Emanuel is also supportive of Anna’s
career as a minister, because many African men aren’t supportive of women who pursue
preaching as a career.
viii. Conflict management: When they came across a problem they said that they would talk
through their problems and eventually come to a conclusion together. When they can’t
agree on a decision then it usually comes down to what Emanuel wants, because he is the
man of the house and in African tradition the man has the final say. Anna said she is very
blessed though, because Emanuel is nice and listens to her and her thoughts on decisions.
5. Analysis
a. Identification of family strengths:
i. Level and amount of communication, teamwork, bonding, health promotion activities,
well aware of health history, health literacy, wash their hands before meals
b. What are needs identified by family?
i. More money, better ways to prevent malaria and HTN, stop thumb sucking
c. What are needs identified by community health nurse?
i. Financial security, better closure for shelter, be aware of stagnant water sources, and
other risk reduction efforts to prevent mosquitos from entering the home, HTN screening
and risk factor modification, and stop thumb sucking
6. Two complete nursing diagnoses for the family, including interventions directed at meeting those
needs, and desired outcomes.
a. Diagnosis 1:
i. Risk for vector-born diseases related to high prevalence of mosquitos and open roof at
home.
ii. Interventions:
1. Choosing one room to have completely closed off from the outdoors, remove any
stagnant water, toilet seat covers, putting insecticide coils near doors outside,
continuing to use insect nets and frequent Malaria checks
iii. Desired Outcomes:
1. Family will remain free of vector-born diseases
b. Diagnosis 2:
i. Readiness for enhanced knowledge related to positive health outcomes as evidenced by
verbalizing questions on how to improve their health status.
ii. Interventions:
1. Provide education on preventing HTN (foods to avoid and foods to consume,
exercise) HTN screenings; provide methods on how to stop thumb sucking
iii. Desired Outcomes:
1. The parents will get their blood pressure screened once every three months,
verbalize understanding of lifestyle changes related to prevention of HTN,
Christian will remain free of thumb sucking behaviors within 3 months
Genogram
Include household members, extended family, and significant others; ages or date of birth, occupation,
geographic location, illnesses, health problems, major events, triangles, and characteristics of relationships.